Comparative Evaluation of
Operator and Patient Chair Position during Extractions among Various
Undergraduate Students
Kalyani.
P1,
Dr. G. Kaarthikeyan2
1BDS 1ST
Year, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai
2Department of
Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai
*Corresponding Author E-mail: kals9702@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
AIM: To evaluate the chair position followed during
tooth extractions by the undergraduate students of Saveetha Dental College.
OBJECTIVE: To observe the chair position followed during tooth extraction by the
undergraduate students.
To compare and
contrast whether the standard chair position is being followed.
BACKGROUND: Chair positions of both the operator and
patient have a pivotal role in determining the success of an extraction.
Correct chair positions helps to avoid musculoskeletal problems to the
operator. Proper chair positioning permits a clear access of the teeth being
extracted and allows easy instrumentation. This study aims in observing the
chair positions followed during tooth extractions performed by undergraduate
students and evaluates whether the
correct position is being followed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This an observational study.
Extractions performed by dental undergraduate students are observed for the
chair positions. After collection of data statistical analyses are carried out.
REASON: The main reason for the study to be conducted is to find the extent to
which the chair positions are being followed in clinical practice.
KEYWORDS: Extractions, chair positions, clock positions,
chair height, musculoskeletal disorders.
INTRODUCTION:
The practice of dentistry is demanding and stressful.
The field of oral surgery in particular forms the core of dentistry. Extraction
is one of the commonest procedures performed at the under graduate level.
Physical factors that incur musculoskeletal problems among dentists can be
largely divided into three areas namely, work environment, hand strength, and
posture. The work environment includes unit chairs and devices. Hand strength
is determined by the material or surface texture of devices and gloves and the
posture used to maintain and control devices requiring strong force during
dental procedures causes musculoskeletal disorders.
Operator position in oral surgery is an important
aspect in the success of dental treatment. Chair positions of both the operator
and patient have a pivotal role in the determining the success of an
extraction. Proper chair positions also help to avoid musculoskeletal problems
in the operator. Dentists are more vulnerable to occupational health hazards,
because their long working hours and maintenance of same postures without
micro-breaks result in MSDs causing pathologies such as tendinitis, synovitis,
tenosynovitis, and bursitis[1].
Lower back, neck and shoulders are the most commonly
affected body sites. According to previous studies the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders was found to
be generally higher in women than men, which is attributed to lower muscle
volume, physical strength of women and female hormones. However, except for the
wrist, there were no significant gender differences in musculoskeletal
disorders[2].
Dentists who work more often in the sitting position
have showed a higher incidence of severe low back pain than dentists who often
alternate between sitting and standing postures[3]. Another fact is that
dentists those who sat at least 80% of the time worked less hours and had less
of a workload during their working hours. High frequency of pain and high risk
levels, according to the RULA method, suggest inappropriate and incorrect
ergonomic postural habits existing among dental professionals[2].The posture
required to treat the maxillary second molar was reported to cause considerably
greater pain than that required to treat anterior teeth[4].
Proper positioning permits a clear view of the teeth
being worked on and allows easy access to the teeth during instrumentation.
This study observes chair positions in tooth extractions performed by
undergraduate students and examines whether the correct position is being
followed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
This study was an observational study. On the whole 24
extraction procedures were observed. All the students were final year students
and interns of a city-based private dental college. The observation was about
the patient and operator chair position during extraction. 12 procedures were
performed by final year students and another 12 by interns.
Neither the operator nor the patient was informed
beforehand about the observation. It was kept secretive. First all the
information about the patient and clinician as mentioned above were recorded.
Then the tooth number was noted down. As the extraction proceeded, the chair
position of the operator and patient were observed and taken down. Changes in
the chair positions during the course of extraction were also observed. The
clinician was particularly observed for his skill in extracting the entire
tooth. If the extraction was in pieces, a note was made.
The patient details included name, age, sex,
occupation and OP number while the clinician details included name and year of
study.
Under operator position the clock position, sitting or
standing position, grip of instruments and the position supporting hand were
considered.
The observations made under the patient position were
the chair position, chair height, chin, thigh and head positions.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Table. 1. Number
of procedures in which the positions were followed correctly
|
Position |
Number
of. Procedures |
Percentage
of procedures |
|
Clock position |
9 |
75% |
|
Patient Chair position |
9 |
75% |
|
Patient chair height |
4 |
33.33% |
|
Chin position |
11 |
91.67% |
|
Head position |
7 |
58.33% |
Figure. 1
Table. 2. The
most preferred clock position among operators of final year
|
Clock
position |
Number
of
procedures |
Percentage
of
procedures |
|
8 O' clock |
6 |
50% |
|
9 O' clock |
2 |
16.67% |
|
10-11 O'clock |
1 |
8.33% |
|
12 O'clock |
3 |
25% |
Figure. 2
Table. 3. Number
of procedures in which the positions were followed correctly
|
Positions |
Number
of
procedures |
Percentage
of
procedures |
|
Clock position |
10 |
83.30% |
|
Patient chair position |
12 |
100% |
|
Patient chair height |
6 |
50% |
|
Chin position |
12 |
100% |
|
Head position |
7 |
58.33% |
Figure. 3
Table. 4. The
most preferred clock position among interns
|
Clock
position |
Number
of
procedures |
Percentage
of
procedures |
|
8 O'clock |
9 |
75% |
|
9 O'clock |
2 |
16.67% |
|
10-11 O'clock |
0 |
0% |
|
12 O'clock |
1 |
8.33% |
Figure. 4
RESULTS:
The extent to which the
patient and operator chair positions are being followed progressively increases
from final year students towards interns. This can be attributed to increased
experience and attainment of knowledge about chair positions.
DISCUSSION:
This study aimed at observing
the various chair positions followed by both the operator and patient during
extractions. The results of this study revealed the extent to which the chair
positions to be followed are being implemented in clinical practice.
Among final years, the
practice of following proper chin position is properly implemented (91.67%)which
is to be lauded. But attention must be paid to patient chair height which has
been followed only in 33.33% of the procedures. This causes discomfort to the
patient as well as paves way for musculoskeletal problems in these students.
This also leads to drooping posture of the operator and bending while working
which can inflict pain in the shoulders and back region. Coming to the clock
position, 8 o'clock position is found to be the commonest position among final
year students (50%).
Among interns, the patient
chair positions (100%) and chin positions (100%) are perfectly implemented in
practice. This is to be appreciated. Except for a few procedures, the clock
positions are also being followed properly. This really reduces the risk of
musculoskeletal disorders to a great extent. But only some of the
procedures (50%) have their patients' chair heights proper. In the rest
of the procedures, an increase or decrease in the chair height by an inch or so
was observed. This conditions are to be noted and improved. Also among interns,
8 o'clock position turned out to be the most preferred among all the clock
positions (75%).
In Southern part of India,
Muralidharan D et al., carried a study in the state of Andhra Pradesh and
reported an incidence of 78% MSD. [1]Abduljabbar TA studied musculoskeletal disorders among dentists
in Saudi Arabia and reported 82.9% of the responding dentists had pain or
discomfort from the neck, shoulders, lower back or head. Chowanadisai S et al.,
carried a cross-sectional study regarding the occupational health problems
faced by dentists in Thailand and found that musculoskeletal pain (78%) and
percutaneous injury (50%) are the most often disorders faced by the dentists.
Al Ali K et al., also carried a similar study among dentists in the United Arab
Emirates and reported prevalence of musculoskeletal pain to be 68%.[1] Leggat PA et al.,reported 87.2%
prevalence; neck being the most prevalent MSD during the previous 12 months
followed by lower back and shoulder (53.3 per cent)[1].
CONCLUSION:
From this study, it is
concluded that, though students initially find it difficult to follow the
correct chair positions, it becomes implemented once they become interns. This
greatly reduces musculoskeletal disorders and other discomforts in clinical
practice. Though 8' o'clock position is preferred among both final year
students and interns, its accordance while operating in different quadrants is
to be considered.
REFERENCES:
1. H. S. Bedi.et al., Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dentists and Application
of DMAIC Technique to Improve the Ergonomics at Dental Clinics and
Meta-Analysis of Literature, Journal of
Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015 Jun, Vol-9(6): ZC01-ZC03.
2. Forouzan Rafi et al., Prevalence of Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal
Disorders in Dentists: Symptoms and Risk Factors, Journal of Environmental and Public Health Volume 2015,
Article ID 517346.
3. Ratzon NZ et al., Musculoskeletal symptoms among dentists in relation to
work posture, Work.
2000;15(3):153-158.
4. Hyun-Suk Park et al., Analysis of the risk factors of musculoskeletal disease among dentists induced by work
posture, J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 27: 3651–3654,
2015.
Received on 24.03.2016
Modified on 21.04.2016
Accepted on 05.05.2016 ©
RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(6):722-724
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00137.2