Recombinant Peroxidase: Production and its Prospective Applications- A Review
P. Sai Preethi, M Ramesh Pathy*
School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: Psaipreethi1993@gmail.com, mrameshpathy@vit.ac.in
ABSTRACT:
Peroxidases, one of the key commercial enzymes, belong to the oxidoreductase family that catalyze the oxidation of various aromatic and non-aromatic compounds, concomitant with the decomposition of H2O2.With their prominent occurrence in bacteria, fungi, actinobacteria, higher plants and insects, peroxidases have been majorly exploited due to their pivotal role in immunological, bioremediation and industrial uses. Low productivity and expensiveness limits the use of native peroxidases. Supplementary to these shortcomings, native sources yield mixture of isozymes, which is not desirable for commercial scopes. Thus, in conjunction with this, recombinant peroxidases have gained importance for sustainable processing due to their improved catalytic property, thermal stabilities, solvent and anionic tolerance. Hence, this review mainly accentuates on the recombinant peroxidases, diverse cell factories for their expression, peroxidase engineering and their proficient biotechnological applications. The attractive traits of the recombinant forms of peroxidases emphasize the requirement to study them more for their unexplored, hidden environmental and industrial applications.
KEYWORDS: Recombinant peroxidases, oxidoreductases, cell factories, engineering, industrialapplications.
INTRODUCTION:
Establishment and development of environmental friendly technologies are highly challenging processes in the current scenario. Furthermore, the usage of conventional and physico-chemical process for bioremediation is not applicable for large scale processes. Hence, to curtail these challenges and limitations the biocatalysts are utilized as a promising robust tool for the degradation of intoxicating micropollutants.
Oxygen is indispensable for all the living organisms but generation of dioxygen compounds such as Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) can be toxic. In order to destroy these free radicals, aerobes recruit the large panel of proteins, including the heme peroxidases.
Peroxidases (EC 1.11.1.7) are oxidoreductases, capable of catalysing the oxidation of wide range of organic and inorganic substrates, with the reduction of H2O2.
These enzymes can also utilize lipid peroxides as electron donors or acceptors1. The Horse Radish peroxidase was the first promising candidate, known for more than 20 decades and it has been the vital topic of studies till now for several peroxidase mediated applications2. Later, these enzymes were found to be distributed diversely in nature, their vast presence in bacteria, fungi, algae, actinobacteria and plants systems have been documented3.
Peroxidases are broadly classified as heme and non-heme peroxidases. The heme peroxidases are composed of a protoporphyrin IX (heme), a prosthetic agent, contradictorily, the prosthetic group are truantry in non-heme peroxidases. The heme peroxidases are phylogenetically classified into two major superfamilies (peroxidase-cyclooxygenase and peroxidase-catalase superfamilies) and three other families such as dyP-type peroxidases (DyPPrx), haloperoxidases (HalPrx) and di-heme peroxidases4.
The Peroxidase-cyclooxygenase superfamily is made up of members from all domains of life, whose classification was formerly restricted to only animal peroxidases. These multifarious enzymes are dominant to catalyze oxidation of halides5. The peroxidase-catalase superfamily can be additionally categorized into three vital classes. Class I incorporates intracellular peroxidases like yeast cytochrome c peroxidase (CcP) which acts as scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and significant degrader of hydrogen peroxide during the electron transport chain.6 This periplasmic enzyme can also function as a signalling protein and mitochondrial peroxide sensor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae7.
Ascorbate peroxidase (APx) comes next, is affiliated with the removal of hydrogen peroxide in the chloroplast of higher eukaryotes like plants8 and ultimately, the catalase-peroxidases (KatG) exhibiting the hybrid catalytic activities of both peroxidase and catalase, can palliate the oxidative stress exhibited by the organism due to the formation of free radicals or ROS9.
Class II is recognized as peroxidase-catalase superfamily, in which the ligninolytic extracellular enzymes generated by fungus such as lignin peroxidase (LiP), manganese peroxidase (MnP) and versatile peroxidase (VP) are incorporated. Whereas Class III family includes the plant secretory peroxidases such as horseradish peroxidase (HRP), soya bean peroxidase (SBP),switch grass peroxidase (SGP), Neem peroxidase, tree legume peroxidases, papaya peroxidases etc10-14.
REASONS FOR INTEREST IN RECOMBINANT PEROXIDASE:
The global market for industrial enzymes was estimated about $4.2 billion in 2014 and expected to develop at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 7% over the period from 2015 to 2020 to reach nearly $6.2 billion15. Figure 1 enlists the top global producers of horse radish peroxidase. The production of peroxidases from their native source, leads to inadequate outturns and isoenzymes mixtures differing in glycosylation which impedes the subsequent enzyme applications. Thus, the heterologous production of these enzymes in suitable host is a reasonable alternative16.
With the advent of recombinant DNA technology, a microbe can be genetically manipulated and cultured in large quantities to meet increased demand17. Recombinant enzymes can also be characterized due to their auxiliary advantages such as quality by design guidelines, easier isolation, purification, well-defined enzyme preparations and export outside the cell. Additionally, the aptitude to control the recombinant protein or enzyme production by regulatory expression vectors is also an undeniable and worthwhile advantage16,18.
Figure 1: Overture of global countries, dwelling as commercial producers of Horse radish peroxidase (HRP) with high market values (USD Million) from 2012-2017 (Source:Absolute reports market research department)
In this consistent prospect, peroxidases are crucial component for widespread applications like dye degradation19, delignification20,biosensor development21, biodegradation oftoxic nitroaromatic compounds22, immunoassay kits23, effluent treatments24 and melanin reduction25. With these uses, recombinant peroxidases have acquired the potential to become the largest group of commercially used biocatalysts worldwide. Due to their multifarious targeted applications, heterologous expression of peroxidases has been efficiently carried out in wide panel of cell factories such as bacteria26, yeast19, plant27, and fungus28.
So far, reviews on only recombinant production of horse radish peroxidase have been reported. Thus, this comprehensive review for the first time, aims to focus on recombinant peroxidases from distinct sources and their expression systems, engineering and biotechnological applications.
BACTERIAL CELL FACTORIES:
Peroxidases are often expressed in E.coli via recombinant gene expression, as other expression host like yeast has the undesirable tendency of hyper-glycosylating the heterologously expressed glycoproteins, which restrains the subsequent downstream processing and resulting in the hindrance for enzymatic applications. Furthermore, up to 20-fold higher outturns can be accomplished in E. coli than yeast P. pastoris16. In accordance to these adorable traits, the heterologous expression of BsDyp from Bacillus subtilis in E.coli, has facilitated the structure solving and deep characterization of recombinant enzyme; higher recombinant peroxidase yield of 100mg/l is another benchmark triumph reported using E.coli cell factory26,29.
Despite these motivating strategies of protein expression in E.coli, the formation of inclusion bodies (IB) in the cytoplasm, making the protein refolding yield meagre is an abrogating scenario for higher enzyme outturns (Figure 2)16. However, besides, this limitation the synthesis of target protein as IBs withholds several advantages such as i) IBs are comprised of 95% recombinant enzyme ii) the expressed recombinant protein cannot be degraded easily iii) IBs can be separated easily from cellular debris because of their density difference30-33. Thus supporting this strategy, the final yield of refoldedand purified tobacco peroxidase was productive, about 60 mg per litre, quantified in E. coli culture34. The peroxidase from phytopathogenic rice blast fungus, Magnaporthegrisea has also been expressed successfully in E.coli.A collection of references on heterologous expression of peroxidases in E.coli is listed out in Table 1.
Figure 2: A pictorial representation of Escherichia coli cell presenting the expression and localization choice of recombinantly expressed peroxidases.Recombinant peroxidases are expressed in E.coli host systemoften as a misfolded protein, which accumulates as inclusion body(IB).These IBs are either stored in the cytoplasm(A) or can be targeted to the periplasm(B) of E.colicellthrough specific protein transporters (such asTat- and Sec-pathways).Energy-driven and active processes may confer their functional role for the deposition of misfolded protein in IBs.
Table 1: List of various recombinantly expressed peroxidases inE.coli cell factory systems.
|
Gene |
Source |
Host |
Reported yields |
Remarks |
References |
|
Imnp |
Irpexlacteus F17 |
E.coli strain Rosetta (DE3) |
76mg/l |
Inclusion bodies; enzyme refolded to be active. |
[36] |
|
Ec-apx1 |
Eleusinecoracana |
E. coli BL-21 |
n/a |
Fusion protein; intracellular. |
[37] |
|
TPx1 |
Branchiostomabelcheritsingtaunese |
E. coli strain BL21 |
n/a |
Fusion protein; intracellular. |
[38] |
|
katG1 |
Magnaporthe Grisea |
Escherichia coli BL21 DE3 |
30mg/l |
Constitutively expressed, intracellular. |
[35] |
|
LmTRYP6 |
Leishmania Major |
E. coli BL21, E. Coli XL1-Blue |
n/a |
Detection of full tryparedoxin peroxidase gene sequence. |
[39] |
|
GPx |
Pseudoalteromonas sp. ANT506 |
E. coli BL21 |
18.68% |
Intracellular, active. |
[40] |
|
Hrp |
Horse radish |
E. coli BL21(DE3) |
48mg/l |
Soluble; targeted to periplasm. |
[26] |
|
KatG |
Mycobacterium sp. Strain PYR-1 |
Escherichia coli |
n/a |
Intracellular, active. |
[41] |
|
n/a |
Lepidiumdraba |
E. coli BL21 |
n/a |
Insoluble inclusion bodies. |
[42] |
|
LDP |
Lepidiumdraba |
Escherchia coli BL21 |
16mg/l |
Refolded from inclusion bodies |
[43] |
|
Hrp |
Horse radish |
E.coliBL21(DE3) |
100mg/l |
Refolded from inclusion bodies |
[26] |
|
TOP |
Nicotianatabacum |
E.coli BL21(DE3) |
2.55mg/l |
Refolded from inclusion bodies |
[44] |
|
MnP3 |
Phlebiaradiate |
E. coli W3110 |
6% - 7% |
Refolded from inclusion bodies |
[45] |
|
Pbapx |
Pimpinellabrachycarpa |
E. coli |
n/a |
Recombinant expressionresulted in a 1.8 fold increase in Pbapxactivity after treatment with IPTG for 1h |
[46] |
|
hrp |
Horse radish |
Escherichia coli BL21 |
24% |
Refolded from inclusion bodies. |
[47] |
|
HRP C |
Horse radish |
Escherichia coli |
8–10 mg/L, 0.5 mg/L |
Targeted to periplasm; active; refolded from inclusion bodies. |
[48] |
|
HRP |
Horse radish |
E. coli strainBL21 |
110 µg/L |
14-fold higher HRP activity of mutant gene than wild-type |
[49] |
|
TXNPx |
Crithidiafasciculate |
E. coli BL21(DE3) |
2.51U/mg |
Intracellular |
[50] |
|
HRP |
Horse radish |
E. coli KIT strain |
3–4% |
Refolded from inclusion bodies |
[51] |
|
PodC |
Brassica napus |
Escherichia coli Rosetta 2 |
36 mg/l |
Lactose induced; Intracellular; refolded |
[52] |
|
BnAPX |
Brassica napus |
E. coli BL21 (DE3) |
n/a |
Fusion protein; Targeted to chloroplast. |
[53] |
|
Mlip |
Trametescervina |
E. coli BL21(DE3) |
0.6% |
Refolded from inclusion bodies |
[54] |
|
sscp |
Glycine max |
E. coli BL21(DE3 |
11.23 U/ml |
Active protein yield without invitro folding. |
[55] |
n/a-no data available.
YEAST CELL FACTORIES:
Yeast cells, as nether eukaryotes, contribute a panel of advantages for the biotechnological production of recombinant proteins. Although the ‘‘generally regarded as safe” (GRAS) grade, is not held by yeast, S. cerevisiae cells possess it56. S. cerevisiae cells can generate higher recombinant peroxidase. Thus, it would be advantageous to produce peroxidases in S. cerevisiae for applications such as degradation of recalcitrant pollutants like anthracene57. This single-cell eukaryotic organism is also easy to culture and can offer higher density fermentations and productivity along with their fast growing aptitude58. With the supplementary prospective, it ensures strategies such as proper post-translational modifications and protein folding59. It can also secrete the product extracellularly, which simplifies the purification process (Figure 3)60-62.
Figure 3 :A schematic illustration of single yeast host cell evincing the major cell compartmentsinvolved in the recombinant expression of peroxidases.
Arrows represent the secretory pathway, whereby, the secretory protein, peroxidases are expressed on the ER (1); the accumulation of misfoldedproteins results in the induction of the cytoplasmic or secretory protein folding chaperones and thecorrectly folded proteins are transferred to the Golgi bodies (2). The peroxidase protein exiting from thegolgi may be stored in vacuoles or secreted extracellular medium (3) via secretory vesicles.
Besides S. cerevisiae, the contribution of the methylotrophic yeast, Pichiapastoris, can be used as a cellular factory for the recombinant protein expression. It is easier to genetically manipulate and culture P.pastoris, than mammaliancells; high cell densities and growth can also be accomplished with it. The other auxiliary attractive features of the eukaryote, P. pastorisis their efficacy to produce properly folded recombinant proteins, which undergoes all the functionally needed post-translational modifications63. The promoter systems used in P. pastorisfor gene expression control are diverse; they are inducible promoters like AOX164, AOX2 promoter, FLD1promoter and ICL1 promoter65 and constitutive promoters such as GAP66, ENO1, GMP1, HSP82, PET9, SSA4, KAR2 and TPI167.
Among these wider panel of promoters systems of P.Pastoris, the AOX1 has been the most widely utilized promoter, due to its higher yielding efficacy. This methanol-inducible AOX1 (MIA) yeast promoter can control the expression of peroxidase genes in Pichiapastoris as methanol is responsible for inducing peroxidase expression. Thus, supporting the above statement, MIA promoter can exhibit, a proficient regulatory role of peroxidase expression in Pichiapastoriswith higher total protein outturn of 200-500mg/l.68 While, the commonly used promotor for S. cerevisiaesystems which can initiate a strong and constitutive protein expression are:TEF1 promoter (capable of driving high gene expression in both higher and meagre glucose condition) of S. cerevisiae69 and TPI1 promoter of glycolytic gene TPI1, coding for the enzyme triose phosphate isomerise70,71.
However, inspite of this remarkable fact that Saccharmoyces cerevisiae72,73 and Pichia pastoris19,68,74 have often been the promising choice for peroxidase recombinant expression, compared to S. cerevisiae,P. pastorishas been the commonly used hosts for recombinant peroxidases, as the yields are higher68,74. Expression with the incorporation of heme precursors such hemin in the fermentation media of P. pastoris, offers higher peroxidase yield (101mg/l)75.
Interestingly, the usage of yeast recombinant systems also allows addressing some targets and offers information of the results acquired. For instance, a recombinant heterologous expression of lignin peroxidase gene in Escherichia coli revealed a futile result with no expression of the required gene; while the extracellular expression of the former gene and auxiliary endoglucanase gene in the yeast Pichiapastoris, manifested the expression of the two genes proficiently76. Apart from these remarkable traits, the heterologous expression in P. pastoriscould also meet industrial scale requirements, by enhancing the expression levels by 10, 100, or even 1000-fold to that of the wildstrains63. Added to these feature of yeast host systems, additional benefit is that, expressing enzymes like horseradish peroxidase in P.pastoris aids to conjugate with Fab to facilitate for analytical applications like ELISA(Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) methods77.
On the other hand, yeast such as Kluyveromyceslactis is also often preferred for the expression of lignin-degrading enzymes. Lignocellulose is the highly abundant substrate, used for the conversion of biomass into biofuel production and other commercial products. The degradation of plant biomass is efficiently accomplished by different set of enzymes, among which peroxidases are highly responsible for cellulose hydrolysis. K. lactis amalgamates easy single-cell fermentation conditions with eukaryotic post-translational modifications. It easily secretes recombinant enzymes to avoid costlier and time-consuming downstream processes. Hence, the yeast K. lactis is highly preferable for recombinant expression of enzymes. Evincing this promising strategy, K.lactis, accomplished its dedicative role, for the expression of genes encoding for lignin, versatile and manganese peroxidases, from Trichodermareesei and Pycnoporus cinnabarinus78. A list of references on heterologous expression of peroxidases in Yeast is enlisted in Table 2.
Table 2: List of various recombinantly expressed peroxidases invarious yeast cell factories.
|
Gene |
Source |
Host |
Reported yields |
Remarks |
References |
|
GluMnP1 |
Ganodermalucidum |
Pichiapastoris |
126 mg/L |
Extracellular; methanol induced expression |
[19] |
|
mnp1 |
Phanerochaetechrysosporium |
Pichiapastoris |
40mg/L |
Intra(with) and extracellular(without) expression using native and α-factor secretion signal. |
[79] |
|
lipH2 |
Phanerochaetechrysosporium BKM-F-1767 |
PichiapastorisX-33 |
15U/L |
Extracellular; produced only by multicopyrecombinantsyeast cells. |
[80] |
|
HRP |
Horse radish |
Pichiapastoris |
113 mg/L |
Chemical conjugation of Horse radish peroxidase with fusion protein, streptococcal protein G. |
[74] |
|
HRP |
Horse radish |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
260 U/L/OD600 |
Extracellular; active |
[72] |
|
HRP |
Horse radish |
Pichiapastoris |
600 U/L/OD600 15 U/mL |
methanol induced expression with synthetic AOX1 promoter |
[81] |
|
HRP |
Horse radish |
Pichiapastoris ∆och1 |
101mg/L |
Extracellular; recombinant peroxidase production highly influenced by hemin. |
[75] |
|
LP1 |
Pycnoporuscinnabarinus |
Kluyveromyceslactis |
n/a |
Enzyme accumulation within the cell, revealing the retainment of protein in pellet. |
[78] |
|
LP2 |
Pycnoporuscinnabarinus |
Kluyveromyceslactis |
n/a |
Extracellular; secreted efficiently. |
[78] |
|
LP3 |
Pycnoporuscinnabarinus |
Kluyveromyceslactis |
n/a |
Enzyme accumulation within the cell, revealing the retainment of protein in pellet. |
[78] |
|
n/a |
S. viridosporus |
Pichiapastoris |
2.47g/L |
Extracellular; methanol induced expression with AOX1promoter. |
[76] |
|
HRP |
Horse radish |
Pichiapastoris |
3-10mg/L |
Expression of peroxidase with Fab fragments of antibodies by recombinant conjugation. |
[77] |
n/a-no data available.
FUNGAL CELL FACTORIES:
The filamentous fungi have also acquired wider attention as production hosts due to their natural ability to secrete proteins in bulk amount into the growth medium through their hyphae (Figure 4)82. Despite these benefits, until now, only a few fungal host species has shed light for recombinant protein production. Filamentous fungi which are predominant in the markets as production hosts for commercial enzymes are the asexually reproducing A. Niger83, A. Oryzae84 and T. Reesei85. An array of investigations on peroxidases has been accomplished through recombinant production in fungi. The production level reported for the expression of PhanerochaetechrysosporiuminAspergillusniger is the highest heterologous peroxidase expression levels recounted so far, where 105±19. 5mg/litre of manganese peroxidase in shake-flask cultures was spotted86. A.niger, as a host also supports the overexpression of homologous and heterologous enzymes by using a standardized expression cassette. For instance, a manganese peroxidase gene (mnp1) from Phanerochaetechrysosporium was transformed by exploiting the resistance to hygromycin B, and efficiently expressed in A. Niger87. A collection of references on heterologous expression of peroxidases in filamentous fungus is enlisted in Table 3.
Figure 4: A pictorial view, depicting the general morphology of filamentous fungus and proposed pathway of peroxidase synthesis and secretion(septal and apical).
Table 3: List of distinct recombinantly expressed peroxidases in Filamentous fungal expression systems
|
Gene |
Source |
Host |
Reported yields |
Remarks |
References |
|
ylpA |
Phanerochaetesordida YK-624. |
Phanerochaetesordida YK-624 mutant,UV-64 |
n/a |
Extracellular; active |
[28] |
|
CPO |
Caldariomycesfumago |
Aspergillusniger |
10 mg/litre |
Extracellular; active. |
[88] |
|
mnp3 |
n/a |
PleurotusostreatusTMG1 |
0.195 U/flask |
Extracellular |
[89] |
|
|
|
Pleurotusostreatus TMG5 |
0.975 U/flask |
Extracellular |
[89] |
|
|
|
Pleurotusostreatus TMG7 |
Nd |
|
[89] |
|
|
|
Pleurotusostreatus TMG8 |
Nd |
|
[89] |
|
|
|
Pleurotusostreatus TMG9 |
1.560 U/flask |
Extracellular |
[89] |
|
|
|
PleurotusostreatusTMC1 |
0.195 U/flask |
Extracellular |
[89] |
|
|
|
PleurotusostreatusTMC3 |
0.390 U/flask |
Extracellular |
[89] |
|
|
|
PleurotusostreatusTMC5 |
Nd |
|
[89] |
|
|
|
P. ostreatusstrain #261 |
Nd |
|
[89] |
|
lipA |
Phanerochaetechrysosporium |
Aspergillusniger |
n/a |
Expression in a protease-deficient A. nigerstrain using different expression cassettes; extracellular; non active due to incorrect processing of the recombinant enzyme. |
[86] |
|
mnp1 |
Phanerochaetechrysosporium
|
Aspergillusniger |
9.6 ± 1.2 mg/L(Aspergillus minimum growth medium-maltodextrin) 10.7±1.4 mg/L(Aspergillus minimum growth medium-maltodextrin+ 0.02 g/litre of FeSO4) 66.9 ± 1.2 mg/L (Aspergillus minimum growth medium-maltodextrin +500 mg/litre of hemin) 31.5 ± 0.9 mg/L (Aspergillus minimum growth medium-maltodextrin + 5 g/litre of apohemoglobin) 105.9±19.4 mg/L (Aspergillus minimum growth medium-maltodextrin+ 5 g/litre of haemoglobin) |
Expression in a protease-deficient A. nigerstrain using different expression cassettes; extracellular; active. |
[86] |
|
Mnpl |
P. chrysosporium |
P. chrysosporium |
5–10 mg/L |
Extracellular. |
[90] |
|
mnp1 |
P. chrysosporium |
A. oryzae |
5 mg/L |
Extracellular. |
[91] |
|
ylpB |
Phanerochaetesordida YK-624. |
Phanerochaetesordida YK-624 mutant,UV-64 |
n/a |
Extracellular; active |
[28] |
n/a- no data available; N/d-not detected.
Peroxidases are expressed on the ER; the expressed proteins travel to golgi apparatus through secretory vesicles (SV) for post-translational modification. The modified proteins are carried by the secretory vesicles either to the hyphal tip for the extracellular apical secretion or to the septa for in an alternative secretory pathway.
PEROXIDASE ENGINEERING:
Protein engineering makes the enzyme active, stable and specific towards the substrate thus recombinant proteins can be efficiently produced in relevance to the requirement of the users and the process. Furthermore, the enzyme productivity can be augmented by strong promoters, multiple gene copies, and efficient signal sequences, suitably designed to target proteins into the extracellular medium, thus making the downstream processes easy. Several invitro molecular biology techniques such as superior site-directed or random mutagenesis can offer proficient yields, where a single variation in aminoacidic sequences confers improvement in physiochemical properties, such as stability to acidic pH and radical attacks. For instance, introducing a tryptophan residue in the catalytic site, enhanced the acidic stability and Mn2+oxidative activity of the engineered peroxidase, with consequent manifestation of oxidative activities towards veratyl alcohol and synthetic dye, Reactive Black 592. Highlighting the importance of peroxidase engineering, mutation of four phenylalanine residues with alanine residues resulted in marginal improvement of radical stability HRP C93.
Also, engineering peroxidases by incorporating the diverse prominent techniques like MolCraft ‘in vitro protein evolution systems, Cell sorting, Computational protein design, directed evolution, DNA shuffling, Peptidomimetics, mRNA display, De novo enzyme engineering, Cell-free translation systems, Stimulus responsive peptide systems and Designed divergent evolution can establish a remarkable improvement in protein in conjunction with the higher outturns in shorter duration. Thus, for future investigations, these networks of engineering techniques can be highly encouraged to meet the high global market demand of peroxidases.
APPLICATIONS OF PEROXIDASES:
Peroxidases have shown a great aptitude within a variety of industrial applications, where they represent a vital route for “greening” chemical processes. Owing to the heterogeneous properties observed among peroxidases from various sources, an ever-increasing suite of native peroxidases has been applied to different biotechnological processes, with the aim to find the most suitable enzyme for a specific application. However, only few examples of industrial uses of peroxidases currently exist. Most of biotechnological applications with recombinant peroxidases are based on the same commercial preparation. Although, despite these factors, recombinant peroxidases dwell as unbeatable options, for variegated biotechnological applications(Figure 5)
Figure 5: An schematic representation of commercial, industrial and biotechnological applications of peroxidases
Recombinant peroxidase based electronic tongue (biosensor):
Biological electron transfer (ET) reactions are responsible for regulating many biological processes, due to their potentialistic high selectivity, proficiency of the photosynthetic and respiratory ET chains, pH and ionic gradients and ultimately for metabolic transformations94,95. Under conditions when an electrode replaces natural redox partners of ET proteins or redox enzymes, electrochemistry enables the characterisation of the enzyme/protein function, quantitative estimations of ET rates at electrodes and revealing the mechanisms of biological ET reaction. At this point, there emerges a particular interest in scrutinizing the direct ET reactions between the electrode and the protein where, the electrode can accept or donate a electrons for the protein96-105.
Recombinant horseradish peroxidase (rHRP) structurally a, dimer are used for biosensing applications. For example, three forms of (rHRP), such as wild type recombinant HRP, and two recombinant forms with six-His tag at the C and the N-terminus were adsorbed with gold electrode with high and stable responses to hydrogen peroxide due to the bioelectrocatalytic reduction based on electron transfer between HRP and gold. The rHRP modified gold electrode based biosensor was able to detect a lower detection limit of 10mM of H2O2106. In a similar study, Andrey and co-workers, used gold electrode with wild-type rHRP and recombinant forms with cysteine and histidine tags at Asn57, Gln1, Asn189, or Ser309 residues of the protein with long range electron transfer based on the Chemisorption of the various rHRPs onto the gold electrodes through the tags introduced in different positions of the protein surface offering anisotropic orientations of the rHRPs on the gold surface, which permitted a restricted ‘‘rotation’’ of the rHRP molecules on the electrodes107.
The genetically manipulated recombinant tobacco peroxidases (rTOP), are another promising commercial candidates, in addition to HRP. The rTOP outranks as a more active enzyme than rHRP in the reaction of direct electron transfer from the enzyme into the gold surface.In accordance to this statement, rHRP has been recounted to exhibit 63±7 % of direct electron transfer108 while that of rTOP was 68±3 %109. The rTOP can also exist as a benchmark in advanced biodetection system such as amperometric flow immunosensors that are based on a peroxidase chip (P-chip) principle. In these sensors, recombinant peroxidase and a monoclonal antibody are immobilized to a particular analyte like Simazin (herbicide) on a gold electrode. The concentration of Simazin is determined by the virtue of its competition with simazin conjugate and glucose oxidase for binding with antibodies at the electrode110.
Recombinant Peroxidase for dye degradation:
Recombinant peroxidases are prolific option for dye biotransformation. For instance, polyacrylonitrile based entrapped horse radish peroxidase beads manifested a potential use of acid orange 20 degradation111. A similar strategy has been explored with extracellular fluid entrapped using chitosan-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with peroxidase activity112. Recombinant peroxidases also represent an attractive route for degradation of phenol and synthetic dyes such asDrimaren Blue CL-BR, Drimaren Yellow X-8GN, Drimaren Red K-4Bl and Disperse Navy Blue HGL19. Out of ordinary, to other recombinant peroxidases, the heterologous enzyme expressed in Trichodermareesei from Pleurotussapidus displayed an advanced bleaching feature of β-carotene and annatto in addition to the anthraquinonic dye Reactive Blue5113. These eminent catalyst also dwell as oxidizer of inducers like veratryl alcohol and synthetic dyes, such as bromophenol blue and 2,6-dimethoxyphenol dyes114. Hence, in future, the improvement of textile effluent and waste remediation can be highly influenced by molecular docking and dynamic simulation studies.
Recombinant Peroxidase for analytical applications:
The enzymatic immunoassays are based on coupling of antigens or antibodies with marker enzymes such as horseradish peroxidase (HRP, EC 1.11.1.7), for the quantitative analysis and detection of wide panel of substances. However, all the eminent analytical approaches used for the chemical conjugation of haptens and proteins result in the partial inactivation of the conjugate and enzyme heterogeneity, which influences the specificity and sensitivity of the ELISA. Genetic engineering is highly useful for obtaining the recombinant protein conjugates with antigens or antibodies. Such conjugates offers a series of advantages; firstly, they have 1: 1 stoichiometry; secondly, they possess a homogenous composition; thirdly they exhibit the functional activities of both the antigen/antibody and the marker protein, in addition to the reproducibility and simplicity of their production. Recombinant conjugates of antibodies with luciferase115, Arthromycesramosus peroxidase116, alkaline phosphatase117-119, were recounted previously. Recombinant fusion antigens can also be obtained with the bacterial enzymes like β-galactosidase120,121.
The main problem concerned with alkaline phosphatase and β-galactosidase conjugates is the oligomeric structure of these two biocatalysts (dimeric and tetrameric, respectively) and enhancing the conjugates affinity compared to the free antigen, significantly. This is an undesirable strategy, when competitive schemes of enzyme immunoassay are used. On the other hand, HRP that is used extensively for preparation of the conjugates77. can be expressed in E.colicells as inclusion bodies and as well as periplasmic enzyme; however, resulted outturn are similar with low quantity26. Besides, there is a successful evidence of heterologous expression of the HRP gene in E. coli cells aided with the reactivation of the recombinant HRP containing an oligohistidine sequence on the C terminus122, favouring the production of peroxidase as the reporter enzyme with recombinant fusion proteins and their application in the enzymatic immunodetective assay. Supporting this view, the recombinant conjugate of HRP with fatty-acid-binding protein (FABP)123, expressed in E. Coli system has been recounted to be successfully used as an immunotracer while performing the enzymatic immunoassay for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTIVES:
Bio-economic strategy makes a vision, as a significant platform for bioremediation. The contribution of peroxidases as eminent green biocatalysts is highly multifaceted withholding a promising benefits and scope. Besides these prospective, the first and foremost trait required is comprehending and designing of bio-based processes around what happens in nature and mechanisms involved in it; that is, understanding the synergy between all the biocatalysts involved in the degradation of noxious aromatic pollutants, and customization of this knowledge for designing the novel bio-based processes will cogently contribute towards more productive processes. In a similar vein, exploring the active site topology of peroxidase is highly indispensable for acquitance of the oxidative capacity of the enzyme. In the consistent notion, mediators are also playing significant role in determining the enzymatic catalysis. Although, the contribution of synthetic mediators systems tend to enhance the peroxidase activity and their production, some other synthetic mediators like tannic acid might result in meagre secretion of peroxidases in peculiar cases. However, this is not consistent with the other synthetic mediators like gallic acid, guaiacol and veratryl alcohol as they are addressed to offer a higher peroxidase outturn.
On the other hand, natural mediators such as lignin, lignosulphonic acid could also equally commit their role. The empowerment of engineering in mining enzymes from microbial communities has become more feasible due to advances in tagging, sequencer technology, CRISPER (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat)/cas9 mediated genome editing, and oligonucleotide directed mutagenesis and artificial gene synthesis. These techniques pose a focussed channel for the discovery of novel peroxidases. The establishment of new bioinformatics tools such as the fungal peroxidase Database (fpoxDB) has been a cumulative support for researchers to design prominent peroxidases. Such technologies can be adapted in the search of better commercial enzyme systems which can be encouraged for remediation and industrial applications.
Peroxidases have been exploited widely in textile industry for textile bleaching, in the food industry as an index of blanching vegetables and fruits; crosslinking of proteins and carbohydrates to impart novel properties, in the pulp and paper industry for pulp bleaching and for delignification of lignocelluloses. They also play a conversant role in bioremediation, biosensing, effluent treatment, nanobiotechnology and cosmetic industry. Despite of all the adroit applications of peroxidases, there is a need for this biocatalyst to be explored in the biofuel production, synthetic application and pharmaceutical compounds removing systems as they are considered as the major micropollutants exhibiting toxic impacts on marine and aquatic creatures such as fishes. The pharmaceutical drugs such as diphenhydramine, albuterol, testosterone, sertraline and estrogens exhibited structural variation of the endocrine glands of fishes, molluscs, frogs. These endocrine disruptors are mainly plastic additives, pesticides and phthalates. The exposure of these disruptors to the fishes accounts to ultimate consequence of ‘intersex fish’ (male fishes with female characteristics) and death. Henceforth, these undesirable effects of drugs on the environment, necessitates to attest clone and produce proficient recombinant and engineered peroxidases to wield them as a robustsustainable and environment friendly tool.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors thank VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India for providing necessary facilities to carry out this work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors themselves are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
ABBREVIATIONS USED:
ROS:Reactive oxygen species;
DyPPrx:dyP-type peroxidases;
HalPrx: Haloperoxidases;
CcP:Cytochrome c peroxidase;
APx: Ascorbate peroxidase;
KatG:Catalase-peroxidase;
LiP: Lignin peroxidase;
MnP:Manganese peroxidase;
VP:Versatile peroxidase;
SBP: soya bean peroxidase;
SGP: switch grass peroxidase;
CAGR: Compound annual growth rate;
IB: Inclusion Bodies;
GRAS:Generally regarded as safe;
MIA: methanol-inducible AOX1;
ELIZA: Enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay;
SV:Secretory vesicles;
ER: Endoplasmic reticulum;
ET: Biological electron transfer;
rHRP: recombinant horse radish peroxidase;
rTOP: recombinant tobacco peroxidase;
FABP: Fatty-acid-binding protein;
CRISPER:Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat;
fpoxDB:fungal peroxidase Database
REFERENCES:
1 Passardiet al. Prokaryotic origins of the non-animal peroxidase superfamily and organelle-mediated transmission to eukaryotes. Genomics. 89 (5); 2007: 567-579.
2 Krainer FW and Glieder A. An updated view on horseradish peroxidases: recombinant production and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 99 (4); 2015: 1611-1625.
3 Pandeyet al. A Comprehensive Review on Function and Application of Plant Peroxidases. Biochem Anal Biochem. 6; 2017: 308.
4 Zámocký M and Obinger C. Molecular phylogeny of heme peroxidases. Biocatalysis based on heme peroxidases, Edited by Torres E and Ayala M. Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg. 2010; pp. 7-35.
5 Zámocký et al. Independent evolution of four heme peroxidase superfamilies. Arch Biochem Biophys. 574; 2015: 108-119
6 Khademian M and Imlay JA. Escherichia coli cytochrome c peroxidase is a respiratory oxidase that enables the use of hydrogen peroxide as a terminal electron acceptor. ProcNatlAcadSci. USA. 114 (33); 2017: E6922-E6931.
7 Martins D, Kathiresan M and English AM. Cytochrome c peroxidase is a mitochondrial heme-based H2O2sensor that modulates antioxidant defense. Free RadicBiol Med. 65; 2013: 541-551.
8 Dietz K. Thiol-Based Peroxidases and Ascorbate Peroxidases: Why Plants Rely on Multiple Peroxidase Systems in the Photosynthesizing Chloroplast? Mol Cells. 39 (1); 2016: 20-25
9 Li et al. A bifunctional catalase-peroxidase, MakatG1, contributes to virulence of Metarhiziumacridum by overcoming oxidative stress on the host insect cuticle. Environ Microbiol. 19 (10); 2017: 4365-4378.
10 Junker et al. Preparation of aqueous polyaniline-vesicle suspensions with class III peroxidases. Comparison between horseradish peroxidase isoenzyme C and soybean peroxidase. Chem Pap. 67 (8); 2013: 1028-1047.
11 Mouralet al. Characterization of Class III Peroxidases from Switchgrass. Plant Physiol. 173 (1); 2017: 417-433.
12 Pandeyet al. Chitosan immobilized novel peroxidase from Azadirachtaindica: Characterization and application. Int J Biol Macromol. 104; 2017: 1713-1720.
13 Pandey VP and Dwivedi UN. Purification and characterization of peroxidase from Leucaenaleucocephala, a tree legume. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 68; 2011: 168-173.
14 Pandey et al. Purification and characterization of peroxidase from papaya (Carica papaya) fruit. ApplBiochemBiotechnol. 167; 2012: 367-376.
15 Industrial enzymes market by type(carbohydrate, proteases, non-starch polysaccharides andothers),application(food andbeverage, cleaning agents, animal feed andothers),brands and by region-global trends and forecasts to 2020. Available from: http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/market-Reports/industrial-enzymemarket-237327836.html.
16 Eggenreichet al. Production strategies for active heme-containing peroxidases from E. coli inclusion bodies-A review. Biotechnol Reports. 10; 2016: 75-83.
17 Liu et al. How to achieve high-level expression of microbial enzymes: Strategies and perspectives. Bioengineered. 4 (4); 2013: 212-223.
18 David C and Nanette P. Biotechnology. Academic cell.2016.
19 Xuet al. Expression and characteristics of manganese peroxidase from Ganodermalucidum in Pichiapastoris and its application in the degradation of four dyes and phenol. BMC Biotechnol. 17; 2017: 19.
20 Vasinaet al. Lignin-degrading peroxidases in white-rot fungus Trameteshirsuta 072. Absolute expression quantification of full multigene family. PLoS One. 12 (3); 2017: e0173813.
21 Yang H. A Glucose Biosensor based on Horseradish Peroxidase and Glucose Oxidase Co-entrapped in Carbon Nanotubes Modified Electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci. 12; 2017: 4958-4969.
22 Khalid A, Arshad M and Crowley DE. Biodegradation potential of pure and mixed bacterial cultures for removal of 4-nitroaniline from textile dye wastewater. Water Res. 43 (4); 2009: 1110-1116.
23 Veillette et al. Conformational evaluation of HIV-1 trimeric envelope glycoproteins using a cell-based ELISA assay. J Vis Exp. 91; 2014: e51995.
24 Fetyan et al. Biodegradation of Cibacron Redazo Dye and Industrial Textile Effluent by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Immobilized on Chitosan-Fe2O3 composite. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 12 (2); 2017: 1-15.
25 Yoon et al. Melanin reduction by peroxidase activity in lysosome-related organelle extracts from hen egg whites, HeLa cells, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Toxicol. 11 (4); 2015: 441-447.
26 Gundinger T and Spadiut O. A comparative approach to recombinantly produce the plant enzyme horseradish peroxidase in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 248; 2017: 15-24.
27 Ligaba et al. Reducing biomass recalcitrance by heterologous expression of a bacterial peroxidase in tobacco (Nicotianabenthamiana). Sci Rep. 7; 2017: 17104.
28 Sugiura et al. Cloning and Homologous Expression of Novel Lignin Peroxidase Genes in the White-Rot Fungus Phanerochaetesordida YK-624. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 73(8); 2009: 1793-1798.
29 Min et al. A dye-decolorizing peroxidase from Bacillus subtilis exhibiting substrate-dependent optimum temperature for dyes and β-ether lignin dimer. Sci Rep. 5; 2015: 8245.
30 Yamaguchi et al. Protein refolding using chemical refolding additives. Biotechnol J. 8 (1); 2013: 17-31.
31 Singh SM and Panda AK. Solubilization and refolding of bacterial inclusion body proteins. J BiosciBioeng. 99 (4); 2005: 303-310.
32 Li M, Su ZG and Janson JC. In vitro protein refolding by chromatographic procedures. Protein ExprPurif. 33 (1); 2004: 1-10.
33 Maria E and Alois J. Technical refolding of proteins: Do we have freedom to operate? Biotechnol J. 5 (6); 2010: 547.
34 Zakharovaet al. High-yield reactivation of anionic tobacco peroxidase overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Protein ExprPurif. 113; 2015: 85-93.
35 Zamockyet al. Intracellular catalase/peroxidase from the phytopathogenic rice blast fungus Magnaporthegrisea: expression analysis and biochemical characterization of the recombinant protein. Biochem J. 418; 2009: 443-451.
36 Wang et al. Expression of a fungal manganese peroxidase in Escherichia coli: A comparison between the soluble and refolded enzymes. BMC Biotechnol. 16; 2016: 87.
37 Bhatt et al. Cloning, expression and functional validation of drought inducible ascorbate peroxidase (Ec-apx1) from Eleusinecoracana. MolBiol Rep. 40 (2); 2013: 1155-1165.
38 Liao et al. Cloning, expression and antioxidant activity of a thioredoxin peroxidase from Branchiostomabelcheritsingtaunese. PLoS ONE. 12 (4); 2017: e0175162.
39 Eslami G and Salehi R. Cloning and Expression of TRYP6 Gene from Leishmaniamajor (MRHO/IR/75/ER). Availablefrom: http://jad.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jad/article/viewArticle/2
40 Wang et al. A glutathione peroxidase from Antarctic psychrotrophic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. ANT506: Cloning and heterologous expression of the gene and characterization of recombinant enzyme. Bioengineered. 8 (6); 2017: 742-749.
41 Wang et al. Cloning, expression, and characterization of the katG gene, encoding catalase-peroxidase, from the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium Mycobacterium sp. strain PYR-1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 66 (10); 2000: 4300-4304.
42 Fattahianet al. Expression of neutral peroxidase from Lepidium Draba in prokaryotic host. Mol Biol Res Commun. 1; 2014: 135-135.
43 Fattahianet al. Heterologous Expression, Purification and Characterization of a Peroxidase Isolated from Lepidiumdraba. Protein J. 36 (6); 2017: 461-471.
44 Hushpulian et al. Expression and refolding of tobacco anionic peroxidase from E.coli inclusion bodies. Biochem. 68 (11); 2003: 1189-1194.
45 Ufot UF and Monday IK. An engineered Phlebiaradiata manganese peroxidase: Expression, refolding, purification and preliminary characterization. Am J Mol Biol. 2; 2012: 359-370.
46 Verlaget al. Molecular cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase from Pimpinellabrachycarpa. J. Plant Physiol 159; 2002: 1029-1035.
47 Asad et al. Studies on the refolding process of recombinant horseradish peroxidase. Mol Biotechnol. 54 (2); 2013: 484-492.
48 Grigorenko et al. New Approaches for Functional Expression of Recombinant Horseradish Peroxidase C In Escherichia Coli. Biocatal Biotrans formation. 17 (5); 1999: 359-379.
49 Lin Z, Thorsen T and Arnold FH. Functional expression of horseradish peroxidase in E. coli by directed evolution. Biotechnol Prog. 15 (3); 1999: 467-471.
50 Montemartini et al. Sequence analysis of the tryparedoxin peroxidase gene from Crithidiafasciculata and its functional expression in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 273 (9); 1998: 4864-4871.
51 Smith et al. Expression of a synthetic gene for horseradish peroxidase C in Escherichia coli and folding and activation of the recombinant enzyme with Ca2+and heme. J Biol Chem. 265 (22); 1990: 13335-13343.
52 Pliego-Arreaga et al. Lactose- induced expression of recombinant turnip peroxidase in Escherichia coli. Rev MexIng Quim. 12 (3); 2013: 505-511.
53 Liu et al. Expression in Escherichia coli of the gene encoding ascorbate peroxidase from Brassica napus enhances salt tolerance of bacterial cells. Russ J Plant Physiol. 58 (3); 2011: 478-483.
54 Miki et al. Escherichia coli expression and in vitro activation of a unique ligninolytic peroxidase that has a catalytic tyrosine residue. Protein ExprPurif. 68 (2); 2009: 208-214.
55 Liu et al. Expression and characterization of soybean seed coat peroxidase in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 47 (8); 2017: 768-775.
56 Verstrepen K J, Chambers PJ and Pretorius IS. The development of superior yeast strains for the food and beverage industries: challenges, opportunities and potential benefits. Yeasts in food and beverages, Edited by Querol A and Fleet G. Springer, Berlin. 2006; pp. 399–444.
57 Lee et al. Heterologous expression of a new manganese-dependent peroxidase gene from Peniophoraincarnata KUC8836 and its ability to remove anthracene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 122 (6); 2016: 716-721.
58 Hong KK and Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A key cell factory platform for future biorefineries. Cell Mol Life Sci. 69 (16); 2012: 2671-2690.
59 Jonikas et al. Comprehensive characterization of genes required for protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science. 323 (5922); 2009: 1693-1697.
60 Martínez et al. Pharmaceutical protein production by yeast: Towards production of human blood proteins by microbial fermentation. CurrOpinBiotechnol. 23 (6); 2012: 965-971.
61 Payne T et al. Modulation of chaperone gene expression in mutagenized Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains developed for recombinant human albumin production results in increased production of multiple heterologous proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74 (24); 2008: 7759-7766.
62 Ilmén et al. High level secretion of cellobiohydrolases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 4 (1); 2011: 30.
63 Daly R and Hearn Milton TW. Expression of heterologous proteins in Pichiapastoris: a useful experimental tool in protein engineering and production. J. Mol. Recognit. 18 ; 2004: 119-138.
64 Wang et al. Methanol-Independent Protein Expression by AOX1Promoter with trans-Acting Elements Engineering and Glucose-Glycerol-Shift Induction in Pichiapastoris. Sci Rep. 7; 2017: 41850.
65 Sue et al. Heterologous protein production using the Pichiapastoris expression system. Yeast. 22 (4); 2005: 249–270.
66 Jakob et al. GAP promoter-based fed-batch production of highly bioactive core streptavidin by Pichiapastoris. BiotechnolProg. 32 (4); 2016: 855-864.
67 Stadlmayr et al. Identification and characterisation of novel Pichiapastoris promoters for heterologous protein production. J Biotechnol. 150 (4); 2010: 519-529.
68 Krainer et al. Purification and basic biochemical characterization of 19 recombinant plant peroxidase isoenzymes produced in Pichiapastoris. Protein Expr Purif. 95; 2014: 104-112.
69 Siavash et al. Characterization of chromosomal integration sites for heterologous gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 27; 2010: 955-964.
70 Egel-Mitani et al. Yield improvement of heterologous peptides expressed in yps1-disrupted Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb Technol. 26 (9-10); 2000: 671-677.
71 Kjeldsen T et al. Secretory expression of human albumin domains in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their binding of myristic acid and an acylated insulin analogue. Protein ExprPurif. 13 (2); 1998: 163-169.
72 Morawski et al. Functional expression of horseradish peroxidase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichiapastoris. Protein Eng. 13 (5); 2000: 377-384.
73 Morawski B, Quan S and Arnold FH. Functional expression and stabilization of horseradish peroxidase by directed evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BiotechnolBioeng. 76 (2); 2001: 99-107.
74 Krainer et al. Recombinant production of a peroxidase-protein G fusion protein in Pichiapastoris. J Biotechnol. 219; 2016: 24-27.
75 Gmeiner C and Spadiut O. Effects of different media supplements on the production of an active recombinant plant peroxidase in a Pichiapastoris Δ och1 strain. Bioengineered. 6 (3); 2015: 175-178.
76 Thomas L and Crawford DL. Cloning of clustered Streptomyces viridosporus T7A lignocellulose catabolism genes encoding peroxidase and endoglucanase and their extracellular expression in Pichiapastoris. Can J Microbiol. 44 (4); 1998: 364-372.
77 Koliasnikov et al. Recombinant Production of Horseradish Peroxidase Conjugates with Fab Antibodies in Pichiapastoris for Analytical Applications. Acta Naturae. 3 (3); 2011: 85-92.
78 Lambertz et al. Kluyveromyceslactis as an expression host for enzymes that degrade lignocellulosic biomass. CellulChemestry Technol. 50 (3-4); 2016: 385-389.
79 Gu L, Lajoie C and Kelly C. Expression of a Phanerochaetechrysosporium Manganese Peroxidase Gene in the Yeast Pichiapastoris. Biotechnol Prog. 19 (5); 2003: 1403-1409.
80 Wang W and Wen X. Expression of lignin peroxidase H2 from Phanerochaetechrysosporium by multi-copy recombinant Pichia strain. J Environ Sci. 21 (2); 2009: 218-222.
81 Hartner et al. Promoter library designed for fine-tuned gene expression in Pichiapastoris. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (12); 2008: e-76.
82 Nevalainen H and Peterson R. Making recombinant proteins in filamentous fungi-Are we expecting too much? Front Microbiol. 5; 2014: 75.
83 Piumi et al. A novel glucose dehydrogenase from the white rot fungus Pycnoporuscinnabarinus production in Aspergillusniger and physicochemical characterization of the recombinant enzyme. ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol. 98 (24); 2014: 10105-10118.
84 He et al. Functional expression of a novel α-amylase from Antarctic psychrotolerant fungus for baking industry and its magnetic immobilization. BMC Biotechnol. 17; 2017: 22.
85 Lin et al. Improvingcellulase production in submerged fermentation by the expression of a Vitreoscilla hemoglobin in Trichodermareesei. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 7 (1); 2017: 203.
86 Conesa A, Hondel CAMJJVD and Peter J. Studies on the Production of Fungal Peroxidases in Aspergillusniger. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 66 (7); 2000: 3016-3023.
87 Cortés-Espinosa et al. Heterologous expression of manganese peroxidase in Aspergillusniger and its effect on phenanthrene removal from soil. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 21 (3-4); 2011: 120-129.
88 Conesa et al. Expression of the Caldariomycesfumago Chloroperoxidase in Aspergillusniger and Characterization of the Recombinant Enzyme. J Biol Chem. 276(21); 2001: 17635-17640.
89 Irie et al. Homologous expression of recombinant manganese peroxidase genes in ligninolytic fungus Pleurotusostreatus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 55 (5); 2001: 566-570.
90 Mayfield et al. Homologous expression of recombinant manganese peroxidase in Phanerochaetechrysosporium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 60 (12); 1994: 4303-4309.
91 Stewart et al. Efficient expression of a Phanerochaetechrysosporium manganese peroxidase gene in Aspergillusoryzae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 62 (3); 1996: 860-864.
92 Fernández-Fueyo E, Ruiz-Dueñas FJ and Martínez AT. Engineering a fungal peroxidase that degrades lignin at very acidic pH.Biotechnol Biofuels. 7; 2014; 114.
93 Kim et al. Engineering a horseradish peroxidase C stable to radical attacks by mutating multiple radical coupling sites. BiotechnolBioeng. 112(4); 2015: 668-676.
94 Elliott and Elliott. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Oxford University Press, New York. 2014.
95 Nicholls DG and Ferguson SJ. Bioenergetics. Academic Press, London. 1992.
96 Armstrong FA and Lannon AM. Fast interfacial electron transfer between cytochrome c peroxidase and graphite electrodes promoted by amyloglycosides: Novel electroenzymic catalysis of H2O2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109; 1987: 7211–7212.
97 Paddock RM and Bowden EF. Electrocatalytic reduction of hydrogen peroxide via direct electron transfer from pyrolytic graphite electrodes to irreversibly adsorbed cytochrome c peroxidase. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 260; 1989: 487-494.
98 Bartlett PN, Tebbutt P and Whitaker RG. Kinetic aspects of the use of modified electrodes and mediators in bioelectrochemistry. Prog. React. Kinet. 16; 1991: 55–155.
99 Hirst et al. Electrocatalytic voltammetry of succinate dehydrogenase: Direct quantification of the catalytic properties of a complex electron-transport enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118; 1996: 5031–5038.
100 Ikeda T. Frontiers in Biosensorics. Birkhauser Verlag Base, Switzerland.1997.
101 Ferapontova EE, Ruzgas T and Gorton L .Direct electron transfer of heme and molybdopterin cofactor-containing chicken liver sulfite oxidase on alkanethiol modified gold electrodes. Anal. Chem. 75; 2003: 4841–4850.
102 Leger et al. Enzyme electrokinetics: Using protein film voltammetry to investigate redox enzymes and their mechanisms. Biochemistry-US. 42; 2003: 8653–8662.
103 Ferapontova EE. Encyclopedia of Sensors. American Scientific Publishers, California, USA. 2006.
104 Qijin et al. Long-range interfacial electron transfer of metalloproteins based on molecular wiring assemblies. Faraday Discuss. 131; 2006: 181–195.
105 Shipovskov S and Ferapontova EE. Biocatalysis of theophylline oxidation by microbial theophylline oxidase in the presence of non-physiological electron acceptors. Biocatal. Biotransform. 26; 2008: 455–465.
106 Elena et al. Mediatorless biosensor for H2O2 based on recombinant forms of horseradish peroxidase directly adsorbed on polycrystalline gold. Biosens Bioelectron. 16; 2001: 147–157.
107 Andrey et al. Long-range electron transfer in recombinant peroxidases anisotropically orientated on gold electrodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010; 12: 10098–10107.
108 Lindgren et al. Direct electron transfer catalysed by recombinant forms of horseradish peroxidase: insight into the mechanism. Electrochem. Commun. 1 (5); 1999: 171-175.
109 Lindgren et al. Biosensors based on novel peroxidases with improved properties in direct and mediated electron transfer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 15 (9–10); 2000: 491-497.
110 Gazaryan et al. Tobacco Peroxidase as a New Reagent for Amperometric Biosensors. J Anal Chem. 60 (6); 2005: 558–566.
111 Yincan et al. Decolorization of Color Index Acid Orange 20 buffer solution using horseradish peroxidase immobilized on modified PAN-beads. RSC Adv. 7; 2017: 18976-18986.
112 Fetyan et al. Biodegradation of CibacronRedazo Dye and Industrial Textile Effluent by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Immobilized on Chitosan-Fe2O3 Composite. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 12 (2); 2017: 1-15.
113 Lauber et al. Identification, heterologous expression and characterization of a dye-decolorizing peroxidase of Pleurotussapidus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 7 (1); 2017: 164.
114 Huang et al. Cloning and heterologous expression of a novel ligninolytic peroxidase gene from poroid brown-rot fungus Antrodiacinnamomea. Microbiology. 155 (2); 2009: 424-433.
115 Kedar et al. Cell-free production of Gaussiaprinceps luciferase–antibody fragment bioconjugates for ex vivo detection of tumor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 390 (3); 2009: 971–976.
116 Joosten et al. Production of bifunctional proteins by Aspergillusawamori: Llama variable heavy chain antibody fragment (VHH) R9 coupled to Arthromycesramosus peroxidase (ARP). J Biotechnol. 120 (4); 2005: 347-359.
117 Rau D, Kramer K and Hock B. Single-chain f v antibody-alkaline phosphatase fusion proteins produced by one-step cloning as rapid detection tools for elisa. J Immunoass Immunochem. 23 (2); 2002: 129-143.
118 Tachibana et al. Bacterial Expression of a Human Monoclonal Antibody-Alkaline Phosphatase Conjugate Specific for Entamoe bahistolytica. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 11 (1); 2004: 216-218.
119 Mousli et al. Recombinant single-chain Fv antibody fragment-alkaline phosphatase conjugate: A novel in vitro tool to estimate rabies viral glycoprotein antigen in vaccine manufacture. J Virol Methods. 146 (1-2); 2007: 246-256.
120 Peterhans et al. A simple competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay using antigen β galactosidase fusions. Anal. Biochem. 163; 1987: 470-475.
121 Markaryan et al. Construction of expression vectors for gene fusions on the model of beta-galactosidase-human fibroblast beta-interferon for the purpose of immunoenzyme assay. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 646; 1991: 125-135.
122 Grigorenko et al. New Approaches for Functional Expression of Recombinant Horseradish Peroxidase C In Escherichia Coli. Biocatal Biotransformation. 17 (5); 1999: 359-379.
123 Grigorenko et al. A genetically engineered fusion protein with horseradish peroxidase as a marker enzyme for use in competitive immunoassays. Anal Chem. 73 (6); 2001: 1134-1139.
Received on 06.03.2018 Modified on 29.04.2018
Accepted on 10.05.2018 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(7): 3186-3196.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00586.3