Marketed Formulations: Quality Evaluation of Conventional Release Paracetamol Tablet
Mukesh P. Ratnaparkhi*, Shilpa P. Chaudhari, Suresh B. Dhiwar, Rahul R. Gurav,
Department of Pharmaceutics, Marathwada Mitra Mandal’s College of Pharmacy, Kalewadi (Thergaon),Pune
*Corresponding author Email id: mukeshparkhi@yahoo.co.in
ABSTRACT:
The main purpose of this work was to compare the quality of several marketed formulation and to evaluate the specifications laid down by FDA. Conventional release dosage forms are designed to achieve therapeutic effect by releasing drug over a short period of time after administration of dose. It allows the administration of dosage repeatedly in a day for short period of time as compared to extended release dosage form. The conventional paracetamol tablets were collected from market and evaluated for hardness, friability, weight variation, drug content, disintegration and in-vitro dissolution studies.
KEYWORDS: Conventional Release, Paracetamol Tablet, Quality evaluation.
INTRODUCTION:
Conventional-release tablets are expected to achieve fast tablet disintegration which would dissolve rapidly in the gastrointestinal tract for absorption into the blood stream. The quality of a tablet affects its disintegration and dissolution in the gastrointestinal tract. Tablet quality is dependent on the physicochemical properties of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and excipients used, as well as the manufacturing conditions employed during tablet compression1.
The quality of compressed tablets is judged by parameters such as uniformity of weight, uniformity of drug content, hardness or crushing strength, disintegration time, friability, and in-vitro dissolution time2. All these parameters are measured by a series of tests some of which are usually specified in accredited official compendia. A tablet is said to be of good quality if it conforms to all the specifications applicable to that tablet in the official compendia1-4.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Five different brands of marketed conventional release paracetamol 500 mg tablets were collected and evaluated for In-vitro studies.
Marketed preparations:-
P- 500 (Apex lab. Private Ltd. Alatur-603110, Tamilnadu)
TEMPTAL - 500 (Twilight Litaka Pharma. Ltd.,Vasai, Dist- Thane)
FEPANIL (Veritaz Healthcare Ltd., Hydrabad)
CORINOL (SGS Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, Gaziabad. U.P)
CALPOL (Glaxo Smith Kline Pharmaceuticals ltd. Warali Mumbai)
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:
Methodology:
The conventional release paracetamol tablet were collected from market and evaluated for in-vitro (Hardness, Disintegration time, Content uniformity and Dissolution studies) 5, 6.
IN- VITRO Evaluation of Marketed Formulations:-
HARDNESS:-
Hardness which is the force required to diametrically cause a tablet to fracture was determined using a Monsanto hardness tester. This test was repeated twice and the mean recorded.
FRIABILITTY:-
The friability (FR) of the tablets was determined with a Friability Test Apparatus (Veego, Mumbai, India). Twenty (20) tablets were collected, dedusted and weighed on a precision balance and the weight recorded. The tablets were delivered into the transparent drums of the apparatus and set to rotate at 100 revolutions. The weight of dedusted tablets after the test was taken and the difference in weight expressed as a percentage of the initial weight. The tablets that loose less than 1% weight were considered to be compliant
Table No. 1:- Hardness, Disintegration Time, Percentage Drug Content and Friability of Five Conventional Release Marketed Paracetamol Preparations:
|
Sr. No. |
Product |
Hardness kg/cm2 |
Friability (%) |
Disintegration Time(minutes) |
% Drug Content |
|
1 |
P-500 |
5 |
0.524 |
12 |
99.5 |
|
2 |
TEMPTAL 500 |
4. |
0.654 |
11 |
98.90 |
|
3 |
FEPANIL |
4 |
0.628 |
10 |
98 |
|
4 |
CORINOL |
1 |
1.6 |
6 |
97 |
|
5 |
CALPOL |
3.9 |
0.788 |
9 |
99 |
DISINTEGRATION TEST:-
Disintegration test was carried out in distilled water using the Tablet Disintegration test Apparatus (Veego India). Six tablets were placed in the cylindrical glass and the time taken for the tablets to disintegrate was recorded as disintegration time (DT).
CONTENT UNIFORMITY:
Weigh and powder 20 tablets. Weigh accurately a quantity of the powder equivalent to about 0.15 g of Paracetamol, add 50 ml of 0.1M sodium hydroxide dilute with 100 ml of water, shake for 15 minutes and add sufficient water to produce 200.0 ml. Mix, filter and dilute 10.0 ml of the filtrate to 100.0 ml with water. To 10.0 ml of the resulting solution add 10 ml of 0.1M sodium hydroxide, dilute to 100.0 ml with water and mix. Measure the absorbance of the resulting solution at the maximum at about 257 nm, Calculate the content of C8H9NO2 taking 715 as the value of A (1%, 1 cm) at the maximum at about 257 nm.
IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION STUDIES:-
Dissolution test of tablet is carried out by using 900 ml of phosphate buffer pH 5.8.as the medium and rotating the paddle at 50 rpm for 60 minutes. Withdraw a suitable volume of the sample and filter promptly. Reject the first few ml of the filtrate and dilute a suitable volume of the filtrate with the same solvent. Measure the absorbance of the resulting solution at the maximum at 257 nm. Similarly measure the absorbance of a solution of known concentration of paracetamol RS. Calculate the content of C8H9NO2 from the declared content of C8H9NO2 in paracetamol RS.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
The tablet P-500, TEMPTAL-500, FEPANIL, and CALPOL shows the disintegration test, it ranges to 9-12
Minutes. The tablet CORINOL fails the disintegration test as it disintegrated within 6 min in acidic pH. It also fails to pass the hardness test and friability test as per Indian and US Pharmacopoeia Limit.
CONCLUSION:
The tablet P-500, TEMPTAL-500, FEPANIL and CALPOL a marketed preparation complies with all the pharmacopoeia specifications except tablet CORINOL. The tablet corinol fails to pass hardness test, friability test, disintegration test and dissolution test. The tablet corinol get rapidly dispersed in 5.8 phosphate buffer and does not show desired release pattern.
Table No. 2:- Dissolution test conditions in pH5.8 phosphate buffer
|
Sr. No. |
Parameter |
Specification |
|
1 |
Dissolution medium |
pH 5.8 phosphate buffer |
|
2 |
Volume of medium |
900 ml |
|
3 |
Temp. of medium |
37 ± 0.5 |
|
4 |
Paddle rotation speed |
50 rpm. |
|
5 |
Sampling time interval |
10 min. |
|
6 |
Detection wavelength |
257 nm |
Tablet (P-500, TEMPTAL-500, FEPANIL, and CALPOL ) Hardness was found to in the range of 3.9 -5 kg /cm2 in all the products indicate good mechanical strength . in all the formulations friability values is less than 1 % giving an indication tablets formulated are mechanically stable .% weight variation was within the limits . drug contents was know by performing assay and it was found to be between 98 to 99.5 % and it was within the limits
(As shown in Table No. 1). The disintegration time of various marketed preparation were found in the range of 9-12 minutes and also the dissolution profile of all the conventional release product were within the pharmacopeia specification (As shown in Table No. 3) and (As shown in Figure No. 1).
Table No. 3:- % Drug releases in pH 5.8 phosphate buffer:-
|
Sr. No. |
PRODUCT |
% DRUG RELEASES IN pH 5.8 PHOSPHATE BUFFER. |
||||||
|
0 min. |
10 min. |
20 min. |
30 min. |
40 min. |
50 min. |
60 min. |
||
|
1 |
P- 500 |
36.33 |
81.45 |
88.81 |
93.49 |
97.83 |
98.73 |
100 |
|
2 |
TEMPTAL- 500 |
38.68 |
84.77 |
90.71 |
93.25 |
93.43 |
96.16 |
100 |
|
3 |
FEPANIL |
56.52 |
85.77 |
88.32 |
94.46 |
96.67 |
98.10 |
100 |
|
4 |
CORINOL |
84.19 |
90.20 |
95.43 |
97.30 |
99.06 |
100 |
- |
|
5 |
CALPOL |
37.26 |
89.30 |
90.19 |
93.04 |
94.73 |
96.23 |
100 |
Fig No. 1:- % Drug Release in pH 5.8 Phosphate Buffer
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are thankful to Principal Marathwada Mitra Mandal’s College of Pharmacy, Thergaon (Kalewadi) Pune for providing all facilities required to complete this project work.
REFERENCES:
1. Leon Lachman, Herbert A Liberman, Joseph L;The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed. Varghese Publishing House Bombay, India, 1991: 331-332, 346,366-368.
2. Tripathi K D; Essential of Medical Pharmacology .5th ed., Jaypee Brothers Medical Publisher Ltd New Delhi. 210-216.
3. Barar F S K;Essential of Pharmaceutics.3rd ed., S Chand and Company Publishers Ltd Ramnagar New Delhi,2000:317-324.
4. Chowdary K.P.P and Rajlakshmi Y.the Estern Pharmacist 1987,New Delhi, Pamposh Publication.p,51
5. Effect of Dissolution Media pH on the Release of Paracetamol tablets. colorcon, 1996.
6. Indian Pharmacopoeia 1996 Published by Controller of Publication, Delhi .A- 9
Received on 28.12.2011 Modified on 15.01.2012
Accepted on 12.02.2012 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 5(3): Mar.2012; Page 390-392