2nd International Conference on Fostering Interdisciplinary Research In Health Sciences (ICFIRHS) 2019 (01-May-2019)        |

Journal :   Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology

Volume No. :   11

Issue No. :  7

Year :  2018

Pages :   2940-2946

ISSN Print :  0974-3618

ISSN Online :  0974-360X


Registration

Allready Registrered
Click to Login

Comparing Coping Strategies Practiced and its association with stress among medical Students from a Private and Public Medical University



Address:   Retneswari Masilamani1, Myat Moe Thwe Aung2, Vidya Bhagat2, Aini Abu Bakar1, Tung Him Soon1, Lim Chee Yao1, Ng Jia Hui1, Low Zhen Ning1
1Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. UCSI University, Bukit Khor, 21600 Marang, Terengganu. Malaysia
2Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Sultan Zainal Abidin. Kampus Kota, Jalan Sultan Mahmud, 20400 Kuala Terengganu. Malaysia.
*Corresponding Author
DOI No: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00543.7

ABSTRACT:
Introduction: Medical education has been considered highly stressful to medical students. It not only affects medical students’ physical and mental health but chronic stress can impair academic performance, personal and professional development, leading to unsatisfactory patient care. The objective of this study is to compare the coping strategies practiced and its association with stress between medical students from a private and public university. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a public and private university namely, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniZSA) and UCSI University (UCSI) respectively. A total of 245 medical students from UniZSA and 315 medical students from UCSI, from year 1 to year 5 participated in this study. This study was carried out between 2015 till 2016. A universal sampling method was used. A self-administered questionnaires comprising of 3 sections namely sociodemographic information, 12 item validated General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and a 28 item validated Brief Cope Inventory was used in this study. Data entry and analysis were done using SPSS version 20.0 software. Results: The prevalence of stress was higher (42.2%) among UCSI University medical students compared to University Sultan Zainal Abidin medical students (33.1%). The commonly practised coping strategies in both universities were religion, active coping, acceptance, planning, and positive reframing. The negative coping strategies behavioural disengagement and substance abuse were the least practised in both universities. The associated coping strategies with stress were denial (?2 5.740; P<0.05 for UniZSA and ?2 13.31; P<0.001 for UCSI), behavioural disengagement; (?2 19.306; P<0.001 for UniZSA and ?2 7.65; P<0.05 for UCSI) venting (?2 28.776; P<0.001 for UniZSA and ?2 8.56; P<0.05 for UCSI), and self-blame (?2 10.700; P<0.001 for UniZSA and ?2 9.94; P<0.05 for UCSI) in both universities, with an additional associated coping strategy; acceptance (?2 4.277; p<0.05) reported in University Sultan Zainal Abidin. Discussion and conclusion: The stress prevalence was higher among UCSI university students compared to UniZSA medical students. UniZSA medical students practised religion as their highest ranked coping strategy compared to UCSI students who practised active coping. The last 2 ranked coping strategies practised; behavioural disengagement and substance abuse (negative strategies) were similar too. The associated coping strategies with stress were also similar for both universities. Stress management programmes like “Medical Student Well-Being Workshops” should be conducted to further add evidence for the implementation of such interventions for reducing medical student stress.
KEYWORDS:
Medical students, stress, coping strategies, private university, public university.
Cite:
Retneswari Masilamani, Myat Moe Thwe Aung, Vidya Bhagat, Aini Abu Bakar, Tung Him Soon, Lim Chee Yao, Ng Jia Hui, Low Zhen Ning. Comparing Coping Strategies Practiced and its association with stress among medical Students from a Private and Public Medical University. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(7): 2940-2946.
[View HTML]     



Visitor's No. :   657572