Effect of Psychomotor Program for Material Experience on the Coordination of Children with ADHD
Jae Kun Jung*, Youn Tae Suh
Adapted Physical Education, Hanshin University, Osan, Rep. of Korea
*Corresponding author E-mail: hanwoori0119@hanmail.net, syt@hs.ac.kr
ABSTRACT:
Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of psychomotor program for material experience on the coordination of children with ADHD.
Methods/Statistical analysis: The subjects of this study were divided into two groups: an experimental group of 8 children and a control group of 8 children, who are all enrolled in the D Children's Development Center and the K Children's Development Center in Seoul. The study was conducted for 12 weeks, twice per week, 60 minutes in for one session. Coordination tests were conducted in the before- and after-session, respectively, for both groups. As a coordination test instrument, the KTK, which was designed and standardized by Kiphard and Schilling in 1974, was used. SPSS 22.0 was used to process the data, and two-way ANOVA was conducted to compare the data between groups and times. The hypothesis testing is fixed to significance level of p<.05.
Findings: The results of the analysis were as follows:
First, rear balancing MQ1 showed a statistically meaningful difference not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group.
Second, single foot jumping MQ2 showed a statistically meaningful difference not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group.
Third, left and right jumping MQ3 showed a statistically meaningful difference not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group.
Fourth, lateral movement MQ4 showed a statistically meaningful difference not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group.
Fifth, KTK MQT showed a statistically meaningful difference not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group.
Improvements/Applications: The material experience-based psychomotor program needs to be verified by approaching various subjects as well as ADHD children.
KEYWORDS: Psychomotor Program Material Experience, ADHD, Coordination, Childhood
1. INTRODUCTION:
Education of movement discovers its own body, explores communication and environment, and expands its infinite potential. This leads to healthy mind and body, so education of movement is very important as childhood education.¹
In order for the child's developmental program to be effectively applied to children, it is necessary to clarify how the basic body coordination is proceeded and developed in terms of child development.² In order to improve the overall development of childhood, it is necessary to think the ability of physical education coordination. In order to provide the specific goal, the athletic ability structure should approach from various viewpoints.³ Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is a neurological disorder related in child psychiatric clinics and is characterized by difficulty in controlling attention, impulse and behavior. ADHD is account for approximately 3 to 7% of children in school age.4
According to data published by the National Health Insurance Corporation in 2014, ADHD patients increased by 12% during the five years from 2008 to 2012, and the number of patients with ADHD symptoms by 2013 was 58,121. And 69.5% of them (38,307 persons) were found to teenager, which shows the highest occupation rate among children and adolescents behavioral and emotional disorders. The main symptoms of ADHD are characterized by attention deficit, hyperactivity, and impulsive behavior, which is accompanied by cognitive, behavioral, and emotional deficits. Physical activity during early intervention for the development of social skills in ADHD children is the most natural form of treatment, which can improve strength, endurance, speed, physical strength, body coordination and endurance. A lot of people agree that development of exercise ability is very important and necessary for children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Therefore, a variety of exercise education programs are developed for physical education for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.5
In previous studies, there have been reports that exercise has a significant effect on the development of perceptual motility in children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder. For example, children with ADHD can develop perceptual motions through exercise, and the developed motor patterns generally address the social and professional challenges of children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder.6 Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder children tend to hide their ego with cynical appearance and aggressive tendencies because their ego is weak. Therefore, emotional problems are also accompanied. Psychomotricity can be applied to solve and support these problems. This requires an approach that considers the psychological and the physical dimension at the same time that psychomotricity can do. Psychomotricity is the total of human movement activity by psychological driving force. It is therapy and education which positively influences on the psychological aspect by using main mean, body of human being.7 If we understand human movements, body, and mobility in comprehensive viewpoint, education methods and treatment for children with developmental delay should also be approached from a comprehensive and expansive perspective. In other words, a psychological dimension and a physical dimension need to be consider at the same time and psychomotricity is considered to perform this role.8
The psychomotricity is divided into three fields: physical experience, material experience, and social experience. Through these three experiences, the child himself or herself is aimed to achieve the overall ability to perform through self-capacity, social ability, and material ability in relation to the surrounding world. Above of them help individual to behave with confidence in relation to the surrounding world.9 In motor development aspect, children with ADHD exhibit poor performance at coordination, strength, balance, reaction time and show ability of exercise and developmental coordination disorder.10
As such, early intervention for children with ADHD is very important, just like any other disorder. And through early intervention, positive adjustment can be expected for them in kindergarten, elementary school and social group. This study therefore aims to verify the effects related to the athletic performance of ADHD children who need early intervention, using material experience psychomotor programs. We hope that this paper can highlight material experience centered treatment as one of the important factors to improve mobility and improve the quality of life. The purpose of this paper, by study the effect of the psychomotricity centered on material experience, is to provide basic data from the existing study to the more specific research.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
2.1 Subjects:
The subject of this study was 8 elementary school ADHD male children aged 8 ~ 9 who attended the D Child Development Center and K Child Development Center located in Seoul. The subjects were consisted of 16 people. There were 8 experimental groups and 8 control groups not having experience of structured exercise program. All of these subjects were children diagnosed with ADHD from psychiatrists.
2.2 Method:
The study was conducted from March 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015. In the experimental group, the psychomotor program was conducted in the psychomotricity room of the D and the K Child Development Center twice a week for 12 weeks, for a total of 24 sessions for 60 minutes. KTK test tool was used to measure the coordination ability. The duration of the material-experience psychomotor program was 12 weeks, and the change of coordination ability was measured using the same KTK test tool as the pre-test.
2.3 Measuring tool:
The following items were used to measure the before and after effects on subjects. For this study, KTK (Körperkoordinationst für Kinder) test tool was used. This test tool was developed by Kiphard and Schilling (1974) in Germany and is a proven test for measuring body coordination and motor function in infants and children. And it is now widely used in Germany. The contents and components of KTK are shown in Table 1.
|
Contents |
Component |
|
rear balancing |
Balance |
|
single foot jumping |
muscular strength endurance agility |
|
left and right jumping |
Agility cross ability |
|
lateral movement |
Improvisation agility |
2.4 The contents of material-experience psychmotor program:
The educational key of the psychomotricity movement should be a playful and creative movement in a natural and voluntary atmosphere. Therefore, the following principles were considered10. First, it should be a child-centered activity. Second, children should have the right to self-determination. Third, it should be playful. Fourth, children should be autonomous in their behavior rather than in criticism. Fifth, autonomy is important, but clear limits and minimum rules may be needed. The contents of the material-experience psychomotor program are shown in <Table 2>.
|
Week |
Session |
Area |
Topic |
Detailed contents |
Preparation materials |
|
1st week |
1st session 2nd session |
Relationship formation/Material experience |
Playground |
List the tools that match the material-experience to induce positive relationships among the subjects. |
Gym ball Tennis ball Soccer ball |
|
2nd week |
3rd session 4th session |
Material-experience |
Ball |
Team up with friends and discuss each other to create rules. |
Soccer ball Soccer goals |
|
3rd week |
5th session 6th session |
Hula hoop |
Use hula hoops to make various obstacles. Try to pass, skip, pass, and pass between through the obstacles. |
Hula hoop Support |
|
|
4th week |
7th session 8th session |
Balance disk |
Using a variety of tools such as chairs, balance beam, mats, and balance plates, make stepping legs and play across the steps of stepping stones. |
chair Balancing disk mat balance plates ladder |
|
|
5th week |
9th session 10th session |
Material-experience |
Balance beam |
Using a variety of balance beam, walk straight, walk a curve, cross a narrow bridge, move back, sideways, and crawl. |
Different kinds of balance beam |
|
6th week |
11th session 12th session |
Balloon |
Blow a balloon. After putting several balloons in a certain space, one team blows balloons with fan, and the other team moves avoiding balloons. |
Balloon Rubber ball Sponge ball fan |
|
|
7th week |
13th session 14th session |
Bicycle |
Freely ride a regular bicycle and a strider bike without a pedal. Try to avoid obstacles, and catch and play using bicycles,. |
Bicycle Strider |
|
|
8th week |
15th session 16th session |
Pedalo |
Divide into a pair of two people and ride a pedalro go forward and backward. Try to catch and throw the ball riding a pedalro. |
Pedalo Rubber ball Tennis ball |
|
|
9th week |
17th session 18th session |
Material- experience |
Rollbrett |
Divide into a pair of two people and ride a sled, canoe, and so on. |
Rollbrett Long rope, Wooden stick |
|
10th week |
19th session 20th session |
Trampoline |
Jump in a variety of ways using jumpers such as trampoline, air bounce, cushion mats, and more. |
Trampoline air bounce cushion mats |
|
|
11th week |
21st session 22nd session |
swing |
Play freely using various types of swings such as hammocks, roll swings, T-bars, and mat swings. |
Hammock Roll swing T-bar |
|
|
12th week |
23rd session 24th session |
Amusement Park |
Use tools such as rollbretts, air bounces, hammocks, ladders, gym ball and slides to decorate amusement parks and use amusement parks.
|
Rollbrett Air bounce ladder gym ball Slide slider |
2.5 Statistical Analysis:
The SPSS 22.0 program was used to analyze the effect of the program, performed in this study. Data were analyzed by frequency analysis and Descriptive Statistics. In addition, the constituent factor of body coordination was examined by implementing the two-way ANOVA between groups and periods using the KTK test tool. And the level of significance in the data was at p <.05 level.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
3.1. Results:
In this study, we applied the material-experience psychomotor program to the ADHD children. The results of the coordination test were compared with timing and group, and the interaction of time × group. And the following results were obtained.
3.1.1. Rear Balancing MQ1:
Table 3 shows that the experimental group showed pre-M = 74.50 and post-M = 87.13, and the mean difference increased by M = 12.63. In the control group, pre-M was 73.13 and post-M was 73.12, respectively, and the mean difference was decreased by M = 0.01. In the pre- and post- test, the experimental group showed a higher average value than the control group.
|
T |
G |
M |
SD |
N |
|
pre |
experiment group |
74.50 |
4.567 |
8 |
|
control group |
73.13 |
5.055 |
8 |
|
|
post |
experiment group |
87.13 |
11.969 |
8 |
|
control group |
73.12 |
4.549 |
8 |
|
|
all |
experiment group |
80.81 |
10.913 |
16 |
|
control group |
73.13 |
4.646 |
16 |
3.1.2. Single foot jumping MQ2:
According to Table 4, as a result of one leg jump test, the test group showed pre-M = 84.63 and post-M = 101.75, and the mean difference was increased by M = 17.12. The control group showed pre-M = 84.38 and post-M = 82.63, and the difference of mean value decreased by M = 1.75. In the pre- and post- test, the experimental group showed a higher average value than the control group.
|
T |
G |
M |
SD |
N |
|
pre |
experiment group |
84.63 |
9.606 |
8 |
|
control group |
84.38 |
10.542 |
8 |
|
|
post |
experiment group |
101.75 |
5.849 |
8 |
|
control group |
82.63 |
9.620 |
8 |
|
|
all |
experiment group |
93.19 |
11.714 |
16 |
|
control group |
83.50 |
9.791 |
16 |
3.1.3. Left and Right Jumping MQ3:
Table 5 shows that, as a result of right and left jump test, the experimental group showed a pre-M = 81.00 and post-M = 109.00, and that the mean difference increased by M = 28.00. The control group showed pre-M = 79.38 and post-M = 80.88, and the difference of mean value increased by M = 1.50. In the pre- and post- test, the experimental group showed a higher average value than the control group.
|
T |
G |
M |
SD |
N |
|
pre |
experiment group |
81.00 |
18.601 |
8 |
|
control group |
79.38 |
19.161 |
8 |
|
|
post |
experiment group |
109.00 |
6.047 |
8 |
|
control group |
80.88 |
18.689 |
8 |
|
|
all |
experiment group |
95.00 |
19.688 |
16 |
|
control group |
80.13 |
18.301 |
16 |
3.1.4. Lateral Movement MQ4:
According to Table 6, the sideways movement test results showed that the experimental group showed pre-M = 86.25, post-M = 124.64, and the mean difference was increased by M = 38.39. The control group showed pre-M = 83.88 and post-M = 82.88, and the difference in mean value decreased with M = 1.00. In the pre- and post- test, the experimental group showed a higher average value than the control group.
|
T |
G |
M |
SD |
N |
|
pre |
experiment group |
86.25 |
17.417 |
8 |
|
control group |
83.88 |
16.822 |
8 |
|
|
post |
experiment group |
124.63 |
12.738 |
8 |
|
control group |
82.88 |
17.241 |
8 |
|
|
all |
experiment group |
105.44 |
24.698 |
16 |
|
control group |
83.38 |
16.464 |
16 |
3.1.5. KTK MQT:
According to Table 7, the total MQT results showed that the experimental group had a pre-M = 100.50 and a post-M = 125.38, and that the mean difference increased by M = 24.88. The control group showed a pre-M = 99.25 and post-M = 99.37, and the mean difference increased by M = 0.12. In the pre- and post- test, the experimental group showed a higher average value than the control group.
|
T |
G |
M |
SD |
N |
|
pre |
experiment group |
100.50 |
11.613 |
8 |
|
control group |
99.25 |
12.068 |
8 |
|
|
post |
experiment group |
125.38 |
8.467 |
8 |
|
control group |
99.37 |
11.513 |
8 |
|
|
all |
experiment group |
112.94 |
16.168 |
16 |
|
control group |
99.31 |
11.394 |
16 |
3.2. DISCUSSION:
The results of this study are as follows. The pre- and post- mean values of MQ1, MQ2, MQ3, MQ4, and MQT were found to be increased in the ADHD children before and after the material-experience psychomotor program. Considering that ADHD children's attention, adjust of impulsivity, and behavioral control are related to their motor performance, the exercise capacity of children with ADHD and the composition of various exercise programs is very important. And improvement of body coordination which is the basis of exercise ability is more important.
4. CONCLUSION:
The first, rear balancing MQ1 shows significant meaning not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group. The second, single foot jumping MQ2 shows significant meaning not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group. The third, left and right jumping MQ3 shows significant meaning not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group. The fourth, lateral movement MQ4 shows significant meaning not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group. The fifth, KTK MQT shows significant meaning not only in the interaction effect between time and group, but also in the main effect of time and group. In conclusion, the material experience psychomotor program has shown positive effect on the coordination of children with ADHD, according to the KTK MQT.
5. REFERENCES:
1. Kim, Suneung (2001). Coordination in performing basic motor functions in infants and children. 2001 Korean Society for Early Childhood Physical Education, p.53-75.
2. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
3. Ok, Yun ok (1995). MLG program is the perception of mental retardation. Effects on exercise performance. Daegu University Graduate School of Education Department of Education Department of Special Education Master's Thesis
4. Yun, Cheon yeon (2004). Development of standardized diagnostic test for Korean attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and development of web-based evaluation system. seoul: Korea Counseling Society.
5. Kiphard, E. J. (1989). Psychomotorik in Praxis und Theorie. Gutersloh.
6. Hynd, G. W., and Semrud-Clikeman, M.(1990). Dyslexia and brain morphology. Psychological Bulletin. 106, 447-482.
7. Shim, S. H., Hwangbo, Y., Kwon, Y. J., Jeong, H. Y., Lee, B. H. and Lee. H. J. (2008). Increased levels of plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol.Biol. Psychiatry, 32, 1824-1828.
8. Zimmer, R. (2005). Handbuch der Sinneswahrnehmung. Freiburg im Breigau:Verlag Herder.
9. Piek, J. P., Pitcher, T. M. and Hay, D. A. (1999). Motor coordination and kinaesthesis in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine and child Neurology, 41(3), 159-65.
10. Seo, Youn tae (2005b).Effects of pedal training on children's motor skills. Korea Sports Research, no13. P.543-550.
Received on 22.06.2017 Modified on 28.06.2017
Accepted on 10.07.2017 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(7): 2395-2399.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00424.3