Molecular Docking Studies of N-5-Aryl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazolo-2, 2-dichloroacet-amidines as Inhibitors of Enoyl-ACP Reductase Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Pavlo V. Zadorozhnii*, Vadym V. Kiselev, Anastasia E. Titova, Aleksandr V. Kharchenko,
Ihor O. Pokotylo, Oxana V. Okhtina
Department of Organic Substances and Pharmaceutical Preparations, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Gagarin Ave., 8, Dnipro 49005, Ukraine.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: torfp@i.ua
ABSTRACT:
In this paper, we have carried out in silico modeling of inhibition of enzyme Enoyl-ACP reductase (InhA) Mycobacterium tuberculosis N-5-aryl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazolo-2, 2-dichloroacetamidines using the software package ArgusLab 4.0.1. Based on the results of molecular docking we have selected compounds leaders that form more stable complexes with the enzyme as compared to known inhibitors. The studied compounds are a promising class of compounds with potential anti-TB activity, and they can be recommended for further research to treat this disease. The structures of the investigated compounds have been checked for compliance with Lipinski criteria. The prediction of acute toxicity in rats has been carried out in oral and intravenous routes of administration using GUSAR program.
KEYWORDS: Antitubercular, 1,3,4-Oxadiazole, Amidine, Docking, InhA.
INTRODUCTION:
Azoles are crucial for medicinal chemistry and pharmaceutical industry. They are widely used in agriculture, in the production of polymers, semiconductors and dyes. Among them, particular attention is drawn to compounds containing the 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole ring, known as substances with a wide spectrum of the biological activity1-6.
Mostly they have antimicrobial7-14, antiviral15,16, antioxidant9,17 and antitumor18 effect. These substances are of particular interest to fight Alzheimer's Disease19, and as inhibitors of COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes20-22, which makes them a promising class of compounds with anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect. Recently, systems with 1,3,4-oxadiazole ring have been used as scaffolds for the subsequent synthesis of compounds with antituberculosis activity23-27. For example, using (S)-1-cyclohexyl-N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-5-oxopyrrolidi ne-3-carboxamide (1), B. Mathew with colleagues designed and then carried out the synthesis of (E)-1-(furan-2-yl)-N-(5-aryl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazol-2-yl) methanimines (2) (Fig. 1), which possess antituberculosis activity28. As a compound leader they suggested (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1, 3, 4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl) methanimine (2a) (Fig. 1). The mechanism of action of the compounds obtained is presumably connected to inhibition of Enoyl-ACP reductase (InhA) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis28.
Fig. 1: Structures of (S)-1-cyclohexyl-N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-5-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxamide (1), (E)-1-(furan-2-yl)-N-(5-aryl-1,3,4-oxa-diazol-2-yl)methanimines (2) and compound leader (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl)methanimine (2a)28
In this study we have proposed 2, 2-dichloroacetamidines with 1,3,4-oxadiazole fragment (3) as potential inhibitors of InhA enzyme (Fig. 2). The search of hit-compounds has been based on the results of molecular docking29,30. The structures for the prediction have been taken from our own collection of compounds prepared according to procedures described in31,32.
Fig. 2: N-5-aryl-1,3,4-oxadiazolo-2,2-dichloroacet-amidines (3a-e)31,32
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The Software Used:
Optimization of the geometry of the structures being analyzed and molecular docking with InhA enzyme has been carried out using software Argus Lab 4.0.133. Previously, this software package was successfully used to solve similar tasks34-39.
Visualization of the results has been obtained using the programs PyMOL40 and Chimera41. Acute toxicity of the compounds being studied in rats in oral and intravenous routes of administration has been evaluated using GUSAR42 program (http://www.pharmaexpert.ru). The compounds (3) have been checked for compliance with Lipinski criteria43 using a web resource Molinspiration (http://www.molinspiration.com/cgi-bin/properties).
Ligand Preparation:
The structures of all the compounds being studied (3) have been optimized within PM3 Semiempirical Method44-47 before molecular docking. To the compound (3c) the obtained results have been compared with the data of X-ray analysis published earlier (CCDC 952084, http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk)31.
Protein Preparation:
The three-dimensional crystal structure of InhA enzyme co-crystallizer and (S)-1-cyclohexyl-N-(3, 5-dichlorophenyl)-5-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxamide (1) (PDB ID: 4TZK) 48 has been loaded in PDB format from the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org). Except the molecule of the compound (1) (green) there is NAD molecule (red) in the active site of the enzyme (Fig. 3). NAD takes indirect part in the formation of the compound complex (1) with InhA48 through hydrogen bond with a water molecule (H2O 743). Therefore, neither NAD molecule, nor crystal water molecules (blue) have been removed from the binding site before the docking.
Fig. 3: The position of the molecule (S)-1-cyclohexyl-N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-5-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxamide (1) (green) and NAD molecule (red) in the active site of InhA enzyme Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Visualization in PyMOL40.
Molecular Docking Procedure:
Based on the molecule of the compound (1) (co-crystallizer code 501 641), a ligand group named Ligand_X-ray has been created. A three-dimensional model of the binding site has been developed on the basis of this group, its dimensions being calculated automatically and making along the X-axis - 24.817000, the Y-axis - 19.766000 and the Z-axis - 21.712000 Å.
Acute Toxicity Prediction:
To predict acute toxicity, the compounds of the structures (3a-e) have been entered on the official website (http://www.pharmaexpert.ru) using graphical editor Marvin Sketch. Then they have been sent to the server as MNA-descriptors (Multilevel Neighborhoods of Atoms)49. The results of the prediction have been visualized on the display and saved by «copy-paste». For comparison, we have carried out calculations of toxicity (S)-1-cyclohexyl-N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-5-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxamide (1), (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl)methanimine (2a) and isoniazid (INH).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Geometry Optimization:
During the molecular docking we have used the compound (1) as a reference and (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1, 3, 4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl) methanimine (2a) - a compound leader according to the research data28. The built-in protein crystal structure has been used for inhibitor docking (1) with InhA enzyme. In the case of the compound (2a) and amidines (3a-e), we have used molecular structures obtained according to the quantum chemical calculations within the semi-empirical method PM3 (Fig. 4). The total energy of the compound (2a) is -70338.0267 kcal / mol, and the compounds (3a-e) range from -103149.3043 to -86282.3134 kcal / mol.
|
|
|
|
|
(2a) -70338.0267 kcal/mol |
(3a) -91146.0618 kcal/mol |
(3b) -86282.3134 kcal/mol |
|
|
|
|
|
(3c) -89734.1568 kcal/mol |
(3d) -103142.3005 kcal/mol |
(3e) -103149.3043 kcal/mol |
Fig. 4: Molecular structures of (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1, 3, 4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl) methanimine (2a) and N-5-aryl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazolo-2,2-dichloroacetamidines (3a-e) according to the quantum chemical calculations within the semi-empirical method PM3. Visualization in PyMOL40.
The results of geometry optimization N-5-aryl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazolo-2,2-dichloroacetamidines (3a-e) indicate their structural similarity with the compound (2a) (Fig. 5), and they are in good agreement with the data of X-ray structural analysis carried out earlier for the compound (3c) (Fig. 6). The values of bond lengths (Table 1) and bond angles (Table 2), obtained experimentally31 and by calculation, are very close.
|
|
|
Fig. 5: Comparison of the spatial structure of the molecule (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl)methan-imine (2a) (green), the compound (3a) (pink) and (3c) (orange). Visualization in PyMOL40.
|
|
a) |
|
|
|
b) |
|
|
Fig. 6: Molecular structure of (E)-2, 2-dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-(p-tolyl)-1, 3, 4-oxadiazol-2-yl)ethan-1-imine (3c): a) according to XRD data31; b) according to quantum chemical calculations within the semi-empirical method PM3. Visualization in Chimera41.
Table 1: The lengths of the bonds in the molecule (E)-2,2-dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-(p-tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)ethan-1-imine (3c) according to X-ray diffraction data31 and quantum chemical calculations within the semi-empirical method PM3.
|
Bond
|
Length, Å |
|
|
XRD data |
PM3 method* |
|
|
Cl(1)-C(6) |
1.758(5) |
1.795 |
|
N(1)-C(5) |
1.351(5) |
1.394 |
|
N(1)-C(1) |
1.464(5) |
1.494 |
|
N(3)-N(4) |
1.418(5) |
1.366 |
|
O(1)-C(2) |
1.397(5) |
1.419 |
|
O(2)-C(8) |
1.369(5) |
1.387 |
|
C(1)-C(2) |
1.500(7) |
1.539 |
|
C(5)-C(6) |
1.519(5) |
1.507 |
|
C(9)-C(14) |
1.385(6) |
1.399 |
|
C(10)-C(11) |
1.399(7) |
1.388 |
|
C(12)-C(13) |
1.365(6) |
1.396 |
|
C(13)-C(14) |
1.382(6) |
1.390 |
|
Cl(2)-C(6) |
1.756(4) |
1.798 |
|
N(1)-C(4) |
1.455(5) |
1.491 |
|
N(2)-C(5) |
1.293(5) |
1.326 |
|
N(4)-C(8) |
1.288(5) |
1.336 |
|
O(1)-C(3) |
1.413(5) |
1.417 |
|
O(2)-C(7) |
1.376(5) |
1.378 |
|
C(3)-C(4) |
1.481(5) |
1.538 |
|
C(8)-C(9) |
1.439(6) |
1.455 |
|
C(9)-C(10) |
1.386(6) |
1.400 |
|
C(11)-C(12) |
1.374(6) |
1.397 |
|
C(12)-C(15) |
1.490(7) |
1.487 |
* Software package ArgusLab 4.0.1 gives bond lengths up to the sixth decimal place, but for the convenience of comparison with XRD data, their value has been rounded to the third decimal.
Table 2: The value of the bond angles (E)-2,2-dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-(p-tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)ethan-1-imine (3c) according XRD data31 and quantum chemical calculations within the semi-empirical method PM3.
|
Group of atoms |
Angle, deg. |
|
|
XRD data |
PM3 method* |
|
|
C(5)-N(1)-C(4) |
128.5(4) |
124.3 |
|
C(4)-N(1)-C(1) |
111.3(4) |
112.2 |
|
C(7)-N(3)-N(4) |
106.6(4) |
107.7 |
|
C(2)-O(1)-C(3) |
108.8(4) |
112.7 |
|
N(1)-C(1)-C(2) |
109.3(4) |
110.3 |
|
O(1)-C(3)-C(4) |
112.7(4) |
112.1 |
|
N(2)-C(5)-N(1) |
118.8(4) |
113.3 |
|
N(1)-C(5)-C(6) |
118.7(5) |
122.0 |
|
C(5)-C(6)-Cl(1) |
112.4(3) |
110.6 |
|
N(3)-C(7)-N(2) |
134.4(5) |
135.5 |
|
N(2)-C(7)-O(2) |
113.7(4) |
115.3 |
|
N(4)-C(8)-C(9) |
128.8(5) |
129.8 |
|
C(14)-C(9)-C(10) |
117.6(5) |
119.7 |
|
C(10)-C(9)-C(8) |
120.5(5) |
118.8 |
|
C(12)-C(11)-C(10) |
121.8(6) |
120.5 |
|
C(13)-C(12)-C(15) |
121.6(6) |
121.1 |
|
C(12)-C(13)-C(14) |
121.5(5) |
120.5 |
|
C(5)-N(1)-C(1) |
119.7(4) |
123.5 |
|
C(5)-N(2)-C(7) |
122.3(4) |
125.2 |
|
C(8)-N(4)-N(3) |
106.4(4) |
108.9 |
|
C(8)-O(2)-C(7) |
103.2(4) |
105.7 |
|
O(1)-C(2)-C(1) |
112.6(5) |
112.8 |
|
N(1)-C(4)-C(3) |
110.2(4) |
110.2 |
|
N(2)-C(5)-C(6) |
122.5(5) |
124.7 |
|
C(5)-C(6)-Cl(2) |
111.8(3) |
110.5 |
|
Cl(2)-C(6)-Cl(1) |
112.8(2) |
107.6 |
|
C(12)-C(13)-C(14) |
121.5(5) |
120.5 |
|
N(3)-C(7)-O(2) |
111.6(4) |
109.2 |
|
N(4)-C(8)-O(2) |
112.2(5) |
108.5 |
|
O(2)-C(8)-C(9) |
119.0(5) |
121.7 |
|
C(14)-C(9)-C(8) |
121.9(5) |
121.5 |
|
C(9)-C(10)-C(11) |
120.0(6) |
120.0 |
|
C(13)-C(12)-C(11) |
117.7(6) |
119.4 |
|
C(11)-C(12)-C(15) |
120.6(6) |
119.5 |
|
C(13)-C(14)-C(9) |
121.4(5) |
119.9 |
*Software package ArgusLab 4.0.1 gives the values of bond angles to the nearest hundredth, but for the convenience of comparison with XRD data, their value has been rounded to the nearest tenth.
Molecular Docking Results for Etalons:
The calculated energy of inhibitor binding (1) to the active site of the enzyme is -10.9453 kcal / mol; the calculation time makes 4 seconds. The calculated results of the inhibitor position in the enzyme active site are close to the results obtained by X-ray diffraction method (Fig. 7), root-mean-square deviation of atomic positions (RMSD) is 2.541947 Å.
|
a) |
b) |
|
|
|
Fig. 7: The position of (S)-1-cyclohexyl-N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-5-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxamide (1) in the active site of InhA enzyme according to XRD data (a)48 and molecular docking (b), the complex energy -10.9453 kcal / mol. RMSD is 2.541947 Å. Visualization in PyMOL40.
The calculated energy (∆G) of inhibitor binding (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl)methanimine (2a) to the active site of the enzyme is -9.08205 kcal/ mol, the calculation time makes 3 seconds. The results obtained are very close to the results of the research28, according to which the energy of complex InhA-(2a) is -9.7426 kcal / mol. The molecule of the compound (2a) is further fixed in the active site of InhA enzyme due to the complex system of intermolecular hydrogen bonds with the molecules of crystal water - H2O 818, H2O 737 and H2O 743 (Fig 8).
Fig. 8: The position of (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl)methanimine (2a) in the active site of InhA enzyme according to molecular docking, the complex energy -9.08205 kcal / mol. Visualization in PyMOL40.
Molecular Docking Results for Amidines (3a-e):
According to the results of molecular docking, the most stable complex with InhA enzyme forms the compound (3a), exceeding both (S)-1-cyclohexyl-N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-5-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxamide (1) and (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl)methanimine (2a) on this parameter. The complexes energy with structures (3b) and (3c) is slightly higher. These compounds are inferior to inhibitor (1), but superior to inhibitor (2a) in strength of the complex with the enzyme (Table 3). The compounds (3d) and (3e) are inferior to etalons.
Table 3: The results of molecular docking of N-5-aryl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazolo-2, 2-dichloroacetamidines (3a-e).
|
Compound |
∆G with InhA, kcal / mol |
Time, s |
|
3a |
-11.6495 |
6 |
|
3b |
-9.30622 |
3 |
|
3c |
-9.60187* |
3 |
|
3d |
-9.05578 |
4 |
|
3e |
-8.34818 |
4 |
* The value of the complex energy at the docking with the structure obtained as a result of quantum chemical calculations is given for the compound (3c) (Fig. 6b). In comparison with the structure obtained by X-ray analysis (Fig. 6a), the complex energy is somewhat higher and makes -9.35924 kcal / mol.
(E)-N-Benzyl-2,2-dichloro-N'-(5-(p-tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)acetimidamide (3a) is efficiently bound to InhA enzyme due to the formation of two intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Fig. 9). A Hydrogen atom of the crystal water molecule (H2O 743) and a Nitrogen atom N(3) of 1,3,4-oxadiazole ring take part in the formation of one hydrogen bond, the length H...N being 2.873637 Å. A Hydrogen atom of amidine fragment (BnNH) and an Oxygen atom of peptide bond Pro156-Ala157 form the second hydrogen bond, bond length NH...O156=С′156 (Pro 156) being 2.834225 Å.
Fig. 9: The position of (E)-N-benzyl-2,2-dichloro-N'-(5-(p-tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)acetimidamide (3a) in the active site of InhA enzyme according to the results of molecular docking. Visualization in PyMOL40.
(E)-2,2-Dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)ethan-1-imine (3b) when bound to the enzyme active site forms a complex system of intermolecular hydrogen bonds with three molecules of crystal water and an Oxygen atom of morpholine cycle (Fig. 10). Hydrogen bonds are formed by: 1) a Hydrogen atom of water molecule (H2O 819) and an Oxygen atom of morpholine cycle, the bond length H.O - 3.400024 Å; 2) a Hydrogen atom of water molecule (H2O 818) and an Oxygen atom of morpholine cycle, the bond length H...O - 2.364742 Å; 3) a Hydrogen atom of water molecule (H2O 737) and an Oxygen atom of morpholine cycle, the bond length H..O - 2.521765 Å.
Fig. 10: The position of (E)-2,2-dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)ethan-1-imine (3b) in the active site of InhA enzyme according to the results of molecular docking. Visualization in PyMOL40.
(E)-2,2-Dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-(p-tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)ethan-1-imine (3с) when bound to the enzyme active site it is formed one hydrogen bond with a Hydrogen atom of the crystal water molecule (H2O 743) and a Nitrogen atom N(2) of 1,3,4-oxadiazole cycle, the length H...N - 2.896771 Å (Fig. 11).
Fig. 11: The position of (E)-2, 2-dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-(p-tolyl)-1, 3, 4-oxadiazol-2-yl) ethan-1-imine (3с) in the active site of InhA enzyme according to the results of molecular docking. Visualization in PyMOL40.
Lipinski criteria:
The studied structures have been checked for compliance with Lipinski criteria using a web resource Molinspiration43. All of the compounds correspond to them (Table 4).
Table 4: The test of the compounds (3a-e) for compliance with Lipinski criteria.
|
Compound |
Mr |
logP |
Rot.Bond |
Hdonor |
Hacceptor |
|
3a |
375.26 |
4.75 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
|
3b |
341.20 |
2.99 |
4 |
0 |
6 |
|
3c |
355.23 |
3.44 |
4 |
0 |
6 |
|
3d |
386.19 |
2.90 |
5 |
0 |
9 |
|
3e |
386.19 |
2.95 |
5 |
0 |
9 |
Acute Toxicity:
Antituberculosis drugs have sufficiently high toxicity50,51, so the compounds (3a-e) have been evaluated for the acute toxicity in rats using GUSAR program42. For comparison, we have given the results of toxicity calculations (S)-1-cyclohexyl-N-(3, 5-dichlorophenyl)-5-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxamide (1), (E)-N-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1, 3, 4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-1-(furan-2-yl) methanimine (2a) and isoniazid (INH) (Table 5).
Table 5: Calculation of the acute toxicity N-5-aryl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazolo-2,2-dichloroacet-amidines (3a-e) in rats in intravenous and oral routes of administration.
|
Compound |
Toxic LD50 (mg/kg) |
|
|
IV* |
Oral. ** |
|
|
3a |
105.300 |
2131.000 |
|
3b |
137.100 |
1624.000 |
|
3c |
101.100 |
1421.000 |
|
3d |
136.900 |
1572.000 |
|
3e |
123.200 |
1974.000 |
|
1 |
63.550 |
2545.000 |
|
2a |
128.900 |
741.000 |
|
INH |
256.100 |
899.700 |
*IV – intravenous route; ** Oral. – Oral route.
CONCLUTION:
Using the software package ArgusLab 4.0.1 we have carried out in silico modeling of Enoyl-ACP Reductase (InhA) enzyme Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibition. We have suggested N-5-aryl-1, 3, 4-oxadiazolo-2, 2-dichloroacetamidines as potential inhibitors. Compounds leaders (E)-N-benzyl-2,2-dichloro-N'-(5-(p-tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)acetimidamide (3a), (E)-2,2-dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)ethan-1-imine (3b) and (E)-2,2-dichloro-1-morpholino-N-(5-(p-tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)ethan-1-imine (3с) have been selected based on the results of molecular docking, forming more stable complexes with the enzyme as compared to known inhibitors. The studied compounds are the promising class of compounds with potential anti-TB activity, and they can be recommended for the further study of their pharmacological properties. The structures of all compounds studied correspond to Lipinski criteria. The prediction of acute toxicity in rats has been carried out in oral and intravenous routes of administration using GUSAR program.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Oliveira CS, Lira BF, Barbosa-Filho JM, Lorenzo JGF, Athayde-Filho PF. Synthetic Approaches and Pharmacological Activity of 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazoles: A Review of the Literature from 2000–2012. Molecules. 2012; 17(9): 10192-10231. doi:10.3390/molecules170910192
2. Sharma J, Ahsan MJ. 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazole: A Versatile Therapeutic Heterocycle. Adv. Biomed. Pharma. 2014; 1(1): 1-10.
3. Khalilullah H, Ahsan MJ, Hedaitullah Md, Khan S, Ahmed B. 1,3,4-Oxadiazole: A Biologically Active Scaffold. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2012; 12(8): 789-801. doi:10.2174/138955712801264800
4. Mukesh B, Vandana Sh, Rakesh K. Biological activities of 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole: a review. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2011; 2(12): 84-89.
5. Somani RR, Shirodkar PY. Oxadiazole: A biologically important heterocycle. Der Pharma Chemica. 2009; 1(1): 130-140.
6. Sahu VKR, Singh AK, Yadav D. Review article on 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazole derivaties and its Pharmacological activities. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2011; 3(3): 1362-1372.
7. Bhatia Sh, Gupta M. 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazole as antimicrobial agents: An overview. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2011; 3(3): 137-147.
8. Siddiqui SZ, Abbasi MA, Aziz-ur-Rehman, Irshad M, Shahzad B, Ashraf M, Ahmad I, Lodhi MA, Mirza B, Ismail H, Akhtar MN. Synthesis pharmacological evaluation, molecular docking and cytotoxicty studies on some N-substituted 5-[(4-chlorophenoxy) methyl]-1, 3, 4-oxadiazole-2yl-2-sulfanylacetamides. Indo Amer. J. Pharm. Res. 2014; 4(8): 3603-3617.
9. Hanif M, Shoaib K, Saleem M, Rama NH, Zaib S, Iqbal J. Synthesis, Urease Inhibition, Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Molecular Docking Studies of 1,3,4-Oxadiazole Derivatives. ISRN Pharmacology, 2012, 9 pages. doi:10.5402/2012/928901
10. Chitre TS, Panda S, Patil ShM, Chothe AS, Vignesh G, Salake AB, Kathiravan MK. Novel 1,3,4-(thiadiazol-2-ylamino)methyl-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-thiones: synthesis, docking and antimycobacterial testing. Adv. Biol. Chem. 2011; 1(2): 7-14. doi:10.4236/abc.2011.12002
11. Rani NS, Subbareddy GV, Jayaveeera KN, Ravindranath LK. Synthesis, characterization, biological evaluation and docking studies of organo phosphorous pyrazole-5-one derivatives of 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole derivatives of sortase A staphylococcus inhibitors. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2015; 7(6): 534-542.
12. Oliveira CS, Lira BF, Falcão-Silva VS, Siqueira-Junior JP, Barbosa-Filho JM, Athayde-Filho PF. Synthesis, molecular properties prediction, and anti-staphylococcal activity of N-acylhydrazones and new 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives. Molecules. 2012; 17(5): 5095–5107. doi:10.3390/molecules17055095
13. Chawla R, Arora A, Parameswaran MK, Sharma PCh, Michael S, Rav TK. Synthesis of novel 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives as potential antimicrobial agents. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2010; 67(3): 247-253.
14. Parikh PK, Marvaniya HM, Sen DJ. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole derivatives as potential antibacterial and antifungal agents. Int. J. Drug Dev. Res. 2011; 3(2): 248-255.
15. Li Z, Zhan P, Liu X. 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazole: A Privileged Structure in Antiviral Agents. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2011; 11(13): 1130-1142. doi:10.2174/138955711797655407
16. Gan X, Hu D, Li P, Wu J, Chen X, Xue W, Song B. Design, synthesis, antiviral activity and three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship study of novel 1,4-pentadien-3-one derivatives containing the 1,3,4-oxadiazole moiety. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016; 72(3): 534-543. doi:10.1002/ps.4018
17. Shakir RM, Ariffin A, Abdulla MA. Synthesis of New 2, 5-Di-substituted 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazoles Bearing 2, 6-Di-tert-butylphenol Moieties and Evaluation of Their Antioxidant Activity. Molecules. 2014; 19(3): 3436-3449. doi:10.3390/molecules19033436
18. Tu G, Yan Y, Chen X, Lv Q, Wang J, Li Sh. Synthesis and antiproliferative assay of 1,3,4-oxadiazole and 1,2,4-triazole derivatives in cancer cells. Drug Discov. Ther. 2013; 7(2): 58-65. doi:10.5582/ddt.2013.v7.2.58
19. Saitoh M, Kunitomo J, Kimura E, Hayase Y, Kobayashi H, Uchiyama N, Kawamoto T, Tanaka T, Mol CD, Dougan DR, Textor GS, Snell GP, Itoh F. Design, synthesis and structure–activity relationships of 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives as novel inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase-3β. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009; 17(5): 2017-2029. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2009.01.019
20. Bala S, Kamboj S, Saini V, Prasad DN. Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic Evaluation and Molecular Docking Studies of N-Phenyl Anthranilic Acid-Based 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazole Analogues. J. Chem. 2013; ID 412053: 6 pages. doi:10.1155/2013/412053
21. Bhansali SG, Kulkarni VM. Design, synthesis, docking, QSAR, ADME studies and pharmacological evaluation of biphenyl-2-oxadiazoles as anti-inflammatory agents. Der Pharma Chemica. 2015; 7(1): 156-173.
22. Somani RR, Bhanushali UV. Synthesis and Evaluation of Antiinflammatory, Analgesic and Ulcerogenic Potential of NSAIDs Bearing 1, 3, 4-Oxadiazole Scaffold. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2011; 73(6): 634-640.
23. Joshi ShD, More UA, Kulkarni MSh, Nelaguddad K, Kulkarni VH. Combined Pharmacophore and Molecular Docking-based In silico Study of Some Pyrrolyl 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole benzothioate Derivatives. RGUHS J. Pharm. Sci. 2015; 5(2): 69-80. doi:10.5530/rjps.2015.2.6
24. Asif M. A review on potent antitubercular agent isoniazid and its analogues. Int. J. Pharm. Chem. 2012; 2(4): 110-120. doi:10.7439/ijpc.v2i4.755
25. Pattan ShR, Rabara PA, Pattan JS, Bukitagar AA, Wakale VS, Musmade DS. Synthesis and evaluation of some novel substituted 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole and pyrazole derivatives or antitubercular activity. Indian J. Chem. Sec. B. 2009; 48(10): 1453-1456.
26. Das R, Asthana GSh, Suri KA, Mehta DK, Asthana A. Synthesis and Assessment of Antitubercular and Antimicrobial Activity of Some Novel Triazolo and Tetrazolo-Fused 1,3,4-Oxadiazole Molecules Containing Pyrazine Moiety. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015; 7(10): 806-811.
27. Kerur Sh, Alagavadi K, Zhu H, Manvi F. Synthesis, characterization and molecular docking simulation of disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives for antibacterial studies. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014; 3(10): 573-585.
28. Mathew B, Suresh J, Mathew GE, Sonia G, Krishnan GK. Design, Synthesis, Toxicity Estimation and Molecular Docking Studies of N-(furan-2-yl)-1-(5-substituted)phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)methanimine as Antitubercular Agents. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2014; 76(5): 401-406.
29. Young DC. Computational drug design. Published by John Wiley AND Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. 2009; 307.
30. Holtje H-D, Sippl W, Rognan D, Folkers R. Molecular Modeling. Basic Principles and Applications. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH AND Co. KGaA, Weinheim. 2008; 319.
31. Zadorozhnii PV, Kiselev VV, Kharchenko AV. N-Hetaryl-2,2-dichloroacetamidines. Visn. Dnipropetr. Univ. Khim. 2014; 22(2): 31-38. doi:10.15421/081412
32. Zadorozhnii PV, Pokotylo IO, Kiselev VV, Kharchenko AV. New 2,2-Dichloroacetamidines with Heterocyclic Fragments. Chem. Sci. Trans. 2016; 5(4): 1056-1062. doi:10.7598/cst2016.1310
33. Thompson M. ArgusLab 4.0.1., Planaria software LLC, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2004. http://www.arguslab.com
34. Chatterjee P, Samant L, Mukherjee S, Bapat S, Chowdhary A. Computational 3D Modelling and In Silico Characterization of Human Interferon Induced Transmembrane Proteins. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2014; 5(2): 1142-1154.
35. Rai AK, Singh RR, Pandey N. Designing Inhibitors against Hexokinase 1 and Hexokinase 2 domain mutations of GCK and studying its association in Diabetes. J. Biol. Eng. Res. Rev. 2015; 2(1): 15-19.
36. Tanguenyongwatana P, Jongkon N. Molecular docking study of tyrosinase inhibitors using ArgusLab 4.0.1: A comparative study. Thai J. Pharm. Sci. 2016; 40(1): 21-25.
37. Narayanan S, Ramchandran B, Rajendiran S, Chandra S, Tiwari A, Rajarethinam R, Vasudev RK. Potent antitumour activity of (–)epigallocatechin gallate: indications from in vitro, in vivo and in silico studies. Curr. Sci. 2016; 110(2): 187-195. doi:10.18520/cs/v110/i2/187-195
38. Dash R, Uddin MMN, Hosen SMZ, Rahim ZB, Dinar AM, Kabir MSH, Sultan RA, Islam A, Hossain MK. Molecular docking analysis of known flavonoids as duel COX-2 inhibitors in the context of cancer. Bioinformation. 2015; 11(12): 543-549. doi:10.6026/97320630011543
39. Zarate X, Schott E, Escobard CA, Lopez-Castroe R, Echeverria C, Alvarado-Soto L, Ramirez-Taglea R. Interaction of chalcones with ct-DNA by spectrophotometric analysis and theoreticalsimulations. Quim. Nova. 2016; 39(8): 914-918. doi:10.5935/0100-4042.20160114
40. DeLano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System; DeLano Scientific: Palo Alto, CA, 2003; http://www.pymol.org
41. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004; 25(13): 1605-1612. doi:10.1002/jcc.20084
42. Lagunin A, Zakharov A, Filimonov D, Poroikov V. QSAR modelling of rat acute toxicity on the basis of PASS prediction. Mol. Inf. 2011; 30(2-3): 241-250. doi:10.1002/minf.201000151
43. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997; 23(1-3): 3-25.
44. Thompson MA, Zerner MC. A theoretical examination of the electronic structure and spectroscopy of the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas viridis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113(22): 8210-8215. doi:10.1021/ja00022a003
45. Thompson MA, Glendening ED, Feller D. The Nature of K+/Crown Ether Interactions: A Hybrid Quantum Mechanical-Molecular Mechanical Study. J. Phys. Chem. 1994; 98(41): 10465-10476. doi:10.1021/j100092a015
46. Thompson MA, Schenter GK. Excited States of the Bacteriochlorophyll B Dimer of Rhodopseudomonas viridis: A QM/MM Study of the Photosynthetic Reaction Center That Includes MM Polarization. J. Phys. Chem. 1995; 99(17): 6374-6386. doi:10.1021/j100017a017
47. Thompson MA. QM/MMpol: A Consistent Model for Solute/Solvent Polarization. Application to the Aqueous Solvation and Spectroscopy of Formaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, and Acetone. J. Phys. Chem. 1996; 100(34): 14492-14507. doi:10.1021/jp960690m
48. He X, Alian A, Stroud R, Ortiz de Montellano PR. Pyrrolidine carboxamides as a novel class of inhibitors of enoyl acylcarrier protein reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Med. Chem. 2006; 49(21): 6308‑6323. doi:10.1021/jm060715y
49. Filimonov DA, Lagunin AA, Gloriozova TA, Rudik AV, Druzhilovskii DS, Pogodin PV, Poroikov VV. Prediction of the biological activity spectra of organic compounds using the PASS online web resource. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2014; 50(3): 444-457. doi:10.1007/s10593-014-1496-1
50. Saukkonen JJ, Cohn DL, Jasmer RM, Schenker S, Jereb JA, Nolan CM, Peloquin CA, Gordin FM, Nunes D, Strader DB, Bernardo J, Venkataramanan R, Sterling TR. An Official ATS Statement: Hepatotoxicity of Antituberculosis Therapy. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 2006; 174 (8): 935-952. doi:10.1164/rccm.200510-1666ST
51. Yoon YH, Jung KH, Sadun AA, Shin H-Ch, Koh J-Y, Toxicity. Ethambutol-Induced Vacuolar Changes and Neuronal Loss in Rat Retinal Cell Culture: Mediation by Endogenous Zinc. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2000; 162(2): 107-114. doi:10.1006/taap.1999.8846.
Received on 16.02.2017 Modified on 21.03.2017
Accepted on 30.03.2017 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(4): 1091-1097.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00198.6