Separation, Characterization and quantification of Impurities and Identification of stress degradants of Cabazitaxel by RP-HPLC and LC-ESI-MS techniques

 

S. Hemchand1*, R. Ravi Chandra Babu1, Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna2

1GITAM Institute of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, India

2Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis & Quality Assurance, GITAM Institute of Pharmacy,

GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: hemchand.suryadevara@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Cabazitaxel is a natural taxoid used to treat prostate cancer in advanced stage. The authors have separated and identified seven impurities of Cabazitaxel using RP-HPLC and LC-MS techniques. Gradient mode was chosen for the separation of impurities in presence of Cabazitaxel and the method was validated as per the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. The impurities were quantified in the present study and the plausible degradation path was also proposed. Stress degradation studies were performed and the degradants obtained were characterized with the help of mass spectra. Shimadzu HPLC prominence coupled with MS Spectrometry (THERMO) with Sunfire C18 column (100x 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm particle size) was used for performing the chromatographic separation with0.05% formic acid and acetonitrile mixture as mobile phase with flow rate 1.0 ml/min.The injection volume 10µL and wavelength was monitored at 220 nm). The method was applied to the pharmaceutical formulation to study the suitability of the method. The method is very much useful for the pharmacokinetic studies as well as the metabolites study in vitro and in vivo of cancer patients.

 

KEYWORDS: Cabazitaxel, RP-HPLC, Stability indicating, Impurities, Validation, LC-ESI-MS.

 


INTRODUCTION:

Cabazitaxel is an anti-cancer drug used for the treatment of prostate cancer1. Cabazitaxel was approved by US FDA2 in June 2010. European Medicines Agency3 also approved Cabazitaxel to use in combination with prednisone for the patients who are resistant to docetaxel treatment. Cabazitaxelis 15-[((1R,2S)-1-hydroxy-2-((1,1-dimethylethyloxy) carbonylamino-2-phenyl ethyl) carbonyl oxy]-(1S,2S,4S,7R,9S,10S,12R,15S)-1-hydroxy-9,12-dimethoxy-10,14,17,17-tetramethyl-4-(methylcarbonyloxy)-11-oxo-2-(phenylcarbonyloxy)-6-oxa tetracyclo [11.3.1.03,10.04,7] heptadec-13-ene and has molecular weight 835.93 g/mol with molecular formula C45H57NO14.It binds and stabilizes tubulin where microtubular inhibition results due to de-polymerization and cell division and thereby arrests the cell cycle.

 

Many researchers had worked on Cabazitaxel previously for its quantitative determination using HPLC4-10 and mass spectral techniques in human plasma11-12 and in rat whole blood13. At present the authors have proposed a new stability indicating liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method as well as LC-MS technique for the determination of Cabazitaxel along with seven impurities. The authors also characterized the degradants products formed during the stress degradation studies using LC-MS data and compared with the known impurities for confirmation. Shimadzu HPLC prominence coupled with MS Spectrometry (Thermo) with Sunfire C18 column (100 x 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm particle size) was used for the chromatographic study. 0.05% formic acid and acetonitrile mixture was chosen as mobile phase and the system was operated on gradient mode with flow rate 1.0 ml/min.The injection volume was 10µL and detection wavelength was 220 nm. Cabazitaxel was subjected to stress degradation studies and the degradant products were analyzed using mass spectroscopy. Impurities (I - VII) were separated on gradient mode and characterized using mass spectroscopy. Cabazitaxel and its seven impurities were quantified and the method was validated (ICH guidelines) 14-16. The chemical structures of Cabazitaxel and its seven impurities were given in Figure 1.


 

 

 

Cabazitaxel

Impurity I - (2R,3S) N-BOC-Phenyl isoserine

 

 

Impurity II

(4S,5R) -3-Tert-butoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyl-4-phenyl- 

5-oxazolidine carboxylic acid

Impurity III – 10-Deacetyl baccatin–III

 

(1S,2S,4S,7R,9S,10S,12R,15S,)-1,9,12,15-tetrahydroxy- 10,14,17,17-tetramethyl-4-(methylcarbonyloxy)-11)-oxo-2-(phenylcarbonyloxy)-6-oxa tetra cyclo [11.3.1.03,10.04,7] heptadec-13-ene

 

 

Impurity IV – Free amine

 

(2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-12b-acetoxy-9-(((2R,3S)-3-amino-2-hydroxy-3-phenyl propanoyl) oxy)-11-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a, 3 ,4, 4a, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12a, 12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methano cyclodeca [3,4] benzo [1,2-b]oxet-12-yl benzoate

 

Impurity V – 7,10-Diethoxy-10-DAB-III

 

(1S,2S,4S,7R,9S,10S,12R,15S)-1,15-dihydroxy-9,12-dimethoxy-10,14,17,17-tetramethyl-4- (methylcarbonyloxy)-11)-oxo-2-(phenylcarbonyloxy)-6-oxa tetra cyclo [11.3.1.03,10.04,7] heptadec-13-ene

 

 

Impurity VI – Coupled product

 

(4S,5R)-5-((2aR,4S,4aS,6R,9S,11S,12S,12bS)-12b-acetoxy-12-(benzoyloxy)-11-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9,10,11,12,12a,12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methanocyclodeca[3,4]benzo[1,2-b]oxet-9-yl)3-tert-butyl2,2-dimethyl-4-phenyl oxazolidine-3,5-dicarboxylate

Impurity VII –Docetaxel anhydrous

 

(2aR,4S,4aS,6R,11S,12S,12bS)-12b-acetoxy-9-(((2R,3R)-3- ((tertbutoxy carbonyl) amino)-2-hydroxy-3-phenyl propanoyl) oxy)-4,6,11-trihydroxy-4a,8,13,13-tetramethyl-5-oxo-2a,3,4,4a,5,6,9, 10, 11,12,12a,12b-dodecahydro-1H-7,11-methano cyclodeca [3,4] benzo[1,2-b]oxet-12-yl benzoate

Figure 1: Chemical structures of Cabazitaxel and its seven Impurities (I-VII)


MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Cabazitaxel API (Active pharmaceutical ingredient) and its seven impurities were procured from Dr. Reddy’s Labs (Hyderabad, India) and used as it is without further purification.HPLC grade acetonitrile, formic acid, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide and 30% w/v hydrogen peroxide were purchased from Merck and Milli-Q water from Millipore system was used.Cabazitaxel stock solution spiked with its seven impurities (I-VII) were prepared in acetonitrile and stored.

 

Chromatographic conditions

Cabazitaxel and its impurities were quantified using Shimadzu HPLC prominence Model coupled with MS Spectrometry (Thermo) with X-Caliber software. Mass detector (Ion trap mass detector) with Electrospray ionization (both positive and negative modes) maintaining capillary temperature 250 °C (Spray/Source voltage (kV): 4.5; Sheath gas flow (Arb): 30.00; Aux/Sweep gas flow (Arb): 5.00). Sunfire C18 column (100 x 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm particle size) was employed and 0.05% formic acid and acetonitrile mixture was used as mobile phase with injection volume 10µL. The system was operated on gradient mode with flow rate 1.0 ml/min monitoring wavelength at 220 nm. Column temperature:25°C and that of the solutions at 15°C.

 

Method validation14

Series ofCabazitaxel(0 - 300 µg/mL) solutions spiked along with its sevenimpurities (I-VII) were prepared and10 µl of each mixture was injected in to the HPLC system and the system was operated on gradient mode. Thepeak area and thereby the average peak area (n=3) was calculated from the resulting chromatograms and calibration curve wasdrawn using mean peak area on the y-axis and the concentration of the analyte on the x-axis. Precision studies (n=6) were performed for the mixture containing Cabazitaxeland its seven impurities (I-VII) and the % RSD of the mean peak area was determined. Accuracy study was performed for Cabazitaxel and its seven impurities (i.e. 50%, 100% and 150%). Robustness was also performed by varying flow rate (0.2 ml/min), organic phase ratio (5%) and column temperature (5°C).

 

Stress degradation studies15

Cabazitaxel was exposed to different stress conditions and the fate of the drug was studied with the help of mass spectra.Basic hydrolysis was performed by treating Cabazitaxel with 0.005 N NaOHfor 22 hours at room temperature in dark place where as acidic hydrolysis was performed with 0.5 N HCl for 24 hours at room temperature in dark place. Both acid hydrolyzed and base hydrolyzed drug samples were neutralized before injecting in to the HPLC system. Oxidationwas conducted by treating the drug with 10% H2O2for 24 hours at room temperature in dark place. Photolysis was conducted by exposing the drug for 1.2 million lux hours and 200 watt hr/sq. meter and thermal degradation was conducted by heating the drug at 60°c for 9 days in a Petri dish.

 

Experimental application to Cabazitaxel injection

Cabazitaxel injectionis available (60 mg/1.5 ml) with brand names Cabapan (Heet Healthcare Pvt Limited), Jevtana (Dheer Healthcare Ltd; Nexus LifecarePvt Ltd), Kabanat (Shubham Pharmaceuticals). Three different brands were procured, extracted with acetonitrile and then diluted with mobile phase as per the requirement. The percentage purity of Cabazitaxel was determined using the proposed method.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Specific and sensitive stability indicating HPLC andLC-ESI-MSmethods wereestablishedfor the quantification of Cabazitaxel and its seven impurities on gradient mode using formic acid and acetonitrile mixture. The reported methods in the literature were discussed and compared with the presentin Table 1.

 

Table.1. Evaluation of reported liquid chromatographic methods with the present study

Mobile phase (v/v)

λ

(nm)

Linearity

(mg/ml)

Method

Ref.

Acetonitrile:  phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) (70:30)

230

0.1-150

HPLC

4

Methanol:  0.1% ortho phosphoric acid (80: 20)

210

0.1-200

HPLC

5

Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile

230

0.025-1.5

Impurities

6

Acetonitrile: sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.0) (30:70)

210

0.1-150

HPLC

7

Acetonitrile: tetra butyl ammonium hydrogen sulphate (70 : 30)

231

0.1–150

HPLC

8

Methanol:  tetra butyl ammonium hydrogen sulphate(70: 30)

210

0.1-200

HPLC

9

Methanol: Sodium acetate buffer (80 : 20)

234

0.1-200

HPLC

10

Ammonium hydroxide: methanol (83:17)

275

2-20

Human plasma LC-MS

11

Acetonitrile: Ammonium formate

362

0.01-0.1

Human plasma LC-MS

12

Acetonitrile: Ammonium acetate (80:20)

236

2.49-99.6

Rat blood (dry blood spots)            

(LC-MS/MS)

13

0.05% Formic acid: Acetonitrile (Gradient mode)

220

0-300

HPLC and LC-ESI-MS

& Seven Impurities

Present work

 


Method optimization

The RP-HPLC method was optimized using 0.05% formic acid and acetonitrile mixture as mobile phase with flow rate 1.0 ml/min on gradient mode(Table 2) for the determination of Cabazitaxel and its seven impurities. The optimized chromatographic conditions were shown in Table 3. Cabazitaxelwas eluted at 8.712 ± 0.05 min along with its seven impurities(Figure 2). The individual chromatograms of the impurities (I-VII) were shown in Figure 3.

 

Table. 2. Gradient program of Cabazitaxel

Time (min)

% Mobile phase A

% Mobile phase B

Initial (0.01)

80

20

2.0

65

35

5.0

50

50

8.0

15

85

11

10

90

13

80

20

16

80

20

Table. 3. Optimized chromatographic conditions of Cabazitaxel

Column

Sun fire C18, 100 x 4.6 mm, 3.5 mm particle

Detector

UV detector

Mobile phase

Mobile phase A: 0.05% HCOOH in water

Mobile phase B: Acetonitrile

Mobile phase program

Gradient  mode

Flow rate

1.0 mL/min

Detection Wavelength

220 nm

Column Temperature

25°C

Sample Temperature

15°C

Injection volume

10 µL

Diluent

Acetonitrile: water (80: 20)

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Figure 2: Characteristic chromatogram of A) Blank B) Cabazitaxel (Rt8.713 min) C) Cabazitaxel (Rt 8.712 min) with its impurities


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3: Representative chromatograms of Impurities (I-VII) and Blank


Method validation

Cabazitaxelhas shown linearity 0-300 µg/mL (Table 4) with linear regression equation 2813.6x-122.02 (R2 = 0.9999) (Figure 4) with % RSD range 0.29-0.94. The linear regression equations of the impurities of Cabazitaxel were shown in Table 5. The % RSD in precision study (n=6) of Cabazitaxel and its impurities was less than 2 confirming that the method is precise (Table 6) and the corresponding chromatograms obtained during the precision study were shown in Figure 5. The percentage recovery of Cabazitaxel and its impurities in accuracy study was shown in Table 7.The % RSD in robustness study of Cabazitaxel and its impurities was less than 2 informing that the method is robust (Table 8) and the corresponding chromatograms obtained during the robustness study were shown in Figure 6.

 

Table. 4. Linearity of Cabazitaxel

Conc. (mg/ml)

*Mean peak area

RSD (%)

0

0

0.29

5

14265

0.35

20

56284

0.47

37.5

106146

0.35

75

213079

0.57

112.5

318523

0.94

150

415391

0.83

225

659215

0.75

300

848542

0.64

*Mean of three replicates

Table. 5.Linearity ofimpurities of Cabazitaxel

Impurity

Regression equation

(Correlation coefficient, r2)

I

Y = 1629.6 x + 4936.2 (0.9992)

II

Y = 2018 x + 9503.3 (0.9993)

III

Y = 966.04 x + 2528 (0.999)

IV

Y = 1999.1 x + 781.77 (0.9998)

V

Y = 2539 x + 9458.8 (0.9995)

VI

Y = 1227.1 x + 322.38 (0.9996)

VII

Y = 2009 x + 3573.7 (0.9999)

 

 

 

Figure 4: Calibration curve of Cabazitaxel

 


 

Table. 6. Precision study of Cabazitaxel and its impurities

Impurities

 / Drug

Retention time (min) / Peak area / Theoretical plates (Figure 5)

*Mean peak area ± SD (%RSD)

1 (A)

2 (B)

3 (C)

4 (D)

5 (E)

6 (F)

I

2.809

2.814

2.81

2.813

2.811

2.803

142964.5 ± 2208.430642 (1.545)

141126

140791

142830

145739

145603

141698

15343.576

13882.036

14692.368

13151.873

15298.252

5234.481

II

4.302

4.299

4.294

4.299

4.298

4.294

215336.6667 ± 2967.541384 (1.378)

211447

213165

214520

215698

219633

217557

27056.555

26800.334

28406.057

26475.36

26787.453

28664.876

III

5.94

5.93

5.922

5.931

5.933

5.925

105019.1667 ± 1533.300938 (1.889)

105438

102684

104411

106503

106767

104312

32151.273

31281.199

30791.995

30531.203

31508.861

32131.726

IV

6.414

6.412

6.407

6.408

6.41

6.404

154465.3333 ± 2666.679708 (1.726)

155010

151205

158634

153696

155916

152331

45903.405

47099.344

44881.397

48385.653

48454.409

46381.359

V

7.734

7.733

7.73

7.731

7.733

7.725

183175.1667 ± 3207.670271 (1.751)

186259

187648

180372

182432

179515

182825

93411.006

89041.025

97157.477

96519.049

92271.569

91204.197

VI

8.194

8.189

8.184

8.189

8.19

8.18

90076.1667 ± 1400.395432 (1.555)

90238

90186

90350

92326

89280

88077

86326.921

83133.742

86489.711

87767.769

85109.1

85968.412

Cabazitaxel

8.732

8.732

8.731

8.732

8.734

8.724

212773.3333 ± 2866.47579 (1.347)

215967

211862

215525

211774

213339

208173

123398.05

124401.16

127519.58

129470.47

128868.58

127135.97

VII

10.611

10.614

10.616

10.616

10.617

10.604

144285.5 ± 1110.19093 (0.769)

143716

142906

143384

145229

145694

144784

110904.76

103704.84

103926.16

107849

104158.14

107393.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 5: Characteristic chromatograms of Cabazitaxel and its Impurities (I-VII) during precision study

 

 


Table. 7. Accuracy study of Cabazitaxel and its impurities

Sample Name

(Impurities/ Drug)

% Recovery

50%

100%

150%

I

93.2 ± 1.34

101.1 ± 0.2

99.2 ± 0.3

II

99.1 ± 1.18

98.7 ± 1.6

101.4 ± 0.7

III

95.6 ± 1.23

98.9 ± 1.7

98.9 ± 2.8

IV

100.2 ± 0.91

100.1 ± 0.9

101.3 ± 1.9

V

99.3 ± 1.18

101.5 ± 0.5

99.8 ± 1.8

VI

97.2 ± 0.88

100.9 ± 1.3

98.9 ± 0.7

Cabazitaxel

99.5 ± 0.89

99.8 ± 0.91

99.6 ± 0.9

VII

98.17 ± 1.52

99.9 ± 1.4

99.8 ± 2.1

 


 

 

 

 

Table. 8. Robustness study of Cabazitaxel (150 mg/ml)and its impurities (I-VII)

Parameter

Condition

Retention time (min) / Mean peak area / Theoretical plates / (% RSD)

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

Cabazitaxel

VII

Flow rate (± 0.1 ml/min)

0.8

3.225

183309

12790.899

(0.51)

4.923

231212

28351.943

(0.45)

6.814

109755

34286.024

(0.96)

7.121

190466

61646.476

(0.59)

8.293

198485

98838.779

(0.52)

8.925

102442

89233.545

(0.50)

9.310

264868

123863.642

(0.99)

11.412

172605

100482.543

(0.83)

1.0

2.822

298059

13936.835

(0.63)

4.314

365564

27174.953

(0.78)

5.951

173713

32463.611

(0.54)

6.427

301875

49010.728

(0.45)

7.743

384054

95454.391

(0.74)

8.192

189155

87034.916

(0.29)

8.742

440391

127218.226

(0.87)

10.625

298288

102318.772

(0.51)

1.2

2.470

143800

12350.068

(0.55)

3.860

179055

24919.761

(0.69)

5.384

90460

29032.314

(0.65)

5.873

154842

41081.938

(0.82)

7.325

214298

89081.878

(0.65)

7.694

93607

85987.064

(0.86)

8.322

211456

135146.161

(0.96)

10.069

146528

114800.110

(0.39)

Mobile phase ratio

Formic acid: acetonitrile (± 5 %, v/v)

Organic phase

5 % less

3.470

174206

29658.879

(0.46)

5.119

217508

36595.893

(0.71)

6.791

102477

47747.904

(0.81)

7.191

180140

78133.198

(0.94)

8.258

186336

127026.549

(0.26)

8.760

99723

106401.682

(0.69)

9.198

265059

139191.920

(0.81)

11.566

178926

85933.619

(0.44)

 

2.822

298059

13936.835

(0.39)

4.314

365564

27174.953

(0.38)

5.951

173713

32463.611

(0.69)

6.427

301875

49010.728

(0.87)

7.743

384054

95454.391

(0.89)

8.192

189155

87034.916

(0.75)

8.742

440391

127218.226

(0.57)

10.625

298288

102318.772

(0.54)

Organic phase

5 % more

2.124

47282

8397.571
(0.45)

3.592

177614

20086.107

(0.85)

5.156

89779

23598.848

(0.72)

5.528

159623

35309.715

(0.39)

7.114

202099

64437.475

(0.67)

7.562

91819

70904.063

(0.53)

8.230

210175

113844.339

(0.39)

9.903

142004

133939.318

(0.55)

Column temperature

20°C

2.812

151332

5513.884

(0.69)

4.294

185225

26572.816

(0.91)

5.922

91970

30025.343

(0.62)

6.406

160169

44788.192

(0.65)

7.731

189545

95699.351

(0.37)

8.185

90775

86939.470

(0.23)

8.733

213183

124171.636

(0.88

10.617

144298

108752.283

(0.25)

 

25°C

2.822

298059

13936.835

(0.53)

4.314

365564

27174.953

(0.78)

5.951

173713

32463.611

(0.49)

6.427

301875

49010.728

(0.83)

7.743

384054

95454.391

(0.59)

8.192

189155

87034.916

(0.22)

8.742

440391

127218.226

(0.89)

10.625

298288

102318.772

(0.35)

30°C

2.807

174480

13991.629

(0.62)

4.291

211963

26784.160

(0.76)

5.917

107593

31225.093

(0.97)

6.404

177507

45246.812

(0.56)

7.727

212852

95939.553

(0.51)

8.150

109164

83299.702

(0.34)

8.727

255749

130084.999

(0.64)

10.613

173535

100468.804

(0.26)

 


Assay of Cabazitaxel

Two different brands of Cabazitaxel formulations were analyzed using both RP-HPLC and LC-ESI-MS methods. Cabazitaxel has shown 99.34-100.05 purity during the assay for the wo brands available in India. The excipients did not interfere with the drug peak.

 


 

 

                                 

 

0.8 ml/min

1.2 ml/min

 

 

Organic phase 5 % less

Organic phase 5 % more

 

 

Column temperature at 20°C

Column temperature at 30°C

Figure 6: Characteristic chromatograms of Cabazitaxel and its Impurities (I-VII) during robustness study

 

 


Stress degradation studies of Cabazitaxel

Liquid Chromatographic (RP-HPLC) study

Cabazitaxel and it seven impurities were analyzed using both RP-HPLC and LC-ESI-MS techniques(Total run time of 16 min). Cabazitaxel was eluted at about 8.738 ± 0.05 min in all stress degradation studies. During acidic hydrolysis twodegradant products(DP) were eluted at 2.819 (DP-1) and 9.409 min in the HPLC chromatogram (Figure 7) and during the base hydrolysis study three DPs were observed in the chromatogram at 2.820, 5.932 and 6.429 min. No degradants were marked in oxidation but more than 38% of the drug has undergone degradation andduring photolysis a small DP was observed at 8.978 min. Except oxidation in all the degradation studies less than 15 % of the drug has undergone degradation (Table 9) and the system suitability parameters were within the acceptable criteria. So therefore the mass spectral study was done further to characterize the degradant products.

 


 

Table. 9. Stress degradation studies of Cabazitaxel (RP-HPLC)

Stress conditions

*Mean peak area

Rt (min)

Degradant peaks (DP) (min)

*(%) Drug recovered

* (%) Drug decomposed

Theoretical

Plates of drug

Theoretical

Plates of DPs

Cabazitaxel

7929456

8.713

-

100

-

129173.970

-

Acidic hydrolysis

7046233

8.738

2.819

9.409

88.86

11.14

118576.979

19952.843

95407.050

Base hydrolysis

7484079

8.735

2.820

5.932

6.429

94.38

5.62

110418.160

19704.216

29939.093

49887.951

Oxidation

4840188

8.734

-

61.04

38.96

120039.686

-

Photolysis

7033047

8.740

8.978

88.69

11.31

115538.741

 

149954.350

Thermal degradation

7819540

8.737

-

98.61

1.39

113653.970

-

 

 

Acid blank

Acid hydrolysis

 

 

Base blank

Base hydrolysis

 

 

Oxidation blank (H2O2)

Oxidation

 

 

Photolysis

Thermal degradation

Figure 7: Characteristic chromatograms of Cabazitaxel during stress degradation studies (RP-HPLC)

 


Liquid Chromatography-Mass spectrophotometric (LC-MS) study

The LC-MS study was further continued to characterize the DPs observed during the degradation studies. All the stress degraded drug mixturesused for the liquid chromatographic study were introduced in to the LC-MS system and the study was continued. The LC-MS chromatogram for the blank solution was shown Figure 8.

 

During the acid hydrolysis the LC-ESI-MS chromatogram (Figure 9)so obtained has shown degradant peaks at 2.83-2.88 (DP-1) and 8.75-8.80 min (Cabazitaxel) and the mass spectra has shown base peaks at m/z values 735.92 and 836.02 respectively(Figure 10).The degradant product DP-1 observed during the acidic hydrolysis has the same retention time as that of Impurity-I eluted at 2.772 min and from the mass spectra it was confirmed that the Impurity I is nothing but the degradant product DP-1. The schematic degradation pathway was shown in Scheme 1 below.

 

During the alkaline hydrolysis the LC-ESI-MS chromatogram (Figure 11) so obtained has shown degradant peaks at 2.886 (DP-1), 5.99 (DP-2), 6.51 min (DP-3) and 8.75-8.88 min (Cabazitaxel) and the mass spectra was shown in Figure 12. The DP2 and DP-3 observed have the same retention time as that of Impurity III and Impurity IV which were confirmed from their mass spectral data. During oxidation and thermal degradation no degradant was seen and therefore mass spectra was not studied.

 

During the photolysis the LC-ESI-MS chromatogram (Figure 13) so obtained has shown degradant peaks at 2.886 (DP-1), 5.99 (DP-2), 6.51 min (DP-3) and 8.75-8.88 min (Cabazitaxel) and the mass spectra was shown in Figure 13. During oxidation and thermal degradation no degradant was seen and therefore mass spectra was not studied.


 

Figure 8: LC-MS Chromatogram of blank

 

Figure 9: LC-ESI-MS chromatogram of Cabazitaxel during acidic hydrolysis

 

 

 

 

Figure 10: LC-ESI-MS chromatogram and Mass spectra of Cabazitaxel during acidic hydrolysis

(Mass spectra of Cabazitaxel (Rt 8.75 min) and DP-1 (Rt 2.83-2.88 min)

 

 

 

Scheme 1: Degradation pathway of Cabazitaxel

 

Figure 11: LC-ESI-MS chromatogram and Mass spectra of Cabazitaxel during base hydrolysis

(Mass spectra of DP-1 at Rt 2.86 min)

 

 

 

Figure 12: LC-ESI-MS chromatogram and Mass spectra of Cabazitaxel during base hydrolysis

(Mass spectra of DP-2 at Rt 5.99 min and DP-3 at Rt 6.51 min)

 

 

 

 

Figure 13: LC-MS chromatogram and Mass spectra of Cabazitaxel during photolysis

(Mass spectra of Cabazitaxel at 8.77 min and DP-4 at Rt 8.98-9.03 min)

 

 


Specificity

Specificity of the method was verified by stress degradation studies. Cabazitaxel peak was not at all interfering with the degradants observed during acidic, alkaline, oxidation, photolysis and thermal degradation studies. The resolution was >2, tailing factor was <1.5 and the theoretical plates were >2000 confirming that the system suitability parameters were satisfied for the HPLC method.

 

CONCLUSIONS:

A new validated stability indicating RP-HPLC method and LC-ESI-MS method were developed for the determination ofCabaitaxeland its seven impurities (I – VII). Three degradant products i.e. DP-1, DP-2 and DP-3 were obtained during the stress degradation studies and they are identical with the Impurities I, III and IV respectively. The mass balance data supported the degradation study and the characterization of the impurities.Theproposed methods werevalidated as per ICH guidelines and found to be sensitiveand specific.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are grateful to Dr. Reddy’s Labs (Hyderabad, India)and Shubham Pharmaceuticalsfor providing the gift samples of Cabazitaxel and its process impurities. The authors have no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Oudard S, TROPIC: Phase III trial of Cabazitaxel for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, Future Oncology. 7; 2011: 497-506.

2.       Jevtana (cabazitaxel) Injection Approved by U.S. FDA After Priority Review (Press release). sanofi-aventis. 2010-06-17. Retrieved June 17, 2010.

3.       Assessment Report for Jevtana (Cabazitaxel), Procedure No.: EMEA/H/C/002018, European Medicines Agency, London, 2011.

4.       Mathrusri Annapurna M, Pramadvara K, Venkatesh B, Sowjanya G. Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the determination of Cabazitaxel. Indo-American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.  3(11); 2013: 9262-9269.

5.       Mathrusri Annapurna M, Venkatesh B, Supriya GN. A validated stability-indicating liquid chromatographic method for determination of Cabazitaxel - a novel microtubule inhibitor.  Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability.  6(4); 2014: 134-138.

6.       Chengyan Li, Gongjian Lan, Jinyuan Jiang, Mingjie Sun, Taijun Hang. Development and validation of a stability-indicating HPLC method for the determination of the impurities in Cabazitaxel. Chromatographia.  78; 2015: 825-831.

7.       Mathrusri Annapurna M, Venkatesh B, Pramadvara K, Hemchand S. Development and validation of a stability-indicating liquid chromatographic method for the assay of Cabazitaxel. Chemical Science Transactions. 3(2); 2014:854-860.

8.       Venkatesh B, Mathrusri Annapurna M, Pramadvara K. Analytical stress degradation studies of Cabazitaxel (a semi synthetic natural taxoid) using liquid chromatography. Pharmaceutical Methods. 6(3); 2015:137-142.

9.       Mathrusri Annapurna Mukthinuthalapati, Venkatesh Bukkapatnam, Sunkara Mrunal Chaitanya. Determination of Cabazitaxel (an anti-prostate cancer agent) by reverse phase liquid chromatography. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 10(4); 2017: 1138-1144.

10.     Mathrusri Annapurna Mukthinuthalapati, Venkatesh Bukkapatnam, A new validated RP-HPLC method for the quantification of Cabazitaxel - an anticancer plant product. Science Spectrum.  2(1); 2017: 31-38.

11.     Kort A, Hillebrand MJX, Cirkel GA, Voest EE, Schinkel AH, Rosing H, Schellen JHM, Beijnen JH. Quantification of Cabazitaxel, its metabolite docetaxel and the determination of the demethylated metabolites RPR112698 and RPR123142 as docetaxel equivalents in human plasma by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B. 925; 2013:117-123.

12.     Peter de Bruijn, Anne-Joy M de Graan, AnnemiekeNieuweboer, Ron HJ Mathijssen, Mei-Ho Lam, Ronald de Wit, Erik, AC Wiemer, Walter J Loos. Quantification of Cabazitaxel in human plasma by liquid chromatography/ triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry: a practical solution for non-specific binding. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 59; 2012: 117–122.

13.     Jagannath Patro1 V, Nageshwara Rao R, Tripathy NK.  LC-MS/MS determination of Cabazitaxel in rat whole blood on dry blood Spots. Open Access Scientific Reports. 1; 2012: 1-4.

14.     ICH Q2 (R1) Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology (2005).

15.     ICH Q1A (R2) Stability testing of new drug substances and products (2003).

16.     ICH Q3A (R2) Impurities in new drug substances (2006).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 29.08.2018          Modified on 12.09.2018

Accepted on 04.10.2018        © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(10): 4683-4698.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00857.0