Determination of Clopidogrel bisulphate using Drug Selective Membranes

 

Oussama Mansour1*, Dania Nashed2, Amir Alhaj Sakur2

1Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Quality Control Dept, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Andalus University, Syria

2Analytical and Food Chemistry Dept, Faculty of Pharmacy, Aleppo University, Syria

*Corresponding Author E-mail: mansouroussama@yahoo.fr

 

ABSTRACT:

Newly developed ion selective electrode has been developed for determination of Clopidogrelbisulphate(CLP) in pure form and pharmaceutical preparations. The selective electrode was constructed from Clopidogrel with pairing agent Nesslerreagentin presence of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) as the plasticizing solvent mediator. The electrode displayed a Nernstian response with a mean calibration graphs slopeof 28.37 mv.decade-1,over linear concentration range 10-2-10-5M of the drug, with detection limits 0.063 µMand quantification limits 0.191 µM. The electrode was effective at pH range between 1-3. The influence of possible interfering species such as inorganic cations and pharmacologically related compounds was studied. The electrode showed a fast response of (18±2 sec) for a period of 11 days,without significant change in electrode parameters. The method is precise as shown by mean recoveries range of (97.9-102.9 %)with a mean relative standard deviation less than 2.80. The results were compared to those obtained by a reference method. The proposed electrode was used for the determination of CLP in pure form and pharmaceutical formulation.

 

KEYWORDS: Ion selective electrodes, Clopidogrel, Nernstian slope, potentiometric determination, Nessler reagent.

 


INTRODUCTION:

Clopidogrelbisulphate (CLP) chemically is: methyl (+)-(s)-α-(o-chlorophenyl)6,7-dihydrothieno (3, 2-c) pyridine- 5(4H)- acetate bisulphate (Figure 1), is a new antiplatelet aggregation by selective preventing binding adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to its platelet receptor [1]. It prevent ischemic stroke, mycordil infraction and vascular disease [2].

 

 

Fig .1 : Chemical structure of CLP

 

 

Literature showed some analytical methods for determination of Clopidogrelbisulphate such as HPLC [3-5], HPTLC[6, 7], UV Spectrophotometric [8-12], H-NMR[13], GC-MS[14], Capillary electrophoresis [15,16], Voltammetry and potentiometric methods [17,18].

 

Ion selective electrode is one of the most effective, accurate, economic analytical methods for determination of organic and inorganic substances[19].The aim of this work was to develop a sensitive, selective and validated ISEs for the determination of Clopidogrelbisulphate in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Apparatus:

The electrochemical measurements were made with IONcheck 10 pH/mvmeter–Radiometer Analytical S.A.(CEDEX-France) with electrodes consist of [Clopidogrel-Nessler reagent–poly phenyl chloride (PVC)–di butyl phthalate (DBP)] membrane in conjunction with double junction Ag/Ag Cl electrode as external reference electrode ( lab. assembly ), containing 1M KCl in the outer compartment. The pH measurements were made with Crison model Glp 21/ Eu (Spain). Ultrasonic processor model power sonic 405 (Korea). All potentiometric measurements were made at 25±1 C with constant stirring using hot-plate magnetic stirrer MS 300 BANTE (China). All weights were taken by analytical balance SARTORIUS model 2474 (Germany) with accuracy ±0.1mg.

 

Reagent and Materials.:

Analytical grade Clopidogrelbisulphate (Glenmarak Generics Ltd- India), high molecular weight PVC (SABC, KSA), di–n-butyl phthalate (DBP) 99%, Tetrahydroforan 97%, HCl 37%, NaOH 99.8%, KCl (GR grade), Mercury iodide Hg2I2, Potassium iodide KI, from (MERCK-Germany), Bi-distilled water (conductivity ≤10 μS/cm) were used.

 

Preparation of NESSLER's Reagent:

THOULET'S solution KHgI3 was prepared by mixing 1 mmol hot aqueous suspension of mercury (II) iodide with 2 mmol solution of potassium iodide. To have NESSLER's reagent K2HgI4, 2 mmol potassium hydroxide was added. Any precipitate was filtered. Then, the filtrate brought to room temperature and diluted to the required concentration [20].

 

Standard Drug Solutions :

Stock standard (0.01 M) Clopidogrelbisulphate was prepared by dissolving accurate weight in Bi–distilled water using the ultrasonic bath. Working solution ranging (0.1-1000) µM were prepared by serial dilutions of the stock solution. Britton –Robinson universal buffer 0.2 M was used [21].

 

Ion Selective Electrodes:

Preparation of Ion-Pair(IP):

The ion pairs was prepared by mixing 50 mL of 1mM CLP with 50 mL of Nessler reagent. The precipitates Clopidogrel–Nessler reagent (yellowish powder) wasfiltered and washed thoroughly with distilled water until the conductivity of the washed water is close to the conductivity of bi –distilled water and dried at room temperature for 24 hrs. Ion pairwas stored in will – closed amber glass bottles. The molecular ratio was found to 1:2 with Nessler reagent.

 

Membranes Composition:

The membranes were prepared by dissolving equal weights of matrix PVC and the plasticizer (DBP) and suitable weight of ion pair in a minimum volume of tetrahydrofuran (THF). The solutions were poured into a petri –dish, covered with a filter paper and the solvent was allowed to evaporate slowly at room temperature to get the membranes that  represent the electro-active part of ion selective electrode [22].

 

 

Construction of ISEs:

A punched circular membrane was attached to a poly-ethylene tube in an electrode configuration and attached to the end of a glass tube. This electrode was filled with an internal solution consisting of 1mM CLP in 1 M KCl. Ag/AgCl wire electrode was used as an internal reference electrode. Then this electrode attached to double junction Ag/AgCl electrode as the external reference electrode, containing 1 M KCl in the outer compartment. The circuit closed by attaching the cell to pH/mvmeter [23, 24].

 

Electrode Calibration :

25 mL aliquots of (0.1-100000) µM Clopidogrel standard solutions were transferred into 50 mL beaker and the electrode in conjunction with Ag/AgCl reference electrode was immersed in the solution. All potentiometric measurements were performed using the cell:

 

Ag/AgCl –KCl (1M)+CLP (1mM)llCLP-NES –DBP –PVC membrane ll test solutionll Ag/AgCl –KCl (1M)

The measured potential was plotted against the minus logarithm of CLP concentration. The electrodewas washed with Bi–distilled water and dried with tissue paper between measurements.

 

Effect of Ion Pair Percentage on Electrode Potential :

We have prepared a set of membranes containing a different percentage of ion pair ranging between
(2-8)%, then we studied the effect of this percentage on electrode potential and we selected the percentage that showed the closet slope to Nernstian slope [22].

 

Effect of pH:

The effect of pH on the potential response was investigated using (10-2and10-3) MClopidogrel solutions. The pH of the solutions was adjusted between 1-6 using suitable amounts of 1M KOH or HCl solution. The potential readings corresponding to different pH value were recorded. On the other hand, the study was repeated using Britton – Robinson universal buffer. The pH of the buffer solutions was adjusted between 1-6, and a specific volume of it was added to the drug solution.

 

Selctievity:

Selectivity coefficients K PotA,Bwere determined by the matched potential method [25] In this method, the potentiometric selectivity coefficient is defined as the activity ratio of primary and interfering ion that give the same potential change under the same conditions.

 

K=(ŕ-a ) / a B

 

At first, a known activity (ŕCLP) of the primary ion solution is added into a reference solution that contains a fixed activity (ŕCLP) of primary ions, and the corresponding potential change (ΔE) is recorded. Then, a solution of an interfering ion is added to the reference solution until the same potential change (ΔE) recorded again [26].

 

Determination of Clopidogrel in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms:

Local manufacturing formulations, Copiral (75 mg film coated tablets, AVENZOR pharmaceutical industries), PLOFEXINE (75 mg film coated tablets, ASIA pharmaceutical industries) and Platgo (75 mg f.c.t, MEECYPHARMA pharmaceutical industries) were used for the analysis of CLP by direct potentiometric determination method. Ten tablets of each drug were finely powdered and accurate weight equivalent to one tablet was taken and dissolved using the same procedure used to dissolve the drug substance. The solution was filtered through a common filter paper and transferred to 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with bi–distilled water, from this solution 2.14 mL was taken and diluted to50 mL to get 10-4 M concentration. The final solution was analyzed as described under electrode calibration.

 

RESULTS:

Calibration Graphs and the Best Electrode

The analytical range of a potentiometric electrode was the linear part of the calibration graphs, it was
 (10-2-10-5) M, pc=(2-5), see figure 2 Increasing IP percentage in the membrane was found to increase the electrode response the slope of the linear area reaching -28.73 m.v.decade-1m.v.decade-1 for electrode 6%ion pair ratio as showed in figure 3, but at percentage higher than that detective we found a decrease in electrode response and slope, that due to the kinetic of the ion pair inside the membrane.

 

 

Fig. 2: Effect of IP content on CLP-NES calibration curve.

 

 

Fig. 3: Effect of IP percentage in the ion selective membrane on the slope of the liner area for equation curve: E=f(pCCLP)

 

Table 1: The least squares equations data obtained from the liner equation

CLP-NES

IP%

2

4

6

8

S,mv.decade-1

21.67

23.17

28.73

27.06

b, mv

-8.28

78.97

104.88

80.51

r2

0.9899

0.9794

0.9898

0.9952

 

Effect of pH on potential:

The effect of pH of the CLP test solution on electrode potential was investigated. The results showed that the potential remained constant despite the pH change in the range between 1-3 and we found the same results when we used a Britton –Robinson universal buffer as shown in figures 4, that indicate the applicability of this electrode in the pH specified range.

 

 

Fig. 4: Effect of pH on the potential response of theCLP-NES electrode using 10 mMCLP solution, 1 mMCLP solution, in BRITTON-ROBINSON universal buffer solutions.

 

Selectivity of the Electrodes:

the results of the potentiometric selectivity coefficients of the prepared electrodes showed high selectivity toward Clopidogrel in presence of different inorganic cations and some pharmacologically related compounds.The results summarized in table 2.

 

Table 2: Selectivity coefficient of some interfering ions by CLP-NES

Interfering, B

KMFX,B

Selectivity

Ca Cl2

13x10-3

76.9

NH4Cl

15x10-3

66.6

NaCl

4.4*10-3

227.2

KCl

26*10-3

38.4

dextrose

5.93*10-3

168.6

CMC

7.20*10-3

138.3

Mg stearate

9.36*10-3

106.8

 

Life Time Study:

Clopidogrelselective electrode life time was estimated with a calibration curves periodical test of standard solutions (10-1-10-6) M and calculation of its response slope. The calibration curves were plotted after an optimum soaking time of 6 hrs in 1 mMCLP solution. The slope was-28.73 m.v.decade-1 for electrode-1at 25 °C. The electrode was continuously soaked in 1 mM solution of CLP for about 15 days. The calibration plot slopes decrease slightly to be -23.85 after 11 days .These indicate that soaking the electrode in drug solution for a long time has a negative effect on the response of membrane.

 

Response Characteristics and Linearity:

Linear range, correlation coefficient and detection limits, were given in Table3. The electrode show a nearly Nernestain response in the range between(10-10000) µM, PC (2-5).

 

Table 3: Response characteristics of CLP-NES electrode

Parameter

CLP-NES

IP%

6%

Slope, mV.decade-1

-28.73

Intercept, mV.decade-1

104.88

Correlation coefficient (R2)

0.9898

Linear range, μM

10-10000

LOD, μM

0.063

LOQ, μM

0.191

Response time for 1 mM, sec

18 ± 2

Life time, day

11

Working pH range

1-3

 

Quantification of Clopidogrel bisulphate:

The developed electrode found to be effective in the potentiometric determination of Clopidogel in both pure form and pharmaceutical preparations.

 

Accuracy and Precision:

The low values of relative standard deviation (RSD) indicate good precision and reproducibility of the method. The average percent recoveries obtained were 97.90–102.99%, indicating a good accuracy of the methods. The results obtained were summarized in Table 4.

 

Table 4: Direct determinations of CLP in bulk solution using proposed electrodes

CTaken, (µg/mL)

CFound ,(µg/mL)

R%

SD

RSD%

4198.91

4324.87

102.99

53.19

1.23

419.89

414.01

98.59

7.24

1.75

41.98

41.10

97.90

0.95

2.31

4.19

4.28

102.14

0.12

2.80

 

Application to the pharmaceutical dosage forms:

The proposed method has been successfully applied to the determination of Clopidogrelbisulphate in pharmaceutical preparations by calibration curve method.

 

The results obtained were compared with a reference HPLC method [27]. As shown in table 5. Statistical analysis of the result obtained by the proposed and comparison methods using STUDENT’s t-test and variance ratio F-test[28], showed no significant difference between them regarding accuracy and precision, respectively.

 

Table 5: Determinations of CLP in pharmaceutical preparations using proposed electrode.

Drugs

X ± SDa

R%

t- value

f- value

Clopiral

75.25±0.56

100.3

0.03

2.71

Platgo

72.62±0.47

96.8

1.51

1.61

Plofexine

73.67±0.61

98.2

2.01

2.21

a Average of five replicates.

b Tabulated t-value at 95% confidence level is 2.776.

c Tabulated F-value at 95% confidence level is 6.39.

 

DISCUSSION:

New constructed sensor was developed for Clopidogrelbisulphate determination over a wide range of concentration in pH range between 1-3. The electrode showed a very good selectivity to CLP in the presence of various common inorganic cation and different pharmacological related compounds. This electrode can be used as fast, economic, simple and sensitive analytical method for the determination of Clopidogrel in bulk powder and pharmaceutical preparations.

 

REFERENCES:

1        Budavari S. "The Merc Index "13 th Ed., pharmacokinetic of Clopidogrel after administration of a a high loading dose. 2011: 856.

2        Gomes Y, Adams E, Hoogmartens J. Analysis of purity in 19 drug product tablets containing Clopidogrel. J. pharma. Biomed. A. 2004: 341-348.

3        Saber AL, Elmosallamy M A , AMLN A A. Liquid chromatography and potentiometric methods for determination of Clopidogrel, Journal of Food and Drug Analysis.16 (2); 2008.

4        Shu-qin L, Jian-wen L, Ji H, Xiao-fan S, Jin S, Zhong-qui H. Determination of the content of the compound Clopidogrel bisulphate tablet by hplc, J. Shen.Pharma. Univ. 25(12); 2008: 983-986.

5        Javed M K, Iqbal Z, Khan A, Shah Y, Ahmed L. Development and validation of HPLC-UV method for the determination of Clopidogrel in pharmaceutical and plasma, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Rela.Techno.34(18); 2011:2118-2129.

6        Petal RB, Shankar M B, Petal M R , Bhatt K K. Simultaneous estimation of acetylsalicylic and Clopidogrel bisulphate in pure powder and tablet formulation by HPLC and HPTLC. J. AOAC. Int. 91(4); 2008: 750-5.

7        Sinha P K, Damel M C, Bothara K G. A validated stability indicating HPTLC method for determination of aspirin and Clopidogrel in combined dosage forms. J. Anal. Chem. 4(2); 2009: 152-160.

8        Yogita Shete N S, Mahajan Y V, Pore R L, Kuchekar B S. Spectrophotometric estimation of Clopidogrelbisulphate in pharmaceutical. Ind. J. Pharma.Sci.7(1); 2009: 216-218.

9        Game M D, Gabhane KB, Sakarkar D M. Quantitative analysis of Clopidogrelbisulphate and aspirin by first derivative spectrophotometric method in tablets. Ind. J. Pharma. Sci. 72(6); 2010: 825-828.

10      Gurav S, Tembare R, Salunkhe V, Senthilkumar G P. Spectrophotometric determination of Clopidogrelbisulphate in pharmaceutical formulations. J. Pharma. Tech. Res. 1(4); 2011: 258-263.

11      Cholke P B, Ahmed ., Chemate S Z, Jadhave K R. Development and validation of spectrophotometric method for Clopidogrelbisulphate in pure and in film coated tablet dosage form, Arch. Appli. Sci. Res. 4(1); 2012: 59-64.

12      Rujput S j, George R K , Ruikar D B. Simultaneous estimation of Clopidogrelbisulphate and aspirin from combined dosage. Ind. J. Pharma. Sci. 70(4); 2008: 450-454.

13      Reist M, Roy M, Montseny J P, Mayer J M, Carrupt, Bergar Y, Testa B. Very slow chiral inversion of Clopidogrel in rats: a pharmaceutical and mechanistic investigation, Drug Metab. Dispos. 28(12); 2000: 1405-10.

14      Lagorce P, Pere Y, Ortiz J, Necciari J, Bressolle F. Assay method for the carboxylic acid in human plasma by gas chromatography – mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed.Sci. Appl., 720(1-2); 1998: 107-17.

15      Fayed A S, Weshahy S A, Shehata M A, Hassan N, Pauwels J, Hogmartens J, Vanschepael A. Separation and determination of Clopidogrel and its impurities by capillary electrophoresis. J. Pharma. Biomed.Anal. 49(2); 2009:193-200.

16      Karazniewicz M, Glowka F, Oszkinis G. Capillary zone electrophoresis method for determination of s-Clopidogrel carboxylic acid metabolite in human plasma and urine designed for biopharmaceutic studies. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.878(13-14); 2010: 1013-8.

17      Dermis S, Aydogan E. Electrochemical study of the antiplatet agent Clopidogrel and its determination using differential pulse voltammetry in bulk form and pharmaceutical preparations with a glassy carbon electrode. Pharmazi. 65(3); 2010: 175-81.

18      Ibrahim S F, Alarfaj N, Aly F. Determination of Clopidogrelbisulphate using Ion-Selective Electrode in bulk, pharmaceutical formulation and in biological fluids. Journal of American science. 8(12); 2012: 276-283.

19      Bratovcic A, Odobasic A, Catic S.The advantages of the use of Ion-Selective potentiometry in relation to UV/VIS spectroscopy. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus.74(3); 2009: 139-142.

20      Sakur A A, Bassmajei M S, Dabbeet H A. Novel Moxifloxacin Ion Selective Electrodes for Potentiometric Determination of Moxifloxacin in Pure Form and Pharmaceutical Formulations. International Journal of Academic Scientific Research (IJASR).3(4); 2015: 66-75.

21      Reynolds J E, Josowicz M, Vegh R B, Solntsev KM. Spectral and Redox Properties of the GFP Synthetic Chromophores as a Function of pH in buffered media. Chemical Communications.49(71); 2013:7788-90.

22      Haroun M, Nashed D, Sakur A A, New electrochemical methods for the determination of Prasugrel using ion selective membranes, International Journal of Academic and Scientific Research. 2017; 5(3):30-36.

23      Moody G J, Nassory NS, Thomas JDR. Interference studies on a PVC-matrix membrane calcium ion- selective electrodes based on calcium bis-di[4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylputyl)phenyl] phosphate as electode and tri-n-pentyl phosphate as solvent mediator. Talanta. 26(9); 1979: pp. 873-879.

24      Mandil H, Sakur A A, Nasser B. New Ion Selective Electrode for Potentiometric Determination of Gatifloxacin in Pure Form and Pharmaceutical Formulations. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (IJPPS).5(2); 2013: 423-42.

25      Umezawa Y, Bühlmann P, Umezawa K, Tohda K, Amemiya S. Potentiometric selectivity coefficients of ion-selective electrodes part I. inorganic cations (technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 72(10);2000: 1851-2082

26      Thomas J D R. Devices for ion-sensing and pX measurement. Pure Appl. Chem.73(1); 2001: 31-38).

27      Rapid and accurate determination of Clopidogrel in tablet by using spectrophotometric and chromatographic techniques.

28      Meier PC, Zünd R E. Statistical Methods in Analytical Chemistry. Wiley-Interscience publication, New York.2000; 2nd ed.

 

 

 

 

Received on 29.12.2017           Modified on 25.01.2018

Accepted on 15.03.2018          © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(5):2017-2021.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00374.8