Stability Indicating RP-HPLC method for the determination of Abiraterone (An Anti-Cancer Drug)

 

Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna*, Debi Prasad Pradhan, Krishna Chaitanya Routhu

Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Quality Assurance, GITAM Institute of Pharmacy,

GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra pradesh-530045, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: mannapurna.mukthinuthalapati@gitam.edu

 

ABSTRACT:

Abiraterone is used for the treatment of prostate cancer for men. Abiraterone is available as Abiraterone acetate. Food and drug administration approves Abiraterone for treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer. A new stability indicating RP-HPLC method has been proposed for the quantification of Abiraterone. Capcell PAK C18 column (100 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 3 µm particle size) was used for the chromatographic study of Abiraterone acetate with mobile phase mixture 0.1 % acetic acid and acetonitrile (11:89 v/v) (Flow rate: 1.2 mL/min) on Shimadzu Model CBM-20A/20 Alite HPLC system (PDA detector). Forced degradation studies were performed and the method was validated.

 

KEYWORDS: Abiraterone, stability indicating, RP-HPLC; validation, ICH guidelines..

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Abiraterone (C24H31NO) is an irreversible inhibitor of 17α-hydroxylase/C17, 20-lyase (CYP17) which is play a part in the production of androgens in the testes and adrenal glands1-2. Abiraterone (Fig 1) is practically insoluble over a wide pH range of reagents and slightly soluble in HCl and organic solvents. Abiraterone was determined by LC-MS3-4, LC-MS/MS5, spectrofluorimetry6, liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection7 in cancer patients and RP-HPLC methods for the quantification of Abiraterone in rat plasma 8-9 and for dosage forms10-11 have been so far in the literature. In the present study the authors have proposed a stability indicating liquid chromatographic method for the determination of Abiraterone in tablet formulations and the method was validated.

Abiraterone.svg

Figure 1: Chemical Structure of Abiraterone

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Abiraterone is available as tablets with brand names ZYTIGA (Janssen-Cilag Ltd, India), XIBRA (Cipla labs, India) and ABIRAPRO (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, India) with label claim: 250 mg. HPLC grade acetic acid and acetonitrile were procured from Merck. Abiraterone gift sample was supplied from Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, India

 

Method validation

HPLC instrument and chromatographic conditions

Shimadzu Model CBM-20A/20 Alite HPLC system with PDA detector and Capcell PAK C18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 3 µm particle size) column was chosen or the chromatographic study. A mixture of 0.1 % acetic acid and acetonitrile (11:89, %v/v) was used as the mobile phase with flow rate 1.2 mL/min.

 

Procedure:

Abiraterone stock solution (1000 μg/mL) was prepared by dissolving 25 mg of Abiraterone in mobile phase in a 25 mL volumetric flask and a series of (1-1000 μg/mL) diluted solutions were prepared with the diluent (0.1% acetic acid: acetonitrile 20:80). The peak area of chromatograms was noted down and a calibration curve was plotted (Concentration vs peak area). The limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) were calculate based on the calibration curve response.

 

The method was validated by performing different studies – linearity, precision, accuracy and robustness. Precision study was performed on the same day as well as on three different days. Robustness study was performed by modifying the chromatographic conditions slightly and there by measuring the percentage relative standard deviation of the method developed.

 

Forced degradation studies:

Abiraterone standard drug solutions were exposed to different stress conditions such as acidic (0.1N HCl, 80°C, 30 min), alkaline (0.1N NaOH, 80°C, 30 min), oxidation (3% H2O2), thermal (105°C, 30 min) and photolytic (UV radiation; 365 nm, 3 hours) degradations. The resulting acidic and alkaline stressed sample solutions were neutralised and all the solutions were cooled and diluted to proceed for the chromatographic study.

 

Assay of Abiraterone marketed formulations:

Twenty tablets of three different brands of Abiraterone were purchased form the local pharmacy store and extracted for their active pharmaceutical ingredients and processed for the chromatographic study.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

A stability indicating liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the determination of Abiraterone in pharmaceutical formulations (Tablets). A mixture of acetic acid (0.1 %) and acetonitrile (11:89, %v/v) was used as the mobile phase with flow rate 1.2 mL/min.

 

Method optimization:

Method optimization was done using Shimadzu Model CBM-20A/20 Alite HPLC system, equipped with SPD M20A prominence PDA detector. During the method optimization process different columns (Table 1) (Figure 2), mobile phase composition (Table 2), flow rate (Table 3) and diluent composition (Table 4) were used and the detailed reports were tabulated. Capcell C18 Capcell PAK C18 MG-III (100 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm) column was chosen finally for the chromatographic study. Finally a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of 0.1 % acetic acid and acetonitrile (11:89, %v/v) with flow rate 1.2 mL/min. was selected.in which Abiraterone was eluted at 5.327 ± 0.29 mins as a sharp peak (UV detection 252 nm). 

 


 

 

Table.1. Optimization (Variation of columns)

Column used

Retention time (min)

Mean peak area

Tailing factor

Theoretical plates

Observation

Sunfire C18

(150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm)

5.220

237999

3.045

6819.53

Blunt peak

Tailing factor >2

Phenomenex Luna C8

(250 ×4.6 mm, 5 µm)

12.993

335559

4.90

1412.32

Peak is blunt

Rt is more

Tailing factor .>2

Capcell PAK C18 MG-III

(100 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm)

5.375

2551657

1.24

11446.43

Sharp peak Rt <6 min

Taililng factor < 2

 

 

 

 

Sunfire C18 column

Phenomenex Luna C8 column

 

Capcell PAK C18 MG-III

Figure 2: Representative chromatograms of Abiraterone (Column variation)

 

 

Table. 2. Optimization (Variation in mobile phase composition)

Mobile phase ratio (%v/v)

Retention

time (min)

Mean peak area

Tailing factor

Theoretical plates

Peak shape

0.1% Formic Acid : Acetonitrile (20:80)

5.756

2140194

1.388

8320.20

Poor

0.1% Formic Acid : Acetonitrile (15:85)

5.414

2214687

1.262

9781.82

Poor

0.1% Acetic acid : Acetonitrile (20:80)

10.058

3296958

1.211

14746.64

Good

0.1% Acetic acid : Acetonitrile (15:85)

7.832

3389205

1.239

13640.63

Good

0.1% Acetic acid : Acetonitrile (11:89)

5.342

2555784

1.256

11541.92

Good

 

 

 

Table. 3. Optimization (Variation of flow rate)

Flow rate (ml/min)

Retention Time (min)

Mean peak area

Tailing factor

Theoretical  Plates

Peak  shape

0.5

18.984

3645679

1.4

18695

Poor

1.0

10.058

3296958

1.1

14765

Good

1.2

5.381

2554864

1.2

11212

Good

 


Table.4. Optimization (Variation in diluent composition)

Diluent

Rt

Mean peak area

% Assay

0.1% Acetic acid: acetonitrile (20:50)

5.3

2511814

98.40

0.1% acetic acid: Acetonitrile (50:50)

5.4

2494567

97.77

0.1% acetic acid: Acetonitrile (11:89)

5.3

2552155

99.98

 

Method validation12

Abiraterone was eluted at 5.30 ± 0.08 min. Abiraterone has shown linearity 1-1000 μg/mL (R2 = 0.9999) (Table 5) with linear regression equation y = 25841.1139x – 3883.8764 and the LOD and LOQ were found to be 0.2283 μg/mL and 0.69191 μg/mL respectively (Figure 3). The complete separation of the analysis was finished in less than 10 min. The theoretical plates were > 2000, capacity factor > 2 and the tailing factor was < 2.

 

Table. 5. Linearity of Abiraterone

Conc. µg/ml)

*Mean peak area ± SD (% RSD)

1

25404.33 ± 10.07 (0.04)

5

50482.67 ± 303.73 (0.60)

10

253930.67 ± 708.49 (0.28)

20

503069.00 ± 1560.68 (0.31)

50

1271727.00 ± 6043.25 (0.48)

100

2558080.00 ± 14795.91 (0.58)

250

6665404.33 ± 10414.70 (0.16)

500

12829069.00 ± 17833.27 (0.14)

1000

25832390.67 ± 19308.32  (0.07)

*Mean of three replicates

 

Figure 3: Calibration curve of Abiraterone

 

Precision, Accuracy and Robustness

The method precision was performed by assaying the drug samples (50, 100 and 250 μg/mL) on the same day (intra-day precision) and on three different days (inter-day precision) and the % RSD was 0.16-0.58 (intra-day) and 0.37-0.97 (inter-day) (Table 6) i.e. < 2.0 indicating that the method is precise. Accuracy studies were performed by spiking pure drug solutions with Abiraterone tablets extracted solution (50 μg/mL) (80%, 100% and 120%). The percentage recovery was 99.13-99.79 (Table 7) with % RSD 0.11-0.45 (<2.0) indicating that the method is accurate. The robustness study results were discussed in Table 8 and here also the % RSD was found to be less than 2.0 (0.79-1.55) indicating that the optimised method is robust.

 


Table.6. Precision studies of Abiraterone

Conc.

(µg/ml)

Intra-day precision

Inter-day precision

*Mean peak area ± SD (%RSD)

*Mean peak area ± SD (%RSD)

50

127127.00 ± 6043.25 (0.48)

1263173.00 ± 12267.89 (0.97)

100

2558080.00 ± 14795.91 (0.58)

2551073.00 ± 23713.52 (0.93)

250

6665404.33 ± 10414.70 (0.16)

6652698.67 ± 24455.65 (0.37)

*Mean of three replicates

 

Table. 7. Accuracy studies of Abiraterone

Conc. (µg/ml)

*Mean peak area ± SD

(% RSD)

Drug Found

(µg/ml)

*Recovery (%)

API

Formulation

Total

40

50

90

2302293.13 ± 4834.82 (0.21)

89.25

99.17

50

50

100

2574746.67 ± 2790.24 (0.11)

99.79

99.79

60

50

110

2813888 ± 12662.49 (0.45)

109.042

99.13

*Mean of three replicates

 

Table. 8. Robustness studies of Abiraterone

Parameter

Condition

*Peak area

*Mean peak area ± SD (%RSD)

Flow rate (± 0.1 ml/min)

1.1

2594571

2556551 ± 39635.94 (1.55)

1.2

2559607

1.3

2515476

Detection wavelength (± 2 nm)

250

2514857

2529873 ± 20031.69 (0.79)

252

2552618

254

2522145

Mobile phase composition 0.1% acetic acid: acetonitrile (± 2 %, v/v)

9:91

2590562

2552621 ± 37991.6 (1.49)

11:89

2552722

13:87

2514579

*Mean of three replicates

 

 


Assay of Abiraterone marketed formulations

Abiraterone tablet formulations were evaluated by using the above optimised procedure and found that the recovery was 99.34% - 99.67% (Table 9). There is no interference of excipients.

 

Table. 9. Assay of marketed formulations of Abiraterone

Brand Name

Label Claim (mg)

Drug obtained

% Recovery

Brand I

250

248.96

99.58

Brand II

250

248.34

99.34

Brand III

250

249.18

99.67

 

 

 

Forced degradation studies13

Abiraterone standard drug solutions were exposed to different stress conditions and during acidic degradation 65.25 % and during alkaline degradation 14.78 % of the drug was decomposed (Figure 4). In oxidation, thermal and photolytic degradations less than 2% degradation was reported indicating that the drug is resistant towards these conditions (Table 10). The system suitability parameters were well in acceptance criteria. The overlay chromatogram was shown in Figure 5 and that of the peak purity results and 3D chromatograms in Figure 6 and Figure 7 respectively.

 


 

 

Acidic degradation

Alkaline degradation

Figure 4: Chromatograms of Abiraterone: Acidic (5.370 min); Alkaline (5.344 min) degradations

 

Figure 5: Overlay chromatogram of Abiraterone: A) Blank [B] Diluent [C] Acidic [D] Alkaline [E] Oxidative [F] Thermal and [G] Photolytic degradations

 

Table. 9. Stress degradation studies of Abiraterone

Stress conditions

*Drug recovered (%)

*Drug decomposed (%)

Peaks observed

Theoretical

plates

Tailing factor

Peak Purity Index

Single point threshold

Abiraterone standard (Control)

100.00

-

5.388

11500.55

1.25

1.000000

0.999841

Acidic degradation

1 ml 0.1N HCl, 80°C, 30 mins

34.75

65.25

2.726 5.370

11563.26

1.13

1.000000

0.999790

Alkaline degradation

0.1 ml 0.1N NaOH, 80°C, 30 mins

85.22

14.78

2.721 5.344

11232.81

1.24

0.999998

0.994050

Oxidative degradation

1 ml 3% H2O2, 80°C, 30 mins

98.89

1.11

5.278

9333.82

1.28

1.000000

0.999959

Thermal degradation 105°C, 30 mins

99.73

0.27

5.279

11026.43

1.29

1.000000

0.999971

Photolytic degradation 365 nm, 3 hours

99.84

0.16

5.351

10740.18

1.31

0.999995

0.999942

*Mean of three replicates

 

[A]

 

[B]

 

[C]

 

[D]

 

[E]

 

.[F]

Figure 6: Peak purity plots of [A] Abiraterone [B] Acidic [C] Alkaline [D] Oxidative [E] Thermal and [F] Photolytic degradations

 

 

[A]

 

[B]

 

[C]

 

[D]

 

[E]

 

[F]

Figure 7: 3D chromatograms of [A] Abiraterone during [B] Acidic [C] Alkaline [D] Oxidative [E] Thermal [F] Photolytic degradations

 


CONCLUSIONS:

The proposed method was applied for the determination of Abiraterone in laboratory prepared tablets with different excipients and there is no interference of excipients. Abiraterone is sensitive towards acidic and alkaline environments and highly resistant towards temperature, UV radiation and oxidation conditions. The proposed method is economical and simple for the assay of Abiraterone.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are grateful to M/s GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, India for providing the research facilities as well as Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, India for providing the gift samples of Abiraterone. The authors have no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.     Abiraterone Acetate (CAS 154229-18-2). Available from: http://www.scbt.com/datasheet-207240- Abiraterone-acetate.html

2.     Food and drug administration approves Abiraterone for treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer. Available from: http://www.pcf.org/site/c.leJRIROrEpH/b. 7085345/k.82CC/ Food and Drug Administration approves Abiraterone for treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer.htm

3.     Khdera A, Darwish I and Bamanea F. Analysis of Abiraterone stress degradation behavior using liquid chromatography coupled to ultraviolet detection and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 23; 2013:74-77.

4.     Martins V, Asad Y, Wilsher N and Raynaud F. A validated liquid chromatographic– tandem mass spectroscopy method for the quantification of Abiraterone acetate and Abiraterone in human plasma. Journal of Chromatography B Analytical Technology Biomedical Life Sciences. 843(2); 2006: 262-267.

5.     Gaurav S, Punde R, Farooqui J, Zainuddin M, Rajagopal S and Mullangi R. Development and validation of a highly sensitive method for the determination of Abiraterone in rat and human plasma by LC-MS/MS-ESI: application to a pharmacokinetic study. Biomedical Chromatography. 26(2); 2012: 761-768.

6.         Gong A and Zhu X. β-cyclodextrin sensitized spectrofluorimetry for the determination of Abiraterone Acetate and Abiraterone. Journal of Fluorescence. 23(6); 2013: 1279-1286.

7.     Belleville T, Noe G, Huillard O, Thomas-Schoemann A and Vidal M, Goldwasser FAlexandre J and Blanchet B. A HPLC-fluorescence method for the quantification of Abiraterone in plasma from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Journal of Chromatography B Analytical Technology Biomedical Life Sciences. 989; 2015: 86-90.

8.     Kumar SV, Rudresha G, Gaurav S, Zainuddin, Dewang P, Kethiri RR, Rajagopal S and Mullangi R. Validated RPHPLC/UV method for the quantitation of Abiraterone in rat plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats. Biomedical Chromatography. 27(2); 2013: 203-207.

9.     Ramesh Mullangi, Vijay Kumar S, Rudresha G, Sandip Gurav, Mohd Zainuddin, Purushottam Dewang, Raghava Reddy Kethiri and Sriram Rajagopal. Validated RP-HPLC/UV method for the quantitation of Abiraterone in rat plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats. Biomedical Chromatography. 27; 2013: 203-207.

10.   Jala Chandra Reddy B and Sarada NC. Development and validation of a novel RP-HPLC method for stability-indicating assay of Abiraterone acetate, Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 39(7); 2016: 354-363.

11.   Bedi Smriti, Gude Sushmitha, Krishna Muddu and Vasantharaju SG. Novel RP-HPLC method for the quantification of Abiraterone acetate. Journal of Global Pharma Technology. 09(8); 2016: 1-9.

12.   ICH Q2(R1) Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology (2005)ICH Q1A (R2) Stability testing of new drug substances and products (2003).

 

 

 

Received on 16.05.2018            Modified on 08.06.2018

Accepted on 20.07.2018           © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(7): 3007-3012.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00554.1