Design, Development, Evaluation and Optimization of Antiulcer Delayed Release Tablets
Viral Patel*
Department of Pharmacy, Shri Jagdish Prasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Vidyanagari, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: veerpatel5387@icloud.com
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this work was to formulate enteric-coated tablets of Rabeprazole sodium for ulcer therapy. Tablets can be prepared by using commonly approved excipients, which were proved compatible with the active ingredient by DSC and physical observation, method adopted was wet granulation. Excipients used were mannitol, crossprovidole as super disintegrant. Compressed core tablets were given seal coat using HPC followed by enteric coat using HPMCP. Core tablets were checked for parameters like hardness, thickness, friability, disintegration time, and drug content. The tablets were evaluated for disintegration time and drug content. Dissolution studies of the tablets were also carried out using USP (type 2) dissolution apparatus. The dissolution media of OGD Media, 6.0 pH phosphate buffer and 6.8 pH phosphate buffer solution were used at 37° ± 0.5° C for 30 mins in followed by 45 minutes in 6.8 pH Phosphate buffer solution AND 6.0 pH phosphate buffer. Based on the tablets evaluation results, some formulations were selected as the best formulations and were tested for stability studies and evaluated.
KEYWORDS: Proton Pump Inhibitors, Enteric Coated Tablets, Stability studies, HPC, HPMCP
INTRODUCTION:
ORAL SOLID DOSAGE FORMS
Most of drug formulations are administered orally by means of solid dosage forms such as tablets and capsules. Preparations of these solid dosage forms require the presence of other additives. These are included in the formulations to facilitate easy handling, enhance the physical appearance, and improve stability and aid in the delivery of the drug to the blood stream after administration.
GASTRO INTESTINAL ADMINISTRATION - THE ORAL ROUTE
Orally administered drug must be absorbed through the gut which depends on number of factors such as, gastric emptying, intestinal motility, mucosal surface area, degradation of drug in the stomach and first pass effect. The absorption rate varies from the stomach to the intestine owing to the increased surface area (about 4500 cm2), the intestinal mucosa and greater velocity of blood (1000 ml/min) through the intestinal capillaries compared to the gastric capillaries.
In the present study development of an enteric coated delayed release dosage form having one of the raft forming ingredient which is used to provide symptom relief from GERD by forming a physical barrier on top of the stomach contents in the form of neutral gel or raft. Proton pump inhibitor is indicated for the treatment of erosive esophagitis.
For centuries, neutralization of gastric acid with antacids provided only relief from the pain of ulcers. Studies of the physiological control of acid secretion demonstrated that anti-cholinergic agents would block this process. The development of an H2 antagonist that acts at H2 histaminergic receptors provided more specific class of inhibitors of gastric acid secretion. More recently the substituted benzimidazole inhibitors of H+ K+-ATPase (Proton pump) offers very effective means of selectively blocking the proton pump that is responsible for acid secretion by parietal cells3.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease, commonly referred to as GERD or acid reflux, is a condition in which the liquid content of the stomach regurgitates (backs up or refluxes) into the esophagus. The liquid can inflame and damage the lining (cause, causeesophagitis) of the esophagus although visible signs of inflammation occur in a minority of patients. The regurgitated liquid usually contains acid and pepsin that are produced by the stomach. (Pepsin is an enzyme that begins the digestion of proteins in the stomach.) The refluxed liquid also may contain bile that has backed-up into the stomach from the duodenum. (The duodenum is the first part of the small intestine that attaches to the stomach.) Acid is believed to be the most injurious component of the refluxed liquid. Pepsin and bile also may injure the esophagus, but their role in the production of esophageal inflammation and damage is not as clear as the role of acid.
GERD is a chronic condition. Once it begins, it usually is life-long. If there is injury to the lining of the esophagus (esophagitis), this also is a chronic condition. Moreover, after the esophagus has healed with treatment and treatment is stopped, the injury will return in most patients within a few months. Once treatment for GERD is begun, therefore, it usually will need to be continued indefinitely although it is argued that in some patients with intermittent symptoms and no esophagitis, treatment can be intermittent and done only during symptomatic periods.
In fact, the reflux of the stomach's liquid contents into the esophagus occurs in most normal individuals. One study found that reflux occurs as frequently in normal individuals as in patients with GERD. In patients with GERD, however, the refluxed liquid contains acid more often, and the acid remains in the esophagus longer. It has also been found that liquid refluxes to a higher level in the esophagus in patients with GERD than normal individuals.
As is often the case, the body has ways (mechanisms) to protect itself from the harmful effects of reflux and acid. For example, most reflux occurs during the day when individuals are upright. In the upright position, the refluxed liquid is more likely to flow back down into the stomach due to the effect of gravity. In addition, while individuals are awake, they repeatedly swallow, whether or not there is reflux. Each swallow carries any refluxed liquid back into the stomach. Finally, the salivary glands in the mouth produce saliva, which contains bicarbonate. With each swallow, bicarbonate-containing saliva travels down the esophagus. The bicarbonate neutralizes the small amount of acid that remains in the esophagus after gravity and swallowing have removed most of the liquid.
Gravity, swallowing, and saliva are important protective mechanisms for the esophagus, but they are effective only when individuals are in the upright position. At night duringsleep, gravity is not in effect, swallowing stops, and the secretion of saliva is reduced. Therefore, reflux that occurs at night is more likely to result in acid remaining in the esophagus longer and causing greater damage to the esophagus.
Certain conditions make a person susceptible to GERD. For example, GERD can be a serious problem during pregnancy. The elevated hormone levels of pregnancy probably cause reflux by lowering the pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter (see below). At the same time, the growing fetus increases the pressure in the abdomen. Both of these effects would be expected to increase reflux. Also, patients with diseases that weaken the esophageal muscles (see below), such as scleroderma or mixed connective tissue diseases, are more prone to develop GERD.
OBJECTIVE:
The stability of Rabeprazole sodium is a function of pH, it is rapidly degraded in acid media, and is more stable under alkaline condition. The degradation is catalyzed by acidic reacting compounds and Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) is usually stabilized in mixtures with alkaline reacting compounds. Therefore exposure of drug to the acidic content of the stomach would lead to significant degradation of the drug and hence, reduce bioavailability.
Delayed release dosage form is best formulation which is used for drugs that are destroyed in the gastric fluids, or cause gastric irritation, or are absorbed preferentially in the intestine. Such preparations contain an alkaline core material comprising the active substance, a separating layer and enteric coating layer.
The first aim of present work was to prepare delayed release i.e. enteric coated tablet to prevent degradation in the stomach due to the acidic environment or gastric enzymes and to study the factors affecting the film coating of tablets performed in a perforated pan coater. The second aim of present work was optimization of coating process parameters which implicate more significant effects on tablet coating process.
For the delayed release there is need of enteric coating on the core tablet, but the enteric coating is also an acidic medium. There is need to protect the drug from enteric coating layer, for this one more additional coating (seal coating) is required in between core tablet & enteric coating.
Main objective of the study:
1. Drug-Excipients compatibility studies to identify suitable excipients.
2. Selection of manufacturing formula on the basis of process development and formulation strategy.
3. Stability studies of final batch.
EXPERIMENTAL:
PREFORMULATION STUDIES:
Preformulation studies are the first step in the rational development of dosage form of a drug substance. The objective of preformulation studies are to develop a portfolio of information about the drug substance, so that this information useful to develop formulation. Preformulation can be defined as investigation of physical and chemical properties of drug substance alone and when combined with excipients.
Preformulation investigations are designed to identify those physicochemical properties and excipients that may influence the formulation design, method of manufacture, and pharmacokinetic-biopharmaceutical properties of the resulting product. Followings are the tests carried out for the preformulation study.
Micromeritic properties of API:
1. Organoleptic Characteristics:
The color, odor, and taste of the drug were characterized and recorded using descriptive terminology.
2. Particle Size:
Particle size analysis is done by analytical method or by sieve analysis. In analytical method particle size is measured by Malvern Mastersizer. In sieve analysis standard sieves of different meshes were available as per the specifications of USP; sieves were arranged in a nest with coarser at the top. This sieve set was fixed to the mechanical shaker apparatus and shaken for a certain period of times. The powder retained on each sieve was weighed and percentage of powder retained on each sieve was calculated using the initial weight taken.
3. Solubility of drug:
Add measured volumes of different media at physiological pH to 1 gm of Rabeprazole sodium until it dissolve and produce saturated solution. Calculate the mg of Rabeprazole sodium that goes into per ml of solvent or media. Solubility is carried out at temperature between RT.
4. Bulk Density:
An accurately weighed quantity of powder, which was previously passed through # 40 [USP] and carefully poured into graduated cylinder. Then after pouring the powder into the graduated cylinder the powder bed was made uniform without disturbing. Then the volume was measured directly from the graduation marks on the cylinder as ml. The volume measure was called as the bulk volume and the bulk density is calculated by following formula;
5. Tapped Density:
After measuring the bulk volume the same measuring cylinder was set into tap density apparatus. The tap density apparatus was set to 250 taps per minute and operated for 500 taps. Volume was noted as (Va) and again operated for 750 taps and volume was noted as (Vb). If the difference between Va and Vb not greater than 2% then Vb is consider as final tapped volume. The tapped density is calculated by the following formula;
Carr’s Index [Compressibility Index]:
It is one of the most important parameter to characterize the nature of powders and granules. It can be calculated from the following equation;
Table 1: Interpretation of Carr’s index for powder flow
% Compressibility |
Flow ability |
5-15 |
Excellent |
12-16 |
Good |
18-21 |
Fair-passable |
23-35 |
Poor |
33-38 |
Very poor |
>40 |
Very very poor |
6. Hausner’s Ratio:
Hausner’s ratio is an important character to determine the flow property of powder and granules. This can be calculated by the following formula;
Value < 1.25 indicate good flow (=20% Carr)
While > 1.50 indicate poor flow (=35% Carr)
7. Drug Excipients Compatibility Study:
Procedure:
Rabeprazole sodium and Excipients are to be thoroughly mixed in predetermined ratio mentioned in below table and passed through the # 40. The blend was to be filled in amber colored glass vials sealed with aluminum seal and charged at 40ºC/75% RH and 60°C. Similarly Rabeprazole sodium should also be kept at all condition and samples to be withdrawn for analysis within two day of sampling date as per the compatibility study plan.
Table 2: Protocol for drug-excipients compatibility
Sr. No |
Drug- Excipient combination |
Drug – Excipient Ratio |
1 |
Rabeprazole sodium |
NA |
2 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Mannitol |
1: 1 |
3 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
1: 1 |
4 |
Rabeprazole sodium : HPMC phthalate |
1: 1 |
5 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Magnesium Stearate |
1:0.25 |
6 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Ethyl cellulose |
1:1 |
7 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Iron oxide Yellow |
1:0.25 |
8 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Sodium hydroxide |
1:0.25 |
9 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Cros povidone |
1:0.25 |
10 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Propane-1,2 diol (Propylene glycol) |
1:0.25 |
11 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Titanium dioxide |
1:0.25 |
12 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Talc |
1:0.25 |
Condition: 4,7
1. 40° C / 75% RH
2. 60° C
Pack details: Amber colored glass vials with rubber stopper and aluminum seal.
Test to be performed:
1. Description (Physical Observation).
2. DSC of initial sample.
3. Degradation by UPLC (Related substances)
Testing Frequency:
Physical observation shall be done at every two week up to 4 week. Degradation by UPLC shall be done at every two week up to 4 week for 60°C sample and 40°C/75%RH sample.
8. Differential scanning calorimetry:
A differential scanning calorimeter was used for thermal analysis of drug and excipients. The drug and excipients were passed through the # 40 and mixed in ratio as shown in table no.21. The sample was weighed directly in the pierced DSC aluminum pan and scanned at the temperature range of 50-400°c at heating rate of 5°c/min - 10°c/min. and nitrogen purging rate 50ml/min. The thermo grams obtained were observed for any interaction.
9. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis:
The powder X-ray diffraction study was carried to check out change in the polymorphic forms of Rabeprazole sodium during stability. Data was collected in the continuous scan mode. The scanned range was 0-400.
4) Evaluation of tablets:
1. Appearance:
Twenty tablets of each formulation were taken to check any discoloration or degradation of drug in the tablets by visual method. If any discoloration or black spots appears, it shows the degradation or decomposition of the drug in the tablet formulation.
2. Weight variation test:
Every individual tablet in a batch should be in uniform weight and weight variation within permissible limits. Weight control is based on a sample of 20 tablets. Twenty tablets were randomly selected and accurately weighed using an electronic balance. The results are expressed as mean values of 20 determinations.
3. Hardness:
The hardness of the tablets was determined using a Dr. Schleuniger hardness tester.
4. Thickness and diameter:
The thickness of ten randomly selected tablets was determined using a digital vernier caliper. The results are expressed as mean values of 10 determinations. 5.
Friability:
The friability of the tablets was measured in a Roche friabilator. Tablets of a known weight (W0) or a sample of 10 tablets are dedusted in a drum for a fixed time (100 revolutions) and weighed (W) again. Percentage friability was calculated from the loss in weight as given in equation as below. The weight loss should not be more than 1 % w/w with no breakage of any tablet.
6. Disintegration time:
It was performed using USP disintegration test apparatus. One tablet is placed in each tube, and the basket rack is positioned in a 1-L beaker of water at 37°C ± 2°C.
7. Assay of prepared tablet:
Assay of prepared tablet was carried out by Chromatographic method using UPLC.
Mobile Phase:
Prepare a mixture of Buffer*, Methanol in the ratio 55:45v/v, mixed well and degassed by sonication.
*Buffer preparation:
Dissolve 2.5ml Triethylamine into 550 ml Milli-Q water and adjust the pH to 6.9 ± 0.5 with dilute Orthophosphoric acid and mix well, filter through 0.45µ membrane filter.
Standard solution:
Weigh accurately about 50 mg of Rabeprazole sodium working standard in to 200 ml volumetric flask, add about 150 ml of diluent, sonicate to dissolve. Make the volume up to the mark with diluent and mix well.
5 ml of solution diluted to 250 ml with diluents.
(Concentration of Rabeprazole sodium is about 5.0 µg/ml)
Test solution:
For Acid Stage (Back Assay):
Transfer one tablet into a 250 ml volumetric flask, add to it about 150 ml of diluents and sonicate to disintegrate the tablet for about 15 minutes. Dilute up to the mark with diluent. Dilute 10 ml of solution to 200 ml using diluent. Filter through 0.45µ syringe filter discarding first few ml of filtrate.
Chromatographic systems:
Column : Kromasil C18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5µ
Flow rate : 1.0ml/min
Detection Wavelength : 275nm
Injection volume : 40µl
Column oven temperature : 45°C
Sample cooler temperature : 25°C
Run time : 30 minutes
Procedure:
Equilibrate the column with mobile phase till the stable baseline obtained. Inject blank in single, standard solution in five replicates and each test preparation into the chromatographic system and record the chromatograms. The retention time of Rabeprazole sodium peak is about 6.5 minutes. Evaluate the system suitability parameters from standard chromatograms.
System suitability parameters:
In the chromatograms obtained with standard preparation; the %RSD of Rabeprazole sodium peak area in five replicate injections shall be not more than 5.0%.
USP Tailing for Rabeprazole sodium peak shall be not more than 2.0.
USP plate count for Rabeprazole sodium peak shall be not less than 2000.
Calculations:
AT WS 5 250 200 P
% content = ------ x ------ x ----- x ------- x ------- x------ x 100
AS 200 250 LC 10 100
Where,
AT= Average area of Rabeprazole sodium in test preparations
AS= Average area of Rabeprazole sodium in standard preparations
WS= Weight of Rabeprazole sodium working standard taken in mg
P= Potency of Rabeprazole sodium working standard in % w/w
LC = Label claim of Rabeprazole sodium in mg
Report the average results.
8. In-Vitro Dissolution Testing:
Given anti-psychotic drug is not official in any pharmacopoeia. Dissolution of developmental batches and optimized batches was carried out as below.
Preparation of standard solution:
For Acid Stage:
Weigh accurately about 50 mg of Rabeprazole sodium working standard in to 200 ml volumetric flask, add about 150 ml of diluent, sonicate to dissolve. Make the volume up to the mark with diluent and mix well.
5 ml of solution diluted to 250 ml with diluents.
(Concentration of Rabeprazole sodium is about 5.0 µg/ml)
For Buffer Stage:
Weigh accurately about 50.0 mg of Rabeprazole sodium working standard in to 200 ml volumetric flask, add about 50 ml prepared OGD media, sonicate to dissolve. Make the volume up to the mark with dissolution media and mix well.
(Concentration of Rabeprazole sodium is about 3.125 µg/ml)
Dilute 5.0 ml of prepared solution to 100 ml with dissolution medium. Mix it well. Add 10 ml of above solution in to the testube containing 2 ml of 0.5N NaOH solution, mixed well.
Dilute 5 ml of solution to 20 ml using diluents, filter it through syringe filter.
(Concentration of Rabeprazole sodium is about 3.125 µg/ml)
Test solution:
For Acid Stage (Back Assay): Transfer one tablet in each of the dissolution vessel containing 700 ml of 0.1N hydrochloric acid, and run the dissolution apparatus as per the dissolution conditions. After the specified time interval stop the instrument, remove each tablet or the major portion thereof if the tablet is not intact. Transfer it into a 250 ml volumetric flask, add to it about 150 ml of diluents and sonicate to disintegrate the tablet for about 15 minutes. Dilute up to the mark with diluent. Dilute 10 ml of solution to 200 ml using diluent. Filter through 0.45µ syringe filter discarding first few ml of filtrate.
For Buffer Stage:
Step:1 Transfer one tablet in each of the dissolution vessel containing 700 ml of 0.1N hydrochloric acid; and run the dissolution apparatus as per the dissolution conditions. After the specified time interval stop the instrument.
Step:2 Add 300 ml of prepared Tris buffer into each of the dissolution vessel, pH adjusted to 8.0 using 5N NaOH solution. At the specified time interval, withdraw the sample aliquot from each of the dissolution vessel and replace with fresh dissolution media. Add withdrawals in to the centrifuge tubes containing 2 ml of 0.5N NaOH solution, mixed well. Dilute 5 ml of solution to 20 ml with diluents. Filter it using 0.45 µ syringe filter discarding first few ml of filtrate.
Procedure: Equilibrate the column with mobile phase till the stable baseline obtained. Inject blank in single, standard solution in five replicates and each test preparation into the chromatographic system and record the chromatograms. The retention time of Rabeprazole sodium peak is about 6.5 minutes. Evaluate the system suitability parameters from standard chromatograms.
Media: As per OGD
For Acid stage: 0.1N HCl
For buffer stage: 0.6N Tris buffer pH 8.0.
Apparatus and Speed: USP II (Paddle) at 100 RPM
Time points: 120 min in acid stage followed by 45 min in buffer stage.
Temperature: 37 °C ± 0.5 °C
Withdrawal volume: 10 ml
Calculations:
Calculation for acid stage: Calculation % drug release from the measured area of standard and test preparation by the formula:
% drug release in acid stage = % Assay of the tablet - % content of acid stage tablets.
AT WS 5 250 200 P
% content = ------ x ------ x ----- x ------- x ----- x ----- x 100
AS 200 250 LC 10 100
Calculation for buffer stage: Calculate % drug release from the measured area of standerd and test preparation by the formula:
AT WS 5 10 5 1000 12 20 P
% drug = ----- x -----x ---- x-----x ----- x ------- x ----- x ---- x ---- x 100 release AS 100 100 2 20 LC 10 5 100
Where,
AT= Average area of Rabeprazole sodium in test preparations
AS= Average area of Rabeprazole sodium in standard preparations
WS= Weight of Rabeprazole sodium working standard taken in mg
P= Potency of Rabeprazole sodium working standard in % w/w
LC = Label claim of Rabeprazole sodium in mg
Further calculate % of label claim of Rabeprazole sodium present using following formula
Assay (mg/tablet) x 100
% Label Claim = ----------------------------------
Label claim (mg/tablet)
Report the average results.
4.5 FORMULATION DESIGN:
Delayed release tablet will be designed as Immediate release tablet coated with modified release polymer to produce a seal coat followed by enteric coat.
4.3.1 Formulation of Delayed release Tablets with Table 3:
RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM DELAYED RELEASE TABLET 20 mg |
||||||
Batch No. |
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
T5 |
T6 |
Ingredients |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
Rabeprazole sodium |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
Mannitol (SD200) |
40.6 |
40.6 |
40.6 |
- |
- |
- |
Mannitol |
- |
- |
- |
77.0 |
77.0 |
77.0 |
Crospovidone |
- |
4.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Ethanol |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Mannitol SD 200 |
69.9 |
69.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Mannitol |
- |
- |
69.9 |
33.5 |
34.0 |
34.5 |
Sodium hydroxide |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
7.0 |
7.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Crospovidone |
8.0 |
4.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
Magnsium stearate |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
Core tablet wt |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
Formulation of Delayed release Tablets with Table 4:
RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM DELAYED RELEASE TABLET 20 mg |
|||||
Batch No. |
T7 |
T8 |
T9 |
T10 |
T11 |
Ingredients |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
Rabeprazole sodium |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
Mannitol |
77.0 |
77.0 |
77.0 |
77.0 |
77.0 |
Crospovidone |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Ethanol |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Mannitol |
34.5 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
Sodium hydroxide |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Crospovidone |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
Magnsium stearate |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
Core tablet wt |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
Seal coating composition |
|
|
|
|
|
Ethyl cellulose |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.25 |
1.0 |
Magnesium Stearate |
2.97 |
2.7 |
2.42 |
3.0 |
3.3 |
Propylene glycol |
0.28 |
0.55 |
0.83 |
0.5 |
0.45 |
Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
Ethanol |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Seal coated tablet wt |
156.0 |
156.0 |
156.0 |
156.0 |
156.0 |
Enteric coating composition |
|
|
|
|
|
HPMCP |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
Propylene Glycol |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
Talc |
6.57 |
6.57 |
6.57 |
6.57 |
6.57 |
Titanium dioxide |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
Yellow iron oxide |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
Acetone: ethanol |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Enteric coated Tablet wt |
174.5 |
174.5 |
174.5 |
174.5 |
174.5 |
Formulation of Delayed release Tablets with Table 5:
RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM DELAYED RELEASE TABLET 20 mg |
|||||
Batch No. |
T12 |
T13 |
T14 |
T15 |
T16 |
Ingredients |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
Rabeprazole sodium |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
Mannitol |
77.0 |
77.0 |
77.0 |
77.0 |
77.0 |
Crospovidone |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Ethanol |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Mannitol |
34.5 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
Sodium hydroxide |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Crospovidone |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
Magnsium stearate |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
Core tablet wt |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
Seal coating composition |
|
|
|
|
|
Ethyl cellulose |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Magnesium Stearate |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
Propylene glycol |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
Ethanol |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Seal coated tablet wt |
156.0 |
156.0 |
156.0 |
156.0 |
156.0 |
Enteric coating composition |
|
|
|
|
|
HPMCP |
10.0 |
10.5 |
11.0 |
11.5 |
12 |
Propylene Glycol |
1.0 |
1.05 |
1.1 |
1.15 |
1.2 |
Talc |
5.47 |
4.92 |
4.37 |
3.82 |
3.27 |
Titanium dioxide |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
Yellow iron oxide |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
Acetone: ethanol |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Enteric coated Tablet wt |
174.5 |
174.5 |
174.5 |
174.5 |
174.5 |
Manufacturing process:
1. Sifting:
Rabeprazole sodium , Mannitol and Crospovidone were sifted through the 30 # sieve.
2. RMG Granulation:
ü Step 1 ingredients were mixed in Drug in Mixer Granulator for 5 minutes at slow/off condition.
ü Dry powder mixture was granulated with Ethanol under following parameters:
Table 6: RMG parameters for laboratory batch.
Parameter |
Impeller |
Chopper |
Time |
Ethanol (10 ml) |
Fast |
Off |
60 Sec |
Kneading |
Fast |
Off |
60 Sec |
Extra Ethanol addition (5ml) |
Fast |
Off |
30 Sec |
3. Drying:
ü Step-2 wet granules were dried in Tray Dryer at 40°C till loss of drying NMT 2% w/w at 80°C using halogen moisture balance achieved.
ü Above dried granules were sifted through 20 # sieve and collect in polybag.
4. Blending:
ü Mannitol and Sodium hydroxide were sifted through 40 # sieve and mix with step-3 dried granules in conta-blender for 5 minutes.
ü Crospovidone was sifted through 40 # sieve and mix with above blend in conta-blender for 5 minutes.
5. Lubrication:
ü Magnesium stearate was sifted through 60 # sieve and lubricated with step-4 granules in conta blender for 3 minutes.
ü The above lubricated blend was compressed at an average weight of 150mg using 7.5 mm round shape punch.
ü Uncoated tablets were evaluated for physico-chemical parameters and dissolution and charged for stability studies.
6. Seal coating of tablet:
ü Dissolve ethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose in ethanol and stir until it dissolves completely. Add propylene glycol and stir for 10minutes.
ü Homogenize magnesium stearate for 15 minutes and mix it with above solution and stir for another 10minutes.
ü Using above coating dispersion seal coat the uncoated tablets in side-vented, perforated pan coating apparatus up to 4% wt gain.
Inlet Temperature |
45 – 50 °C |
Bed Temperature |
32-37 °C |
Atomization Air Pressure |
1-2 bar |
Pan RPM |
5-8 RPM |
Spray RPM |
3-5 RPM |
ü After finishing the coating, curing was done at 40° C Inlet for 15minutes. Tablets were collected from the pan and evaluated by various parameters.
7. Enteric coating of tablet:
ü Dissolve HPMCP in Acetone and stir until it dissolves completely. Add propylene glycol and stir for 10minutes.
ü Homogenize Talc and Titanium dioxide for 15 minutes. Add Yellow iron oxide to it and homogenize for another 5 minutes. Mix it with above solution and stir for 10minutes.
ü Using above coating dispersion coat the seal coated tablets in side-vented, perforated pan coating apparatus up to 12% wt gain.
Inlet Temperature |
45 – 50 °C |
Bed Temperature |
32-37 °C |
Atomization Air Pressure |
1-2 bar |
Pan RPM |
5-8 RPM |
Spray RPM |
4-8 RPM |
ü After finishing the coating, curing was done at 40° C Inlet for 10minutes. Tablets were collected from the pan and evaluated by various parameters.
Results:
Physical Characterization:
Label Claim |
20 mg |
Description |
Light Yellow color, round shape tablet having imprinting on one side and plain on other side. |
Average weight |
172.5 mg |
Hardness |
30.5 Kp |
Thickness |
4.20 mm |
Diameter |
7.80 mm |
pH of tablet |
7.72 |
Pack / Count details |
HDPE pack of 30 units |
Storage condition |
Store at 25°C |
Shelf life |
36 months |
PREFORMULATION STUDIES:
1) Organoleptic Characteristics of Antiulcer drug:
Table 7: Organoleptic characteristics Rabeprazole sodium
Properties |
Results |
Description |
Amorphous |
Taste |
Tasteless |
Odor |
Odorless |
Color |
White to off-white |
2) Particle size analysis:
Table 8: Particle size of Rabeprazole sodium
Particle Size |
Rabeprazole sodium |
D (0.9) |
223.308 |
D (0.5) |
31.574 |
D (0.1) |
2.805 |
Figure 1: Particle size of Rabeprazole sodium
3) Solubility study of Rabeprazole sodium :
Table 9: Solubility study of Rabeprazole sodium
Solubility |
Rabeprazole sodium (mg/ml) |
pH 4.5 Acetate Buffer |
37.05 |
pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer |
33.90 |
Purified Water |
352.35 |
pH 7.4 Phosphate Buffer |
39.92 |
0.6 M Tris-HCl buffer pH-8.0 |
4.41 |
4) Preformulation Parameters:
Table 10: Results of Preformulation parameters
Parameter |
Rabeprazole sodium |
Bulk Density (gm/cc) |
0.352 |
Tapped Density (gm/cc) |
0.512 |
Compressibility Index (%) |
31.25 |
Hausner’s Ratio |
1.45 |
5) Drug Excipients compatibility study:
Table 11: Physical observation for drug-excipients compatibility at 2-8°C
Drug + Excipients |
Ratio |
2-8°C |
Control |
||
Rabeprazole sodium |
NA |
White to creamish white |
DRUG -X + Mannitol |
1: 1 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
1: 1 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + HPMC phthalate |
1: 1 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Magnesium Stearate |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Ethyl cellulose |
1:1 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Iron oxide Yellow |
1:0.25 |
Yellowish power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Sodium hydroxide |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Cros povidone |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Propylene glycol |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Titanium dioxide |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Talc |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Table 13: Degradation data by HPLC for drug-excipients compatibility study
Batch |
Initial |
||||||||
Imp A |
Imp B |
Imp C |
Imp D |
Imp E |
Imp F |
Imp G |
Un known |
Total Imp |
|
Rabeprazole sodium |
0.002 |
-- |
0.019 |
-- |
0.076 |
0.008 |
0.094 |
0.033 |
0.357 |
Rabeprazole sodium :Mannitol |
0.006 |
-- |
0.029 |
-- |
0.097 |
0.01 |
0.102 |
0.035 |
0.415 |
Rabeprazole sodium .: Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
0.004 |
-- |
0.024 |
-- |
0.105 |
0.008 |
0.088 |
0.031 |
0.377 |
Rabeprazole sodium : HPMC phthalate |
0.015 |
-- |
0.033 |
-- |
0.12 |
0.011 |
0.063 |
0.066 |
0.532 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Magnesium Stearate |
0.001 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.117 |
0.014 |
0.118 |
0.043 |
0.499 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Ethyl cellulose |
0.007 |
-- |
0.029 |
-- |
0.111 |
0.013 |
0.119 |
0.041 |
0.479 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Iron oxide Yellow |
0.014 |
-- |
0.028 |
-- |
0.093 |
0.011 |
0.102 |
0.039 |
0.477 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Sodium hydroxide |
0.018 |
-- |
0.038 |
-- |
0.138 |
0.014 |
0.14 |
0.061 |
0.633 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Cros povidone |
0.011 |
-- |
0.02 |
-- |
0.166 |
0.008 |
0.081 |
0.042 |
0.489 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Propylene glycol |
0.018 |
0.005 |
0.036 |
-- |
0.147 |
0.02 |
0.183 |
0.077 |
0.72 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Titanium dioxide |
0.011 |
-- |
0.02 |
-- |
0.074 |
0.008 |
0.078 |
0.054 |
0.42 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Talc |
0.006 |
-- |
0.016 |
-- |
0.058 |
0.008 |
0.065 |
0.024 |
0.266 |
Batch |
40°C/75%RH,4W |
||||||||
Imp A |
Imp B |
Imp C |
Imp D |
Imp E |
Imp F |
Imp G |
Un known |
Total Imp |
|
Rabeprazole sodium |
0.034 |
-- |
0.029 |
-- |
0.104 |
0.007 |
0.111 |
0.054 |
0.557 |
Rabeprazole sodium :Mannitol |
0.032 |
-- |
0.024 |
-- |
0.086 |
-- |
0.087 |
0.06 |
0.472 |
Rabeprazole sodium .: Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
0.027 |
-- |
0.015 |
-- |
0.077 |
-- |
0.054 |
0.052 |
0.311 |
Rabeprazole sodium : HPMC phthalate |
0.15 |
0.005 |
0.238 |
0.031 |
0.086 |
0.025 |
1.441 |
0.799 |
3.96 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Magnesium Stearate |
0.048 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.104 |
0.006 |
0.12 |
0.084 |
0.583 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Ethyl cellulose |
0.049 |
-- |
0.031 |
-- |
0.117 |
-- |
0.113 |
0.077 |
0.597 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Iron oxide Yellow |
0.041 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.107 |
0.006 |
0.104 |
0.081 |
0.661 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Sodium hydroxide |
0.069 |
-- |
0.037 |
-- |
0.211 |
-- |
0.184 |
0.158 |
0.951 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Cros povidone |
0.039 |
-- |
0.022 |
-- |
0.171 |
-- |
0.079 |
0.065 |
0.527 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Propylene glycol |
0.073 |
0.009 |
0.039 |
-- |
0.2 |
0.041 |
0.48 |
0.144 |
1.115 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Titanium dioxide |
0.035 |
-- |
0.023 |
-- |
0.072 |
-- |
0.077 |
0.091 |
0.555 |
Rabeprazole sodium : Talc |
0.039 |
-- |
0.016 |
-- |
0.068 |
-- |
0.029 |
0.068 |
0.338 |
Table 12: Physical observation for drug- excipients compatibility at 40°C/75%RH and 60°C.
Drug + Excipients |
Ratio |
40°C/75%RH |
60°C |
|
2nd Week closed |
4th Week closed |
2nd Week closed |
||
Rabeprazole sodium |
NA |
White to creamish white |
Slight change in color |
White to creamish white |
DRUG -X + Mannitol |
1: 1 |
White to off white power |
White to off white power |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
1: 1 |
White to off white power |
Lump formation |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + HPMC phthalate |
1: 1 |
White to off white power |
Slight chang in color |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Magnesium Stearate |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Slight change in color |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Ethyl cellulose |
1:1 |
White to off white power |
Lump formation |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Iron oxide Yellow |
1:0.25 |
Yellowish power |
Slight change in color |
Yellowish power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Sodium hydroxide |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Lump formation |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Cros povidone |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Slight change in color |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Propylene glycol |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Lump formation |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Titanium dioxide |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Lump formation |
White to off white power |
Rabeprazole sodium + Talc |
1:0.25 |
White to off white power |
Slight formation of lump |
White to off white power |
Table 13: Degradation data by HPLC for drug-excipients compatibility study
Batch |
Initial |
||||||||||||||||
Imp A |
Imp B |
Imp C |
Imp D |
Imp E |
Imp F |
Imp G |
Un known |
Total Imp |
|||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium |
0.002 |
-- |
0.019 |
-- |
0.076 |
0.008 |
0.094 |
0.033 |
0.357 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium :Mannitol |
0.006 |
-- |
0.029 |
-- |
0.097 |
0.01 |
0.102 |
0.035 |
0.415 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium .: Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
0.004 |
-- |
0.024 |
-- |
0.105 |
0.008 |
0.088 |
0.031 |
0.377 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : HPMC phthalate |
0.015 |
-- |
0.033 |
-- |
0.12 |
0.011 |
0.063 |
0.066 |
0.532 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Magnesium Stearate |
0.001 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.117 |
0.014 |
0.118 |
0.043 |
0.499 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Ethyl cellulose |
0.007 |
-- |
0.029 |
-- |
0.111 |
0.013 |
0.119 |
0.041 |
0.479 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Iron oxide Yellow |
0.014 |
-- |
0.028 |
-- |
0.093 |
0.011 |
0.102 |
0.039 |
0.477 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Sodium hydroxide |
0.018 |
-- |
0.038 |
-- |
0.138 |
0.014 |
0.14 |
0.061 |
0.633 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Cros povidone |
0.011 |
-- |
0.02 |
-- |
0.166 |
0.008 |
0.081 |
0.042 |
0.489 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Propylene glycol |
0.018 |
0.005 |
0.036 |
-- |
0.147 |
0.02 |
0.183 |
0.077 |
0.72 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Titanium dioxide |
0.011 |
-- |
0.02 |
-- |
0.074 |
0.008 |
0.078 |
0.054 |
0.42 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Talc |
0.006 |
-- |
0.016 |
-- |
0.058 |
0.008 |
0.065 |
0.024 |
0.266 |
||||||||
Batch |
40°C/75%RH,4W |
||||||||||||||||
Imp A |
Imp B |
Imp C |
Imp D |
Imp E |
Imp F |
Imp G |
Un known |
Total Imp |
|||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium |
0.034 |
-- |
0.029 |
-- |
0.104 |
0.007 |
0.111 |
0.054 |
0.557 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium :Mannitol |
0.032 |
-- |
0.024 |
-- |
0.086 |
-- |
0.087 |
0.06 |
0.472 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium .: Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
0.027 |
-- |
0.015 |
-- |
0.077 |
-- |
0.054 |
0.052 |
0.311 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : HPMC phthalate |
0.15 |
0.005 |
0.238 |
0.031 |
0.086 |
0.025 |
1.441 |
0.799 |
3.96 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Magnesium Stearate |
0.048 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.104 |
0.006 |
0.12 |
0.084 |
0.583 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Ethyl cellulose |
0.049 |
-- |
0.031 |
-- |
0.117 |
-- |
0.113 |
0.077 |
0.597 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Iron oxide Yellow |
0.041 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.107 |
0.006 |
0.104 |
0.081 |
0.661 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Sodium hydroxide |
0.069 |
-- |
0.037 |
-- |
0.211 |
-- |
0.184 |
0.158 |
0.951 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Cros povidone |
0.039 |
-- |
0.022 |
-- |
0.171 |
-- |
0.079 |
0.065 |
0.527 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Propylene glycol |
0.073 |
0.009 |
0.039 |
-- |
0.2 |
0.041 |
0.48 |
0.144 |
1.115 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Titanium dioxide |
0.035 |
-- |
0.023 |
-- |
0.072 |
-- |
0.077 |
0.091 |
0.555 |
||||||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Talc |
0.039 |
-- |
0.016 |
-- |
0.068 |
-- |
0.029 |
0.068 |
0.338 |
||||||||
Table 14: Degradation data by HPLC for drug-excipients compatibility study
Batch |
Initial |
||||||||||||
Imp A |
Imp B |
Imp C |
Imp D |
Imp E |
Imp F |
Imp G |
Un known |
Total Imp |
|||||
Rabeprazole sodium |
0.002 |
-- |
0.019 |
-- |
0.076 |
0.008 |
0.094 |
0.033 |
0.357 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium :Mannitol |
0.006 |
-- |
0.029 |
-- |
0.097 |
0.01 |
0.102 |
0.035 |
0.415 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium .: Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
0.004 |
-- |
0.024 |
-- |
0.105 |
0.008 |
0.088 |
0.031 |
0.377 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : HPMC phthalate |
0.015 |
-- |
0.033 |
-- |
0.12 |
0.011 |
0.063 |
0.066 |
0.532 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Magnesium Stearate |
0.001 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.117 |
0.014 |
0.118 |
0.043 |
0.499 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Ethyl cellulose |
0.007 |
-- |
0.029 |
-- |
0.111 |
0.013 |
0.119 |
0.041 |
0.479 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Iron oxide Yellow |
0.014 |
-- |
0.028 |
-- |
0.093 |
0.011 |
0.102 |
0.039 |
0.477 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Sodium hydroxide |
0.018 |
-- |
0.038 |
-- |
0.138 |
0.014 |
0.14 |
0.061 |
0.633 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Cros povidone |
0.011 |
-- |
0.02 |
-- |
0.166 |
0.008 |
0.081 |
0.042 |
0.489 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Propylene glycol |
0.018 |
0.005 |
0.036 |
-- |
0.147 |
0.02 |
0.183 |
0.077 |
0.72 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Titanium dioxide |
0.011 |
-- |
0.02 |
-- |
0.074 |
0.008 |
0.078 |
0.054 |
0.42 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Talc |
0.006 |
-- |
0.016 |
-- |
0.058 |
0.008 |
0.065 |
0.024 |
0.266 |
||||
Batch |
60°C 2W |
||||||||||||
Imp A |
Imp B |
Imp C |
Imp D |
Imp E |
Imp F |
Imp G |
Un known |
Total Imp |
|||||
Rabeprazole sodium |
0.023 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.138 |
0.008 |
0.142 |
0.085 |
0.671 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium :Mannitol |
0.021 |
-- |
0.025 |
-- |
0.119 |
0.016 |
0.048 |
0.064 |
0.463 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium .: Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
0.048 |
-- |
0.03 |
-- |
0.24 |
0.056 |
0.382 |
0.17 |
1.339 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : HPMC phthalate |
0.094 |
0.004 |
0.164 |
0.018 |
0.295 |
0.064 |
2.245 |
0.523 |
5.178 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Magnesium Stearate |
0.031 |
-- |
0.032 |
-- |
0.122 |
0.016 |
0.157 |
0.077 |
0.659 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Ethyl cellulose |
0.059 |
-- |
0.049 |
-- |
0.461 |
0.081 |
0.319 |
0.282 |
1.705 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Iron oxide Yellow |
0.021 |
-- |
0.27 |
-- |
0.118 |
-- |
0.109 |
0.056 |
0.569 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Sodium hydroxide |
0.087 |
0.004 |
0.052 |
-- |
0.669 |
-- |
1.577 |
0.397 |
4.196 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Cros povidone |
0.044 |
-- |
0.021 |
-- |
0.201 |
-- |
0.025 |
0.112 |
0.608 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Propylene glycol |
0.082 |
0.004 |
0.057 |
-- |
0.304 |
-- |
0.443 |
0.822 |
3.121 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Titanium dioxide |
0.05 |
-- |
0.024 |
-- |
0.091 |
-- |
0.077 |
0.129 |
0.784 |
||||
Rabeprazole sodium : Talc |
0.046 |
-- |
0.021 |
|
0.086 |
-- |
0.022 |
0.099 |
0.436 |
||||
6) DSC thermograph of drug excipients compatibility studies:
Figure 10: DSC Thermograph of Rabeprazole sodium + Crospovidone
Figure 11: DSC Thermograph of Rabeprazole sodium + Propylene glycol
Table 15: Interpretation of DSC Thermograph
Combination |
Onset (°c) |
End set (°c) |
Rabeprazole sodium |
140.0 |
142.0 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Mannitol |
144.49 |
163.60 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Hydroxy propyl cellulose |
169.09 |
171.51 |
Rabeprazole sodium + HPMC phthalate |
241.62 |
243.46 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Magnesium stearate |
196.02 |
229.21 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Ethyl cellulose |
203.01 |
237.05 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Yellow Iron Oxide |
200.61 |
234.06 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Sodium hydroxide |
201.50 |
235.21 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Crospovidone |
205.26 |
242.02 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Propylene glycol |
83.57 |
93.97 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Titanium Dioxide |
207.78 |
233.02 |
Rabeprazole sodium + Talc |
205.43 |
240.0 |
7) X-Ray Diffraction analysis of RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM :
Figure 14: XRD of Rabeprazole sodium
Figure 15 : XRD of In-House tablet
Figure 16 : XRD of Placebo
5.3 EVALUATION OF TRIAL BATCHES:
Table 16: Comparative release of batches T7 to T16 in OGD Media (0.1N HCl +Tris buffer), (100 RPM)
Time in Minutes |
OGD Media (100 RPM) |
|||||||||
Batch.No |
T7 |
T8 |
T9 |
T10 |
T11 |
T12 |
T13 |
T14 |
T15 |
T16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
65 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
40 |
34 |
29 |
19 |
15 |
20 |
104 |
102 |
48 |
79 |
98 |
100 |
92 |
86 |
98 |
102 |
30 |
100 |
99 |
93 |
84 |
85 |
98 |
102 |
104 |
102 |
100 |
45 |
-- |
-- |
95 |
75 |
-- |
-- |
96 |
95 |
-- |
-- |
F2 Values |
11.83 |
30.21 |
12.84 |
19.63 |
29.71 |
35.78 |
14.95 |
15.21 |
55.13 |
61.40 |
Figure 17: In Vitro drug release profile of batches T7 to T16 in OGD Media (0.1N HCl+Tris buffer), (100 RPM)
Table 17: Comparative release of batches T7 to T16 in OGD Media (0.1N HCl+Tris buffer), (50 RPM)
Time in minutes |
OGD Media (50 RPM) |
|||||||||
Batch.No |
T7 |
T8 |
T9 |
T10 |
T11 |
T12 |
T13 |
T14 |
T15 |
T16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
50 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
30 |
28 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
15 |
75 |
68 |
0 |
0 |
59 |
52 |
45 |
38 |
40 |
32 |
20 |
98 |
89 |
55 |
68 |
98 |
85 |
80 |
76 |
75 |
76 |
30 |
102 |
100 |
85 |
91 |
104 |
102 |
98 |
102 |
104 |
104 |
45 |
98 |
90 |
102 |
104 |
100 |
96 |
100 |
98 |
100 |
99 |
60 |
-- |
-- |
96 |
94 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
F2 Values |
25.27 |
28.85 |
18.73 |
19.55 |
32.08 |
39.16 |
43.56 |
49.72 |
57.44 |
57.97 |
Figure 18: In Vitro drug release profile of batches T7 to T16 in OGD Media (0.1N HCl+Tris buffer), (50 RPM)
Table 18: Comparative release of T7 to T16 in pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer (50 RPM)
Time in minutes |
pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer (50 RPM) |
|||||||||
Batch.No |
T7 |
T8 |
T9 |
T10 |
T11 |
T12 |
T13 |
T14 |
T15 |
T16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
20 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
55 |
45 |
2 |
8 |
42 |
40 |
38 |
36 |
32 |
30 |
30 |
98 |
92 |
65 |
75 |
79 |
78 |
72 |
75 |
80 |
84 |
45 |
102 |
100 |
85 |
98 |
92 |
98 |
85 |
78 |
72 |
75 |
50 |
96 |
95 |
78 |
76 |
65 |
91 |
75 |
70 |
55 |
65 |
60 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
55 |
F2 Values |
24.05 |
25.81 |
29.08 |
28.96 |
41.80 |
26.18 |
30.39 |
32.13 |
31.70 |
55.02 |
Figure 19: In Vitro drug release profile of batches T7 to T16 in pH 6.8 Phosphate buffer (50 RPM)
Table 19: Comparative release of T7 to T16 in pH 6.0 Phosphate Buffer (50 RPM)
Time in minutes |
pH 6.0 Phosphate Buffer (50 RPM) |
|||||||||
Batch.No |
T7 |
T8 |
T9 |
T10 |
T11 |
T12 |
T13 |
T14 |
T15 |
T16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
14 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
18 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
32 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
39 |
39 |
38 |
32 |
25 |
60 |
36 |
23 |
15 |
14 |
55 |
45 |
58 |
59 |
60 |
58 |
70 |
20 |
19 |
26 |
45 |
42 |
39 |
36 |
30 |
39 |
39 |
80 |
|
17 |
26 |
20 |
28 |
25 |
22 |
18 |
20 |
19 |
F2 Values |
43.99 |
40.82 |
36.12 |
36.05 |
40.06 |
41.02 |
43.52 |
47.02 |
47.89 |
54.19 |
Figure 20: In Vitro drug release profile of batches T7 to T16 in pH 6.0 Phosphate buffer (50 RPM)
Table 20: Post compression evaluation of core tablets for Batches T1 to T6
Parameter |
Batch No. |
|||||
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
T5 |
T6 |
|
Weight Variation |
150.2 ± 2% |
150.7 ± 1.5% |
150.4 ± 3% |
150 ± 2% |
150 ± 1% |
150 ± 2% |
Thickness |
4.16 mm |
4.17 mm |
4.18 mm |
4.17 mm |
4.16 mm |
4.17 mm |
Hardness |
4-5 kp |
3-5 kp |
4-5 kp |
4-6 kp |
3-4 kp |
4-5kp |
Diameter |
7.61 mm |
7.61 mm |
7.62 mm |
7.63 mm |
7.61 mm |
7.62 mm |
Friability |
0.15% |
0.42% |
0.17% |
0.34% |
0.27% |
0.31% |
Disintegration Time |
4-5 min |
3-4 min |
4-5 min |
4-5 min |
4-5 min |
5-6 min |
Assay |
99.2% |
99.4% |
100.7% |
99.6% |
99.7% |
101.0% |
Table 21: Post compression evaluation of enteric coated tablets for Batches T7 to T16
Parameter |
Batch No. |
|||||||||
T7 |
T8 |
T9 |
T10 |
T11 |
T12 |
T13 |
T14 |
T15 |
T16 |
|
Weight Variation |
173.5 ± 1.4% |
174.3 ± 2% |
173.9 ± 2.1% |
174.8 ± 1.8% |
173.5 ± 1.4% |
173.2 ± 2% |
173.7 ± 1.5% |
173.4 ± 3% |
173.3 ± 2% |
174.5 ± 1% |
Thickness (mm) |
4.30 |
4.28 mm |
4.29 mm |
4.33 mm |
4.28 mm |
4.29 mm |
4.32 mm |
4.31 mm |
4.37 mm |
4.32 mm |
Hardness (Kp) |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
30-32 kp |
Diameter (mm) |
7.72 mm |
7.73 mm |
7.71 mm |
7.72 mm |
7.71 mm |
7.71 mm |
7.71 mm |
7.72 mm |
7.73 mm |
7.71 mm |
% Friability |
0.11% |
0.23% |
0.44% |
0.26% |
0.34% |
0.15% |
0.42% |
0.17% |
0.34% |
0.27% |
% Assay |
99.8% |
98.9% |
99.9% |
99.4% |
99.7% |
99.2% |
99.4% |
100.7% |
99.6% |
99.7% |
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION:
Since the patent has already claimed on ground of specific polymer as a Delayed forming excipient, the present study was aimed to formulate delayed release tablets of antiulcer drug without using patented polymer to achieve patent non-infringing product. The drug characteristic study shows that the drug has high solubility in water hence it is difficult to control the release in gastric fluid. This study clearly demonstrated that pharmaceutically equivalent delayed release antiulcer tablets can be formulated using non patented polymer such as HPC, HPMCP and Ethyl cellulose.
Development was achieved and summarized as follows:
Ø Initial trials (T1 to T6) showed it was difficult to control the drug release in 0.1N HCl.
Ø High drug release in HCl was controlled by coating the matrix tablet with polymethacrylate polymer but suppress the drug release at higher extent. (T7)
Ø To resolve that immediate release tablet coated with polymethacrylate polymer which cause high drug release in 0.1N HCl and suppress the drug release in pH 6.8 buffer. (T8)
Ø To solve that trials were taken with micronized drug and formulate matrix tablets which gave comparable release in pH 6.8 buffer but still release was high in HCl. (T9 to T11)
Ø Trials with high concentration of glyceryl behenate and sodium citrate were taken to control the release in HCl but it cause suppression of drug release in buffer and no change in drug release in HCl. (T12 and T13)
Ø Further development was done by granulating the powder mixture using Eudragit L30 D55 as a binder and further spray granulated with Eudragit L100 55 as release controlling polymer but % yield was very less. (T14 to T16)
Ø To increase the % yield granulate the powder mixture using Eudragit L100 55 and further spray granulated with Eudragit L30 D55. (T17 to T19)
Ø In that T19 gave comparable dissolution profile in pH 6.8 buffer and 0.1N HCl.
Thus After intensive research, an extended release formulation of an anti-ulcer drug was successfully formulated which had attributes including:
Ø Desired dissolution profile
Ø Stable and Robust
Ø Economical
REFERENCES:
1. http://www.medicinenet.com/gastroesophageal_reflux_disease_gerd/article.htm
2. Dennis L. Avner, Clinical experience with pantoprazole in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Clinical Therapeutics 2000; 22; 1169-1185.
3. Hampson FC, Farndale A, Strugala V, Sykes J, Jolliffe IG, Dettmar PW, Alginate Rafts and their Characterization. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2005; 294; 137-147.
4. Mandel KG, Daggy BP, Brodie DA, Jacoby HI, Alginate-raft formulations in the treatment of heartburn and acid reflux. Ailment pharmacological Therapeutics 2000; 14(6); 669-690.
5. Akseli Kivioja, Ismo Linnosmaa, Arto Vehvilainen, Ilkka Vohlonen Cost minimization analysis of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease implications of varying holding time on conclusions European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2004; 21; 171-178.
6. John M.Imadomi, Lisa McIntyre, Latoya Bernard, Mark Fendrick Step-down from multiple to single-dose proton pump inhibitors; a prospective study of patients with heartburn or acid regurgitation completely relieved with PPIs The American Journal of Gastroenterolgy 2003; 98(9); 1940-1944.
7. Morat Torkoglu, Hakan Varol, Mine Celikok Tableting and stability evaluation of enteric-coated omeprazole pellets. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2004; 57; 279-286.
8. Eiji Fukui, Nobuteru Miyamuru, Katsuji Uemura, Masao Kobayashi Preparation of Enteric-coated timed-release press-coated tablets and evaluation of their function by in vitro and in vivo tests for colon targeting. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2000; 204; 7-15.
9. Crotts G, Sheth A, Twist J, Ghebre-Shellassie I, Development of an enteric coating formulation and process for tablets primarily composed of a highly water soluble, organic acid. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2000; 51; 71-76.
10. Esther T. Waterhouse, Clive Washington and Neena Washington An investigation into the efficacy of the pectin based anti-reflux formulation Aflurax. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2000; 209 (1-2); 79-85.
11. Marc S.Gordon, Anthony Fratis, Ronald Goldblum, Donald Jung, Kenneth E.Schwartz and Zak T. Chowhan In vivo and in-vitro evaluation of four different aqueous polymeric dispersions for producing an enteric coated tablet International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1995; 115(1); 29-34
12. Davis NM, Farr SJ, Kellaway IW, Taylor G and Thomas M, A Comparison of the gastric retention of alginate containing tablet formulation with and without the inclusion of excipient calcium ions. International journal of pharmaceutics-1994; 105 (2); 97-101
Received on 19.04.2013 Modified on 02.05.2013
Accepted on 20.05.2013 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 6(6): June 2013; Page 669-684