Halitosis: Classification, Causes, and diagnostic as well
as Treatment Approach – A Review
Mahadeva Rao
U.S.1, Suganya M. Utharkar2*, C. Shanmuga Sundaram3
1Professor,
Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu.
2AECS Maaruti
College of Dental Sciences & Research Center, Bangalore.
3Head, Department
of Biochemistry, Prof. Dhanapalan College of Arts and Science, Kelambakkam,
Chennai.
*Corresponding Author
E-mail: raousm@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Objectives:
This coverage reviews the current
knowledge on classification, causes, and diagnostic as well as remedial line of
attack on malodor of breath.
Data:
Halitosis, a condition that causes a
severe social handicap to those who suffer from it, has a multifactorial
etiology. It is anasty or offensive odor originating from the breath. The
condition may encompass both oral and non-oral disorders.
Sources:
A private, monthly with keywords
halitosis, malodor, etiology, measurement, and management from Medline and Pub
med updated database of literature was reviewed.
Conclusions:
In majority of cases, halitosis is caused
by oral conditions, defined as oral malodor. Oral malodor fallouts from tongue
coating, periodontal disease, peri-implant disease, deep carious lesions,
exposed necrotic tooth pulps, pericoronitis, mucosal ulcerations, healing
(mucosal) wounds, impacted food or debris, imperfect dental restorations,
unclean dentures, and factors causing decreased salivary flow rate. The basic
progression is microbial degradation of organic substrates. Non-oral etiologies
of halitosis include turbulences of the upper and lower respiratory tract,
ailments of the gastrointestinal tract, some systemic maladies, metabolic
disorders, medications, and carcinomas. Stressful situations are predisposing
factors. There are three primary measurement approaches of halitosis.
Organoleptic measurement and gas chromatography are very dependable, but not
very simply clinically applied techniques. The use of organoleptic measurement
is recommended as the ‘gold standard’. Gas chromatography is the preferable
method if accurate measurements of specific gases are required. Sulphide
monitoring is straightforwardly used method, but has the limitation that
important odors are not detected. The scientific and practical value of
additional or alternative measurement methods, such as BANA test, chemical
sensors, salivary incubation test, quantifying β-galactosidase activity,
ammonia monitoring, ninhydrin method, and polymerase chain reaction, has to be
established. Last but not least, regarding the usage of probiotics, the oral
administration of the probiotic lactobacilli not only seemed to improve the
physiologic halitosis, but also showed beneficial effects on bleeding on
probing from the periodontal pockets.
KEYWORDS:
Halitosis; Oral cavity;
Blood-borne; Respiratory tract; Dentist.
INTRODUCTION:
Halitosis is an nasty modification of the
halitus for the person who has the sign and for related people either, being a
pathological condition or not1 is also known as fetid halitus, stinking
mouth, bad breath or oral malodor2,3. Halitosis is a common
complaint among adults of both genders all over the world. It has a multifactorial
etiology, but its main cause is the decomposition of the organic material by
microorganisms of the oral cavity. One of the pioneers in halitosis research was
‘Howe’ who termed this symptom in 1874 and since then, halitosis has been considered
a clinical entity1. The majority of the citations concerning to halitosis
before 1930 were not confirmed by facts or studies, however were perpetuated by
literature4 .In 1934, Fair and Wells created an instrument called
osmoscope, which was used for measurements of odor density in a subjective and
semi quantitative way4.
Oral malodor is a common problem among
general population and evidences reveal that it forms about85% of all bad
breath. Bad breath can have a distressing effect that may become a social
handicap and the affected person may avoid socializing. The condition is
multifactorial in etiology and may involve both oral and non-oral conditions.
Volatile sulphur compounds (VSC), namely hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and
methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) are the main cause of oral malodor. These
substances are by-products of the action of bacteria on proteins. Gram-positive
bacteria produce little or no malodor; most Gram-negative bacteria are potent
producers of odoriferous compounds. Treatments corresponding to the causes of
oral malodor include mechanical or chemical tongue cleaning, periodontal
disease treatment, oral hygiene instruction and mouth rinses or mouthwashes.
Halitosis, breathe malodor or colloquially known as "bad breath" can
be subdivided as real halitosis, pseudo halitosis and halitophobia5.
1.1. True
halitosis:6
Real halitosis can be further subdivided
into physiological and pathological halitosis. Physiologic halitosis includes
halitosis caused by dietary components, deleterious habits, and morning breath,
secondary to xerostomia caused by physiologic factors. Pathologic halitosis
occurs secondary to pathologic conditions or oral tissues like gingival and
periodontal diseases like Periodontitis, acute necrotizing ulcerative
gingivitis, residual post-operative blood, debris under dental appliances,
ulcerative lesions of the oral cavity, Halitosis may be associated with coated
tongue, may occur due to xerostomia secondary to salivary gland diseases,
tonsilloliths.
1.2. Pseudo
halitosis6
Patients who suffer from pseudo halitosis
complain of the existence of halitosis though it is not perceived by others. This
condition can be managed effectively by counseling (using literature support,
education and explanation of examination results) and simple oral hygiene measures
Halitophobia6. Some individuals continue to insist that they have
halitosis even after they have been treated for genuine or pseudo-halitosis.
Such individuals are categorized as halitophobic. Halitophobia
may be considered when no physical or
social evidence exists to suggest that halitosis is present.
1.3. Psychogenic
Halitosis:6, 7
Psychogenic Halitosis is the one which is
imagined. In this a person believes that his breath smells bad when it actually
does not. This problem may occur in people who tend to exaggerate normal body sensations.
sometimes this is caused by a serious mental disorder such as schizophrenia. A
person with obsessional thoughts have an overwhelmed sense of feeling dirty. A
person who is paranoid may have the delusion that his organs are rotting. Both
these persons feel their breath smells bad. Such people may be helped by having
doctor or dentist assures them that they do not have bad breath. If the problem
continues, person benefit from seeing psychotherapist.
2. Main
causes of halitosis:
2.1.1.
Oral Diseases Related To Halitosis:
Oral cavity pathologies that can cause halitosis
are, among others: dental cavities, periodontal disease, tongue coating,
exposed tooth pulps, extractions/healing wounds, interdentally food impaction,
dentures kept at night or not regularly cleaned, restorative crowns which are
not well adapted, cysts with fistula draining into the mouth, oral cancer and ulcerations.
Most of these factors cause halitosis due to tissue breakdown, putrefaction of amino
acids and decreasing of saliva flow. All these conditions result in the release
of VSC8, 9.
2.1.2.
Otolaryngology and Respiratory Diseases
Related to Halitosis:
Halitosis is a very common complaint among
ENT patients. The main causes of halitosis related to the oro-nasal cavity are
acute viral or bacterial pharyngitis, chronic/purulent tonsillitis,
retropharyngeal abscesses, deep crypts of the tonsils, caseous retention,
chronic/purulent sinusitis, post-nasal drip, foreign body in nasaloro-sinusal
cavity and ozena. These pathologies cause halitosis mainly due to bacterial action,
which lead to putrefaction of the tissues and production of VSC10,8.
Fetid samples of the tongue dorsum coating were compared with nasal mucus and
showed the same composition11. Nasal obstruction leads to mouth
breathing causing dryness of the mouth. A dry mouth causes more epithelium
cells exfoliation, xerostomia, tongue coating and therefore increases the
production of VSC8.
2.1.3.
Digestive Diseases Related to Halitosis:
Many digestive diseases are traditionally
associated with halitosis. Reflux esophagi is, hiatal hernia, Zencker
diverticulum, achalasia are associated. Actually, steatorrhea or other malabsorption
syndromes, which cause excessive flatulence, are the most important causes of
halitosis concerning gastrointestinal diseases10,8. Specialists and internists
often require gastroenterological assessment when facing a halitosis complaint.
Endoscopy is one of the most widely requested tools in halitosis investigation12.
2.1.4.
Temporary halitosis:
It results from hot/spicy food, certain
drinks, alcoholic beverages, coffee and most common from garlic, onion, salty foods,
spices, curries, cured foods like salamis and cooked food such as kippers8.
Tobacco consumption causes moldy odor and Hypo salivation/Xerostomia (dry mouth)
also leads to bad breath13.
2.1.5.
Morning breath:
Everybody has a degree of halitosis, first
thing in the morning. There is a physiological reason for this. During sleep,
the flow of saliva is reduced drastically and tongue and cheek move very little.
This allows food residues to stagnate in the mouth and dead cells that are
normally shed from the surface of tongue and gums and from the inside of cheek
to accumulate. As bacteria starts to work on them and digest them, an
unpleasant smell is generated. This process is biologically known as
putrefaction/rotting. Although normal, anyone suffering from nasal congestion whose
mouth breathes is more likely to suffer from these actions to a greater extent.
Luckily, this morning breath generally disappears after breakfast and after
brushing the teeth because saliva starts to flow again and any leftover
residues are washed away and swallowed14.
2.1.6.
Smoking (cigarettes/cigars):
Breath smells like ash tray. Smoking also
reduces the flow of saliva and therefore further exacerbates the problem15.
2.2.
Crash dieting/fasting:
When the body is no longer supplied with
energy giving carbohydrates it first breaks down glucose stored in the muscles
and liver in the form of glycogen. But this does not last long. After a few hours,
the body begins to breakdown its fat stores and the waste product of their
metabolism, ketones, endows the breath with a distinctive sweet and sickly smell.
This can be seen in those who has vigorously worked out and exercised and not
taken sufficient carbohydrates before or after. People on a strict caveman or
high protein diet experience the same effect for similar reasons.
2.3.
Oral source of halitosis
Malodor that arises from the mouth is the
consequence of microbial putrefaction of food debris, cells, saliva, and blood.
The oral microbes most likely to cause the oral malodor are Gram negative
bacteria and include Prevotella
(Bacteroides) melaninogenica, Treponemadenticola, Porphyromonasgingivalis,
Porphyromonasendodontalis, Prevotellaintermedia, Bacteroidesloescheii,
Enterobacteriaceae, Tannerellaforsythensis (Bacteroidesforsythus),
Centipedaperiodontii, Eikenellacorrodens, Fusobacteriumnucleatumvincentii,
Fusobacteriumnucleatumnucleatum, Fusobacteriumnucleatumpolymorphum, and Fusobacteriumperiodonticum16,17.
However, no obvious association exists between oral malodor and any
specific bacterial infection, suggesting that halitosis reflects complex
interactions between several oral bacterial species. The agents that give rise
to oral malodor include especially the VSC, demines, and short chain fatty
acids.
These bacterial interactions are most
likely to occur in the gingival crevices and periodontal pockets, but oral
malodor can also arise from the posterior dorsal tongue (and this explains why
oral malodor may sometimes occur in people with good oral hygiene). As a
consequence of its large and papillary surface area, the dorsum of the tongue
canretain large amounts of desquamated cells, leucocytes, and micro-organisms
(and presumably salivary constituents). The microbial content on the tongue may
be greater18, 19 but not necessarily different, in people with
periodontal disease than in others.
2.4.
Miscellaneous Causes:
Renal impairment is normally a result of a
chronic glomerulonephritis, which damage the glomerular function, leading to an
increased urea level in the blood. Breathed air is described as ammonium-like
breath and generally is accompanied by complaints of dysgeusia (salty taste)20.
Diabetes can result in accumulation of ketene bodies, which are breathed out
producing a very characteristic halitus, moreover, diabetes causes dry mouth.
In addition, diabetes and other insulin-resistance states are related to
impaired secretion of body fluids, like tear and saliva. There is a decrease in
saliva production and xerostomia can occur21. Trimethylaminuria or “fish
odor syndrome” is agenetic metabolic disorder characterized by a failure in the
oxidation route from trim ethylamine (TMA) to trim ethylamine N-oxide (TMA-O)
in the liver. This occurs due to a mutation in the FMO gene22. High levels
of TMA in urine and others body fluids confer that typical unpleasant,
intermittent characteristic fishy odor to the breath20. Examples of drugs that may cause oral malodor
include alcohol, tobacco, betel, solvent misuse, chloral hydrate, nitrites and
nitrates, dimethyl sulphoxide, disulphiram, some cytotoxic agents, phenothiazines,
amphetamines etc.
3.
Professional
diagnosis for halitosis:
Scientists have long thought that smelling
one's own breath odor is often difficult due to acclimatization, although many
people with bad breath are able to detect it in others. Research has suggested
that self-evaluation of halitosis is not easy because of preconceived notions
of how bad we think it should be. Some people assume that they have bad breath
because of bad taste (metallic, sour, fecal, etc.), however bad taste is
considered a poor indicator. Patients often self-diagnose by asking a close
friend23.
One popular home method to determine the
presence of bad breath is to lick the back of the wrist, let the saliva dry for
a minute or two, and smells the result. This test results in overestimation, as
concluded from research, and should be avoided24. A better way would
be to lightly scrape the posterior back of the tongue with a plastic disposable
spoon and to smell the drying residue. Home tests that use a chemical reaction
to test for the presence of polyamines and sulfur compounds on tongue swabs are
now available, but there are few studies showing how well they actually detect
the odor. Furthermore, since breath odor changes in intensity throughout the
day depending on many factors, multiple testing sessions may be necessary.
3.1.1.
Halimeter:
a portable sulfide monitor used to test
for levels of sulfur emissions (to be specific, hydrogen sulfide) in the mouth
air. When used properly, this device can be very effective at determining
levels of certain VSC-producing bacteria. However, it has drawbacks in clinical
applications. For example, other common sulfides (such as mercaptan) are not
recorded as easily and can be misrepresented in test results. Certain foods
such as garlic and onions produce sulfur in the breath for as long as 48 hours
and can result in false readings. The Halimeter is also very sensitive to
alcohol, so one should avoid drinking alcohol or using alcohol-containing
mouthwashes for at least 12 hours prior to being tested. This analog machine
loses sensitivity over time and requires periodic recalibration to remain
accurate25.
3.1.2.
Gas chromatography:
Portable machines, such as the OralChroma,
are currently being introduced. This technology is specifically designed to
digitally measure molecular levels of the three major VSCs in a sample of mouth
air (hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, and dimethyl sulfide). It is accurate
in measuring the sulfur components of the breath and produces visual results in
graph form via computer interface.
3.1.3.
BANA test:
This test is directed to find the salivary
levels of an enzyme indicating the presence of certain halitosis-related
bacteria.
3.1.4.
β-Galactosidase test:
Salivary levels of this enzyme were found
to be correlated with oral malodor.
Although such instrumentation and
examinations are widely used in breath clinics, the most important measurement
of bad breath (the gold standard) is the actual sniffing and scoring of the
level and type of the odor carried out by trained experts ("organoleptic
measurements"). The level of odor is usually assessed on a six-point
intensity scale26-41.
3.2. Proposal
for a rational protocol:
The intention of this protocol is to assess
the main causes of halitosis concerning their frequency and importance. A logical
knowledge organization must be kept to avoid diagnosis failures and useless/expensive
tests. Initially a physician must have in mind that halitosis complaint is very
common in the general population. Nevertheless, there is a bias concerning differences
between true halitosis and “bad taste in the mouth”. Some patients look for
halitosis treatment due to relatives/friends warnings and others due to self-awareness.
It has to be considered the level of confidence in the information given by relatives/friends.
In our experience, some cases have been mistreated due to biased information
given by an unhappy consort. Moreover, there is physiologic halitosis, which is
sometimes misinterpreted as a disease, and it can be normal. The halitosis most
people experience when wake up is considered physiologic once it disappears after
eating and/or brushing teeth. It is considered physiologic because of the decreased
salivary flow, the increased putrefaction process at night and because of the long
period of starvation while sleeping. If it persists even after eating or brushing
teeth, further investigation is necessary42.
4. Food
source for anaerobic bacteria that cause bad breath:
Most of the odoriferous compounds that
cause bad breath are waste products created by anaerobic bacteria, as they digest proteins. This means that
as we consume food items such as meat and fish, bacteria living in our mouth
also get meal and waste products from their meals are precisely the compounds
that cause bad breath. There is always naturally occurring protein food sources
floating around in our mouth such as dead skin cells or protein compounds found
in the saliva. And then also especially for those who are not diligent with
brushing and flossing, there is always the leftover food debris from yesterday’s
meal and the meal before that and the one before that. High protein foods include
meat, fish, sea food and eggs; dairy foods such as milk, cheese, yoghurt;
cereal grains and products; desserts especially cakes and pies.
4.1.
Where do the bacteria that cause bad
breath live?
For most of us, bad breath causing
bacteria live on the surface of tongue. Secondary locations can be at or below
person's gum line. Bacteria that live on person's tongue, the most common odor
producing region of the tongue is its posterior region; covered by a whitish
layer, dental plaque and its chocked full of anaerobic bacteria. The precise
surface texture found on individual's tongue will influence the amount of
coating that tends to accumulate. Fissured tongue, grooved tongue, and lingua
plicata have more potential to accumulate bacteria laden coating than those with
smoother tongue surface.
5. Correlation
studies:
5.1. Association
of oral malodor with Periodontitis:
A correlation has been found between VSC
concentration in mouth air and increased pocket depth in Periodontitis patients.43,44
The uptake of volatile sulphurs by epithelial cells may play an important role in
the pathogenesis of periodontal disease: it has-been proposed that volatile sulphurs
may alter the permeability of affected cells and facilitate the access of toxic
metabolites into the underlying connective tissue thereby contributing to
collagen degradation. There is also general agreement that the VSC content of exhaled
mouth air and the concentration of VSC precursors increases with the severity
of periodontal disease.
5.2.
Correlation between halitosis and mouth
breathing in children:
Lara Jansiski Motta et al., has carried
out a correlation study between halitosis and mouth breathing in children.45
Accordingly, fifty five children between 3 and 14 years of age were
divided into two groups (nasal and mouth breathing) for the assessment of
halitosis. There were a significantly greater number of boys with the
mouth-breathing pattern than girls. Based on their study, a total of23.6% of
the participants had no mouth odor, 12.7% had mild odor, 12.7% had moderate
odor and 50.9% had strong odor. There was a statistically significant
association between halitosis and mouth breathing. Thus the occurrence of halitosis
was high among the children evaluated, and there was a statistically
significant association between halitosis and mouth breathing.
6.
Treatment
of oral malodor46
It includes
investigating and managing
possible systemic (non-oral) source if organoleptic method detects malodor from
both mouth and nose; improving oral hygiene by professional and patient
administered tooth cleaning; regularizing atraumatic tongue cleaning; to use
regularly the antimicrobial toothpastes and mouthwashes; rinsing with
oil-water; having regular clinical review to ensure maintenance of effective
oral hygiene etc,.
According to traditional ayurvedic
medicine, chewing areca nut and betel leaf is a remedy for bad breath. In South
Asia, it was a custom to chew areca or betel nut and betel leaf among lovers
because of the breath-freshening and stimulant drug properties of the mixture.
Both the nut and the leaf are mild stimulants and can be addictive with repeated
use. The betel nut will also cause dental decay and red or black staining of
teeth when chewed47. Both areca nut and betel leaf chewing, however,
can cause premalignant lesions such as leukoplakia and sub mucous fibrosis, and
are recognized risk factors for oral and oropharyngealsquamous cell carcinoma
(oral cancer)48. Other traditional remedies for halitosis include
Guava leaves in Thailand, eggshells in China, parsley in Italy, and urine-based
mouth rinse in certain European cultures49. Practitioners and
purveyors of alternative medicine sell a vast range of
products that claim to beneficial in treating halitosis, including dietary
supplements, vitamins, oral probiotics. Halitosis is often claimed to be a
symptom of the so-called "candida hypersensitivity syndrome" or related fictitious
diseases, and is claimed to be treatable with antifungal medications or alternative
medications claimed to treat fungal infections.
6.2.
Probiotics50, 51
A diverse consortium of gram-negative and
gram-positive bacteria have been found to contribute to the problem and by
contrast, certain bacterial species that predominate in the mouths of healthy
subjects become noticeably absent in subjects with halitosis. Current
treatments focus on the use of chemical or physical antibacterial regimes to
reduce the numbers of these bacteria. Antimicrobial treatment indiscriminately
depletes populations of both the problematic bacteria and those bacteria that
are not thought to be implicated in halitosis, but which are likely to be
important in the maintenance of a normal oral micro-environment. The outcome of
antimicrobial treatment is inevitably only a temporary reduction in malodor,
until the halitosis-causing bacteria become re-established. Preventing the re-growth
of odor-causing organisms by pre-emptive colonization of the oral cavity with
nonvirulent, commensal microorganisms seems like a reasonable alternative.
Recently several studies were performed to
replace bacteria responsible for halitosis with probiotics as Streptococcus salivarius, Lactobacillus salivarius or Weissellacibaria and concluded that
probiotic bacterial strains, originally sourced from the indigenous oral
microbiotas of healthy humans, may have potential application as adjuncts for
the prevention and treatment of halitosis. The oral administration of the
probiotic lactobacilli not only seemed to improve the physiologic halitosis,
but also showed beneficial effects on bleeding on probing from the periodontal
pockets.
7.
CONCLUSION:
The prevalence of halitosis has been
reported to be as high. However, only a few patients visit dental clinicians to
seek help for halitosis. This fact suggests that the patients who do visit
clinicians may have different psychological characteristics or values concerning
their own breath than other individuals. Since the biochemical pathogenesis of
oral malodor was elucidated earlier, the simple treatment measures have proven
very effective in controlling halitosis. Nevertheless, halitosis treatments are
generally unsuccessful in halitophobic patients because clinicians are unable
to find any signs of bad breath. Patients with psychosomatic halitosis
frequently receive only treatment for genuine halitosis and do not receive care
from a psychological specialist. Patients’ persistent complaints about malodor
are often ignored by dental clinicians. Consequently, these patients may start
“doctor shopping.” Many patients with psychosomatic halitosis are not able to
obtain proper treatment for their condition because of a clinician’s
mismanagement. Since a few of these patients go so far as to commit suicide,
they need appropriate management by a psychological specialist. Therefore, it
is important for the general practitioner to distinguish between patients with
real halitosis and those with psychological halitosis.
A successful protocol for distinguishing
or diagnosing psychosomatic halitosis has not yet been established. Although
more than 100 papers about psychosomatic halitosis have been published during
the past quarter century, classification of and criteria for genuine halitosis
and the psychosomatic condition remain unclear. To clarify the appropriate
management of a patient with psychosomatic halitosis, a simple classification
of the types of halitosis must be established. To conclude, bad breath is a
major concern for many people. Because it nearly always originates from the
mouth, it can and should be diagnosed and treated professionally by dentists.
There is no "stand-alone" product solution for halitosis nor do traditional
standards of dental or periodontal care necessarily eliminate the problem.
Recent developments in the understanding of the etiologies of breath malodor
have spawned new techniques for its assessment and management.
REFERENCES:
1.
Tárzia O. Halitose: um desafioque tem cura. 1ª ed. Rio de
Janeiro: Ed. de Publicações Biomédicas Ltda; 2003.
2.
Grein NJ. Estomatologiapara o clínico - 7a Aula: Halitose
- diagnóstico e tratamento. Odontólogo Moderno 1982;9:40-45
3.
Bogdasarian RS. Halitosis. Otolaryngol Clin NorthAm1986;
19:101-17.
4.
Tonzetich J. Prefácio (1997). In: Rosemberg M. Halitose: perspectivasempesquisa.
Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Guanabara Koogan; 2003.p.55-67.
5.
Yaegaki K, Coil JM. Examination, classification and
treatment of halitosis; clinical perspectives. J Can Dent Assoc.2000; 66:
257-261.
6.
Ongole R1, Shenoy N. Halitosis: Much beyond oral malodor. Kathmandu
University Medical Journal 2010;8:269-275
7.
Scully C, Greenman J. Halitosis (breath odor). Periodontol
2000. 2008; 48(1):66-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00266.x.
8.
Van Steenberghe D. Breath Malodor a step-by-step approach.
Quintessence Books 1st ed. Copenhagen; 2004.
9.
Delanghe G, Ghyselen J, Bollen C, van Steenberghe D,
Vandekerckhove BN, Feenstra L. An inventory of patients’ response to treatment
at a multidisciplinary breath odor clinic. Quintessence Int. 1999; 30:307-10.
10. Tárzia O.
Halitose: um desafioque tem cura. 1ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. de
PublicaçõesBiomédicasLtda; 2003.
11. Rosemberg
M. Halitose: perspectivasempesquisa. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Guanabara Koogan S.A.;
2003
12. Serin E,
Gumurdulu Y, Kayaselcuk F, Ozer B, Ylmaz U, Boyacioglu S. Halitosis in patients
with Helicobacter pylori-positive non-ulcer dyspepsia: an indication for eradication
therapy? Eur J Int Med 2003;14:45-8
13. Interscan corporation
Manual Instruction. PO box 2496 - Chatsworth, CA 01311-2496.
http:/www.gasdetection.com
14. Orrico SR,
de Toledo BE, Fonseca L, Ito IY. Influence of age on the reactivity of the BANA
test among Brazilian children. Braz Dent J 1992; 2:115-22.
15. Kozlovsky
A, Gordon D, Galernter I, Loesche WJ, Rosenberg M. Correlation between the BANA
test and oral malodor parameters. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1036-42.
16. Morita M,
Wang H-L. Association between oral malodor and adult periodontitis: a review. J
Clin Periodontol 2001;28: 813-9
17. Awano S,
Gohara K, Kurihara E, Ansai T, Takehara T. The relationship between the
presence of periodontopathogenic bacteria in saliva and halitosis. Int Dent J
2002;52: 212-6
18. Yaegaki K,
Sanada K. Volatile sulphur compounds in mouth air from clinically healthy subjects
and patients with periodontal disease. J Periodontol Res 1992;27: 233-8.
19. Yaegaki K,
Sanada K. Biochemical and clinical factors influencing oral malodor in
periodontal patients. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 783-9.
20. DV
Steenberghe. Breath Malodor a step-by-step approach. Quintessence Books 1st ed.
Copenhagen; 2004.
21. Rocha EM,
Carvalho CR, Saad MJ, Velloso LA. The influence of ageing on the insulin
signalling system in rat lacrimal and salivary glands. ActaOphtalmolScand
2003;81:639-45.
22. Rosemberg
M. Halitose: perspectivasempesquisa. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Guanabara Koogan S.A.;
2003.
23. Eli, I; Baht, R;
Koriat, H; Rosenberg, M (2001). "Self-perception of breath odor".
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) 132 (5): 621–6.doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0239.
24. Rosenberg, M
(2002). "The science of bad breath". Scientific American 286 (4): 72–9.doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0402-72.
25. Rosenberg, M;
McCulloch, CA. "Measurement of oral malodor: Current methods and future
prospects". Journal of periodontology 1992;63 (9): 776–82.doi:10.1902/jop.1992.63.9.776.
26. Loesche, WJ;
Kazor, C (2002). "Microbiology and treatment of halitosis".
Periodontology 2000 28: 256–79.doi:10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280111.x.
27. Rosenberg, M.
"Clinical assessment of bad breath: Current concepts". Journal of the
American Dental Association (1939) 1996;
127 (4): 475–82.DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0239.
28. Tonzetich J. Direct gas chromatographic
analysis of sulphur compounds in mouth air in man. Arch Oral Biol 1971;
16:587-97.
29. Kaizu T. Analysis of volatile sulphur
compounds in mouth air by gas chromatography. Nippon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi
1976; 18:1-12.
30. Kaizu T. Halitosis, its etiology and
prevention. Nippon ShikaIshikaiZasshi 1976; 29:228-35.
31. Yaegaki K. In: Rosenberg M, editor. Bad
Breath Research Perspectives. Tel-Aviv: Ramot Publishing-Tel Aviv University;
1995. p. 87-108.
32. Yaegaki K, Suetaka T. The effect of
mouthwash on oral malodor production. Shigaku 1989; 76:1492-500.
33. Yaegaki K, Suetaka T. The effect of zinc
chloride mouthwash on the production of oral malodor, the degradations of
salivary cellular elements and proteins. J Dent Health 1989; 9:377-86.
34. Yaegaki K, Suetaka T. Periodontal disease
and precursors of oral malodorous components. J Dent Health 1989; 39:733-41.
35. Yaegaki K, Takano Y, SuetakaT, Arai K,
Masuda T., Ukisu S. Investigation of people’s attitudes and reactions towards
oral malodor. A preliminary survey conducted on dental hygienics students.
Shigaku 1989; 77:171-8.
36. Yaegaki K, Sanada K. Effects of a two-phase
oil-water mouthwash on halitosis. Clin Prev Dent 1992; 14:5-9.
37. Yaegaki K, Sanada K. Volatile sulfur
compounds in mouth air from clinically healthy subjects and patients with
periodontitis. J Periodontal Res 1992; 27(Pt 1):233-8.
38. Yaegaki K, Sanada K. Biochemical and
clinical factors influencing oral malodor in periodontal patients. J
Periodontol 1992; 63:783-9.
39. Richter JT. Diagnosis and treatment of
halitosis. Compendium Cont Dent Edu 1996; 17:370-88.
40. Yaegaki K. In: Rosenberg M, editor. Bad
Breath Research Perspectives. 2nd ed. Tel-Aviv: Ramot Publishing-Tel Aviv
University, 1997;227-31.
41. Yaegaki K, Coil JM. Diagnosis of halitosis
by utilizing questionnaire and organoleptic measurement. Quintessence 1999;
18:745-53.
42. Costa IM.
Metodologiapara o estudo das halitoses. Ars Cvrandiem Odontologia 1981;
7:503-8.
43. Ratcliff
PA,Johnson PW. The relationship between oral malodor, gingivitis and
periodontitis: a Review. J Periodontol 1999;70:485-489
44. Morita M, Wang H-L: Association between oral
malodor and adult periodontitis: a review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2001; 28:
813-819.
45. Lara
Jansiski Motta, Joanna Carolina Bachiega, Carolina Cardoso Guedes, Lorena
Trista˜o Laranja, Sandra KalilBussadori. Association between halitosis and
mouth breathing in children. Clinical Science. 2011; 66(6):939-942. DOI:10.1590/S1807-59322011000600003.
46. Rosenberg
M, Kozlovsky A, Wind Y, Mindel E. Self assessment of oral malodor 1 year
following initial consultation. Halitophobia 1999; 30: 324-7.
47. Norton, SA (January 1998). "Betel: consumption and consequences.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 38 (1): 81–8. doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70543-2.
48. Warnakulasuriya, S; Trivedy, C; Peters, TJ (Apr 6, 2002). "Areca nut use: an independent
risk factor for oral cancer."
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 324
(7341): 799–800. doi:10.1136/bmj. 324.7341.799.
49. Tayara, Rafif; Riad Bacho. "Bad breath: What's The
Story?". Retrieved 13 August 2012.
50. Lalitha TA. Probiotics and Oral Health. J Oral Res Rev 2011;
3(1):20-26.
51. Bollen CM, Beikler T. Halitosis: the multidisciplinary approach. Int J
Oral Sci 2012; 4(2):55–63.
Received on 24.11.2015
Modified on 05.12.2015
Accepted on 11.12.2015
© RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 8(12): Dec.,
2015; Page 1707-1713
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00307.8