![]()
ISSN 0974-3618
(Print) www.rjptonline.org
0974-360X (Online)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Simultaneous
Estimation of Naproxen and Esomeprazole by RP-HPLC and its Validation
Sri Lakshmi D*, Jane T Jacob, Srinivas D, Satyanarayana D
Vikas
Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh-533102. Nitte
University,
Nitte
Gulabi Shetty Memorial Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mangalore,
Karnataka-575 018 India
*Corresponding Author E-mail:
ABSTRACT:
A simple, accurate, economical and precise
reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method has been
developed for the simultaneous determination of
Naproxen and Esomeprazole. The separation was achieved on Agilent CN
column (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 µm) as stationary phase with a mobile phase comprising
of Acetonitrile : K2HPO4:KH2PO4
(60:20:20) in an isocratic mode, at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. The detection was
monitored at 257 nm. The retention time of Naproxen and Esomeprazole were 2.22
min and 3.24 min respectively. The linearity was found to be in the range of
150-350 µg/ml and 6-14 µg/ml for Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with
correlation coefficient of 0.999. The proposed method was validated according
to ICH guidelines for parameters like linearity, accuracy, precision and
specificity. All validation parameters
were within the acceptable range.
The developed method
was successfully applied for the
estimation of Naproxen and Esomeprazole in pure and pharmaceutical dosage form.
KEY WORDS: Naproxen, Esomeprazole,
RP-HPLC, Validation, Simultaneous estimation, ICH guidelines.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Esomeprazole (ESO) (Figure1)
bis(5-methoxy-2-[(S)-[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)
methyl]sulfinyl]-1-H-benzimidazole-1-yl) is a compound that inhibits gastric
acid secretion. Esomeprazole is cost effective in the treatment of gastric
oesophageal reflux diseases. Esomeprazole is the S-isomer of omeprazole, the
first single optical isomer proton pump inhibitor, generally provides better
acid control than racemic counterpart and has a favourable pharmacokinetic
profile relative to omeprazole[1-3]. White to slightly coloured crystalline
powder. It is slightly soluble in water[4].
Received on 01.06.2015
Modified on 20.06.2015
Accepted on 23.06.2015 ©
RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 8(7):
July, 2015; Page 820-824
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00133.X
Naproxen (NAP) (Figure 2)
(S)-6-methoxy-α-methyl-2-naphthaleneacetic acid. Naproxen is a
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)commonly used for the reduction of
moderate to severe pain, fever, inflammation and stiffness. It works by
inhibiting both the COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes. Like other NSAIDs, Naproxen is
capable of producing disturbances in the gastrointestinal tract[5-6]. Naproxen
is an odourless, white to off-white crystalline substance. It is lipid soluble
practically insoluble in water [7].
Literature
survey of Esomeprazole
and Naproxen revealed few
methods based on UV Spectrophotometry [8-9] and
Chromatography [10-11] have
been reported for determination of
both drugs in single
and combined dosage
forms. The present work describes
the development and validation as per ICH guidelines[12] of
reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC)
method, which can
quantify these components
simultaneously.

Fig.1: Chemical structure of Esomeprazole

Fig.2: Chemical structure of Naproxen
2. EXPERIMENTAL
Materials and Methods:
Reagents required
Acetonitrile : HPLC grade, Merck
Water :
HPLC grade, Merck
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate: AR grade,
Merck
Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate: AR grade,
Merck
Drugs used
The gift samples of Esomeprazole and
Naproxen were kindly provided by AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical Ltd and the marketed formulations containing Naproxen
(500 mg) and Esomeprazole (20 mg) were procured from local pharmacy (trade
name: VIMOVO).
Instrumentation and Chromatographic
Conditions
The developed method HPLC system with UV detector data were
acquired and processed by Empower software. The
separation was carried out
at ambient temperature
by using a Agilent CN (4.6 x 250mm, 5µm) .The mobile
phase consisting of
Acetonitrile :K2HPO4: KH2PO4
(60:20:20v/v). The flow rate was 2
ml/min. The injection volume was 0.02 µL and detection at a wavelength of
257nm.
Preparation of Mobile phase
Mix the 200 ml of KH2PO4
(20%) and 200ml of K2HPO4 (20%) and 600 ml of
acetonitrile (60%). Filter through 0.45 µ filter under vacuum filtration.
The mobile phase liquid is also used for
making working dilution of drugs.
Preparation of stock solutions
Stock Solution A of Naproxen and
Esomeprazole (20µg/ml and 5mg/ml respectively)
The stock solution of naproxen and
esomeprazole were prepared by weighing accurately 2 mg of naproxen and 500 mg
of esomeprazole pure drug and transferred to a 100ml volumetric flask and dissolved in the mobile phase and made up
to the mark with mobile phase. Stock solution A was prepared.
Stock Solution B of Naproxen and
Esomeprazole (2µg/ml and 500µg/ml respectively)
From the above Stock Solution A 10 ml was
taken and transferred to a 100ml volumetric flask and made up to the mark with
mobile phase. Stock solution B was prepared.
Working Stock Solution of Naproxen and
Esomeprazole
From the above Stock Solution B 10 ml was
taken and transferred to a 100ml
volumetric flask and made up to
the mark with mobile phase.
Linearity of pure standard solution:
The linearity of the samples of Naproxen
and Esomeprazole was prepared by
suitably diluting working solution and found to be linear response of drug over
a range of 150-350 µg/ml concentration.
for the Naproxen and 6-14µg/ml for Esomeprazole
respectively. The three such linearity’s of Naproxen and Esomeprazole were taken for correlation co-efficient and
standard deviation calculation.
Table 1 : Area Of
Different Concentration Of Naproxen and Esomeprazole Obeying Beer’s Law
|
S. No |
Naproxen (µg/mL) |
Area (mV.s) |
Esomeprazole (µg/mL) |
Area (mV.s) |
|
1 |
150 |
508.413 |
6 |
149.046 |
|
2 |
200 |
717.59 |
8 |
199.190 |
|
3 |
250 |
893.46 |
10 |
253.149 |
|
4 |
300 |
1104.37 |
12 |
306.856 |
|
5 |
350 |
1262.83 |
14 |
358.255 |

Fig 3 : Graph showing Linearity of Naproxen

Fig 4 : Graph
showing Linearity of Esomeprazole

Fig.5: Chromatogram showing peaks of
Esomeprazole and Naproxen
Preparation of Sample Solution
VIMOVO of strength 500mg of Naproxen and
20mg of Esomeprazole. respectively. Average weight of twenty tab were taken and
crushed to make powder, weighed powder
containing 500 mg Esomeprazole was transferred to 100ml of volumetric flask and
volume was made up to the mark with diluent (Acetonitrile: K2HPO4
: KH2PO4)(60:20:20) and filtered through whatmann filter
paper in to another 100ml volumetric flask and make up to mark with same
diluent which gives the solution of 5 mg/ml concentration of Esomeprazole and
20 µg/ml of Naproxen, further dilutions of the solution made to obtain the
concentration of 500 µg/ml concentration of Esomeprazole and 2 µg/ml of Naproxen with the same diluent and again
filter it with milli pore filter through syringe filter and used for further
analysis. The same procedure as mentioned for the pure drug was followed for
the formulation. The concentrations of both
Esomeprazole and Naproxen were determined by measuring peak area at 257
nm.
Assay for Marketed formulation
The Assay performed by the marketed
formulation of Esomeprazole and Naproxen (VIMOVO). The prepared standard and
sample solutions were injected into HPLC and peak areas were recorded. The
amount of drug present and percentage purity was calculated by comparing the
peak areas of the standards with that of samples.
Table 2 : Assay of
marketed formulation
|
Drug |
Labeled amount ( mg ) |
Amount found mg/tab |
% Recovery |
%RSD (n=5) |
|
NAPROXEN |
500
mg |
499.22 |
98.84 |
0.0146 |
|
ESOMEPRAZOLE |
20
mg |
19.77 |
98.85 |
0.0662 |

Fig. 6:
Chromatogram showing peaks of Esomeprazole and Naproxen of formulation
VALIDATION OF HPLC METHOD
The HPLC method was validated in accordance with ICH
guidelines.
Precision
System
Precision for Naproxen and Esomeprazole: The system precision was evaluated by
measuring the peak responses of Naproxen and Esomeprazole for five replicate
injections of standard solution, prepared as the proposed method. The results shown
in the table-3 indicate that the precision of the system is with in the
limit. (Acceptance criteria: % rsd nmt
2.0%)
Method
Precision for Naproxen and Esomeprazole
was determined by preparing a sample solution of single batch Naproxen and
Esomeprazole Tablet five times and analyzing as per the proposed method. The
results shown in Table-3 indicate that the proposed method is precise. (Acceptance criteria: % RSD NMT 2.0%
Accuracy
To check the accuracy of the developed method and to
study the interference of formulation excipients, recovery study was carried
out by using standard addition method by adding 100% concentration to a fixed
amount of the pre analysed sample and the amount of drug were analyzed by the
proposed method. Results from the recovery studies are given in table 4and5.
Limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of quantification
(LOQ)
Limit of detection and limit of quantification were
estimated from signal to noise ratio. LOD is the lowest concentration resulting
in a peak area of three times the baseline noise and the equation is LOD = 3.3
x ASD/S. LOQ is the lowest concentration that provide signal to noise ratio
more than 10 and the equation is LOQ = 10 x ASD/S, where ‘ASD’ is the average
standard deviation and ‘S’ is the slope of the line.
Robustness
Robustness was performed by deliberately changing the
chromatographic conditions. The important parameter to be studied was the
resolution factor between two peaks.
Robustness of the method was carried out by deliberately made small
variation in the flow rate, pH of mobile phase, organic phase ratio and column
oven temperature by using 100 µg mL-1 of Naproxen and 4 µg mL-1
solution of Esomeprazole, respectively.
Linearity
The
linearity of the method was determined by comparing the known concentration Vs
response, a series of calibration
standards 150, 200, 250, 300, 350 µg/ml
of Naproxen and 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 µg/ml
of Esomeprazole were prepared. The
solutions were injected into the chromatographic system and peak area of each
peak at each concentration was noted. The calibration curve was plotted using
peak area versus concentration of the standard solution.
Degradation
Studies:
Acid degradation
About 100 mg of Naproxen and 80 mg of Esomeprazole was
transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in minimum quantity of
diluent, 5 ml of 0.1 N HCL was added and the volume made up to the mark with
diluent, the solution was heated at 60-70oc for 1 hour. Cool the
solution at room temperature further dilutions of the solution made to obtain
the concentration of 50 µg/ml and 20 µg/ml concentration of Naproxen and
Esomeprazole respectively with the same diluent and used for further
analysis. The same procedure as mentioned for the pure drug was followed for
the formulation.
Base
Degradation
About
100 mg of Naproxen and 80 mg of Esomeprazole was transferred to a 100 ml
volumetric flask and dissolved in minimum quantity of diluent, 5 ml of 0.1 N NaoH
was added and the volume made up to the mark with diluent, the solution was
heated at 60-70oc for 1 hour. Cool the solution at room temperature
further dilutions of the solution made to obtain the concentration of 50 µg/ml
and 20 µg/ml concentration of Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with the
same diluent and used for further analysis. The same procedure as
mentioned for the pure drug was followed for the formulation.
Oxidative
Degradation
About
100 mg of Naproxen and 80 mg of Esomeprazole was transferred to a 100 ml
volumetric flask and dissolved in minimum quantity of diluent, 5 ml of 1% H2O2
was added and the volume made up to the mark with diluent, the solution was
heated at 60-70oc for 1 hour. Cool the solution at room temperature
further dilutions of the solution made to obtain the concentration of 50 µg/ml
and 20 µg/ml concentration of Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with the
same diluent and used for further analysis. The same procedure as
mentioned for the pure drug was followed for the formulation.
Thermal
Degradation
About
100 mg of Naproxen and 80 mg of Esomeprazole was placed in a china dish. The
dish was covered by aluminium foil and kept in hot air oven at 60-70ºC for 1
hour and transferred to 100 ml
volumetric flask and dissolved in minimum quantity of diluent and the volume
made up to the mark with diluent, the solution was heated at 60-70oc
for 1 hour. Cool the solution at room temperature further dilutions of the
solution made to obtain the concentration of 50 µg/ml and 20 µg/ml
concentration of Naproxen and Esomeprazole respectively with the same diluent
and used for further analysis. The same procedure as mentioned for the pure
drug was followed for the formulation. Results of degradation data was given in
table no-7.
Table: 3
Precision Data
|
Drug |
Concentration ( µg/ml ) |
System Precision % Recovery (% RSD, n=5) |
Method Precision % Recovery (%RSD, n=5) |
|
Naproxen |
500 |
98.44 (0.0146) |
99.42 (0.0204) |
|
Esomeprazole |
20 |
98.16 (0.0662) |
98.93 (0.0141) |
Table 4: Results of recovery study of Naproxen
|
Amount of Naproxen in sample(µg) |
Amount of standard Naproxen added (µg) |
Total amount of Naproxen (µg) |
Total amount Naproxen found Mean±SD |
Total amount recovered (µg) |
% Recovery (%RSD) |
|
100 |
- |
100 |
99.72±1.0501 |
- |
99.05(1.0604) |
|
100 |
100 |
200 |
198.72±1.0302 |
98.72 |
98.72(1.0603) |
Table 5: Results of recovery study of Esomeprazole
|
Amount of Esomeprazole in sample(µg) |
Amount of standard Esomeprazole added (µg) |
Total amount of Esomeprazole (µg) |
Total amount Esomeprazole found Mean ± SD |
Total amt recovered (µg) |
% Recovery (%RSD) |
|
|
30 |
- |
30 |
29.72±1.0192 |
- |
99.05(1.0604) |
|
|
30 |
30 |
60 |
58.72±1.0502 |
29.00 |
97.86(1.0604) |
|
Table 6: Optical
Characteristics of the Proposed Method for Naproxen and Esomeprazole
|
Parameter |
Naproxen |
Esomeprazole |
|
λmax (nm) selected |
257 |
257 |
|
Beer’s law limits (µg/ml) |
150-350 |
6-14 |
|
Correlation coefficient (r) |
0.999 |
0.998 |
|
Relative standard deviation
(%) |
0.0146 |
0.0662 |
|
% Error at 99%(0.01 level) |
1.249 |
0.321 |
|
% Error at 95%(0.05 level) |
0.844 |
0.217 |
|
Limit of detection (µg/ml) |
0.0550 |
0.0090 |
|
Limit of Quantification
(µg/ml) |
0.1813 |
0.0296 |
Table 7: Degradation Data
|
Drug |
Degradation |
Area (mV.s) |
% Recovered |
% Degraded |
|
Naproxen |
Acid |
114.905 |
89.73 |
10.27 |
|
Base |
116.667 |
99.69 |
0.31 |
|
|
Oxidative |
107.328 |
88.12 |
11.88 |
|
|
Thermal |
97.928 |
78.12 |
21.88 |
|
|
Esomeprazole |
Acid |
599.116 |
92.81 |
7.19 |
|
Base |
611.585 |
101.47 |
- |
|
|
Oxidative |
568.840 |
93.64 |
6.36 |
|
|
Thermal |
530.780 |
85.21 |
14.79 |
CONCLUSION:
The proposed RP-HPLC method was found to be simple,
accurate, precise, linear and specific for quantitative estimation of Naproxen
and Esomeprazole in bulk and its formulation. The proposed RP-HPLC method is
cost effective and less time consuming. Hence the proposed HPLC method is
suitable for routine analysis of Naproxen and Esomeprazole in raw materials and
in pharmaceutical formulations in the quality control laboratories.
REFERENCES:
1. Scott LJ , Dunn CJ
, Mallarkey G , Sharpe M .Esomeprazole – A review of its use in the management
of acid-related disorders. Drugs 2002; 62:1503-38.
2. Sean C Sweetman. Martindale-The complete
drug reference. 2002, 33rd edition: 1225.
3. Priti D Trivedi and Dilip G Maheshwari
,International Journal of ChemTech Research
Vol.2, No.3 July-Sept 2010, 1598-1605. 4.Indian Pharmacopoeia 2014 Vol
II, 1690-1691.
5. United
States Pharmacopoeia and
National Formulary; (24th)
Asian Edition, The
United States Pharmacopoeia
Convention Inc, U.S.A, 2709-3259.
6. Fun, LW. (2002). MIMS Bangladesh.
Medimedia, Singapore. p. 53-67.
7. Indian Pharmacopoeia 2014 Vol III,
2305-2306.
8. Nilesh J, Sneha K, Deepak K J, Sunrendra K J, Acta Poloniae
Pharmaceutical Drug Research, Vol. 69, 2012, 1195-1199.
9. Neha A J, Lohiya R T, Umekar R T,
International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research (IJPSR) Vol.2(5),
2011,130-134.
10. Chandrakant S, Sadhana R, Int J Pharm Pharm
Sci, Vol 4, Suppl 3, 533-537.
11. Palavai S R, Shakil S, Gururaj V, Badri V, Vure P, Jayapal S R, Der
Pharma Chemica, 2011, 3 (6),553-564.
12. International Conference on Harmonization
(ICH) of technical requirements for the registration of pharmaceuticals for
human use, validation of analytical procedures definitions and terminology,
1996, Geneva.