ISSN   0974-3618  (Print)                    www.rjptonline.org

            0974-360X (Online)

 

 

RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

Simultaneous Estimation of Naproxen and Esomeprazole by RP-HPLC and its Validation

 

Sri Lakshmi D*, Jane T Jacob, Srinivas D, Satyanarayana D

Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh-533102. Nitte University,

Nitte Gulabi Shetty Memorial Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka-575 018 India

*Corresponding Author E-mail:

 

ABSTRACT:

A simple, accurate, economical and precise reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of  Naproxen and Esomeprazole. The separation was achieved on Agilent CN column (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 µm) as stationary phase with a mobile phase comprising of  Acetonitrile : K2HPO4:KH2PO4 (60:20:20) in an isocratic mode, at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. The detection was monitored at 257 nm. The retention time of Naproxen and Esomeprazole were 2.22 min and 3.24 min respectively. The linearity was found to be in the range of 150-350 µg/ml and 6-14 µg/ml for Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with correlation coefficient of 0.999. The proposed method was validated according to ICH guidelines for parameters like linearity, accuracy, precision and specificity.  All validation parameters were within the acceptable range.  The  developed  method  was successfully  applied  for the  estimation  of Naproxen and  Esomeprazole in  pure and pharmaceutical dosage form.  

 

KEY WORDS: Naproxen, Esomeprazole, RP-HPLC, Validation, Simultaneous estimation, ICH guidelines.

 

 


1. INTRODUCTION:

Esomeprazole (ESO) (Figure1) bis(5-methoxy-2-[(S)-[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl) methyl]sulfinyl]-1-H-benzimidazole-1-yl) is a compound that inhibits gastric acid secretion. Esomeprazole is cost effective in the treatment of gastric oesophageal reflux diseases. Esomeprazole is the S-isomer of omeprazole, the first single optical isomer proton pump inhibitor, generally provides better acid control than racemic counterpart and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile relative to omeprazole[1-3]. White to slightly coloured crystalline powder. It is slightly soluble in water[4].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 01.06.2015          Modified on 20.06.2015

Accepted on 23.06.2015        © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 8(7): July, 2015; Page 820-824

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00133.X

 

Naproxen (NAP) (Figure 2) (S)-6-methoxy-α-methyl-2-naphthaleneacetic acid. Naproxen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)commonly used for the reduction of moderate to severe pain, fever, inflammation and stiffness. It works by inhibiting both the COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes. Like other NSAIDs, Naproxen is capable of producing disturbances in the gastrointestinal tract[5-6]. Naproxen is an odourless, white to off-white crystalline substance. It is lipid soluble practically insoluble in water [7]. 

 

Literature  survey  of  Esomeprazole  and  Naproxen  revealed few  methods based  on  UV Spectrophotometry [8-9]   and  Chromatography [10-11] have  been  reported  for determination  of  both drugs  in  single  and  combined  dosage  forms. The  present  work describes  the  development and  validation as per ICH guidelines[12]  of  reverse  phase  high performance  liquid chromatographic  (RP-HPLC)  method,  which  can  quantify  these components simultaneously.

     

 

 

Fig.1: Chemical structure of Esomeprazole

 

 

 

 

Fig.2: Chemical structure of Naproxen

 

2. EXPERIMENTAL

Materials and Methods:

Reagents required

Acetonitrile                        : HPLC grade, Merck

Water                                  : HPLC grade, Merck

Potassium dihydrogen phosphate: AR grade, Merck

Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate: AR grade, Merck

 

Drugs used

The gift samples of Esomeprazole and Naproxen were kindly provided by AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical Ltd and  the marketed formulations containing Naproxen (500 mg) and Esomeprazole (20 mg) were procured from local pharmacy (trade name: VIMOVO).

 

Instrumentation and Chromatographic Conditions

The developed method  HPLC system with UV detector data were acquired and processed by Empower software. The  separation was  carried  out  at  ambient  temperature  by  using  a Agilent CN (4.6 x 250mm, 5µm) .The  mobile  phase  consisting  of  Acetonitrile :K2HPO4: KH2PO4 (60:20:20v/v).  The flow rate was 2 ml/min. The injection volume was 0.02 µL and detection at a wavelength of 257nm.  

 

Preparation of Mobile phase

Mix the 200 ml of KH2PO4 (20%) and 200ml of K2HPO4 (20%) and 600 ml of acetonitrile (60%). Filter through 0.45 µ filter under vacuum filtration.

The mobile phase liquid is also used for making working dilution of drugs. 

 

Preparation of stock solutions

Stock Solution A of Naproxen and Esomeprazole (20µg/ml and 5mg/ml respectively)

The stock solution of naproxen and esomeprazole were prepared by weighing accurately 2 mg of naproxen and 500 mg of esomeprazole pure drug and transferred to a 100ml volumetric flask  and dissolved in the mobile phase and made up to the mark with mobile phase. Stock solution A was prepared.

 

Stock Solution B of Naproxen and Esomeprazole (2µg/ml and 500µg/ml respectively)

 

From the above Stock Solution A 10 ml was taken and transferred to a 100ml volumetric flask and made up to the mark with mobile phase. Stock solution B was prepared.

 

Working Stock Solution of Naproxen and Esomeprazole

From the above Stock Solution B 10 ml was taken and transferred to a 100ml  volumetric flask  and made up to the mark with mobile phase.

 

Linearity of pure standard solution:

The linearity of the samples of Naproxen and Esomeprazole   was prepared by suitably diluting working solution and found to be linear response of drug over a range of 150-350 µg/ml  concentration. for the Naproxen and  6-14µg/ml for  Esomeprazole  respectively. The three such linearity’s of Naproxen and Esomeprazole   were taken for correlation co-efficient and standard deviation calculation. 

 

 

 

Table 1 : Area Of Different Concentration Of Naproxen and Esomeprazole Obeying Beer’s Law

S.

No

Naproxen (µg/mL)

Area (mV.s)

Esomeprazole (µg/mL)

Area (mV.s)

1

150

508.413

6

149.046

2

200

717.59

8

199.190

3

250

893.46

10

253.149

4

300

1104.37

12

306.856

5

350

1262.83

14

358.255

 

 

Fig 3 : Graph showing Linearity of Naproxen

 

 

Fig 4 : Graph showing Linearity of Esomeprazole

 

 

 

Fig.5: Chromatogram showing peaks of Esomeprazole and Naproxen

 

 

Preparation of Sample Solution

VIMOVO of strength 500mg of Naproxen and 20mg of Esomeprazole. respectively. Average weight of twenty tab were taken and crushed to make  powder, weighed powder containing 500 mg Esomeprazole was transferred to 100ml of volumetric flask and volume was made up to the mark with diluent (Acetonitrile: K2HPO4 : KH2PO4)(60:20:20) and filtered through whatmann filter paper in to another 100ml volumetric flask and make up to mark with same diluent which gives the solution of 5 mg/ml concentration of Esomeprazole and 20 µg/ml of Naproxen, further dilutions of the solution made to obtain the concentration of 500 µg/ml concentration of Esomeprazole and 2 µg/ml of  Naproxen with the same diluent and again filter it with milli pore filter through syringe filter and used for further analysis. The same procedure as mentioned for the pure drug was followed for the formulation. The concentrations of both  Esomeprazole and Naproxen were determined by measuring peak area at 257 nm.

 

Assay for Marketed formulation

The Assay performed by the marketed formulation of Esomeprazole and Naproxen (VIMOVO). The prepared standard and sample solutions were injected into HPLC and peak areas were recorded. The amount of drug present and percentage purity was calculated by comparing the peak areas of the standards with that of samples.

 

 

Table 2 : Assay of marketed formulation

Drug

Labeled amount

( mg )

Amount found

mg/tab

% Recovery

%RSD

(n=5)

NAPROXEN

500 mg

499.22

98.84

0.0146

ESOMEPRAZOLE

20 mg

19.77

98.85

0.0662

   

Fig. 6: Chromatogram showing peaks of Esomeprazole and Naproxen of formulation

 

VALIDATION OF HPLC METHOD 

The HPLC method was validated in accordance with ICH guidelines.

 

Precision

System Precision for Naproxen and Esomeprazole: The system precision was evaluated by measuring the peak responses of Naproxen and Esomeprazole for five replicate injections of standard solution, prepared as the proposed  method. The results  shown  in the table-3 indicate that the precision of the system is with in the limit.  (Acceptance criteria: % rsd nmt 2.0%)

 

Method Precision for Naproxen and  Esomeprazole was determined by preparing a sample solution of single batch Naproxen and Esomeprazole Tablet five times and analyzing as per the proposed method. The results shown in Table-3 indicate that the proposed method is  precise. (Acceptance criteria: % RSD NMT 2.0%

 

Accuracy

To check the accuracy of the developed method and to study the interference of formulation excipients, recovery study was carried out by using standard addition method by adding 100% concentration to a fixed amount of the pre analysed sample and the amount of drug were analyzed by the proposed method. Results from the recovery studies are given in table 4and5.

 

Limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of quantification (LOQ)

Limit of detection and limit of quantification were estimated from signal to noise ratio. LOD is the lowest concentration resulting in a peak area of three times the baseline noise and the equation is LOD = 3.3 x ASD/S. LOQ is the lowest concentration that provide signal to noise ratio more than 10 and the equation is LOQ = 10 x ASD/S, where ‘ASD’ is the average standard deviation and ‘S’ is the slope of the line.

 

Robustness

Robustness was performed by deliberately changing the chromatographic conditions. The important parameter to be studied was the resolution factor between two peaks.  Robustness of the method was carried out by deliberately made small variation in the flow rate, pH of mobile phase, organic phase ratio and column oven temperature by using 100 µg mL-1 of Naproxen and 4 µg mL-1 solution of  Esomeprazole, respectively.

 

Linearity

The linearity of the method was determined by comparing the known concentration Vs response, a  series of calibration standards  150, 200, 250, 300, 350 µg/ml of Naproxen  and 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 µg/ml of Esomeprazole  were prepared. The solutions were injected into the chromatographic system and peak area of each peak at each concentration was noted. The calibration curve was plotted using peak area versus concentration of the standard solution.

 

Degradation Studies:

Acid degradation

About 100 mg of Naproxen and 80 mg of Esomeprazole was transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in minimum quantity of diluent, 5 ml of 0.1 N HCL was added and the volume made up to the mark with diluent, the solution was heated at 60-70oc for 1 hour. Cool the solution at room temperature further dilutions of the solution made to obtain the concentration of 50 µg/ml and 20 µg/ml concentration of Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with the same diluent and used for further analysis. The same procedure as mentioned for the pure drug was followed for the formulation.

 

Base Degradation

About 100 mg of Naproxen and 80 mg of Esomeprazole was transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in minimum quantity of diluent, 5 ml of 0.1 N NaoH was added and the volume made up to the mark with diluent, the solution was heated at 60-70oc for 1 hour. Cool the solution at room temperature further dilutions of the solution made to obtain the concentration of 50 µg/ml and 20 µg/ml concentration of Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with the same diluent and used for further analysis. The same procedure as mentioned for the pure drug was followed for the formulation.

 

Oxidative Degradation

About 100 mg of Naproxen and 80 mg of Esomeprazole was transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in minimum quantity of diluent, 5 ml of 1% H2O2 was added and the volume made up to the mark with diluent, the solution was heated at 60-70oc for 1 hour. Cool the solution at room temperature further dilutions of the solution made to obtain the concentration of 50 µg/ml and 20 µg/ml concentration of Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with the same diluent and used for further analysis. The same procedure as mentioned for the pure drug was followed for the formulation.

 

Thermal Degradation

About 100 mg of Naproxen and 80 mg of Esomeprazole was placed in a china dish. The dish was covered by aluminium foil and kept in hot air oven at 60-70ºC for 1 hour and  transferred to 100 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in minimum quantity of diluent and the volume made up to the mark with diluent, the solution was heated at 60-70oc for 1 hour. Cool the solution at room temperature further dilutions of the solution made to obtain the concentration of 50 µg/ml and 20 µg/ml concentration of Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with the same diluent and used for further analysis. The same procedure as mentioned for the pure drug was followed for the formulation. Results of degradation data was given in table no-7.

 

Table: 3 Precision Data

Drug

Concentration

( µg/ml )

System Precision

% Recovery (% RSD, n=5)

Method Precision

% Recovery

(%RSD, n=5)

Naproxen

500

98.44 (0.0146)

99.42 (0.0204)

Esomeprazole

20

98.16 (0.0662)

98.93 (0.0141)

 

 

 

 

 


Table 4: Results of recovery study of Naproxen

Amount of Naproxen

in sample(µg)

Amount of standard Naproxen added (µg)

Total amount of Naproxen (µg)

Total amount Naproxen found Mean±SD

Total amount recovered (µg)

% Recovery

(%RSD)

100

-

100

99.72±1.0501

-

99.05(1.0604)

100

100

200

198.72±1.0302

98.72

98.72(1.0603)

 

Table 5: Results of recovery study of Esomeprazole

Amount of Esomeprazole

in sample(µg)

Amount of standard Esomeprazole

added (µg)

Total amount of Esomeprazole (µg)

Total amount Esomeprazole found

Mean ± SD

Total amt recovered

(µg)

% Recovery

(%RSD)

30

-

30

29.72±1.0192

-

99.05(1.0604)

30

30

60

58.72±1.0502

29.00

97.86(1.0604)


 

Table 6: Optical Characteristics of the Proposed Method for Naproxen and Esomeprazole

Parameter

Naproxen

Esomeprazole

λmax (nm) selected

257

257

Beer’s law limits (µg/ml)

150-350

6-14

Correlation coefficient (r)

0.999

0.998

Relative standard deviation (%)

0.0146

0.0662

% Error at 99%(0.01 level)

1.249

0.321

% Error at 95%(0.05 level)

0.844

0.217

Limit of detection  (µg/ml)

0.0550

0.0090

Limit of Quantification (µg/ml)

0.1813

0.0296

 

Table 7: Degradation Data

Drug

Degradation

Area  (mV.s)

% Recovered

%  Degraded

 

Naproxen

Acid

114.905

89.73

10.27

Base

116.667

99.69

0.31

Oxidative

107.328

88.12

11.88

Thermal

97.928

78.12

21.88

Esomeprazole

Acid

599.116

92.81

7.19

Base

611.585

101.47

-

Oxidative

568.840

93.64

6.36

Thermal

530.780

85.21

14.79

 

 

 


CONCLUSION:  

The proposed RP-HPLC method was found to be simple, accurate, precise, linear and specific for quantitative estimation of Naproxen and Esomeprazole in bulk and its formulation. The proposed RP-HPLC method is cost effective and less time consuming. Hence the proposed HPLC method is suitable for routine analysis of Naproxen and Esomeprazole in raw materials and in pharmaceutical formulations in the quality control laboratories. 

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Scott LJ , Dunn CJ , Mallarkey G , Sharpe M .Esomeprazole – A review of its use in the management of acid-related disorders. Drugs 2002; 62:1503-38.

2.       Sean C Sweetman. Martindale-The complete drug reference. 2002, 33rd edition: 1225.

3.       Priti D Trivedi and Dilip G Maheshwari ,International Journal of ChemTech Research  Vol.2, No.3 July-Sept 2010, 1598-1605. 4.Indian Pharmacopoeia 2014 Vol II, 1690-1691.

5.       United  States  Pharmacopoeia  and  National  Formulary;  (24th)  Asian  Edition,  The  United  States Pharmacopoeia Convention Inc, U.S.A, 2709-3259.

6.       Fun, LW. (2002). MIMS Bangladesh. Medimedia, Singapore. p. 53-67.

7.       Indian Pharmacopoeia 2014 Vol III, 2305-2306.

8.       Nilesh J, Sneha K, Deepak  K J, Sunrendra K J, Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutical Drug Research, Vol. 69, 2012, 1195-1199.

9.       Neha A J, Lohiya R T, Umekar R T, International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research (IJPSR) Vol.2(5), 2011,130-134.

10.    Chandrakant S, Sadhana R, Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 4, Suppl 3, 533-537.

11.    Palavai S R, Shakil S,  Gururaj V, Badri V, Vure P, Jayapal S R, Der Pharma Chemica, 2011, 3 (6),553-564.

12.    International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) of technical requirements for the registration of pharmaceuticals for human use, validation of analytical procedures definitions and terminology, 1996, Geneva.