Nonassociative rings with some Jordan product identities in the center

 

K. Madhusudhan Reddy

Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, VIT University, Vellore -632 014, Tamil Nadu.

CorrespondingAuthorE-mail:drkmsreddy@yahoo.in

 

ABSTRACT:

Quadri et al proved that if R is an associative ring satisfying the identity(xy)2 = x2y2 for all x, y in R, then R is commutative. Many results have been proved for associative rings. This paper contains generalization of some results on nonassociative rings with unity. Jordan product type identities were takenin the center of nonassociative rings. Here xy = xy + yx is the Jordan product. The following identities satisfies the commutativity of a nonassociative ring with unity in the center.(i) (xy) ÎU,

(ii) (xy)2 – (xy) ÎU,(iii) (xy2) – (x2y) ÎU,(iv) (xy)2 – (x2y2) ÎU,

(v) (x2y2)z2 – (xy)zÎU,(vi) (xy)2z2 – (xy)zÎU,(vii) (xy2)z – (xy)zÎUand

(viii)  (x2y2)z2 – (xy)zÎU for all x, y, z in R.

 

KEYWORDS: Nonassociative ring, center, and  Char. ≠ n

AMS Classifications :17D05, 17D15.

 


 

INTRODUCTION: 

Throughout this paper R represents nonassociative ring with char. ¹ 2. The center U of R is defined as U = {uÎR / [u, R] = 0}. It is also called as commutative center. A ring R is of characteristic ≠ n if nx = 0 implies x = 0 for all x in R and n a natural number.

 

Theorem 1:Let R be a nonassociative ring of char. ¹ 2 with unity satisfying (xy) ÎU for allx, y in R. Then R is commutative.

 

Proof :  By hypothesis (xy)ÎU

or           xy + yxÎU.                                                     (1)

Now we replace x with x + 1 in (1). Then (x + 1)y + y(x + 1) ÎU.

or           xy + yx + 2yÎU.                                           (2)

Using (1) in (2), we get

2yÎU. Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we get yÎU.

i.e., xy = yx, for all x in R.

Hence R is commutative.               

 

Theorem 2 :Let R be a nonassociative ring of char. ¹ 2 with unity satisfying

(xy)2 – (xy) ÎUfor all x, y in R. Then R is commutative.

Proof :  By hypothesis (xy)2 – (xy) ÎU

or           (xy + yx)2 – (xy + yx) ÎU.                                        (3)

Now by replacing x with x +1 in (3), we get

((x+1)y + y(x+1))2 – ((x+1)y + y(x+1)) ÎU

i.e., (xy + yx)2 + (2y)2 + (xy + yx) (2y) + (2y) (xy + yx)  – (xy + yx+ 2y) ÎU.(4)

 

Using (3) in (4), we get

4y2  + (xy + yx) (2y) + (2y) (xy + yx)  – 2yÎU.        (5)

Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we get  

2y2+ (xy + yx) (y) + (y) (xy + yx)– yÎU.                   (6)

 

Now by replacing x with x + 1 in (6), we get

2y2 + (xy + yx+2y) (y) + (y) (xy + yx + 2y)– yÎU.    (7)

Using (6) in (7), we get

4y2ÎU.

Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we get

y2ÎU.                                                                             (8)

By replacing y with y + 1 in (8) and using (8), we get

2yÎU. Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we have yÎU

orxy = yx for all x in R.

Hence R is commutative.


Theorem 3 :Let R be a nonassociative ring of char. ¹ 2 with unity satisfying

(xy2) – (x2y) ÎUfor all x, y in R. Then R is commutative.

 

Proof :  By hypothesis (xy2) – (x2y) ÎU

or           (xy2 + y2x) – (x2y + yx2) ÎU.                                                                                                                  (9)

Now by replacing x with x + 1 in (9), we get

(xy2 + y2x+2y2) – (x2y + yx2+2y2)ÎU. (10)

Using (9) in (10), we get

4y2ÎU.

Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we get

y2ÎU.                                                                                                                                                                          (11)

By replacing y with y + 1 in (11) and using (11), we get

2yÎU. Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we have yÎU

orxy = yx for all x in R.

 

Theorem 4 : Let R be a nonassociative ring of char. ¹ 2 with unity satisfying

(xy2) – (x2y) ÎU for all x, y in R. Then R is commutative.

 

Proof : By hypothesis (xy2) – (x2y) ÎU,

or           xy2 + y2x – x2y – yx2ÎU.                                                                                                                         (12)

By replacing x with x + 1 in (12), we get

(x + 1)y2 + y2(x + 1) – (x + 1)2y – y(x + 1)2ÎU

or           xy2 + y2x – x2y – yx2 – 2xy – 2yx – 2yÎU.                                                                                                         (13)

Now by using (12) and (13), we get

               2xy + 2yx + 2yÎU.                                                                                                                                   (14)

Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we get

               xy + yx+ yÎU.                                                                                                                                           (15)

Again by replacing x with x + 1 in (15) and using (15), we obtain

2yÎU. Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we get yÎU or xy = yx, for all x in R.

Hence R is commutative.     

              

Theorem 5 : Let R be a nonassociative ring of char. ¹ 2 with unity satisfying

(x2y2)z2 – (xy)zÎU for all x, y, z in R. Then R is commutative.

 

Proof : By hypothesis (x2y2)z2 – (xy)zÎU.                                                                                                    (16)

Now we replace z with z + 1 in (16)Then

(x2y2) (z + 1)2– (xy) (z + 1) ÎU

or           (x2y2)z2 – (xy)z+ 2(x2y2)z  + (x2y2) – (xy) ÎU.                                                                     (17)

Using (16) in (17), we obtain

               2(x2y2)z+ (x2y2) – (xy) ÎU.                                                                                                            (18)

Again by replacing z with z + 1 in (18), we get

               2(x2y2)(z + 1) + (x2y2) – (xy) ÎU

or        2(x2y2)z + (x2y2) – (xy) + 2(x2y2) ÎU.                                                                                                         (19)

Using (18) in (19) and R is of char. ¹ 2, we get

x2y2 ÎU

or           x2y2 + y2x2ÎU.                                                                                                                                            (20)

By replacing x with x + 1 in (20) and using (20), we get

2xy2 + 2y2x + 2y2ÎU. Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we obtain

xy2 + y2x + y2ÎU.                                                                                                                                                                     (21)

Again by replacing x with x + 1 in (21) and using (21), we get 2y2ÎU.

Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we get y2ÎU.                                                                                                                     (22)

By replacing y with y + 1 in (22) and using (22), we get

2yÎU. Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we have yÎU

orxy = yx for all x in R.

Hence R is commutative.   

 

Theorem 6: Let R be a nonassociative ring of char. ¹ 2 with unity satisfying

 (xy)2z – (xy)zÎU for all x, y, z in R. Then R is commutative.

 

Proof : By hypothesis (xy)2z– (xy)zÎU.                                                                                                                     (23)

Now we replace z with z + 1 in (23) Then

(xy)2 (z + 1) – (xy) (z + 1) ÎU

or           (xy)2z + (xy)z-  (xy)z – (xy) ÎU.                                                                                             (24)

Using (23) in (24), we obtain

               (xy)2– (xy) ÎU.                                                                                                                                  (25)

From theorem 2 the results follows.

Hence it is commutative.

 

Theorem 7: Let R be a nonassociative ring of char. ¹ 2 with unity satisfying

(xy2) z – (xy)zÎU for all x, y, z in R. Then R is commutative.

 

Proof : By hypothesis (xy2) z– (xy)zÎU.                                                                                                                      (26)

Now we replace z with z + 1 in (26) Then

(xy2) (z + 1) – (xy) (z + 1) ÎU

or           (xy2)z + (xy2)z-  (xy) z  – (xy) ÎU.                                                                                               (27)

Using (26) in (27), we obtain

               (xy2) – (xy) ÎU.                        

Or  (xy2+y2x) – (xy + yx)                                                                                                                                          (28)

By replacing x with x + 1 in (12) and using (12), we get

2y2 – 2yÎU.                                                                                                                                                                  (29)

Since R is of char. ¹ 2,y2yÎU.                                                                                                                                              (30)

By replacing y with y + 1 in (30) and using (30), we get

2yÎU.                                                                                                                                                                            (31)

Since R is of char. ¹ 2, we have yÎU

orxy = yx for all x in R.     

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Giri, R.D. and Modi, A.K. “Some results on commutativity of nonassociative rings”, The Alligarh Bull. of Maths., vol. 14 (1992–93), 39–42.

2.       Herstein, I.N. “Topics in Ring theory”, Univ. of Chicago press, London (1969).

3.       Quadri, M.A., Khan, M.A. and Ashraf, M. “Some elementary theorems for rings”, Math. Stud., 56 (1988) 223–226.

4.       Ram Awtar. “On the commutativity of nonassociative rings”, Publicationes Mathematicae, 22 (1975) 177–185.

 

 


 

 

 

Received on 02.12.2016               Modified on 19.12.2016

Accepted on 24.12.2016              © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(12): 2319-2321

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00465.0