Using SSNTD Technique to Assess Radon Flux Density in Liquid Cleaning Materials Samples Available in Iraqi Pharmacies and Markets
Ali Abid Abojassim1*, Hussien Abid Ali Bakir1, Mokhalad Ali Zbalh2, Ban Ali Al-Ruwaishidi1
1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Kufa, Al-Najaf, Iraq
2Genetic engineering Department, Biotechnology College, Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon, Iraq
*Corresponding Author E-mail: ali.alhameedawi@uokufa.edu.iq
ABSTRACT:
In this study, thirty samples of cleaning materials (liquid) were collected from the local pharmacies and markets of Al-Najaf government to assess radium content and radon flux density (radon exhalation rate) using LR-115 Type II technique. These samples were divided into six groups according to country of origin (i.e. Iraq, Turkey, Jordon, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other countries). The results demonstrate that, the average of radium content in six groups (Iraq, Turkey, Jordon, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other counties) were 55.22±0.29 Bq/kg, 56.15±0.37 Bq/kg, 32.38±0.37 Bq/kg, 27.28±0.63 Bq/kg, 60.34±0.73 Bq/kg and 41.90±0.23 Bq/kg respectively. The average values of radon flux density were 9.24±0.25 μBq/m2.h, 11.00±0.31 μBq/m2.h, 6.06±0.31 μBq/m2.h, 4.55±0.59 μBq/m2.h,11.17±0.64 μBq/m2.h and 7.33±0.20 μBq/m2.h respectively. All values of radium content and radon flux density in the study samples were found to be less than the allowed the values of 57.600 mBq/m2.h and 370 Bq/kg published by UNSCEAR and OECD.
KEYWORDS: Radium content, Radon exhalation rates, cleaning material and LR-115 Type II detector.
INTRODUCTION:
The highest percentage of human radiation exposure comes from the naturally existed sources. These include terrestrial and extra-terrestrial sources. The origin of the extraterrestrial radiation is the outer space as cosmic rays that reach the atmosphere. However, terrestrial ones are coming from radioactive nuclei exits in trace amounts across the earth's crust which includes soils and rocks. The types of radiations that emitted from those nuclei can be transferred to human beings either via food chains or by inhalation causing deposition of energy within tissues. In this context, people are always exposing to ionizing radiation from naturally occurring radioactive sources [1].
Alpha-emitting radioactive sources are harmful elements to human being because of their high energy. The alpha particles are able to cause damage to normal tissues of different organs through chemical and toxicity effects [2]. The radon as a short lived decay product is responsible for most of the radiation hazards after it has been taken inhalation. The radon inhalation hazard results from that it’s emitted alpha particles trapped in the lung and depositing their energies in the tissue, causing a higher damage than that of beta particles or gamma-rays. The cancer of lung and skin, and kidney diseases are the resulted health effects that attributed to radon-decay products inhalation [3]. Radium-226 and the corresponding radon-222 mainly originated from the naturally occurring uranium-238, that is existed in every types of rocks, building materials and soils in form of parts per million (ppm). The uranium content world average in the earth’s crust is estimated to be around 4 ppm. The Radium element is being a member of uranium radioactive series, is present elsewhere in the earth’s crust; hence, radon, which is the daughter of radium, is also presents everywhere but in different levels [4]. Knowledge about the level of the radioactivity in cleaning materials enables people to be aware of any possible radiation hazard resulting from the use of consuming such materials. In the light of the aforementioned facts, it is therefore, necessary to evaluate the radioactivity in some types of cleaning materials. Measuring of radon concentration and radon exhalation rates of liquid materials is a key in the radiation protection field. Environmental effects of cleaning agents are caused by chemical compounds in cleaning products. Cleaning agents may be bioactive with an effect that is ranging from mild to severe. Endocrine disruptors have been linked to cleaning agents [5,6]. Green cleaning can be considered as an approach to address the problems associated with traditional cleaning materials. [7-11]. In the present study, radium content and radon exhalation rates from different liquid cleaning materials commonly used in Iraqi were assessed using solid state nuclear track detectors (LR-115 Type II).
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Thirty of liquid cleaning material samples were collected from different pharmacies and markets in Iraq. These samples were divided in to six groups according to country of mad as shown in Table (1).
Experimental setup:
A LR-115 type II detector with a (12 μm) thickness was used to measure radium content and radon exhalation rates in the samples of liquid cleaning material. Every sample was placed inside a plastic cylindrical container with 7 cm length and 3.5 cm radius in a position that face the track detector. The same weight of the sample was placed in an emanation chamber, which then closed for a period of four weeks in order to reach a state of equilibrium between radium and radon. The dimensions of each detector were 1×1 cm2 and placed in the upper part of each containers (cylinder cover), while the samples placed the container floor and then sealed for 30 days exposure. After that, the LR-115 detector was etched in a sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution of (2.5) normality. This solution was prepared by dissolving 40 g of NaOH in 0.4 L of distilled water. After preparing the etching solution using magnetic stirrer, it was kept for 24 h to reach the homogeneity state. During this time, the detectors were carefully removed from the containers and, if possible, to maintain the surface of the detectors free of scratches. Next, detectors were placed in NaOH solution at the water bath locking it‘s temperature at (60 C°) for 90 minutes. Lastly, the detectors were removed from the solution and washed extensively by distilled water and then dried by soft papers. The numbers of tracks per unit area of detector were then counted using a 400X magnification power optical microscope (HDCE-50B Digital Camera, System Microscope N-120A).
Table 1. Samples of liquid cleaning materials used in this study
|
No. |
Country |
Sample Type |
Sample Name |
Sample code |
|
|
1 |
Iraq |
Dishwasher |
Al-Ammer |
I1 |
|
|
2 |
Dishwasher |
Al-Wazir |
I2 |
||
|
3 |
Dishwasher |
Al-Yakuet |
I3 |
||
|
4 |
Dishwasher |
Rand |
I4 |
||
|
6 |
Dishwasher |
Dina |
I5 |
||
|
7 |
Chlorine detergent |
Fas |
I6 |
||
|
8 |
Turkey |
Dishwasher |
Cif |
T1 |
|
|
9 |
Shampoo |
Ipek |
T2 |
||
|
11 |
Shampoo |
Nono |
T3 |
||
|
12 |
Shampoo |
Vinos |
T4 |
||
|
13 |
Shampoo |
Fax |
T5 |
||
|
14 |
Jordon |
Dishwasher |
Al-Jazira |
J1 |
|
|
15 |
Dishwasher |
Al-Emlaq |
J2 |
||
|
16 |
Dishwasher |
Tauri |
J3 |
||
|
17 |
Chlorine detergent |
Flash |
J4 |
||
|
18 |
Cloth washer |
Lara |
J5 |
||
|
19 |
Saudi Arabia |
Dishwasher |
Fairy |
SA1 |
|
|
20 |
Shampoo |
Pert(Plus) |
SA2 |
||
|
21 |
Shampoo |
Head&Shoulders |
SA3 |
||
|
22 |
Egypt |
Chlorine detergent |
Mr muscle |
E1 |
|
|
23 |
Shampoo |
Elvive |
E2 |
||
|
24 |
Shampoo |
Sunsilk |
E3 |
||
|
25 |
Other |
Labanon |
Cloth washer |
Persil |
O1 |
|
26 |
Cloth washer |
Persil (black) |
O2 |
||
|
27 |
Bahrain |
Cloth washer |
Vanish |
O3 |
|
|
28 |
Moroccan |
Shampoo |
Palmoive |
O4 |
|
|
29 |
Chain |
Shampoo |
Repair |
O5 |
|
|
30 |
France |
Shampoo |
Wellice |
O6 |
|
|
31 |
Germany |
Dishwasher |
Berfy |
O7 |
|
Calculations of Radium Content and Radon Flux Density: Radium content in study samples was calculated using the following [12,13]:
where, ρ refers to the track density which was calculated by [14]:
Te refers to the effective exposure time given by [13]:
K refers to the calibration factor. The calibration factor in this study for exposed dosimeters (5-30 days) to radium-226 (Radon-222 source) of an activity of 3300 Bq was calculated to be (0.02±0.003) (track/cm2)/(Bq.d. m3), which would agree well with many previous studies [15-18]. M is the sample mass (kg), A is the cross-section area of the can (m2) and h is the distance between the detection and top surface of the samples (m).
The radon flux density (Bq/m2.h ) of the sample for the release of the radon can be calculated using the following expression [19]:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Tables from (2) to (7) presents the values of radium content and radon flux density for liquid cleaning materials samples. From table (2), it can be seen that the value of radium content and radon flux density in Iraqi samples were varied from (24.35) Bq/kg to (85.07) Bq/kg with an average of (55.22±0.29) Bq/kg and varied from (4.18) μBq/m2.h to (16.72) μBq/m2.h with an average of (9.24±0.25) μBq/m2.h respectively.
Table 2: Results of CRa and Ex for samples under study that made in Iraq
|
No. |
Sample code |
CRa (Bq/kg) |
Ex( μBq/m2.h) |
|
1 |
I1 |
56.83 |
10.47 |
|
2 |
I2 |
85.07 |
16.72 |
|
3 |
I3 |
78.15 |
11.52 |
|
4 |
I4 |
24.35 |
4.18 |
|
5 |
I5 |
56.92 |
6.29 |
|
6 |
I6 |
30.02 |
6.27 |
|
Average ± S.D |
55.22±0.29 |
9.24±0.25 |
|
According to table (3), it can be seen that the value of radium content and radon flux density in Turkey samples were varied from (30.09) Bq/kg to (101.24) Bq/kg with an average of (56.15±0.37) Bq/kg and varied from (6.28) μBq/m2.h to (19.90) μBq/m2.h with an average of (11.00±0.31) μBq/m2.h respectively.
Table 3: Results of CRa and Ex for samples under study that made in Turkey
|
No. |
Sample code |
CRa (Bq/kg) |
Ex( μBq/m2.h) |
|
1 |
T1 |
31.36 |
7.32 |
|
2 |
T2 |
30.09 |
6.28 |
|
3 |
T3 |
48.69 |
11.93 |
|
4 |
T4 |
101.24 |
9.57 |
|
5 |
T5 |
69.37 |
19.90 |
|
Average ± S.D |
56.15±0.37 |
11.00±0.31 |
|
From table (4), It is clear that the value of radium content and radon flux density in Jordon samples were varied from (10) Bq/kg to (75.06) Bq/kg with an average of (32.38±0.37) Bq/kg and varied from (2.08) μBq/m2.h to (15.68) μBq/m2.h with an average of (6.06±0.31) μBq/m2.h respectively.
Table 4: Results of CRa and Ex for samples under study that made in Jordon
|
No. |
Sample code |
CRa (Bq/kg) |
Ex(μ Bq/m2.h) |
|
1 |
J1 |
10 |
2.08 |
|
2 |
J2 |
19.71 |
3.14 |
|
3 |
J3 |
75.06 |
15.68 |
|
4 |
J4 |
24.4 |
4.19 |
|
5 |
J5 |
32.77 |
5.23 |
|
Average ± S.D |
32.38±0.37 |
6.06±0.31 |
|
From table (5), it can be seen that the value of radium content and radon flux density in Saudi Arabia samples were varied from (21.26) Bq/kg to (34.35) Bq/kg with an average of (27.28±0.63) Bq/kg and varied from (3.13) μBq/m2.h to (6.33) μBq/m2.h with an average of (4.55±0.59) μBq/m2.h respectively.
Table 5: Results of CRa and Ex for samples under study that made in Saudi Arabia
|
No. |
Sample code |
CRa (Bq/kg) |
Ex(μ Bq/m2.h) |
|
1 |
SA1 |
34.35 |
6.33 |
|
2 |
SA2 |
26.23 |
4.19 |
|
3 |
SA3 |
21.26 |
3.13 |
|
Average ± S.D |
27.28±0.63 |
4.55±0.59 |
|
Regarding table (6), it can be seen that the value of radium content and radon flux density in Egypt samples were varied from (28.41)Bq/kg to (97.58) Bq/kg with an average of (60.34±0.73) Bq/kg and varied from (5.23) μBq/m2.h to (16.78) μBq/m2.h with an average of (11.17±0.64) μBq/m2.h respectively.
Table 6: Results of CRa and Ex for samples under study that made in Egypt
|
No. |
Sample code |
CRa (Bq/kg) |
Ex( μBq/m2.h) |
|
1 |
E1 |
97.58 |
16.78 |
|
2 |
E2 |
28.41 |
5.23 |
|
3 |
E3 |
55.05 |
11.50 |
|
Average ± S.D |
60.34±0.73 |
11.17±0.64 |
|
From table (7), It can be seen that the value of radium content and radon flux density in Other country samples were varied from (19.05)Bq/kg to (62.75) Bq/kg with an average of (41.90±0.23) Bq/kg and varied from (4.19) μBq/m2.h to (12.54) μBq/m2.h with an average of (7.33±0.20) μBq/m2.h respectively.
Table 7: Results of CRa and Ex for samples under study that made in Other country
|
No. |
Sample code |
CRa (Bq/kg) |
Ex(μ Bq/m2.h) |
|
1 |
O1 |
56.71 |
6.27 |
|
2 |
O2 |
62.75 |
11.56 |
|
3 |
O3 |
32.02 |
6.29 |
|
4 |
O4 |
60.05 |
12.54 |
|
5 |
O5 |
36.53 |
6.28 |
|
6 |
O6 |
26.23 |
4.19 |
|
7 |
O7 |
19.05 |
4.21 |
|
Average ± S.D |
41.90±0.23 |
7.33±0.20 |
|
Table (8) presents a summary for the radium content and radon flux density if the liquid cleaning materials samples that are made in Iraq, Turkey, Jordon, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other countries supported by figures (2) and (3). The Egypt samples were characterized by the highest value of radium content and radon flux density, while the lowest value of radium content and radon flux density in Saudi Arabia samples.
Table 8: Summary results of CRa and Ex for samples under study across different countries
|
Country |
CRa (Bq/kg) |
Ex( μBq/m2.h) |
|
Iraq |
55.22 |
6.65 |
|
Turkey |
56.15 |
7.92 |
|
Jordon |
32.38 |
4.36 |
|
Saudi Arabia |
27.28 |
3.27 |
|
Egypt |
60.34 |
8.04 |
|
Other countries |
41.90 |
5.27 |
According to above, it can be noticed that there are some variations in the findings of each of radium content and radon flux density across the study samples. These variations may be attributed to the differences in the nature of the samples composite and nuclei percentage of these samples. Nevertheless, the findings of radium content are less than the permissible level (370 Bq/kg) which had been recommended by Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)[20]. Therefore, the results show that the samples of liquified cleaning materials as attributed to different counters were clearly safe as far as the hazards of radium are concerned. Additionally, it is found that, Radon flux density (radon exhalation rates) as being observed in samples of the current study are well below the world average of 57 600 mBq/m2 h therefore this would not pose any health hazards to the human beings [21].
Figure (2): CRa as a function of country that made the samples under study
Figure (2): Ex as a function of country that made the samples under study
CONCLUSION:
The study of radium content and radon flux density in some liquid of cleaning materials Samples in Iraq showed that, all samples been tested had radium content and radon flux density less than the world average values of 370 Bq/kg and 57.600 mBq/m2.h recommended by UNSCEAR and OECD respectively. From a radioprotection point of view, it can be concluded that the studied samples can be used by human with negligible radiation hazards.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
The authors would like to acknowledge all those who have contributed to this issue. Special thanks to the staff of the Department of Physics at Kufa University.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Namibi, K. S. V., Bapat, V. N., David, M., Sundram, V. K., Sunta, C. M., Soman, S. D., (1986), Internal Report: Health Physics Division, B.A.R.C, Bombay.
2. Fleisch, R. L., Price, P. B., Walker, R.M., (1975), "Nuclear Tracks In Solids: Principle And Application''. University Of California Press, Berkelely, P 210-215.
3. Kumar, S., Chander, S., Yaday, G. S., Shama, A. P., (1986), "Some Environmental Effect Studies On The Response Of (CR-39) Plastic Track Detector", Nuclear Tracks 12, P. 129-132.
4. Khan, M. S., Srivastava D. S. and Ameer A., (2012), Study of radium content and radon exhalation rates in soil samples of northern India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(5) P.1363-1371.
5. Swan, S.H.; et al. (2005). "Decrease in Anogenital Distance Among Male Infants with Prenatal Phthalate Exposure.". 113. Environmental Health Perspectives: 1056–1061.
6. Jump up to: A B C D Warhurst, A. Michael (January 1995). "An Environmental Assessment of Alkylphenol Ethoxylates and Alkylphenols"
7. Chen, J., Rahman, N. M., And Itiya, I. A., (2010), "Radon Exhalation From Building Materials For Decorative Use", J. Of Environ. Radioactivity 101, P. 17-22.
8. Khan, A. J., Rajendra, Prasad., Tyagi, R. K., (1992), "Measurement Of Radon Exhalation Rate From Some Building Materials", Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 20(4) P. 609-610.
9. Mahur, A. K., Khan, M. S., Naqvi, A. H., Prasad, R., Azam, A., (2008), "Measurement Of Effective Radium Content Of Sand Samples Collected From Chhatrapur Beach, Orissa, India Using Track Etch Technique", Radiatmeas, 43: S520-S522 , 4829-9671 And 4829-9671.
10. Mahur, A. K., Kumar, R., Sengupta, D., Prasad, R., (2008), "Estimation Of Radon exhalation Rate, Natural Radioactivity And Radiation Doses In Fly Ash Samples From Durgapur Thermal Power Plant, Westbengal, India", Journal Of Environmental Radioactivity, 99, P. 1289-1293.
11. Ali A. AboJassim , Shaymaa A. Kadhim , Faeq A. Mohammed, (2014) "Radon of Concentrations Measurement in Some Types of Toothpastes Available in the Iraqi Markets", journal of Babylon University/Pure and Applied Sciences, 22(7):1967-1972.
12. Ali Abid Abojassima, Ahmed Rahim Shltake, Laith Ahmed Najam and Inas Riad Merzaa, (2017), "Radiological Parameters Due to Radon-222 in Soil Samples at Baghdad Governorate (Karakh), Iraq" Pak. j. sci. ind. res. Ser. A: phys. sci. 60(2) 72-78.
13. Shakir, Khan. M., Naqvi, A. H., Azam, A., Srivastava, D.S., (2011), "Radium And Radon Exhalation Studies Of Soil", Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 8 (4), P. 207-210.
14. Heiyam Najy Hady, Ali Abid Abojassim and Zahrah Baqer Mohammed, (2016), " Study of Radon Levels in Fruits Samples using LR-115 Type II Detector", J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 9 (6): 446-451, 2016
15. Eappen, K.P. and Y.S. Mayya, 2004. Calibration factors for LR-115 (type-II) based radon thoron discriminating dosimeter. Radiation Measurements, 38: 5-17.
16. Ali Abid Abojassim, Fares A. Al-kufi, Dalal Naji Hameed, Oday A. Gaghan, Eqbal Naji Hameed, (2017), "222Rn and 238U Concentrations in Some Samples of Hair Dyes in local Iraqi pharmacies", Research J. Pharm. and Tech., 10( 6) P. 1-5.
17. Verma, D. and M.S. Khan, 2014. Assessement of indoor radon, thoron and their progeny in dwellings of bareilly city of northern india using track etch detectors. Rom. J. Phys., 59: 172-182.
18. Duggal, V., A. Rani and R. Mehra, 2014. A study of seasonal variations of radon levels in different types of dwellings in Sri Ganganagar district, Rajasthan. J. Radiation Res. Applied Sci., 7: 201-206.
19. Abojassim A.A., Najam L.A., Naji D., Hussain T.A., (2017), "The effective radium content and radon exhalation rate in hair dyes samples", Int. J. Radiat. Res., 15(2) P. 207-211.
20. OECD, Organization for economic cooperation and development. In: Exposure to radiation from natural radioactivity in building materials. Report by a group of Experts of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD, Paris, France. (1979).
21. UNSCEAR, (2000), Report Of The United Nations Scientific Committee On The Effects Of Atomic Radiation To The General Assembly. ANNEX B Exposures From Natural Radiation Sources.
Received on 15.05.2017 Modified on 28.06.2017
Accepted on 15.07.2017 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(8): 2456-2460.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00434.6