Recent Advances in Stimuli Induced Pulsatile Drug Delivery System : A Review

 

Gurpreet Arora*, Inderbir Singh, Manju Nagpal and Sandeep Arora

Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chandigarh-Patiala Highway, Rajpura-140401, Patiala, Punjab, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: gurpreet.arora9@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Recently, there has been a great deal of research activity in the development of stimuli-responsive drug delivery. Many vital functions are regulated by pulsed or triggered release of bioactive substances at a specific site and time. The ability to deliver therapeutic agents to a patient in pulsatile release profile has been a major goal in drug delivery research in order to mimic the function of the living systems to minimize the undesired side effects. This review will cover methods that have been developed to control drug release according to pulsed stimuli.  The systems are designed to alter the rate of drug delivery in response to stimuli (internally or externally) such as changes in temperature, chemical, pH, magnetic or electric fields etc. Such systems are suitable for the release of therapeutic agent that benefit from non-constant plasma concentrations. These systems have the potential to improve the quality of life for patients undergoing therapy with a variable dosing regimen. The present article provides a brief introduction and recent developments in the area of stimuli-responsive pulsatile drug delivery systems and their applications in drug delivery.

 

KEYWORDS: Pulsatile Drug Delivery System, Stimuli Induced, Temperature Induced, chemical induced, pH Induced, Electric Induced, Magnetic Induced.

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

Increase in advancement in drug delivery technologies lead to development of more efficacious drug delivery systems with already existing molecule rather than going for new drug discovery because of inherent hurdles posed in drug discovery and development process. [1] One of the advanced drug delivery system is pulsatile drug delivery that is based on the fact that many body function follow circadian rythm e.g. secretion of hormones, acid secretion in stomach, gastric emptying, gastrointestinal blood transfusion and metabolism. This system is also helpful for delivery of drugs which produce biological tolerance or which are degraded in stomach or irritate gastric mucosa or for targeting of drug to distal organ and even for drugs that undergo first pass metabolism. These conditions demand for a time controlled therapeutic scheme releasing the right amount of drug at the right time. Pulsatile drug delivery system (PDDS) is defined as the rapid and transient release of certain amount of molecules within a short time period immediately after a predetermined off-release period, i.e. lag time as shown in Fig 1.

 

Pulsatile drug delivery system is time and site-specific drug delivery system, thereby providing special and temporal delivery and increasing patient compliance. [2] The first pulsed delivery formulation that released the active substance at a precise defined time point was developed in the early 1990s. The research was aimed to achieve a sigmoidal release pattern and pulsed drug release was obtained after a defined lag time.[3]

 

Chronotherapy:

Human exhibit endogenous circadian rythms that are regulated by master circadian clock of the body, the suprachiasmatic nucleus.[5] Recent studies have revealed that diseases have predictable cyclic rhythms and that the timing of medication regimens can improve outcome in selected chronic conditions table (1).[6] Co-ordination of biological rhythms and medical treatment is called chronotherapy.[7]

 

CLASSIFICATION OF PDDS

Various pulsatile drug delivery systems have been fabricated now days. These are classified as follows (Fig 2)

 

TIME CONTROLLED PULSATILE DRUG DELIVERY

Time Controlled pulsatile drug delivery classified into single and multiple unit systems. There are depicted in (Fig 3) along with samples of different systems developed so far.

 


 

Table 1: Target Diseases in Chronotherapy

Disease

Chronological behavior and symptoms

Drugs used

Arthritis

Increased conc. of c-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in blood. Pain in early morning compared to day time.

NSAIDS, Glucocorticoids

Diabetes mellitus

Increase in blood sugar level after meal.

Sulfonylurea, Insulin

Cardiovascular diseases

BP lowers during sleep cycle but rises steeply at early morning hours.

Nitroglycerin, Calcium channel blockers

Peptic ulcer

Acid secretion increases in night as well as in afternoon.

Proton pump blockers

Asthma

Precipitation of attacks after midnight or at early morning hours.

Beta-agonists, Antihistaminics

Attention deficit syndrome

Increase in DOPA level in afternoon.

Methylphenidate

Hypercholestemia

Increased cholesterol synthesis during night than day time.

HMG CoA Reductase inhibitors

 


 

Fig 1: Drug release profile of pulsatile drug delivery systems. [4]

 

Fig 2: General classification of pulsatile drug delivery system

 

TIME CONTROLLED PULSATILE DRUG DELIVERY

Time Controlled pulsatile drug delivery classified into single and multiple unit systems. There are depicted in (Fig 3) along with samples of different systems developed so far.

 

STIMULI-INDUCED PULSATILE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

Stimuli Induced Pulsatile Drug Delivery has been classified based on internal or external stimulus. Further classification is given in Fig. 4.

 

These systems are designed on the basis of physiochemical processes of the body. In other words these systems are novel drug delivery approaches meant for targeted drug delivery at specific site due to induction of certain physiochemical stimuli at target site. Biological stimuli like release of certain enzymes, hormones, antibodies, pH of the site, temperature of the site, presence of certain cells, concentration of biomolecules (glucose, neurotransmitters, inflammatory mediators) etc act as stimuli to trigger the release of drug from these type of drug delivery systems as shown in fig 5.[8]

 

Table 2 presents different drug delivery systems based on ‘‘smart hydrogels’’ and their release mechanism with an external stimulus. In all these cases, phase transitions occur due to the change in external environment. The change may be gradual and smooth, or may be abrupt or discontinuous, depending upon the nature of the system. This leads to a change in the water uptake or swelling behaviour of the polymer, which is dependent upon factors like thermal, chemical, pH, electric current, magnetic etc.

 

A. Internal Stimuli Induced Pulsatile Systems

1. Temperature Induced Systems

Temperature is the most widely utilized triggering signal for a variety of triggered or pulsatile drug delivery systems. The use of temperature as a signal has been justified by the fact that the body temperature often deviates from the physiological temperature (37ºC) in the presence of pathogens or pyrogens. This deviation sometimes can be a useful stimulus that activates the release of therapeutic agents from various temperature-responsive drug delivery systems for disease accompanying fever. Thermal stimuli-regulated pulsed drug release is established through the design of drug delivery devices such as hydrogels and micelles. [11] Thermoresponsive hydrogels have been investigated as possible drug delivery carriers for stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems. Poly(N-isopropyl acryl amide) PIPAAm cross-linked gels has shown thermoresponsive, discontinuous swelling / deswelling phases: swelling, for example, at temperatures below 32ºC, while shrinking above this temperature. A sudden increase in temperature above the transition temperature of these gels resulted in the formation of a dense, shrunken layer on the gel surface (‘skin layer’) which hindered water permeation from inside the gel into the environment. Drug release from the PIPAAm hydrogels at temperatures below 32ºC, was governed by diffusion, while above this temperature drug release was stopped completely, due to the ‘skin layer’ formation on the gel surface (on–off drug release regulation). [12-15] Kaneko and co-workers developed a new method to accelerate gel swelling/deswelling kinetics based on molecular design of gel structure. Free mobile linear PIPAAm chains were grafted within the cross-linked PIPAAm hydrogels. These gels had the same transition temperature as conventional PIPAAm gels and existed in the swollen state below the transition temperature, while above this temperature these get shranked.

 


 

Fig 3: Classification of time controlled pulsatile drug delivery system

 

Fig 4: Classification of stimuli induced pulsatile drug delivery systems

 

Fig 5: Schematic illustration of an ideal stimuli-modulated polymeric drug delivery System [9]

 

Table 2: Effect of Different External Stimuli on the Release of Bioactive Molecules from hydrogels [10]

Stimulus

Types of hydrogels

Type Release Mechanism

Thermal

Thermo-responsive

hydrogel

Change in temperature changes the polymer–polymer and water–polymer interactions which effect swelling and cause release of drug

Chemical

 

Hydrogel containing

electron-accepting groups

Electron-donating compounds results in formation of charge-transfer complexes effect swelling and release of drug

pH

Acidic or basic hydrogel

Change in pH cause swelling effect in release of drug

Electrical

Polyelectrolyte hydrogel

 

Applied electric field changes membrane charging and cause electrophoresis of charged drug which effect swelling and release of drug

Magnetic

Magnetic particles

dispersed in microspheres

Applied magnetic field changes in pores in gel cause change in swelling which help in release of drug

 

 


PIPAAm grafted gels showed rapid deswelling kinetics without formation of skin layer on surface. This is probably due to rapid dehydration of graft chains formed by hydrophobic aggregation on the three-dimensional cross-linked chains. The molecular weight of the graft chains had a significant effect on the gel deswelling kinetics and also on the drug release profiles, especially for large molecular weight drugs. [16-18] A similar rapid deswelling phase was achieved by incorporating poly(ethylene glycol) graft chains in PIPAAm cross linked hydrogels. [19] The low molecular weight compounds released immediately from conventional PIPPAm gels after a temperature increase, after which the release was terminated due to the formation of a dense impermeable skin layer on the surface. In comparison, 65% of the drug was released in one burst from free PIPPAm grafted hydrogels with a graft molecular weight of 9000, following the temperature increase. Graft-type gels with a molecular weight of 4000 showed oscillating drug release profiles. The release of high molecular weight compound from PIPPAm graft type gels was shown to burst after a temperature increase of 40 ºC, while release was suppressed from IGG 4000. The difference in drug release profiles for two graft-type gels is probably due to the different strengths of aggregation forces between the formed hydrophobic cores within the graft-type gels. The large molecular weight graft chains formed more hydrophobic cores within the gels upon the temperature increase, which induced rapid gel deswelling. In contrast, aggregation forces between graft chains in IGG 4000 were relatively weak, thus leading to the formation of skin layer on the gel surface, which limited the drug diffusion from gel interior. A similarly rapid deswelling phase was achieved by incorporating poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) graft chains into PIPPAm cross-linked hydrogels. The introduction of PEG chains did not alter the transition temperature. [20] Yuk et al. designed temperature-sensitive drug delivery systems using a mixture of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer (F-68) and poly vinyl alcohol (PVA). Change in the ratio of F-68/PVA could be used to manipulate the swelling transition of polymer complex gel. Pulsatile release of acetaminophen in response to change in temperature between 35 and 40ºC has observed. [21] US Patents 6733788 and 20020015712 describe a medical device containing thermo-sensitive cellulose gel structure, which can deliver the bioactive solute compounds to a target location in the body. The gel structure deswells at certain temperature and expels the biologically active solute with an increase in gel temperature. The loaded solute released in a relatively short period of time under the influence of increased temperature of the body.[22,23] Thermo-responsive polymeric micelle systems constitute polymeric micelles whose properties and biological interests make them a most noteworthy candidate as drug carrier for the treatment of cancer.[24] The polymeric micelle is composed of amphiphilic block copolymers exhibiting a hydrophobic core with a hydrophilic corona. Due to these unique characteristics, polymer micelles exhibit stealth characteristics and are not detected by the body defense system (reticuloendothelial system). Thus passive targeting could be achieved through enhanced permeation retention (EPR) effect of tumor sites.[25] Okano and coworkers used an end functionalized PIPAAm to prepare block copolymers. Hydrophobic polymers, such as poly(butyl methacrylate) (PBMA), polystyrene (PSt), poly(lactic acid) (PLA) were used. [26-29] Block copolymers formed micellar structure (with core-shell structure) in aqueous solution below PIPAAm's transition temperature. The shell was made from thermo-responsive PIPAAm, while the core consisted of hydrophobic polymer aggregates of poly(butyl methacrylate) (PBMA). The hydrated PIPAAm corona acted as an inert material towards all biological entities below PIPAAm's LCST. However, upon temperature increase above 32° C hydrated PIPAAm chains became hydrophobic, due to dehydration of polymer chains, thus resulting in aggregation and precipitation. The hydrophobic anticancer drug, andriamycin, was incorporated in to PBMA micelle cores. At temperatures below PIPAAm's low crystalline solution temperature (LCST), drug release was at a minimum, with a value less than 10%. However upon temperature increase above PIPAAm's LCST, accelerated release of andriamycin was observed.

 

2. Chemical Stimuli Induced Pulsatile Systems:

(a) Glucose-Responsive Insulin Release Devices:

A number of stimuli responsive hydrogels have been developed for controlled release of insulin which respond to glucose concentration changes. One such system is based on glucose oxidase (GOD) catalysed glucose oxidation. Ishihara et al. reported two types of gel membrane systems GOD and nicotinamide-immobilized gel membranes. When glucose was oxidized by the immobilized GOD, the resulting hydrogen peroxide oxidized the nicotinamide units inducing positive charges. The gel membranes became hydrophilic and permeability get increased. [30] In other study, GOD-immobilized hydrogels were prepared from 2-hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate and N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate. Glucose in the medium was transformed to gluconic acid through a reaction mediated by hydrogel-immobilized GOD. Protonation of hydrogel amino groups lead to swelling of hydrogel membrane thereby induced this type of membrane, the insulin permeability through the hydrogels were found to be higher. [31, 32] Kim and co-workers have developed self-regulating insulin delivery systems using microcapsules containing the glucose-binding lectin, concanavalin A (Con A) and Con A-bound glucosylated insulin. Glucosylated insulin bound to Con A was released through exchange with external glucose, due to the difference in their binding constants direct injection of microcapsules into the peritoneal cavity may cause undesirable side-effects arising from the immune response toward Con A. Moreover, refilling of glucosylated insulin after exhausting initially bound insulin molecules is required. [33, 34] Another insulin drug delivery system is based on copolymer of acrylamide and allyl glucose. The side chain glucose units in the copolymer were bound to Con A. These hydrogels showed a glucose-responsive, sol–gel phase transition dependent upon the external glucose concentration. The nonlinear dependence of this sol–gel phase transition with regard to the glucose concentration was not only due to the increased binding affinity of allyl glucose to Con A compared to native glucose, but the cooperative interaction between glucose containing copolymer and Con A as well. [35, 36] Okano et al. focused on the boronic acid moiety, which is known to form reversible bonds with polyol compounds, including glucose. Water-soluble copolymers, containing phenylboronic acid side chains, have formed reversible complex gels with polyol compounds such as poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA). [37, 38] Such complexes dissociated after the addition of glucose in a concentration dependent manner. Utilizing this polyol-binding characteristic of boronic acid, microgel beads (containing phenyl-boronic acid) with a diameter of 100–400 mm were prepared. Gluconic acid-modified insulin was bound to the boronic acid moiety of the beads. The bound insulin was released after substitution with external glucose molecules. The only disadvantage is that the system works at pH 8.5 and, therefore, much higher than physiological conditions. [39] Shiino et al. incorporated amino groups in the vicinity of the boronic acid in the gels. The lone electron pair of the amino nitrogen atom was coordinated with the boron atom in such a position as to allow the formation of stable complexes with the polyol at a pH lower than 8.5. Thus, glucose-sensitive insulin release was achieved at pH 7.4 using amine-containing phenyl-boronic acid copolymer gel beads. [40] Kataoka et al. recently developed glucose and thermo-responsive hydrogels using acrylamidophenylboronic acid and N-iso-propylacrylamide (IPAAm). The obtained gels, containing 10 mol% phenylboronic acid moieties, showed a transition temperature of 22 ºC in the absence of glucose. Below this temperature, the gels existed in a swollen state. The introduction of glucose to the medium altered the transition temperature of the gels in such a way that the transition temperature increased with increasing glucose concentration to reach 36 ºC at 5.0 g/ l glucose concentration. Boronic acid was in equilibrium between the undissociated (uncharged) and the dissociated (anionically charged) form. With increasing glucose concentration, the equilibrium shifted to increase the amount of dissociated boronate groups and the gels became more hydrophilic. Thus, the data indicated that the gel’s swelling / deswelling was regulated by glucose concentration at a fixed temperature. [41]

 

(b) Inflammation-Induced Pulsatile Release:

When human beings receive physical or chemical stress, such as injury, broken bones, etc., inflammation reactions take place at the injured sites. At the inflammatory sites, inflammation responsive phagocytic cells, such as macrophages and polymorphonuclear cells, play a role in the healing process of the injury. During inflammation, hydroxyl radicals (.OH) are produced from these inflammation responsive cells. Yui and co-workers  focused on the inflammatory induced hydroxyl radicals and designed drug delivery systems, which responded to the hydroxyl radicals and degraded in a limited manner. They used hyaluronic acid (HA), a linear mucopolysaccharide composed of repeating disaccharide subunits of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and D-guluronic acid. In the body, HA is mainly degraded either by a specific enzyme, hyaluronidase, or hydroxyl radicals. Degradation of HA via the hyaluronidase is very low in a normal state of health. Degradation via hydroxyl radicals however, is usually dominant and rapid when HA is injected at inflammatory sites. Thus they prepared cross-linked HA with ethylene glycol diglycidylether or polyglycerol polyglycidylether. These HA gels degraded only when the hydroxyl radicals were generated through the Fenton reaction between Fe2+ ions and hydrogen peroxide in vitro. Thus, a surface erosion type of degradation was achieved. When microspheres were incorporated in HA hydrogels as a model drug, these microspheres were released only when hydroxyl radicals induced HA gel degradation. The microsphere release was regulated by the surface erosion type of degradation. Furthermore, in vivo tests of HA hydrogel degradation showed that HA gels were degraded only when inflammation at the implanted site was induced by surgical incision. Control HA gels implanted in the animals were found to be relatively stable over a period of 100 days. Thus, it is possible to treat patients with inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, using anti-inflammatory drug incorporated HA gels as new implantable drug delivery systems. [42, 43]

 

(c) Drug Release from Intelligent Gels Responding To Antibody Concentration:

There are numerous kinds of bioactive compounds which exist in the body. Recently, novel gels were developed which responded to the change in concentration of bioactive compounds to alter their swelling / deswelling characteristics. Miyata and co-workers focused on the introduction of stimuli-responsive cross-linking structures into hydrogels. Special attention was given to antigen antibody complex formation as the cross linking units in the gel, because specific antigen recognition of an antibody can provide the basis for a new device fabrication. Utilizing the difference in association constants between polymerized antibodies and naturally derived antibodies towards specific antigens, reversible gel swelling /deswelling and drug permeation changes occurred. Thus, biological stimuli-responsive hydrogels were created. [44, 45]

 

3. pH Sensitive Pulsatile Release:

It is a widely accepted and versatile approach to design chronotropic systems to attain specified lag time prior to drug release by using pH dependent polymers. These can be single unit or multiparticulate dosage forms with reliable and predictable drug release profile. These type of systems possess the advantage of fact that there exists different pH environment at different parts of gastrointestinal tract. Hence by employing pH dependent polymers targeting at specific site of gastrointestinal tract is possible as well as a desired lag time can be achieved due to dependency of polymer solubility only at a particular pH of gastrointestinal tract. Examples of pH dependent polymers include copolymers of methacrylic acid (various grades of Eudragit), phthalates, carboxy methyl cellulose etc. These polymers are utilized for enteric coating to protect the drug from degradation in upper G.I.T and attain drug release at specific part of intestine (according to solubility of polymer at particular pH and specific site of intestine) after a predetermined lag time. A number of chronotropic systems have been developed and marketed for chronotherapy utilizing pH dependent polymers for asthma, angina, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, diabetes, ulcer etc. [46]

 

(a) pH Dependent Colonic DDS:

A progressive pH increase is observed from the stomach to the rectum. pH of stomach is 2-3 (higher after eating), 6.5-7 in the small intestine and 7-8 in the large intestine. pH sensitive polymers especially those that contain carboxyl groups which make them insoluble at low pH values and soluble at higher pH values are used for colon targeting of drug. Eudragit L (soluble at pH>6 specifically used as enteric polymer) and Eudragit S and FS (dissolve at pH> 7, specifically dissolve in colon/rectum) and their combinations are used for colon targeting. Tablets, minitablets or pellets containing drug are coated with these polymer for achieving colon delivery. pH-based systems are commercially available for number of drugs.

 

(b) pH and Time Dependent Colonic Systems:

Combination of enteric polymer with delayed release component that relies on the passage of time, lead to feasibility of target the drug in the terminal ileum and colon. These systems are comprised of (i) An outermost coating of an enteric polymer such as Eudragit L, S or FS that ensures dosage transit from stomach to some distance into small intestine. (ii) A second barrier coating of a pH-independent polymer such Eudragit RS or ethyl cellulose that delays drug release for several hours. (iii) An innermost drug layered nonpareil seed. One example of this system is colon targeted delivery capsule. The system contains an organic acid that is filled in a hard gelatin capsule as a pH- adjusting agent together with the drug substance. This capsule is then coated with a three layered consisting of an acid –soluble layer, a hydrophilic layer and an outermost enteric layer. After ingestion of the capsule, these layers prevent drug release until the environment pH inside the capsule decreases by dissolution of the organic acid, upon which the enclosed drug is quickly released. Therefore, the onset time of drug release is controlled by the thickness of the acid-soluble layer. In fact, capsule disintegration does not start until 5h after gastric emptying regardless of whether the formulation is administered to fasted or fed subjects.

 

(c) pH and Bacterial Enzyme–Dependent Colonic DDS:

A unique technology that combines the advantages of bacterial enzyme-degradable polysaccharides and pH- sensitive polymers is the CODES system. The outer coating is composed of a standard enteric polymer such as Eudragit L which dissolves after the transit of dosage form into the small intestine and exposes the undercoating, which is composed of Eudragit E (acid soluble). This coating will not dissolve in the environment of the small or large intestine. The undercoating permits lactulose to be released into the environment adjacent to the tablet. This disaccharide is metabolised to short chain fatty acids, which lower the local pH to point where the Eudragit E dissolves. This final dissolution step exposes the core of the tablet permitting drug dissolution to occur. [47]

 

B. EXTERNAL STIMULI INDUCED PULSATILE SYSTEM:

1. Electric Stimuli-Responsive Pulsatile Release:

An electric field as an external stimulus provide several advantages such as the availability of equipment, which allows precise control with regards to the magnitude of current, duration of electric pulses, interval between pulses etc. Electrically responsive delivery systems are prepared from polyelectrolytes (polymers which contain relatively high concentration of ionisable groups along the backbone chain) and are thus, pH-responsive as well as electro-responsive. Under the influence of electric field, electro-responsive hydrogels generally deswell or bend, depending on the shape of the gel lies parallel to the electrodes whereas deswelling occurs when the hydrogel lies perpendicular to the electrodes. Synthetic as well as naturally occurring polymers, separately or in combination, have been used. Examples of naturally occurring polymers include hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulphate, agarose, carbomer, xanthan gum and calcium alginate. The synthetic polymers are generally acrylate and methacrylate derivatives such as partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, polydimethylaminopropyl acrylamide. Many of these gels are prepared by either cross-linking the water-soluble polymers using radiation or chemical agents such as Ca2+ ions, ethylene diglycidylether, N,N´-methylene bisacrylamide, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate or by free-radical polymerization of monomers. Complex multi-component gels or interpenetrating networks have been prepared in order to enhance the gel’s electro responsiveness. [48] Several approaches have been reported describing the preparation of electric stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems using hydrogels. Kishi et al. developed an electric stimulus induced drug release system based on swelling / deswelling Characteristics of polyelectrolyte hydrogels. These gels exhibited reversible swelling / shrinking behaviour in response to on–off switching of an electric stimulus. Poly(sodium acrylate) microparticulate gels containing pilocarpine as a model drug were prepared. Pilocarpine release from microparticulate gel beads was found to be increased with applied electric stimuli. However, because the matrix itself showed higher swelling in the medium, pilocarpine release was not terminated after removal of the electric current. Thus, on–off release regulation of drugs could not be realized with this system. [49] Kwon and co-workers used cross-linked poly(2-acrylamide-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid-co-butyl methacrylate) (P(AMPS-co-BMA)) hydrogels for electric stimuli-induced drug delivery systems. Positively charged edrophonium chloride was incorporated within negatively charged (P (AMPS-co-BMA)) hydrogels via an electrostatic interaction and investigated the drug release from the hydrogels in an electric field. By applying electric field, ion-exchange between edrophonium ions and protons commenced at the cathode, resulting in a rapid drug release from the hydrogels. The drug release rate was increased by increasing applied voltage in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, complete on–off drug release regulation was achieved with this system, as no drug release was apparent without the application of an electric field. Electric stimuli induced release of, the neutral drug, hydrocortisone from (P (AMPS-co-BMA)) hydrogels via a diffusion mechanism was developed and the release of hydrocortisone was found to show a small pulse when an electric current was applied. These pulses, however, may be attributed to the bulk squeezing caused by anisotropic deswelling under the electric field. This hydrogel system may be a potential candidate for the delivery of positively charged drugs in conjunction with iontophoresis. [50–52]  Kwon et al. synthesized a different type of electroresponsive hydrogel. The gels were formed when two aqueous polymer solutions were mixed and a complex was formed due to hydrogen bonding or ionic bonding between the polymers over a certain pH range. When the polycationic polyamine solution was mixed with the polyanionic heparin solution, a complex was formed via ionic bonding between the positively charged NH3+ groups in polyallylamine and the COO- and SO3- groups in heparin, over the broad pH range 3-10. They also achieved ‘on-off’ drug release utilizing a polyethyloxazoline (PEO) and polymethacrylic acid (PMAA) from solid complexes by hydrogen bonding below pH 5, but the complexes dissolve above pH 5.4. When an electric current was applied through the disk-shaped matrix of the complex in a saline solution, the matrix dissolved at the surface facing the cathode because local pH increase near the cathode and resultant hydrogen bonding was disrupted. The release pattern of heparin from the polyelectrolyte complex exhibited complete on–off profile in response to on–off stimuli of electric current.  Insulin released from the matrix with dissolution in response to application of the electric current. [53] Feedback-controlled drug delivery of an ionic drug was investigated based on the electrophoresis. In this system, drug release was regulated in either a positive or a negative manner by appropriate control of the electric field between a pair of platinum electrodes placed on either side of rate controlling polymeric hydrogel membrane. Control of the electric field was carried out by the microprocessor, which received signals from the biosensor element. [54] Kiser et al. designed lipid-coated microgels for the triggered release of drugs. Ionic microgels were synthesized from the monomers of methylenebisacrylamide (MBAM), methylacrylic acid (MAA) and 4-nitrophenyl methacrylate (NPMA) and coated with a lipid bilayer. The release of drug was triggered from the gels using either lipid solubilising surfactants or electroporation.  The swelling and release of drugs in three stages: i) the permeability of the membrane might be sufficiently compromised (e.g. by electroporation or membrane dissolution or other permeabilizing species), but only to an extent that allows proton efflux from the microgel and a sodium ion influx into the gel particle; ii) microgel begins to swell due to occurrence of exchange process, allowing additional ions to be transported across the membrane and so that disruption of membranes causes uncoating of microgel; and iii) drug is exchanged from the hydrogel by Na+ ions and diffuse down its concentration gradient out of the expanded polymer network into the surrounding medium over a period of time, resulting in a triggered release.[55] Electronic microelectromechanical devices was manufactured using standard microfabrication techniques that are used to create silicon chips for computers and they often have moving parts or components that enable some physical or analytical function to be performed by the device. such devices are commonly referred to as “microelectromechanical systems “(MEMS). MEMS are found in ink-jet printers, automotive applications, and microtube engines used in the aerospace industry. MEMS for biological applications are classified as either microfluidic devices or nonmicrofluidic and release multiple chemical substances on demand by a mechanism devoid of moving its parts. [56, 57] The usage of MEMS is triggered, particularly pulsatile delivery of drugs represents a new area of study that is to be explored. One straightforward approach to achieve this drug reservoir is the fabrication of silicon microparticles that contain an internal reservoir loaded with drug. These devices could be used for oral drug delivery, with release of the drug triggered by binding of a surface-functionalized molecule to cells in the digestive tract.[58] The completely implantable minipump made by MinimedR, has also a pulsatile, radio controlled injection rate through a catheter into the intraperitoneal region. It was found that patients with the implantable pump did not differ from control subjects on any measure of psychosocial function but that pump users monitored their blood glucose levels more frequently and had lower average blood glucose levels.[59] Even though this type of device may improve patient’s mobility and reduce infections by eliminating transcutaneous catheters, they may still be hampered by their size, cost, ability to deliver only drugs in solution and the limited stability of some drugs in solution at 37ºC. Ikemoto et al. developed a stepmotor micropump for the injection of nanolitre(nl) volumes of drug  D-amphetamine solution into discrete brain regions of freely moving rats was and  it found to be well tolerated. This micropump delivered a reliable volume of 50 nl per infusion over an hour at a rate of one infusion per minute. [60] Microchip delivery devices, described in US Patents 579898, US2006123861 and 0121486 provide a means to control both the rate and time of release of variety of bioactive molecules, in either a continuous or pulsatile manner. Hundreds or thousands of reservoirs can be fabricated on a single microchip. The molecules to be delivered were inserted into the reservoirs by injection or spin coating methods in their pure form or in a release system. The release systems include polymers and polymeric matrices, non-polymeric matrices, and other common excipient or diluents. The physical properties of the release system control the rate of the release of molecules. Release from an active device is controlled by a pre-programmed microprocessor, remote control, or by biosensors. [61-63] US Patents 20060057737A1 and 20060178655A1 described a device and method for the time and/ or rate controlled release of one or more drugs. The device includes implantable microchips which have reservoirs containing the bioactive compounds for the triggered or controlled release. The microchip devices include i) a substrate, ii) at least two reservoirs in the substrate containing the molecules for release, and iii) a reservoir cap positioned on, or within a portion of the reservoir and over the molecules, so that the molecules are released from the device by diffusion through or upon disintegration or rupture of the reservoir caps in controlled manner. Each of the reservoirs of a single microchip can contain different molecules and/or different amounts and concentrations, which can be released independently. The filled reservoirs can be capped with materials that passively or actively disintegrate. Passive release reservoir caps can be fabricated using materials that allow the molecules to diffuse passively out of the reservoir over certain time. Active release reservoir caps can be fabricated using materials that disintegrate upon application of electrical, mechanical, or thermal energy. Release from an active device is also controlled by a preprogrammed microprocessor, remote control, or by biosensors. [64, 65] US Patents 20060121486A1 and 20060100608A1 described the device includes a reservoir cap formed of an electrically conductive material, which prevents the reservoir contents from passing out from the device and prevents exposure of the reservoir contents to molecules outside of the device; electrical input and output leads connected to the reservoir cap, such that upon application of an electrical current through the reservoir cap, via the input and output lead, the reservoir cap ruptures to release or expose the reservoir contents.[66,67] US Patent 20060105275A1 describes modified fabrication methods and structures for micro-reservoir devices. The multi-reservoir device comprising i) patterning one or more photoresist layers on a substrate; ii) depositing onto the substrate at least one metal layer by a sputtering process to form a plurality of reservoir caps and conductive traces; iii) removing the photoresist layers using a lift off process; iv) forming a plurality of reservoirs in the susbtrate; v) loading each reservoir with bioactive molecules; and vi) sealing of each reservoir. The reservoir cap comprises a first conductive material coated with one or more protective metal films, such as gold, platinum, silicon carbide, silicon dioxide and platinum silicide.[68]

 

2. Magnetically Induced Pulsatile Release:

The use of an oscillating magnetic field to modulate the rates of drug release from polymer matrix was one of the old methodologies. Magnetic carriers receive their magnetic response to a magnetic field from incorporated materials such as magnetite, iron, nickel, cobalt etc.[69] For biomedical applications, magnetic carriers must be water-based, biocompatible, non-toxic and non-immunogenic. Magnetic steel beads were embedded in ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVAc) matrix that was loaded with bovine serum albumin (model drug) and increased rates of drug release were obtained in the presence of an oscillating magnetic field. [70] During exposure to the magnetic field, the beads oscillate within the matrix, alternatively creating compressive and tensile forces. This in turn acts as a pump to push an increased amount of the drug molecule out of the matrix. Co-polymers with a higher Young's modulus were more resistant to the induced motion of steel beads, and consequently the magnetic field has less effect on the rate of drug release from these materials.[71] Saslawski et al. developed different formulations for in vitro magnetically triggered delivery of insulin based on alginate microspheres. In an experiment, ferrite microparticles (1 mm) and insulin powder were dispersed in sodium alginate aqueous solution. The ferrite-insulin alginate suspension was later dropped in aqueous calcium chloride solution which causes the formation of cross linked alginate spheres, which were further cross linked with aqueous solution of poly(L-lysine) or poly(ethylene imine). The magnetic field characteristics due to the ferrite microparticles and the mechanical properties of the polymer matrices were supposed to play role in controlling the release rates of insulin from the system.[72] Babincova et al. had developed magnetoliposomes for triggered release of drug. In their delivery systems, they entrapped dextran-megnetite and model drug, 6-carboxyfluorscein in the liposomes and used laser as triggering the release of model agent. The magnetite absorbs the laser light energy to heat the lipid bilayer above the gel-liquid crystal phase transition temperature (Tc), which is 41 ºC for dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine. Liposomes made from this lipid release their content as soon as temperature is reached to this level. They have also suggested that the absorption of laser energy by magnetite particles provide a means for much localized heating and controlled release of liposome with a single laser pulse. This may have potential applications for selective drug delivery especially to the eye and skin e.g. a number of products patented based on magnetically induced drug delivery system. [73] US Patent 20016251365 describes about the magentosomes comprising magnetic monocrystals having a maximum diameter of 45 nm surrounded by a phospholipids membrane developed from triggered release in the body. The membrane consists of phophotidylethanolamine, phosphotidyl glycerol and phosphotidyl choline containing mainly the fatty acids such as palmitic acid, palmitoloeic and oleic acid. These magnetosomes having cationic charge increase the probability that the antibodies and therapeutic agents can be correctly bound to them as a potential carrier for antibodies. [74] US Patent 20036514481B1 describes about the nanosized particles termed as “nanoclinics” or “nanoparticles” or “nanobubbles”, prepared from iron oxide particles using a reverse micelle colloidal reaction. A tracking agent such as a two photon is attached to the surface of the particles to track the nanoparticles using two-photon laser scanning microscopy. Silica (sodium salt) is added to perform the silica shell. A carbon spacer is then attached to the silica surface to reduce the steric hindrance for the binding of the targeting agent to spacer. These nanoparticles can be used for lysis of cells, such as for the treatment of cancer. For the lysis of tumor cells, the targeting agent is selected based on the molecules on the surface of the tumor cells. Following binding and/ or internalization of the nanoparticles by the tumor cells, the particles are exposed to DC magnetic field. Dc magnetic field can be obtained by standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) equipment which typically has a magnetic filed in the range of 0.1 to 5 Tesla. [75] US Patent 2006997863B2 provides a treatment method for hyperthermia that involves the administration of a magnetic material composition, which contains single-domain magnetic particles attached to a target-specific ligand, to a patient and the application of an alternating magnetic field to inductively heat the magnetic material composition, which cause the triggered release of therapeutic agents at the target tumor or cancerous cells.[76]

 

APPLICATIONS:

(a) Parenteral Delivery:

The best way to provide sustained release medication is to place the drug in a delivery system and inject or implant the system into the body tissue. Thermoreversible gels based on poloxamers have been mainly used. [77] Poloxamer gel alone or with the addition of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) or dextran was reported for epidural administration of drugs in vitro. [78] Pluronic F127 gels incorporating either insulin or insulin-PLGA nanoparticles were evaluated as a successful controlled delivery system. [79] Likewise, Intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of human growth hormone using poloxamer gels was tested long acting single dose injection of lidocaine was developed using same gels. [80] Noyer et al. invented a new class of injectable controlled release depots of protein which consisted of blends of Pluronics with poly(D, L-lactide)/1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone solutions. [81] Thermosensitive hydrogels may also be used for parenteral administration e.g. ReGel® (triblock copolymer PLGA-PEG-PLGA) has been used as a drug delivery carrier for the continuous release of human insulin. Steady amounts of insulin secretion from the ReGel® formulations up to day 15 of the subcutaneous injections were achieved. [82] Biodegradable poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(L-lactic acid) hydrogels were developed and exists in their sol-gel transition was reported as a result of temperature change form of sol at an elevated temperature (around 45°C) and forms a gel after subcutaneous injection and subsequent rapid cooling to body temperature. [83] Chenite et al. developed novel thermally sensitive combinations of chitosan/polyol salts, which turn into gel implants, when injected in vivo and proved to be a prototype for a new family of thermosetting gels highly compatible with biological compounds. [84] Hydrogels formed by xyloglucan were also evaluated as a sustained release vehicle for the intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin. [85] PAA/polymethacrylic acid forms a pH-sensitive complex with PEG in situ exhibiting the potential to release drug substances subcutaneously over a period of few days. Alternatively, an aqueous solution containing methyl cellulose (MC) in combination with polymethacrylate yields a reversible gel due to the change of temperature and pH shortly after parenteral administration. [86]

 

(b) Ocular Delivery:

Effective ocular delivery of drug is mostly based on an increase of ocular residence time of dosage form. Ophthalmic hydrogels with enhanced viscosity and mucoadhesive properties is best approach. Among these polymers, in situ gels are preferred since they are conveniently dropped in the eye as a solution, where undergo transition into a gel. Thermosensitive, specific ion sensitive or pH- sensitive hydrogels have been examined for their potential as vehicles for ocular drugs. Poloxamers as thermogelling polymers[87] have been effectively employed alone or in combination of other such as e.g. PEG [88], PAA [89], MC, HPMC, CMC [90] is often necessary. Ion-sensitive polymers belong to the mainly used in situ gelling materials for ocular drug delivery. Slightly viscous gellan gum solutions in low concentrations (<1%) showed markedly increase in apparent viscosity, when introduced into presence of a physiological level of cations, without requiring more ions than 10–25% of those in tear fluid. The precorneal contact times for drugs can thus be extended up to 20h. [91, 92] Gellan containing formulations of pilocarpine HCl allowed reduction of drug concentration from 2% to 0.5% obtaining the same bioavailability. [93] Alginic acid was exploited for ocular delivery based using ability of gel formation at physiological Ca2+ levels. This polymer significantly enhanced the duration of the pressure reducing effect of pilocarpine to 10h [94] and carteolol to 8h [95] allowing only once a day administration in case of carteolol. Aqueous solutions of PAA that transform into gels upon increase in pH may be used as in situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery systems. However, the amount of PAA required to form stiff gel upon instillation in the eye is not easily neutralized by the buffering action of tear fluid. Combination of PAA with a suitable viscosity enhancing polymer e. g. HPMC [96] or MC [97] allows a reduction in the PAA concentration without comprising the in situ gelling properties. The formulation containing Carbopol®940 and Methocel E50LV (HPMC) afforded sustained release of ofloxacin over an 8h period. [96]

 

(c) Peroral Drug Delivery:

Site-specific delivery of drugs to specific regions of the GI tract utilizes pH sensitive hydrogels. Silicone microspheres were prepared using hydrogels made of varying proportions of PAA derivatives and cross-linked PEG which released prednisolone in the gastric medium or showed gastroprotective property. [98] Cross-linked dextran, amidaded pectins, guar gum and inulin were investigated to develop a potential colon-specific drug delivery system as potential of faster swelling under high pH. [99] Formulations of gellan and sodium alginate for oral delivery of PCM was developed containing complexed calcium ions that undergo gelation by release of these ions in the acidic environment of the stomach. [100]

 

(d) Rectal Delivery:

The rectal route may be used to deliver many types of drugs that are formulated as liquid, semi-solid (ointments, creams and foams) and solid dosage forms (suppositories). Conventional suppositories often cause discomfort during insertion and these also unable to be sufficiently retained at a specific position in the rectum, sometimes they can migrate upwards to the colon, that makes them possible for drug to undergo the first-pass effect. Choi et al. developed novel in situ gelling liquid suppositories with gelation temperature at 30–36°C, using Poloxamer 407 and/ or poloxamer 188 as temperature sensitive polymeric carriers. Bioadhesive polymers were used to modulate the gel strength and the bioadhesive force. [101] Charrueau et al. proposed 18% poloxamer 407 solution as a vehicle for short-chain fatty acid enemas. After gelation at 37°C, it allows control release of short chain fatty acids. [102] The potential use of thermoreversible xyloglucan gels for rectal drug delivery was investigated and more sustained release of indomethacin was achieved in vitro in comparison with commercial suppositories. [103]

 

(e) Vaginal Delivery:

The vagina, in addition to being an important organ of reproductive tract, serves as a potential route for drug administration. Formulations based on a thermoplastic graft copolymer that undergo in situ gelation have been developed to provide the prolonged release of active ingredients such as nonoxynol-9, progestins, estrogens, peptides and proteins. [104] Chang et al. have recently reported a mucoadhesive thermosensitive gel (combination of poloxamers and polycarbophil) which exhibited increased and prolonged antifungal activity of clotrimazole in comparison with conventional PEG-based formulation. [105]

 

(f) Dermal and Transdermal Delivery:

For percutaneous administration thermally reversible gel of Pluronic F127 was evaluated as vehicle for sustained delivery of indomethacin. [106] In vivo studies suggest that 20% w/w aqueous gel may be of practical use as a base for topical administration of the drug. Poloxamer 407 gel was found suitable for transdermal delivery of insulin. The combination of chemical enhancers and iontophoresis resulted in synergistic enhancement of insulin permeation. [107]

 

(g) Nasal Delivery:

Nasal formulations of AEA with chlorpheniramine maleate and tetrahydrozoline hydrochloride were investigated. The findings suggest that liquid AEA formulations facilitate the instillation into the nose and the hydrogel formed on the mucous membrane provide controlled drug release. [108]

 

CONCLUSION:

The number of products based on new drug delivery systems has significantly increased in the past few years, and this growth is expected to continue in the near future. Incorporating an existing medicine into a new drug delivery system can significantly improve its performance in terms of efficacy, safety and improved patient compliance. Delivery systems with a pulsatile or triggered release pattern are receiving increasing interest for the development of various drugs, where conventional systems with a continuous release are not ideal. Some of the current programmable drug delivery systems that employ polymer-based include Covera-HS, Verelan PM, Cardizem LA, Innopran XL, Uniphyl, and naproxen sodium from Andrx Pharmaceuticals. The major drawbacks in these polymer-based triggered release systems arise from biological variations among individuals. The medical and pharmaceutical scientists should now focus concisely over the importance of triggered release of drugs. The key considerations in the design of these systems are their biocompatibility and the toxicity of the polymer-based devices, response to external stimuli, ability to maintain the desired levels of drugs in serum, shelf life and reproducibility.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Davis SS, Illum L. Drug Delivery Systems for Challenging Molecules. Int J Pharm.1998; 176: 1-8.

2.       Kikuchi A, Okano T. Pulsatile drug release control using hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;    54:53-77.

3.       Petereit HU. Pulsed release drug delivery. Available from www.iptonline.com. 2003:101-04.

4.       Bussemer T, Bodmeier RA. Drug Delivery: Pulsatile Systems. Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology, Edn 3, pp.1287-1297.

5.       Lu B, Zee P. Circadian rhythm sleep disorder. Chest  2006; 130: 1915-23

6.       Youan BC. Chronopharmaceutics: Gimmick or clinically relevant approach to drug delivery. J  Controlled Release. 2004; 98:337-53.

7.       Bruguolle B, Lemmer B. Recent advances in chronopharmacokinetics: methodological problems. Life Sci. 1993; 52: 1809- 24.

8.       Akhgari A, Garekani HA, Sadeghi F, Azimaie M. Statistical optimization of indomethacin pellets coated with pH dependent methacrylic polymers for possible colonic drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2005; 305: 22-30.

9.       Sung KW, You BH. Stimuli-Modulated Delivery Systems, Transport Processes in Pharmaceutical Systems Transport Processes in Pharmaceutical Systems, Marcel Dekker Inc; 559-585

10.     Brondsted H. Ph.D Dissertation. The University of Utah., Salt Lake City, UT, 1991

11.     Okano T, Yuim N, Yokoyama M, Yoshida R. Advances in Polymeric Systems for Drug Delivery, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, Switzerland, 1994.

12.     Bae YH, Okano T, Kim SW. ‘On–off’ thermo control of solute transport. I. Temperature dependence of swelling of N-isopropylacrylamide networks modified with hydrophobic  components in water. Pharm. Res. 1991; 8: 531–37

13.     Bae YH, Okano T, Kim SW. ‘On–off’ thermo control of solute transport. II. Solute release from thermosensitive hydrogels. Pharm. Res. 1991; 8: 624–28.

14.     Bae YH, Okano T, Kim SW. ‘On–off’ thermo control of thermally reversible heterogels for drug delivery. J. Control. Release.1990; 13: 21–31.

15.     Okano T, Bae YH, Jacobs H, Kim SW, Thermally on–off switching polymers for drug permeation and release. J. Control. Release.1990; 11: 255–65.

16.     Yoshida R, Uchida K, Kaneko Y, Sakai K, Kikuchi A, Sakurai Y, Okano T. Comb-type grafted hydrogels with rapid de-swelling response to temperature changes. Nature. 1995; 374: 240-42.

17.     Kaneko Y, Sakai K, Kikuchi A, Yoshida R, Sakurai Y, Okano T. Influence of freely mobile grafted chain length on dynamic properties of comb-type grafted poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels. Macromolecules 1995; 28: 7717-7723

18.     Kaneko Y, Sakai K, Kikuchi A, Sakurai Y, Okano T, Macromol. Chem. Fast swelling/deswelling kinetics of comb-type grafted poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels. Macromol. Symp. 1996; 109: 41-53.

19.     Preparation of macroporous poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel with improved temperature sensitivity. Journal of polymer science. 2003; 41: 2390-2392.

20.     Kaneko Y, Nakamura S, Sakai K, Aoyagi T, Kikuchi A, Sakaurai Y, Okano T. Rapid deswelling response of poly(N isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels by the formation of water release channels using poly(ethylene oxide) graft chains. Macromolecules. 1998; 31: 6099–6105.

21.     Oh KS, Han SK, Choi YW, Lee JH, Lee JY Yuk SH. Hydrogen-bonded Polymer Gel and Its Application as a Temperature-sensitive Drug Delivery System. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 2393-98.

22.     Fisher JP. US patent No. US6733788, 2004.

23.     Mebride JF, Gehrker SH, Fisher JP. US patent No. US0015712, 2002.

24.     Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001; 47: 113–31.

25.     Matsumura Y, Maeda H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 1986; 46: 6387–92

26.     Chung JE, Yokoyama M, Yamato M, Aoyagi T, Sakurai Y, Okano T. Thermo responsive drug delivery from polymeric micelles constructed using block copolymers of poly( N isopropylacrylamide) and poly(butyl methacrylate). J. Control. Release. 1999; 62: 115–27.

27.     Chung JE, Yokoyama M, Okano T. Inner core segment design for drug delivery control of thermo-responsive polymeric micelles. J. Control. Release. 2000; 65: 93–103.

28.     Kohori F, Sakai K, Aoyagi T, Yokoyama M, Sakurai Y, Okano T. Preparation and characterization of thermally responsive block copolymer micelles comprising poly(N-iso-propylacrylamide- b-DL-lactide). J. Control. Release. 1998; 55: 87–98.

29.     Kohori F, Sakai K, Aoyagi T, Yokoyama M, Yamato M, Sakurai Y, Okano T. Control of adriamycin cytotoxic activity using thermally responsive polymeric micelles composed of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N,N-dimethylacrylamide)-b-poly(D,L-lactide). Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 1999; 16: 195–205.

30.     Ishihara K, Kobayashi M, Shinohara I. Control of insulin permeation through a polymer membrane with responsive function for glucose. Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1983; 4: 327- 31.

31.     Kost J, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Sungh M. Glucose-sensitive membranes containing glucose oxidase: Activity, swelling, and permeability studies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1985; 19: 1117–33.

32.     Albin G, Horbett TA, Ratner BD. Glucose sensitive membranes for controlled delivery of insulin: insulin transport studies. J. Control. Release. 1985; 2: 153–64.

33.     Kim SW, Pai CM, Makino K, Seminoff LA, Holmberg DL, Gleeson JM, Wilson DE, Mack EJ. Self- regulated glycosylated insulin delivery. J. Control. Release. 1990; 11: 193–201.

34.     Makino K, Mack EJ, Okano T, Kim SW. A microcapsule self regulating delivery system for insulin. J. Control. Release. 1990; 12: 235–39.

35.     Obaidat AA, Park K. Characterization of protein release through glucose-sensitive hydrogel membranes. Biomaterials. 1997; 18: 801–06.

36.     Obaidat AA, Park K. Characterization of glucose dependent gel–sol phase transition of the polymeric glucose concanavalin A hydrogel system. Pharm. Res. 1996; 13: 989–95.

37.     Kitano S, Hisamitsu I, Koyama Y, Kataoka K, Sakurai TOY. Effect of the incorporation of amino groups in a glucose-responsive polymer complex having phenylboronic acid moieties.  Polym. Adv. Technol. 1991; 2: 261–64.

38.     Kitano S, Kataoka K, Koyama Y, Okano T, Sakurai Y. Glucose-responsive complex formation between poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(N vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) with pendant phenyl boronic acid moieties. Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1991; 12: 227–33.

39.     Shiino D, Murata Y, Kataoka K, Koyama Y, Yokoyama M, Okano T, Sakurai Y. Preparation and characterization of a glucose-responsive insulin-releasing polymer device. Biomaterials. 1994; 15: 121–28.

40.     Shiino D, Murata Y, Kubo A, Kim YJ, Kataoka K, Koyama Y, Kikuchi A, Yokoyama M, Okano T, Sakurai Y. Amine containing phenyl boronic acid gel for glucose-responsive insulin release under physiological pH. J. Control. Release. 1995; 37: 269-76.

41.     Kataoka K, Miyazaki H, Bunya M, Okano T, Sakurai Y. Totally synthetic polymer gels responding to external glucose concentration: their preparation and application to on–off regulation of insulin release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 12694–95.

42.     Yui N, Okano T, Sakurai Y. Inflammation responsive degradation of crosslinked hyaluronic acid gels. J. Control. Release.1992; 22: 105–16.

43.     Yui N, Nihira J, Okano T, Sakurai Y. Regulated release of drug microspheres from inflammation responsive degradable matrices of crosslinked hyaluronic acid. J. Control. Release. 1993; 25: 133–43.

44.     Miyata T, Asami N, Uragami T. A reversibly antigen responsive hydrogel. Nature 1999; 399: 766–69.

45.     Miyata T, Asami N, Uragami T. Preparation of an antigen sensitive hydrogel using antigen–antibody bindings. Macromolecules 1999; 32: 2082–84.

46.     Akhgari A, Garekani HA, Sadeghi F, Azimaie M. Statistical optimization of indomethacin pellets coated with ph dependent methacrylic polymers for possible colonic drug delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2005; 305: 22-30.

47.     Brahmankar MD, Jaiswal BS. Controlled drug delivery in Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetic A Treatise. Edn 2, Vallabh prakashan, 2010, pp. 458-62.

48.     Yuk SH, Cho SH, Lee HB. Electric current-sensitive drug delivery systems using sodium-alginate/ polyacrylic acid composites. Pharm Res. 1992; 9: 955-957.

49.     Kishi R, Hara M, Sawahata K, Osada Y. Conversion of chemical into mechanical energy by synthetic polymer gels (chemomechanical system), In Polymer Gels — Fundamentals and Biomedical Applications, D. DeRossi, K. Kajiwara, Y. Osada, A. Yamauchi (Eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1991, pp. 205–220.

50.     Kwon IC, Bae YH, Okano T, Berner B, Kim SW. Stimuli sensitive polymers for drug delivery systems. Makro mol. Chem. Macromol. Symp. 1990; 33: 265–77.

51.     Kwon IC, Bae YH, Kim SW. Electrically erodible polymer gel for controlled release of drugs. Nature. 1991; 354: 291–93.

52.     Kwon IC, Bae YH, Okano T, Kim SW. Drug release from electric current sensitive polymers. J. Control. Release. 1991; 17: 149–56.

53.     Kwon IC, Bae YH, Kim SW. Heparin release from polymer complex. J. Control. Release. 1994; 30:155–59.

54.     Emanuele AD, Staniforth JN. Feedback controlled drug delivery using an electro-diffusion pump. J. Control. Release. 1993; 23: 97–104.

55.     Kiser P, Wilson G, Needham D. Lipid-coated microgels for the triggered release of doxorubicin. J Control Release. 2000; 68: 9- 22.

56.     Santini JT, Cima MJ, Langer R. A controlled-release microchip. Nature. 1999; 397: 335-338.

57.     Santini JT, Richards AC, Schiedt R, Cima MJ, Langer R. Microchips as controlled-drug delivery devices. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2000; 39: 2396-2407.

58.     Ahmed A. Bonner C, Desai TA. Bioadhesive microdevices for drug delivery: a feasibility study. Biomed Microdevices. 2001; 200: 89-95.

59.     Barrett DH, Davidson PC, Steed LJ, Abel GG, Loman KE, Saudek CD. Evaluation of the pshycosocial impact of the Minimed variable-rate implanatable insulin pump. South Med J. 1995; 88: 1226-30.

60.     Ikemoto S, Sharpe LG. A head-attachable device for injecting nanolitre volumes of drug solutions into brain sites of freely moving rats. J Neurosci Methods. 2001; 110: 135-140.

61.     Santini JT, Cima MJ, Langer RS. US Patent No. 5797898, 1998.

62.     Santini JT, Cima MJ, Langer RS. US Patent No. 20006123861, 2000.

63.     Santini JT, Hutchinson CE. US Patent No. 20060217798A1, 2006.

64.     Santini JT, Sbiaa Z, Coppeta JR. US Patent No. 20060057737A1, 2006.

65.     Santini JT, Cima MJ, Sheppard NF, Herman SJ. US Patent No. 20060178655A1, 2006.

66.     Gertner ME, Schlesinger M.  US Patent No. 20060121180, 2006.

67.     Uhland SA, Polito BF, Maloney JM, Sheppard NF, Herman SJ, Yomtov BY. US Patent No. 20060100608A1, 2006.

68.     Maloney JM, Sbiaa Z, Santini JT, Sheppard NF, Uhland SA. US Patent No. 20060105275A1, 2006.

69.     Hsieh DST, Langer R, Folkman J. Magnetic modulation release of macromolecules from polymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA. 1981; 78: 1863-67.

70.     Edelman ER, Kost J, Bobeck H, Langer R. Regulation of drug release from polymer matrices by oscillating magnetic fields. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1985; 19: 67-83.

71.     Kost J, Noecker R, Kunica E, Langer R. J. Magnetically controlled release systems: effect of polymer composition. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1985; 19: 935-40.

72.     Saslawski O, Weigarten C, Beniot JP, Couvereur P. Magnetically responsive microspheres for pulsed delivery of insulin. Life Sci 1988; 42: 1521-28.

73.     Babincova M, Sourivong P, Chorvat D, Babinec P. 1999 Laser triggered drug release from magnetoliposomes. J Magnetism Magn Mater 1999; 163-66.

74.     Bauerlein E, Schuler D, Reszka R, Pauser S. US Patent No. 20016251365B1, 2001.

75.     Prasad PN, Bergey EJ, Liebow C, Levy L. US Patent No. 20036514481B1, 2003.

76.     Handy ES, Ivkov R, Ellis-Busby D, Foreman A, Braunhut SJ, Gwost DU, Ardman B. US Patent No. 20066997863B2 2006.

77.     Ricci EJ, Bentley MVLB, Farah M, Bretas RES, Marchetti JM. Rheological characterization of Poloxamer 407 lidocaine hydrochloride gels. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2002;17:161-7.

78.     Paavola A, Yliruusi J, Rosenberg P. Controlled release and dura mater permeability of lidocaine and ibuprofen from injectable poloxamer-based gels. J Control Release.1998; 52: 169-78.

79.     Barichello JM, Morishita M, Takayama K, Nagai T. Absorption of insulin from Pluronic F-127 gels following subcutaneous administration in rats. Int J Pharm. 1999; 184: 189- 198.

80.     Katakam M, Ravis WR, Banga AK. Controlled release of human growth hormone in rats following parenteral administration of poloxamer gels. J Control Release. 1997; 49:21-6.

81.     DesNoyer JR, McHugh AJ. The effect of Pluronic on the protein release kinetics of an injectable drug delivery system. J Control Release. 2003; 86:15-24.

82.     Kim YJ, Choi S, Koh JJ, Lee M, Ko KS, Kim SW. Controlled release of insulin from injectable biodegradable triblock copolymer. Pharm Res. 2001; 18: 548-50.

83.     Jeong B, Bae YH, Lee DS, Kim SW. Biodegradable block copolymers as injectable drug-delivery systems. Nature. 1997; 388: 860-2.

84.     Chenite A, Chaput C, Wang D, Combes C, Buschmann MD, Hoemann CD. Novel injectable neutral solutions of chitosan form biodegradable gels in situ. Biomaterials. 2000; 21: 2155-61.

85.     Suisha F, Kawasaki A, Miyayaki S, Shirakawa M, Yamatoya K, Sasaki M. Xyloglucan gels as sustained release vehicles for the intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin C. Int J Pharm. 1998;172: 27-32.

86.     Matschke C, Isele U, van Hoogevest P, Fahr A. Sustained release injectables formed in situ and their potential use for veterinary products. J Control Release. 2002; 85:1-15.

87.     Wei G, Xu H, Ding PT, Li SM, Zheng JM. Thermosetting gels with modulated gelation temperature for ophthalmic use: the rheological and gamma scintigraphic studies. J Control Release. 2002; 83: 65-74.

88.     Edsman K, Carlfors J, Petersson R. Rheological evaluation of poloxamers as an in situ gel for ophthalmic use. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1998; 6:105-12.

89.     Ling HR, Sung KC. Carbopol/pluronic phase change solutions for ophthalmic drug delivery. J Control Release. 2000; 69:379-88.

90.     El-Kamel AH. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of Pluronic F127-based ocular delivery system for timolol maleate.  Int J Pharm. 2002; 241: 47-55.

91.     Paulsson M, Hagerstrom H, Edsman K. Rheological studies of the gelation of deacetylated gellan gum (Gelrite®) in physiological conditions. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1999; 9: 99-105.

92.     Carlfors J, Edsman K, Petersson R, Jornving K. Rheological evaluation of Gelrite® in situ gels for ophthalmic use. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1998; 6:113-9.

93.     Hartmann V, Keipert S. Physico-chemical, in vitro and in vivo characterization of polymers for ocular use. Pharmazie. 2000; 55:440-3.

94.     Cohen S, Lobel E, Trevgoda A, Peled Y. A novel in situforming ophthalmic drug delivery system from alginates undergoing gelation in the eye. J Control Release. 1997; 44: 201-8.

95.     Sechoy O, Tissie G, Sebastian C, Maurin F, Driot J-Y, Trnquand C. A new long acting ophthalmic formulation of Carteolol containing alginic acid. Int J Pharm. 2000; 207:109-16.

96.     Srividya B, Cardoza RM, Amin PD. Sustained ophthalmic delivery of ofloxacin from a pH triggered in situ gelling system. J Control Release. 2001; 73:205-11.

97.     Kumar S, Haglund BO, Himmelstein KJ. In situ-forming gels for ophthalmic drug delivery. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1994; 10:47- 56.

98.     Carelli V, Coltelli S, Di Colo G, Nannipieri E, Serafini MF. Silicone microspheres for pH-controlled gastrointestinal drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 1999; 179:73-83.

99.     Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000; 50:27-46.

100.  Kubo W, Miyazaki S, Attwood D. Oral sustained delivery of paracetamol from in situ-gelling gellan and sodium alginate formulations. Int J Pharm .2003; 258:55-64.

101.  Choi HG, Oh YK, Kim CK. In situ gelling and mucoadhesive liquid suppository containing acetaminophen: enhanced bioavailibility. Int J Pharm. 1998; 165:23-32

102.  Charrueau C, Tuleu C, Astre V, Grossiord JL, Chaumeil JC. Poloxamer 407 as a thermogelling and adhesive polymer for rectal administration of short-chain fatty acids. Drug Devel Ind Pharm. 2001; 27:351-7.

103.  Miyazaki S, Suisha F, Kawasaki A, Shirakawa M, Yamatoya K, Attwood D. Thermally reversible xyloglucan gels as vehicles for rectal drug delivery. J Control Release. 1998; 56:75-83.

104.  Vermani K, Garg S. The scope and potential of vaginal drug delivery. Pharm Sci & Technol Today. 2000; 3:359-64.

105.  Chang JY, Oh YK, Kong HS, Kim EU, Jang DD, Nam KT.  Prolonged antifungal effects of clotrimazole-containing mucoadhesive thermosensitive gels on vaginitis. J Control Release. 2002; 82:39-50. Miyazaki S, Tobiyama T, Takada M, Attwood D. Percutaneous absorption of indomethacin from pluronic F127 gels in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1995; 47:455-7.

106.  Pillai O, Panchagnula R. Transdermal delivery of insulin from poloxamer gel: ex vivo and in vivo skin permeation studies in rat using iontophoresis and chemical enhancers. J Control Release. 2003; 89:127-40

107.  Aikawa K, Mitsutake A, Uda H, Tanaka S, Shimamura H, Aramaki Y. Drug release from pH- response polyvinylacetal diethylaminoacetate hydrogel, and application to nasal delivery. Int J Pharm. 1998; 168:181-8.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 30.12.2010       Modified on 21.01.2011

Accepted on 28.01.2011      © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 4(5): May 2011; Page 691-703