Assessment
of Heavy Metal Induced Organ Toxicity in marketed Ayurvedhic
Formulation and Report its LD50 value with Brine Shrimp Lethality Assay
Saranya A,
Nithya S*
Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Vels University (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil
Nadu, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: sermugapandian.nithya@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Ayurvedhic system of medicine is an ancient and traditional
medicine of India. These preparations use combination of remedies to alleviate
diseases. Heavy metal poisoning in ayurvedhic
preparation contribute to 0.6% of global burden for diseases. Children
consuming this estimated to contribute about 6, 00,000 of newer intellectual
disabilities every year. Previously the ayurvedhic
preparations were available as bhasmas and they are
incorporated with adjuvant heavy metals to increase the potency. Heavy metals
often found are lead, arsenic and mercury. Lead interferes with many bodily
function affecting brain, lungs, liver and kidney. Arsenic causes keratosis, gangrene; cancer in skin, kidney, bladder and
lungs after 20 yrs. Mercury is a neurodevelopmental
poison affecting cell migration causing cell degeneration and death. In modern
formulations their presence may be excessive because of poor quality control,
contamination, adulteration and improper purification. Therefore users of ayurvedhic formulation are at risk of developing heavy
metal poisoning leading to organ toxicity. In this study a selective herbal
formulation were subjected to estimate for their heavy metal content and its
lethality value is found by carrying out with brine shrimp lethality assay.
KEYWORDS: Ayurvedha, Lead,
Arsenic, Mercury, Lethality Assay.
INTRODUCTION:
Ayurveda is one of the traditional systems in India. Ayurvedic formulation is the system of healing that
originated in ancient period in india .the ancient hindu science of health and medicine, based on maintaining
balance among the five elements earth, air, fire and ether 1.Ayurvedha is derived from theSanskrit words “Ayur” means
“living or life” and “veda” means “science or
knowledge” that defined as the “knowledge of living” or “the science of
longevity”1,2.
Ayurveda is a stream
of the knowledge passed on from generation to generation from teachers to their
students. Samhitas - the authentic text books of Ayurveda are a compendium of experiences by ancient doctors
and discussions by teachers and disciples. Aim of Ayurveda
is to prevent diseases in a healthy person and to cure the diseased one.World Health Organization estimated that 80% of the
world inhabitants still rely mainly on traditional medicines for their health
care3. Ayurvedic
medicines containing detoxified, toxic material, poisonous substances, heavy
metals should be taken under medical supervision4.
Demerits
of Ayurvedic Medicine:
· Lack of dosage instructions.
·
Poison risk associated with wild
herbs.
· Medication interactions.
·
Lack of regulation5.
Heavy
metals:
Heavy
metals are the natural components of the earth crusts6. Heavy metals refer to any metallic
chemical element that has a relatively high density and is toxic or poisonous
at low concentration7,8.Heavy metal poisoning in ayurvedic preparation contribute to 0.6% of global burden
for diseases. Children consuming this estimated to contribute about6, 00,000 of
newer intellectual disabilities every year.9
Mercury
(Hg), Copper (cu), Arsenic (As), Lead (Pd), Cadmium (Cd),
Chromium (Cr) this is some of the example of heavy metal. Mercury is a heavy,
silvery –white metal and hence it is commonly known as quick silver and was
formerly named hydrargyrum .Compared to other metals,
it is a poor conductor of heat, but a fair conductor of electricity6,7 .
A
Normal mercury level is less than 10µg/l or 0.47µg/kg/day it is according to world
health organization.Mercury has a freezing point of
-38.83°C and a boiling point of 356.73°C, both exceptionally low for a metal.
In addition, mercury’s boiling point of 629.88K (356.73°C) is the lowest of any
metal. Mercury is a chemical element with symbol Hg and atomic number80.10,11
Mercury
is a prominent environment contaminant that causes detrimental effect to human
health12,13. Although the liver has been known to be a main target
organ, there is limited information on in-vivo molecular mechanism of mercury
–induced toxicity in the liver. Mercury (Hg) is not only a threat to public
health but also a growth risk factor to plants,as it
is readily accumulated by higher plants.10
Mercury
(Hg) is deadly toxic to humans and ecosystems,which
is considered as a global pollutant because it is highly toxic or mobile and extremely persistent in the environment
.It is not only a threat to public health
but also a growth risk factor to plants, as it is readily accumulated by
higher plants14,15.Hence forth the preparations made from
plant extracts have the possibility to have traces of heavy metals in it and
thereby leading to organ toxicity.16,17
Organ
toxicity is the degree to which a substance can damage an organism. Toxicity
can refers to the effect on a whole organism, such as an animals, bacterium, or
plant, as well as the effect on a substructure of the organism, such as a cell
or an organ such as the liver toxicity.18,19
Copper
is a chemical element with symbol Cu and atomic number 29. It is a soft,
malleable and ductile metal with very high thermal and electrical conductivity.
A freshly exposed surface of pure copper has a reddish-orange color18. Symbol: Cu, Melting
point: 1,085 °c; Molar
mass: 63.546 g/mol; atomic
number: 29
Copper Health Benefits and Recommended Intake. Copper is an
essential trace mineral necessary for survival. Most of the copper in the body
is found in the liver, brain, heart, kidneys and skeletal muscle.It
is a ductile metal with very high thermal and electrical conductivity. Pure copper
is soft and malleable; a freshly exposed surface has a reddish-orange color. It is used as a conductor of heat and
electricity, a building material, and a constituent of various metal alloys20,21.
Copper is a mineral that's found throughout the body. It helps your body make red blood cells and keeps nerve
cells and your immune system healthy. It also helps form collagen, a key part
of bones and connective tissue.22,23
Copper is incorporated into a variety of proteins and metallicenzymes which perform essential metabolic functions; the micronutrient is
necessary for the proper growth, development, and maintenance of bone,
connective tissue, brain, heart, and many other body organs24,25.
All US coins are now copper alloys, and gun metals also contain copper. Most copper is used in
electrical equipment such as wiring and motors. This is because it conducts
both heat and electricity very well, and can be drawn into wires.14
Used
in electrical switches, fluorescent light bulbs, thermometer ect. Emission from mercury containing product are
batteries, thermometers. Mercury is also used in dental filling as amalgam26,27.
Signs
and symptoms of metal toxicity:
As
an example of the scope of a heavy metal’s toxicity, lead can affect the
nervous system, gastrointestinal system, cardiovascular system, blood
production, kidney, and reproductive system 28.Symptoms of heavy metal toxicity include
mental confusion, pain in muscles and joints, headaches, short term memory
loss, allergies, vision problems, chronic fatigue and others24,29.
The
symptoms are so vague that it is difficult to diagnose based on symptoms alone.
Mercury toxicity has been linked to, among other things, mercury dental
fillings, particularly when people have a large number of them. Symptoms
include a metallic taste in the mouth, excess salivation, gingivitis, tremors,
stomach and kidney troubles. Mental symptoms include shyness, irritability,
apathy and depression, psychosis, mental deterioration and anorexia10,14,17.
Treatment:
The
first step in treating any heavy metal toxicity is to identify the toxic
elements and begin the removal process. The easiest screening process is a Hair
analysis. For many patients intravenous
Vitamin C and replacement mineral infusion are also recommended to support the
body through the metal removal process29,30.
Symptoms
will often begin to improve within weeks or even days of commencing treatment.
Therapy may last from 6 months to 2 years.31
Brine
Shrimp:
Artemia is a genus of aquatic crustaceans known as
Brine Shrimp. Brine shrimp is a small fairy which lives in a pool and salt
water like oceans and is used as food for aquarium fish. Sea monkeys are the
brand name for brine shrimp32.In their first stage of development, Artemia do
not feed but consume their own energy reserves stored in the cyst. Wild brine
shrimp eat microscopic plank tonic algae33.
Scientific
classification:
·
Family :
Artemiidae.
·
Kingdom : Animalia.
·
Order :
Anostraca.
·
Species :
Artemia saline.
Structure
of Brine Shrimp:
The body of the Artemia
is divided into head, thorax, and abdomen. The entire body is converted with a
thin, flexible exoskeleton of chitin to which muscles are attached internally
and shed periodically. The adult has 3 eyes and 11 pairs of legs and can grow
to 15 millimeter in size. Their blood contains the pigment Hemoglobin, which is
also found in vertebrate34.Artemia do not feed but
consume their own energy reserves stored in the cyst. Wild brine shrimp eat
microscopic plank tonic algae. Cultured brine shrimp can also
be fed particulate foods including yeast, wheat flour, and soybean powder or egg yolk35.
Figure No -1 Brine Shrimp egg.
Figure
No-2-Structure of Brine Shrimp under Compound Microscope
Uses:
·
They are soft and easily digestible and contain enzymes that
help fish to better utilize other feeds.
·
They are high in protein, ranging from 55% to 60% protein by
dry weight, supporting rapid weight gain in young fish36.
·
They can be feed to both marine and freshwater fish,
surviving and swimming for hours –even in fresh water.
·
They can grow quickly, multiplying in weight 500 fold in
three to four weeks and increasing in size from 450 microns to 1.5 centimeters
in length37.
Lethal Dose 50:
LD stands for "Lethal
Dose". LD50 is
the amount of a material, given all at once, which causes the death of 50% (one
half) of a group of test animals. The LD50 is one way to measure the short-term
poisoning potential (acute toxicity) of a material38.
LD 50 (Lethal Dose
50) =
The apparent least
lethal dose –[a×b]/N.
Where;
N = Number of animals in each groups.
a = Dose difference.
b = Mean mortality.
Brine
Shrimp Lethality Assay:
The brine shrimp lethality assay is
considered as a useful tool for preliminary assessment of toxicity .It has also
been suggested for screening pharmacological activities in ayurvedic
formulation39,40.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Collection of ayurvedic medicine:
Marked Ayurvedic drug were
collected from the ayurvedic retail shop in guindy,(Chennai) for the project or research work. The
collected ayurvedic medicines are NityanandaRas,
Vata gajankush Ras, Prabhakara Vati. These drugs were selected because of their uses and
it is easily available in market but only get with the prescription.The
drugs that selected is in tablet form so it is easy to carry .Nityananda Ras is used to treat
Gout, Tumor, Piles, Elephantiasis, Obesity etc . It has potential in the
treatment of cancer .It can taken once or twice along with cold water. And it
having the doses of 250-500 mg. Vata gajankush Ras is used to treat Neuro muscular disease, Paralysis, Arthritis, Cramps. Vata gajankush Ras is taken 1-3 time in the morning and evening. It is
advised along with long pepper, honey. In this drug the dosage are125-259 mg
once or twice a day. Prabhakara Vati
is used in the treatment of Heart disease. It contains mineral origin
ingredients and hence should only be taken under a doctor’s prescription. The ayurvedic doctor should advise toget
the dosage of 125mg- 250 mg once or twice a day.
Preparation of drug solution:
The collected of three marketed ayurvedic
drug were taken each separately and crushed it thoroughly until it converted
into a fine powder. Then the ayurvedic drug (each
100g) were individually defatted with warm water (100ml) and then filtered and
subjected for the activity studies40.
Table No 1- The Number of Shrimp nauplii
that survived after treating with the three Ayurvedic
Drug Solution and their percentage mortality
Drug Solution |
Concentration (ppm or mg/l) |
Number of
surviving nauplii after 24 hours |
Total number
of surviving nauplii (live) |
% Mortality |
||
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
||||
NITYANANDA RAS |
1 |
10 |
09 |
08 |
27 |
10% |
10 |
07 |
08 |
06 |
21 |
30% |
|
100 |
06 |
05 |
04 |
15 |
50% |
|
1000 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
100% |
|
VATAGAJANKUSH RAS |
1 |
07 |
07 |
08 |
22 |
27% |
10 |
04 |
06 |
05 |
15 |
50% |
|
100 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
100% |
|
1000 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
100% |
|
PRABHAKARA VATI |
1 |
07 |
08 |
08 |
23 |
23% |
10 |
05 |
06 |
05 |
16 |
47% |
|
100 |
04 |
05 |
05 |
14 |
53% |
|
1000 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
00 |
100% |
Number of animal dead in each groups
% Mortality=
--------------------------------------×100
% of Nauplii
surviving in control
Heavy metal report:
The ayurvedic
drug is given for the test to identify the heavy metal amount or the quantity
present in it. The test is given in SGS India private limited in Ambattur Industrial state, Ambattur
,Chennai -600058.
Table No -2 Heavy Metal Report
Ayurvedic drug Solution |
Test
for heavy metal |
Methods
used |
Result
(
in units) |
NITYANANDHA
RAS |
Mercury |
SO-IN-MUL-TE-063
BY ICP-MS |
1.04g/ 100
g |
Copper |
SO-IN-MUL-TE-063
BY ICPOES |
1.42g/ 100
g |
|
VATA
GAJANKUSH RAS |
Mercury |
SO-IN-MUL-TE-063
BY ICP-MS |
1.33g/ 100
g |
Copper |
SO-IN-MUL-TE-063
BY ICPOES |
0.02g/ 100
g |
|
PRABHAKARA
VATI |
Mercury |
SO-IN-MUL-TE-063
BY ICP-MS |
0.20g/ 100
g |
Copper |
SO-IN-MUL-TE-063
BY ICPOES |
0.02g/ 100
g |
Brine Shrimp Lethality Assay (BSLA)39,40:
Brine shrimp eggswere obtained from the Aquamarine world in guindy. Filtered, artificial seawater was prepared sea salt
38 gms in 1 liter of distilled water for hatching the
shrimp eggs. The initial PH should be between 7.5 and 8. The pH is likely to
fall during the culture period and can be adjusted upward with the addition of
baking soda or NaHCO3. Monitor Ph regularly and adjust as needed.
The seawater was put in a small plastic container (hatchingchamber)
with a partition for dark (covered) and light areas. Shrimp eggs were added
into the dark side of the chamber while the lamp above the other side (light)
will attract the hatched shrimp. Two days were allowed for the shrimp to hatch
and mature as nauplii (larva). After two days, when
the shrimp larvae are ready, 4 ml of the artificial seawater was added to each
test tube and 10 brine shrimps were introduced into each tube. Thus, there were
a total of 30 shrimps per dilution. Then the volume was adjusted with
artificial seawater up to 5 ml per test tube. The test tubes were left
uncovered under the lamp. The number of surviving shrimps were counted and
recorded after 24 hours.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
The ayurvedic drug solution of the powdered
drug tested shows good brine shrimp activity. The lethality dose of Nityananda Ras, Vatagajankush Ras, and Prabhakara Vati solution were
1ppm (µl/ml), 10ppm,100ppm, and 1000ppmrespectively (Table-2). The degree of
lethality was directly proportional to the concentration of the solution.
Maximum mortality 100% were observed at a concentration of 1000ppm in Nityananda Ras,and Prabhakara Vatisolution while that of
Vata gajankush Ras was at 100 and 1000ppm.
In result, the brine shrimp lethality of the ayurvedic
drugs were found to be concentration will be dependent .The observed lethality
of the drug solution indicated the presence of potent activity. According to ayurvedic drug solution is toxic(active) if it has an LD50
value of less than 1000µg/ml while non-toxic (inactive) if it is greater than
1000µg/ml.
The results showed that the drug solution of the three selected ayurvedic drug were potent or active against brine shrimp
where Vata gajankush Ras was the most active at 10 ppm.
In the study conducted by drug solution Vata gajankush Ras was observed as
having an neuromuscular activity and it is more potent even at small amount.
Prabhakara Vati
ranks as the second potent drug against brine shrimp at 1-10ppm in this
presence study. And it is used to treat heart diseases and it is also act as
cardiac tonic. The result on the lethality of Nityananda
Rason brine shrimps is less than the other drugs of Vata gajankush Ras and Prabhakara Vati. Thus, some useful drugs of therapeutic importance may
develop out of the research work.
In the other hand, some studies have shown that Nityananda
Ras solution exhibited selective cytotoxicity
against several cancer cell lines. Thus,the result on
Nityananda Ras supports its
use in traditional ayurvedic medicine as well as that
of Prabhakara Vati and Vata gajankush Ras.
The tested ayurvedic drugs contain heavy metal
of mercury and copper at the amount of non-toxic level at below
1000ppm.Theayurvedic drug solution is toxic (active) if it has an LD50 value of
more than 1000µg/ml while non-toxic (inactive) if it is less than 1000µg/ml.The Nityananda Ras contain heavy metal of mercury is 1.04g/100 and copper
is1.42g/100 g. The Vata gajankush
Ras contain 1.33g/100 g in mercury and copper
contain 0.02g/100 g. The Prabhakara Vati contains mercury
at the level of 0.20g/100 g and copper is the lesser amount of 0.02g/100
g.
CONCLUSION:
The ayurvedic extract of Nityananda
Ras, Vatagajankush Ras, Prabhakara Vati,are the drug exhibited for brine shrimp toxicity
against the brine shrimp and considered as containing active or potent
components. This is because their LD50 values are less than 1000 ppm or 1g/l. It is very useful for any future in vivo or
clinical study of the drug solutions. However, further toxicity studies are
needed to determine the effect on this ayurvedic drug
on chronic toxicity, on animal fetus, pregnant animals, and their reproductive capacity,to complete the safety profile of this solution.
Thus some useful drugs of therapeutic importance may develop out of the
research work.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are thankful to Vels University (VISTAS) and its management for providing
research facilities and encouragement.
REFERENCES:
1.
Ackerman, J. T.,
Eagles-Smith, C. A., Herzog, M. P., Hartman, C. A., Peterson, S. H., Evers, D.
C., … Bryan, C. E. (2016). Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across
western North America: A synthesis. The Science of the Total Environment.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.071
2.
Acosta, D. da S.,
Danielle, N. M., Altenhofen, S., Luzardo,
M. D., Costa, P. G., Bianchini, A., … Dafre, A. L. (2016). Copper at low levels impairs memory of
adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) and affects swimming performance of larvae. Comparative
Biochemistry and Physiology. Toxicology and Pharmacology: CBP, 185-186,
122–130. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2016.03.008
3.
Albert, S., Nongrum, M.,
Webb, E. L., Porter, J. D. H., and Kharkongor, G. C.
(2015). Medical pluralism among indigenous peoples in northeast India -
implications for health policy. Tropical Medicine and International Health:
TM and IH, 20(7), 952–960. http://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12499
4.
Asem, A., and Sun,
S.-C. (2016). Morphological differentiation of seven parthenogenetic
Artemia (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) populations from China, with special emphasis
on ploidy degrees. Microscopy Research and
Technique, 79(4), 258–266. http://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22625
5.
Azevedo, B. F., Simőes, null, Fiorim, J., Botelho, T., Angeli, J. K., Vieira, J. V. A., … Vassallo,
D. V. (2016). Chronic mercury exposure at different concentrations produces
opposed vascular responses in rat aorta. Clinical and Experimental
Pharmacology and Physiology. http://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1681.12578
6.
Banana, A. A. S., Mohamed, R. M. S. R., and Al-Gheethi, A. a. S. (2016). Mercury pollution for marine
environment at Farwa Island, Libya. Journal of
Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 14, 5.
http://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-016-0246-y
7.
Carocci, A., Rovito, N., Sinicropi, M. S., and
Genchi, G. (2014). Mercury toxicity and
neurodegenerative effects. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology, 229, 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03777-6_1
8.
Chaiyo, S., Mehmeti, E., Žagar, K., Siangproh, W., Chailapakul, O., and
Kalcher, K. (2016). Electrochemical sensors for the
simultaneous determination of zinc, cadmium and lead using a Nafion/ionic liquid/graphene
composite modified screen-printed carbon electrode. Analytica
Chimica Acta, 918,
26–34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.03.026
9.
Davis, J. A., Ross, J. R. M., Bezalel,
S., Sim, L., Bonnema, A.,
Ichikawa, G., … Ackerman, J. T. (2016). Hg concentrations in fish from coastal
waters of California and Western North America. The Science of the Total
Environment. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.093
10.
Dey, Y. N., Mahor, S., Kumar, D., Wanjari,
M., Gaidhani, S., and Jadhav,
A. (2016). Gastrokinetic activity of Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
tuber in rats. Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology,
5(1), 36–42. http://doi.org/10.5455/jice.20151211063819
11.
Diop, M., and Amara, R. (2016). Mercury concentrations in the coastal
marine food web along the Senegalese coast. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research International. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6386-x
12.
Eagles-Smith, C. A., Ackerman, J. T., Willacker, J. J., Tate, M. T., Lutz, M. A., Fleck, J. A., …
Pritz, C. F. (2016). Spatial and temporal patterns of
mercury concentrations in freshwater fish across the Western United States and
Canada. The Science of the Total Environment.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.229
13.
El Fels, L., Hafidi, M., and Ouhdouch, Y.
(2016). Artemia salina as a
new index for assessment of acute cytotoxicity during
co-composting of sewage sludge and lignocellulose
waste. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 50, 194–200.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.002
14.
Enrico, M., Roux, G. L.,
Marusczak, N., Heimbürger,
L.-E., Claustres, A., Fu, X., … Sonke,
J. E. (2016). Atmospheric Mercury Transfer to Peat Bogs Dominated by Gaseous
Elemental Mercury Dry Deposition. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(5),
2405–2412. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06058
15.
Goretti, E., Pallottini, M., Ricciarini, M.
I., Selvaggi, R., and Cappelletti,
D. (2016). Heavy metals bioaccumulation in selected tissues of red swamp
crayfish: An easy tool for monitoring environmental contamination levels. The
Science of the Total Environment, 559, 339–346.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.169
16.
GuŢu, C. M., Olaru, O. T., Purdel, N. C., Ilie, M., NeamŢu, M. C., Dănciulescu Miulescu, R., … Margină, D. M. (2015). Comparative evaluation of
short-term toxicity of inorganic arsenic compounds on Artemia
salina. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology
= Revue Roumaine De Morphologie
Et Embryologie, 56(3), 1091–1096.
17.
Herman, M., Golasik, M., Piekoszewski, W., Walas, S., Napierala, M., Wyganowska-Swiatkowska,
M., … Florek, E. (2016). Essential and Toxic Metals
in Oral Fluid-a Potential Role in the Diagnosis of Periodontal Diseases. Biological
Trace Element Research. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-016-0660-0
18.
Hoseinifar, S. H., Zare, P., and Kolangi Miandare, H. (2015). The effects of different routes of inulin administration on gut microbiota
and survival rate of Indian white shrimp post-larvae (Fenneropenaeus
indicus). Veterinary Research Forum: An
International Quarterly Journal, 6(4), 331–335.
19.
Jackson, A., Evers, D. C., Eagles-Smith, C. A.,
Ackerman, J. T., Willacker, J. J., Elliott, J. E., …
Bryan, C. E. (2016). Mercury risk to avian piscivores
across western United States and Canada. The Science of the Total
Environment. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.197
20.
Jensen, J., Larsen, M. M., and Bak,
J. (2016). National monitoring study in Denmark finds increased and critical
levels of copper and zinc in arable soils fertilized with pig slurry. Environmental
Pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987), 214, 334–340.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.034
21.
Jiménez-Cortés, J. G.,
Serrano-Meneses, M. A., and Córdoba-Aguilar, A.
(2012). The effects of food shortage during larval development on adult body
size, body mass, physiology and developmental time in a tropical damselfly. Journal
of Insect Physiology, 58(3), 318–326.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.11.004
22.
Kumar, V., Kalita, J.,
Bora, H. K., and Misra, U. K. (2016). Relationship of
antioxidant and oxidative stress markers in different organs following copper
toxicity in a rat model. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 293,
37–43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2016.01.007
23.
Liu, T.-Y., Hung, Y.-M., Huang, W.-C., Wu, M.-L., and
Lin, S.-L. (2016). Do Taiwanese people have greater heavy metal levels than
those of Western countries? Singapore Medical Journal.
http://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2016082
24.
Lv, B., Xing, M., and
Yang, J. (2016). Speciation and transformation of heavy metals during vermicomposting of animal manure. Bioresource
Technology, 209, 397–401.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.015
25.
Lyu, H., Gong, Y.,
Tang, J., Huang, Y., and Wang, Q. (2016). Immobilization of heavy metals in
electroplating sludge by biochar and iron sulfide. Environmental
Science and Pollution Research International.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6621-5
26.
Milioni, A. L. V., Nagy,
B. V., Moura, A. L. A., Zachi,
E. C., Barboni, M. T. S., and Ventura, D. F. (2016). Neurotoxic impact of mercury on the central nervous system
evaluated by neuropsychological tests and on the autonomic nervous system
evaluated by dynamic pupillometry. Neurotoxicology. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.04.010
27.
Musmarra, D., Karatza, D., Lancia, A., Prisciandaro, M., and Mazziotti di Celso, G. (2016). Adsorption
of Elemental Mercury Vapors from Synthetic Exhaust Combustion Gas onto HGR
Carbon. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association (1995).
http://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1170077
28.
Niemi, M., and Stĺhle, G. (2016). The use of ayurvedic
medicine in the context of health promotion - a mixed methods case study of an ayurvedic centre in Sweden. BMC Complementary and
Alternative Medicine, 16(1), 62.
http://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1042-z
29.
Nirola, R., Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K., Aryal, R., Correll, R., and
Naidu, R. (2016). Assessment of metal toxicity and bioavailability in metallophyte leaf litters and metalliferous
soils using Eisenia fetida
in a microcosm study. Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety, 129, 264–272.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.034
30.
Nisar, M., Shah, S. M.
M., Khan, I., Sheema,
null, Sadiq, A., Khan, S., and Shah, S. M. H.
(2015). Larvicidal, insecticidal, brine shrimp cytotoxicity and anti-oxidant activities of Diospyros kaki (L.) reported from Pakistan. Pakistan
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 28(4), 1239–1243.
31.
Payyappallimana, U., and Venkatasubramanian, P. (2016). Exploring Ayurvedic Knowledge on Food and Health for Providing
Innovative Solutions to Contemporary Healthcare. Frontiers in Public Health,
4, 57. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00057
32.
Planas, M., Quintas, P., Chamorro, A., and Silva, C. (2010). Female
maturation, egg characteristics and fatty acids profile in the seahorse
Hippocampus guttulatus. Animal Reproduction
Science, 122(1-2), 66–73.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.07.008
33.
Rehman, S. U., Choe, K., and Yoo, H. H. (2016).
Review on a Traditional Herbal Medicine, Eurycoma longifolia Jack (Tongkat Ali):
Its Traditional Uses, Chemistry, Evidence-Based Pharmacology and Toxicology. Molecules
(Basel, Switzerland), 21(3).
http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21030331
34.
Riddick, E. W., and Wu, Z. (2015). Does a Change
from Whole to Powdered Food (Artemia franciscana eggs) Increase Oviposition
in the Ladybird Coleomegilla maculata?
Insects, 6(4), 815–826. http://doi.org/10.3390/insects6040815
35.
Ropero, M. J. P., Farińas, N. R., Krupp, E., Mateo, R., Nevado,
J. J. B., and Martín-Doimeadios, R. C. R. (2016).
Mercury and selenium binding biomolecules in
terrestrial mammals (Cervus elaphus
and Sus scrofa) from a
mercury exposed area. Journal of Chromatography. B, Analytical Technologies
in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 1022, 159–166. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.04.003
36.
Stock, A.-K., Reuner, U., Gohil, K., and Beste, C. (2015).
Effects of copper toxicity on response inhibition processes: a study in
Wilson’s disease. Archives of Toxicology.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-015-1609-3
37.
Velpandian, T., Gupta, P.,
Ravi, A. K., Sharma, H. P., and Biswas, N. R. (2013).
Evaluation of pharmacological activities and assessment of intraocular
penetration of an ayurvedic polyherbal
eye drop (ItoneTM) in experimental models.
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 13, 1.
http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-1
38.
Vogel, C., Krüger, O., Herzel, H., Amidani, L., and
Adam, C. (2016). Chemical state of mercury and selenium in sewage sludge ash
based P-fertilizers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 313,
179–184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.079
39.
Yutong, Z., Qing, X., and
Shenggao, L. (2016). Distribution, bioavailability,
and leachability of heavy metals in soil particle
size fractions of urban soils (northeastern China). Environmental Science
and Pollution Research International.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6652-y
40.
Zohra, B. S., and Habib, A. (2016). Assessment of heavy metal contamination
levels and toxicity in sediments and fishes from the Mediterranean Sea
(southern coast of Sfax, Tunisia). Environmental
Science and Pollution Research International.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6534-3
Received on 21.08.2016
Modified on 11.09.2016
Accepted on 02.10.2016 ©
RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(1): 263-268.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00054.3