Profile of Antimicrobial Resistance of Aerobic Pathogenic Bacteria isolated from Different Clinical Infections in Al-Kufa Central Hospital –Iraq During period from 2015 to 2017

 

Ahmed Abduljabbar Jaloob Aljanaby1, Israa Abduljabbar Jaloob Aljanaby2

1University of Kufa, faculty of science, Department of Microbiology, IRAQ.

2University of Kufa, College of pharmacy, Department of Microbiology, IRAQ.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: ahmedaj.aljanabi@uokufa.edu.iq, Israa.challoob@uokufa.edu.iq

 

ABSTRACT:

Objectives: Resistance of antimicrobials by different pathogens is a dangerous problem in developing countries. Therefore we design this study to identify the most prevalent pathogenic bacteria that cause different infections in Al-Kufa Central Hospital – Iraq and determine the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of these pathogens.

Methods: Five hundred and seventeen bacterial strains were isolated from different infections (urinary tract infections 171, burns infections 238, respiratory tract infection 55 and blood infection 53). Eleven antimicrobials disc were used to determine the antimicrobial sensitivity by disc diffusion method.

Results: Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most predominate bacteria (122 isolates) followed by K. Pneumoniae (96 isolates), E.coli (64 isolates), S. pyogenes (59 isolates), S. aureus (51 isolates), S. pneumoniae (48 isolates), Proteus. spp. (47 isolates) and Salmonella spp. (14 isolates). All bacterial strains were highly resistant to most antimicrobials with percentage between 90% to 100%.There were 459 bacterial strains (91.61%) were multidrug resistant. Conclusions: This study proved that the predominant bacteria of burns infections and urinary tract infections were P. aeruginosa followed by K. Pneumoniae. Gentamicin, Amikacin and Ciprofloxacin are a drug of choice for treatment of these infections.

 

KEYWORDS:  Burns infections, UTI, Respiratory tract infections, Blood infection, Pathogenic bacteria, Antimicrobials.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Hospital environment play an important role in different infections, due toit is contains diverse population of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and viruses[1]. Microorganisms are present in large numbers in moist hospital environments, but some can also survive under hard environmental conditions[2]. Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria are one of the most important microorganisms are found in hospitals environments and cause different infections in in-patients such as urinary tract infection, respiratory tract infection, burns infections and blood infection[3, 4].

 

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli have been found to be the most commonly pathogenic bacteria associated with different infections worldwide[4, 5, 6].

 

Hospitals were considered as a reservoir for many types of pathogenic bacteria, usually many of which are multi-resistant to antimicrobials[7, 8].

 

In hospitals, morbidity, increased health care costs and longer stays caused by the emergence bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents is a global public health problem[9]. Recently, in hospitals environments especially in developing countries the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria is an increasing infection control problem lead to difficult to treat inpatients infected with different infections because of increased antibiotic resistance rate[3, 7, 10]. Recently, vertical and horizontal gene transfer is two of the most important methods of bacterial evolution and enabling these pathogens to resist different type of antimicrobials such as aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol and penicillins[11]. In developing countries such as Iraq, annually, there is high emergence of different infections such as, urinary tract infection, burns infections and respiratory tract infection caused by different multidrug resistant bacteria. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to identify the most prevalent pathogenic bacteria that cause different infections in Al-Kufa Central Hospital – Iraq and determine the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of these pathogens during the period from 2015 to 2017 to evaluate the changing trend of antimicrobial susceptibility in this hospital.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Patients, Specimens collection and bacterial identification:

A total number of 517of in patients infected with different infections were included in this study, age range (18-60) years old (males and females) attending to the Al-Kufa General Hospital in Al-Kufa City –Iraq, from 1-1-2015to 1-1-2017. A total number of 238 swabs were collected from skin of in patients infected with burns infections, 171 urine samples were collected from in patients with urinary tract infections, 55 sputum samples were collected from in patients with respiratory tract infection and 53 blood samples were collected from in patients infection with blood infection. All burns swabs were streaked by sterile swab (Bioanalyse – Turkey) on the surface of blood agar (Oxoid – UK) plates, Chocolate agar (Oxoid – UK) plates and MacConkey agar (Oxoid – UK) plates and incubated aerobically in 37°C for 24h.12.All urine and sputum specimens were collected in sterile container (Hi-media – India) and streaked by sterile swab (Bioanalyse – Turkey)on the surface of blood agar (Oxoid – UK) plates, Chocolate agar (Oxoid – UK) plates and MacConkey agar (Oxoid – UK) plates and incubated aerobically in 37°C overnight12. Five ml of blood specimen was taken from in patients suspected infected with blood infection by sterile disposable syringe (Himedia – India) and added to 45 ml of brain heart infusion broth (Oxoid – UK) and incubated aerobically in 37°C for 7 days with continuous shaking every day, then streaked (by sterile loop, (Himedia – India) on the surface of blood agar (Oxoid – UK) plates, Chocolate agar (Oxoid – UK) plates and MacConkey agar (Oxoid – UK) plates and incubated aerobically in 37oC overnight[12]. All growing pathogenic bacteria were identified by using standard bacteriological procedures according to Collee et al., (1996)12, MacFadden (2000)[13] and CLSI (2015)[14].

 

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing:

This test was done by using disc diffusion method according to Bauer et al., (1966)[15]. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)[14] guidelines were used to interpret results (CLSI, 2015)[14] and the susceptibility patterns were determined following CLSI guidelines (2015)[14].

 

Five pure and fresh colonies from each type of bacterial growth was adjusted according to MacFarland nephelometer scale (1.5 × 108 CFU/ml) and streaked on Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK) surface by sterile swab (Bioanalyse – Turkey). The antibiotics disks were placed aseptically on it and incubated at 37°C overnight. Eleven antimicrobials were used: Amoxicillin(AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).All antimicrobials were providing from Bioanalyse – Turkey.

 

RESULTS:

Total specimens:

Out of the 517 total specimens there were 290 specimens (56.092 %) were gram negative bacteria, 195 specimens (37.719 %) were gram positive bacteria and 16 specimens (3.094 %) with no any growth(Table 1).

 

Table 1: Total specimens in this study (N=517).

Bacterial growth

No.

%

Gram negative

226

43.713

Gram positive

275

53.191

No growth

16

3.094

Total

517

100

 

From the 517 total specimens there were 171 bacterial isolates (33.075 %) have been isolated from urine, 238 bacterial isolates (46.034 %) have been isolated from burns, 55 bacterial isolates (10.638 %)have been isolated from sputum, 53 bacterial isolates (10.253 %) have been isolated from blood and 16 specimens (3.094 %) with no bacterial growth(Table 2).


 

Table 2: Numbers and percentages of gram positive and gram negative bacterial isolates according to sites of infection(N=517).

Site of isolate

G+ve Bacteria (100%)

G-ve Bacteria (100%)

No growth (100%)

Total (100%)

Urine

96 (18.568 %)

68 (13.152 %)

7 (1.353 %)

171 (33.075 %)

Burns

114 (22.051 %)

124 (23.985%)

0 (0.0 %)

238 (46.034 %)

Sputum

38 (7.350 %)

17 (3.289 %)

0 (0.0 %)

55 (10.638 %)

Blood

27 (5.223 %)

17 (3.289 %)

9 (1.740 %)

53 (10.253 %)

Total

275 (53.191 %)

226 (43.713 %)

16 (3.096%)

517 (100%)

 


Numbers and percentage of gram positive and gram negative bacterial isolates according to sites of infection:

Out of total 517 isolates, the results proved that P.aeruginosa was the most predominant bacterium (122 isolates, 23.597%) and Salmonella spp. was the lowest dominant bacterium (14 isolates, 2.707%)isolated from all specimens. Also, the results indicate that burns infections was the most site of bacterial isolates with 238 isolates (46.034%) (Table 3).


 

Table 3. Numbers and percentages of gram positive and gram negative bacterial isolates according to sites of infection (N= 517).

Bacteria

Urine (100%)

Burns (100%)

Sputum (100%)

Blood (100%)

Total (100%)

P.aeruginosa

45 (8.704)

44 (8.51)

20 (3.86)

13 (2.514)

122 (23.597)

K.Pneumoniae

76 (14.700%)

15 (2.901%)

5 (0.967%)

0 (0.0%)

96 (18.568)

E.coli

10 (1.934%)

41 (7.930%)

13 (2.514%)

0 (0.0%)

64 (12.379)

Proteus.spp.

33 (6.382%)

14 (2.707%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

47 (9.090)

Salmonellaspp.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

14 (2.707%)

14 (2.707)

S. aureus

0 (0.0%)

46 (8.897%)

0 (0.0%)

5 (0.967%)

51 (9.864)

S.pyogenes

0 (0.0%)

44 (8.510%)

9 (1.740%)

6 (1.160%)

59 (11.412)

S.pneumoniae

0 (0.0%)

34 (0.065%)

8 (1.547%)

6 (1.160%)

48 (9.288)

No growth

7 (1.353%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

9 (1.740%)

16 (3.094)

Total

171 (33.075)

238 (46.034)

55 (10.638)

53 (10.253)

517 (100)

 


Antimicrobial susceptibility test:

The results proved that most bacterial isolates were high resistance against different antimicrobials especially against Amoxicillin, Ticarcillin, Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid, Chloramphenicol and Nitrofurantoin (Figures 1 to 9). Also, the results shows that there were 459 isolates were multidrug resistant and P. aeruginosa, K. Pneumoniae and S. aureus were the most prevalence multidrug resistant bacteria (Table 4).

 

 

Figure 1: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 122 P.aeruginosa isolates from different clinical sources.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).

 

 

Figure 2: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 96 K.Pneumoniae isolates from different clinical sources.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin, (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid, (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).

 

Figure 3: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 64 E.coli isolates from different clinical sources.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).

 

 

Figure 4: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 47Proteus spp. isolates from different clinical sources.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin(CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).


 

Figure 5: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 14 Salmonella spp. isolates from different clinical sources.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).

 

 

Figure 6: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 51 S. aureus isolates from different clinical sources.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).


 

Figure 7: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 59 S. pyogenes isolates from different clinical sources.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).

 

 

Figure 8: Antimicrobial susceptibility test of 48 S.pneumoniae isolates from different clinical sources.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).


 

Figure 9: Total percentage of antimicrobials resistance of bacterial isolates from different infections.

Amoxicillin (AX, 25 µg), Ticarcillin (TIC, 75 µg), Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg) Gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), Amikacin (AK, 30 µg), Tobramycin (TM, 10 µg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), Doxycycline (DO, 30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), Chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg) and Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg).

Table 4. Prevalence of multidrug resistant bacteria isolated from different infections (N= 501).

Bacteria

Total isolates

Urine (%)

Burns (%)

Sputum (%)

Blood (%)

Total (%)

P.aeruginosa

122

45 (100)

44 (100)

20 (100)

13 (100)

122 (100)

K.Pneumoniae

96

76 (100)

15 (100)

5 (100)

0 (0.0%)

96 (100)

E.coli

64

10 (100)

41 (100)

8 (61.53)

0 (0.0%)

59 (92.18)

Proteus.spp.

47

30 (90.90)

14 (100)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

44 (93.61)

Salmonellaspp.

14

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

9 (64.25)

9 (64.25)

S. aureus

51

0 (0.0%)

46 (100)

0 (0.0%)

5 (100)

51 (100)

S.pyogenes

59

0 (0.0%)

30 (68.18)

9 (100)

3 (50)

42 (71.18)

S.pneumoniae

48

0 (0.0%)

24 (70.58)

8 (100)

4 (66.66)

36 (75)

 Total

 501 (100)

 161

 214

 50

 34

 459 (91.61)

 

 


DISCUSSION:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and S.aureus are associated with many infections such as urinary tract infection, burns infections and blood infection and they are recognized public health threat often acquired from the hospital environment and contaminated medical devices[16]. They are not only an important cause of morbidity but also increase the stay of the patient in the hospital and increase the cost of treatment[17].In this study, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae were the most prevalent bacteria at rate 23.597%, 18.568%and 9.864% respectively, and both of them were multidrug resistant with percentage 100%. This result is in agreement with many studies such as Apondi et al. (2016)16, Mitiku et al. (2015)[18], Kossow et al. (2017)[19], Dinh et al. (2017)[20] and Saba et al. (2017)[21] when they found that these bacteria were the most predominant pathogens and were multidrug resistance to most antimicrobials. Escherichia coli and Proteus spp. are the most important pathogenic bacteria cause urinary tract infection and became more virulent and more resistant to antimicrobials (multidrug resistant) in last five years[22, 23]. In this study, there was high prevalence of multidrug resistant E.coli and Proteus spp. with percentage 92.18% and 93.61%respectively, this result are in agreement with Abduzaimovic et al. (2016)[24], Pal et al. (2016)[25] and Ma et al. (2017)[26]. Other pathogenic bacteria were prevalent in this study in different percentages (Salmonella spp.2.707%), (S.pyogenes 11.412%) and (S. pneumoniae 9.288%). But, these bacteria were multidrug resistant with high rates 64.25%, 71.18% and 75% respectively. This result is in agreement with Forkus et al., (2017)[27], Babbar et al., (2017)[28] and Thapa et al., (2017)[29]. Salmonella typhi is the main causative agent of enteric fever, is a majorpublic health concern in Iraq and other developing countries. Several studies from developing countries have already identified this pathogen as multidrug resistant bacteria and a common cause of blood infection in hospitals of this regions[30, 31]. Streptococcus pyogenes and S.pneumoniae are the most important pathogenic bacteria causing different infections such as respiratory tract infection and the most pathogenic bacteria can resist different types of antimicrobials and therefore they are called multi-drug resistant bacteria[32].

 

The antibiotic susceptibility analysis of the bacterial isolates showed that about 20% were wild type, while 91.61% were multidrug resistant, particularly to cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. These resistance profiles can be due to expression of different enzymes such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and to over expression of efflux systems. Multi antibiotic resistance concerned all virulence profiles. Studies showed that resistance mechanisms such as efflux pump can contribute to virulence of bacteria[33]and a high proportion of multidrug bacterial isolates were found with virulence factors[34, 35]. The coevolution or coexistence of resistance and virulence may be inherent to their genetic linkage in the same genetic determinants and accessory elements (transposons, integrons and plasmids)[36].The use of antimicrobials is the single most important factor leading to antimicrobial resistance around the world[34]. Antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed drugs used in human medicine. However, up to 55% of all the antibiotics prescribed for people are not needed or are not optimally effective as prescribed. Antibiotics are also commonly used in food animals to prevent, control, and treat disease, and to promote the growth of food-producing animals. The use of antibiotics for promoting growth is not necessary, and the practice should be phased out [37]. In the present study, most bacterial strains were resistant to Amoxicillin, Ticarcillin and Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid, on the other hand Ciprofloxacin, Tetracycline and Tobramycin were provided good antibacterial effect. When a microbe acquires a genetic mutation making it resistant to the effect of one or more antimicrobial agents that were once effective. This genetic mutation may be acquired by gene transfer or spontaneously. Pathogenic bacteria that are resistant to different antimicrobials (more than three classes) are called multidrug resistant[38]. In conclusions: During past of the two years, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae were in the first place that cause infections in Al-kufa General hospital. Most pathogenic bacteria became high resistant to most antimicrobials.

 

 

REFERENCES:

1.     Aljanaby AAJ and Medhat AR. Prevalence of Some Antimicrobials Resistance Associated-genes in Salmonella typhi Isolated from Patients Infected with Typhoid Fever. J Biol Sci. 2017; 17(4): 171-184, 2017

2.     Aljanaby AAJ and Alhasnawi HMRJ. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Multidrug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Different Clinical Sources in Al-Najaf Province-Iraq. Pak J Biol Sci. 2017; 20(5): 217-232.

3.     Solomon FB, Wadilo FW, Arota AA, Abraham YL. Antibiotic resistant airborne bacteria and their multidrug resistance pattern at University teaching referral Hospital in South Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017; 16(1):29.

4.     Ahmed D, Nahid MA, Sami AB, Halim F, Akter N, Sadique T, Rana MS, Elahi MS, Rahman MM. Bacterial etiology of bloodstream infections and antimicrobial resistance in Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2005-2014. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017; 6:2.

5.     Kollef MH, Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Vo L, Schein J, Micek ST, Kim M.J Infect. Epidemiology, microbiology and outcomes of healthcare-associated and community acquired bacteremia: a multicenter cohort study. 2011; 62(2):130-135.

6.     Vallés J, Palomar M, Alvárez-Lerma F, Rello J, Blanco A, Garnacho-Montero J, Martín LoechesI. Evolution over a 15year period of clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with community-acquired bacteremia. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41(1):76-83.

7.     Aljanaby, A.A.J.J., 2012. Antibacterial activity of an aqueous extract of Petroselinum crispum leaves against pathogenic bacteria isolated from patients with burns infections in Al-najaf Governorate, Iraq. Res Chem Intermed., 38(9).

8.     Muhammad UK, Isa MA, Aliyu ZM. Distribution of potential nosocomial pathogens isolated from environments of four selected hospital in Sokoto, North Western Nigeria. J Microbiol Biotechnol Res. 2013; 3:139–143.

9.     Davane M, Suryawanshi N, Pichare A, Nagoba B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa from hospital environment. J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 4:42–43.

10.  Biswas PP, Dey S, Adhikari L, Sen A. Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococcus species isolated from clinical samples and feces of colonized patients by phenotypic and genotypic methods. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2016; 59(2):188-193.

11.  Price LB, Johnson JR, Aziz M, Clabots C, Johnston B, Tchesnokova V, Nordstrom L, Billig M, Chattopadhyay S, Stegger M, Andersen PS, Pearson T, Riddell K, Rogers P, Scholes D, Kahl B, Keim P, Sokurenko EV. The epidemic of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli ST131 is driven by a single highly pathogenic subclone, H30-Rx. MBio. 2013; 4(6):e00377-13.

12.  Collee, J.G., B.P. Marmion, A.G. Fraser, and A Simmons, 1999. Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology.(14 ed.) Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp:263-298.

13.  MacFaddin, J. F, 2000. Biochemical Tests for Identification of Medical Bacteria, 3rd edn., Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, P. A. 912 pages.

14.  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M100-S25 performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-fifth informational supplement; 2015.

15.  Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disc method. Am. J Clin Pathol 1966; 45:493–496.

16.  Apondi OE, Oduor OC, Gye BK, Kipkoech MK. High prevalence of multi-drug resistant klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary teaching hospital in western kenya. Afr J Infect Dis. 2016; 10(2):89-95.

17.  Awoke D. Longitudinal bacteriology of burn patients at Yekatit 12 hospital burn center, Addis-Ababa, Ethiopia AAU electronic library 1–51; 2011.

18.  Mitiku M, Ali S, Kibru G. Antimicrobial drug resistance and disinfectants susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from clinical and environmental samples in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Am J Biomed Life Sci. 2015; 2:40–45.

19.  Kossow A, Kampmeier S, Willems S, Berdel WE, Groll AH, Burckhardt B, C R, Groth C, Idelevich EA, Kipp F, Mellmann A, Stelljes M. Control of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients by a novel bundle including remodeling of sanitary and water supply systems. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 18.

20.  Dinh A, Davido B, Calin R, Paquereau J, Duran C, Bouchand F, Phé V, Chartier-Kastler E, Rottman M, Salomon J, Plésiat P, Potron A. Ceftolozane/tazobactam for febrile UTI due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a patient with neurogenic bladder. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017; 3.

21.  Saba CKS, Amenyona JK, Kpordze SW. Prevalence and pattern of antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from door handles and other points of contact in public hospitals in Ghana. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017; 6:44.

22.  Dereje M, Woldeamanuel Y, Asrat D, Ayenachew F. Urinary tract infection among fistula patients admitted at Hamlin fistula hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.m BMC Infect Dis. 2017; 17(1):150.

23.  Diwan V, Purohit M, Chandran S, Parashar V, Shah H, Mahadik VK, Stålsby Lundborg C, Tamhankar AJ. A Three-Year Follow-Up Study of Antibiotic and Metal Residues, Antibiotic Resistance and Resistance Genes, Focusing on Kshipra-A River Associated with Holy Religious Mass-Bathing in India: Protocol Paper. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(6).

24.  Abduzaimovic A, Aljicevic M, Rebic V, Vranic SM, Abduzaimovic K, Sestic S. Resistance in Urinary Isolates of Escherichia coli. Mater Sociomed. 2016; 28(6):416-419.

25.  Pal N, Hooja S, Sharma R, Maheshwari RK. Phenotypic Detection and Antibiogram of β-lactamase-producing Proteus Species in a Tertiary Care Hospital, India. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2016; 6(5):267-273.

26.  Ma J, Li N, Liu Y, Wang C, Liu X, Chen S, Xie X, Gan S, Wang M, Cao W, Wang F, Liu Y, Wan D, Sun L, Sun H. Antimicrobial resistance patterns, clinical features, and risk factors for septic shock and death of nosocomial E.coli bacteremia in adult patients with hematological disease: A monocenter retrospective study in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(21):e6959.

27.  Forkus B, Ritter S, Vlysidis M, Geldart K, Kaznessis YN. Antimicrobial Probiotics Reduce Salmonella enterica in Turkey Gastrointestinal Tracts. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 40695.

28.  Babbar A, Kumar VN, Bergmann R, Barrantes I, Pieper DH, Itzek A, Nitsche-Schmitz DP. Members of a new subgroup of Streptococcus anginosus harbor virulence related genes previously observed in Streptococcus pyogenes. Int J Med Microbiol. 2017; 307(3):174-181.

29.  Thapa R, Bhagat C, Shrestha P, Awal S, Dudhagara P. Enzyme-mediated formulation of stable elliptical silver nanoparticles tested against clinical pathogens and MDR bacteria and development of antimicrobial surgical thread. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017; 16: 39.

30.  Brooks WA, Hossain A, Goswami D, Nahar K, Alam K, Ahmed N, Naheed A, Nair GB, Luby S, Breiman RF.Bacteremic typhoid fever in children in an urban slum, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005; 11(2):326-329.

31.  Rahman BA, Wasfy MO, Maksoud MA, Hanna N, Dueger E, House B. Multi-drug resistance and reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin among Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates from the Middle East and Central Asia. New Microbes New Infect. 2014; 2(4):88-92.

32.  Pumarola F, Marès J, Losada I, Minguella I, Moraga F, Tarragó D, Aguilera U, Casanovas JM, Gadea G, Trías E, Cenoz S, Sistiaga A, García-Corbeira P, Pirçon JY, Marano C, Hausdorff WP. Microbiology of bacteria causing recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) and AOM treatment failure in young children in Spain: shifting pathogens in the post-pneumococcal conjugate vaccination era. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 77(8):1231-6.

33.  Singh S, Singh SK, Chowdhury I, Singh R. Understanding the Mechanism of Bacterial Biofilms Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents. Open Microbiol J. 2017; 11:53-62.

34.  Aljanaby, A. A. J. and A.H. A. Alhasani, 2016. Virulence factors and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of multidrug resistance Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from different clinical infections. Afr J Microbiol Res. 10(22) 829-843.

35.  Burt SA, Ojo-Fakunle VT, Woertman J, Veldhuizen EJ. The natural antimicrobial carvacrol inhibits quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum and reduces bacterial biofilm formation at sub-lethal concentrations. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e93414.

36.  Schroll C, Barken KB, Krogfelt KA, Struve C. Role of type 1 and type 3 fimbriae in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formation. BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10:179.

37.  de Macedo JL, Santos JB. Bacterial and fungal colonization of burn wounds. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005; 100(5):535-539.

38.  Thapa R, Bhagat C, Shrestha P, Awal S, Dudhagara P.Enzyme-mediated formulation of stable elliptical silver nanoparticles tested against clinical pathogens and MDR bacteria and development of antimicrobial surgical thread. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017; 16(1):39. 

 

 

 

 

Received on 10.08.2017          Modified on 24.09.2017

Accepted on 15.10.2017        © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2017; 10(10):3264-3270.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00579.0